Talk:Neptunium(III) chloride/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: UnbihexiumFan (talk · contribs) 04:32, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: TheBritinator (talk · contribs) 23:38, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I will review this. Doing as a QPQ. As this is a more technical subject than I'm used to, please allow me a bit more time to go through the sources. TheBritinator (talk) 23:38, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @UnbihexiumFan, I've left some comments. TheBritinator (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
Well written
- Nothing sticks out to me here, all grammatically sound.
References
- For references 3 & 16, I feel like it should include the website/publisher name, whether it be google patents or United States Patent, just to make it clear what it is. Should also include the date retrieved.
- Source 6 gives me a phishing warning when I try to open it?
- Source 15 should include the website/author name, and the date retrieved. All website/news sources should include it for that matter.
Spotcheck: I can't check a lot due to restricted/paid access but I gave it my best shot:
Source 3 (patent) checks out.- Source 11 (Plutonium) checks out, I think.
- ? Please clarify source 15 (IAEA) for me; where does it say that Neptunium(III) (or similar) can be used in molten-salt reactors, and that its combined? I can't find it.
- I don't believe anything I have linked needs an access date. From Template:Citation:
For example, access-date is required for online sources
...that do not have a publication date; see WP:CITEWEB.
Everything has a publication date so an access date is unneccessary. I have replaced the patent citations with Template:Cite patent, replaced the link for source 6, and added the website name for source 15. Source 15 does not say anything about neptunium(III) chloride; I only used it for background as to what a molten-salt reactor is. The information instead comes from source 16. - UnbihexiumFan (talk | contribs) 19:11, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Very well. Source 15 is still missing the name. TheBritinator (talk) 20:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Done :D
- UnbihexiumFan (talk | contribs) 20:17, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Passing. TheBritinator (talk) 20:19, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
- Very well. Source 15 is still missing the name. TheBritinator (talk) 20:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
Scope
- I'm assuming this covers all the bases.
Neutrality
- All prose is appears neutral and without bias.
Stability
- No sign of active edit wars.
Illustration
- All images are own work with valid rationale, likely PD anyway due to simple geometry.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.