Talk:Lactalis

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lactalis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091203120633/http://www.lactalis.fr/index_uk.html to http://www.lactalis.fr/index_uk.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

An editor with time and inspiration on their hands might expand this article by translating text, and copying citations, from the more detailed French-language version of this article. Acwilson9 (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

User:Cortador has removed a large chunk of content from this page without discussion. As they have not provided an argument for why the content should be removed I cannot offer a rebuttal other than to say that their statement that "none of these products has coverage that warrants inclusion" is unsupported and insufficient to warrant the removal of useful information. Tiggum (talk) 05:36, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

I have provided an argument: without non-primary coverage, including a list like this isn't justified. This isn't a product catalogue. Cortador (talk) 05:57, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Should the article contain lists of and information about the company's international brands? Tiggum (talk) 11:56, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@Tiggum: Why do you need an RfC to answer that question? Polygnotus (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

(Invited randomly by a bot) If there are no reliable, independent sources for these brands, lack of notability is a good reason to exclude such detail. Jojalozzo (talk) 14:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

There is no need for an RFC for such a simple situation: begin with a discussion on the talk page with the other user. Try to reach a consensus. Try third-party WP:3O. Going to an RFC a this point wastes resources. Please revert your RFC. WP:NOTBURO — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 00:54, 14 January 2026 (UTC) -

Please assume good faith. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 00:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC) —

Maybe don't summon me if you're not actually doing an RfC? Benjamin (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know what that means. I did my best to figure out what the correct procedure would be but it all seems very complicated. I just want to preserve the useful information that used to be on this page. Tiggum (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)