Talk:Mother London
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Science fiction?
I can understand why one would call it fiction, but fantasy and science-fiction really seem quite out of place. The one and only detail not fitting in proper fiction is the idea of telepathy (that anyway is largely labelled as "mental problem" in the book). It's a wonderful book, but it really needs a much more proper classification here. --92.112.19.152 (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Agreed - it's definitely not science fiction. Macphysto (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Last sentence - relevance?
Not a big deal, but the last sentence before the references (“Michael Moorcock was the editor of New Worlds and gained numerous critical acclaim and media attention”) seems out of place and unnecessary in the context of this novel. As for grammar (“numerous critical acclaim”?) I’d better not go there. Boodyinbkavk (talk) 13:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)