Talk:Pokémon Go/Archive 3

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following:

Regular updates are planned, with CEO Hanke saying that the game is an MMO and will be maintained on a "bi-weekly" basis rather than creating a sequel.^[1]

Thank you. --211.30.17.74 (talk) 03:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Not done MMO is a description of the game and how the devs are treating it in regard to updates. And I thought something like this existed in the article already? ~ Dissident93 (talk) 03:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

@Dissident93: The bi-weekly bit doesn't seem to be included. -- Gestrid (talk) 07:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

If so, why shouldn't it be included? Particularly the part about Pokemon GO being maintained, rather than getting spun off into "Silver" or "Ruby" sequels? A reviewer has noticed the connection ("Jeremy Parish (US Gamer) compared the game and its social aspects to a massively multiplayer online game") but this is confirmation from a primary source. --211.30.17.74 (talk) 03:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

The second sentence under the Gameplay section is currently "Once created, the avatar is displayed at the on a map using the player's current geographical location." (is displayed at the on a map... is incorrect.) I would suggest that it should be "Once created, the avatar is displayed on a map using the player's current geographical location." Laefk (talk) 00:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks Laefk! Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 02:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/21/middleeast/what-pokemon-go-looks-like-in-syria/ What do you think about include of this information to article? Dawid2009 (talk) 13:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

I believe we should have the year noted as this is relevant to dates and events related to the app and will ensure longevity of the article accuracy. Recently a few years have been removed....thoughts? Dane2007 (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

• Agreed, most editors do not think about the future of articles, only written in a present point-of-view. How will a reader in August 2017 know if half the events stated on the article happened last month or when the game was released in July 2016? ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 04:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
  • It's all based on the context of the paragraph. If a paragraph starts out stating 2016, it's assumed dates thereafter are all in 2016 unless stated otherwise. If the year changes mid-paragraph, add the new year when appropriate. Adding years after every mention of a day is repetitive and often redundant. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 04:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Right, but some of them weren't and a lot of the tense was also written as if Pokemon Go will still be globally relevant in 100+ years. Just imagine if this was a fad from 1916. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 05:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

I found two interesing sources: https://aboutcroatia.net/news/world/pokemon-go-prohibited-islam-egyptian-religious-body-says-29086, and http://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3094012 Dawid2009 (talk) 14:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Was this a fatwa? kencf0618 (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Is someone intrested in this topic? It is possible that this section will be soon archived by bot and this disscussion will subside. Dawid2009 (talk) 10:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes exactly. Annaloveshungergames27 (talk) 23:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Yes Sinister6889 (talk) 06:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

That might be interesting for Religion and video games. I haven't got the time the upcoming days, I'll try to add then. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

@Dawid2009: I took the brackets off your links, because they hide the URLs, and all we see are ^[1] and ^[2]. --Thnidu (talk) 02:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Is Reddit user ftb_hodor the first player to complete the game? Unsure of his real name. Below is the website.

http://www.polygon.com/2016/7/21/12247678/pokemon-go-complete-pokedex (Mobile mundo (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC))

• Is this important though? ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 00:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

This edit request to Pokémon Go has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

It's also been banned in Malaysia and Saudi Arabia.

SOURCE = https://au.news.yahoo.com/technology/a/32251650/malaysian-islamic-leaders-say-no-to-pokemon-go/#page1

Bendavidsmith (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

 Not done It's not officially banned in either country. Just a strong recommendation to Muslims to not play the game, which is already mentioned in the article. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

I am a new user. In going through the page I wondered a couple of things. One, who was this game initially designed for? And two, has there been any research into what the demographics are of the people that are playing this game. It seems to me that it would be interesting to know the answers to these questions. I am not a player myself, but work with many who do. Just thought that it might be something that could be relevant to the page if there was a better understanding of who was playing. However, I am not sure if the game has been out long enough to get an accurate account.

Wibharri (talk) 01:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wibharri (talk • contribs) 01:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cyclonebiskit: The chart is great, much better than prose. But it lists Puerto Rico as being shown in white, which would blend into the background and make that relatively tiny island almost impossible to see on the map.

However, Puerto Rico is actually currently shown in green, along with the rest of the Caribbean and continental Latin America. I suggest using brown, which is not currently used on the map and which would stand out well against the white. I don't know how to edit the map at all, or I would boldly change it myself. Thnidu (talk) 03:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Thnidu: Thanks~ Been trying to figure out how to do it for a bit and it finally came together tonight. The Puerto Rico one is colorless since the release is a bit mixed up between sources. @Molecule Extraction: since you're the most recent person to update the map, would you mind fixing this up? ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 04:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cyclonebiskit: Ah, sure. Thanks for informing! :) Molecule Extraction (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cyclonebiskit:  Done :) Molecule Extraction (talk) 04:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Molecule Extraction: Thanks for doing this so quickly! ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 05:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cyclonebiskit and Molecule Extraction: Thanks, fellow editors. :-) --Thnidu (talk) 06:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

@Cyclonebiskit and Thnidu: Very much welcome. Molecule Extraction (talk) 06:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Over 75 percent of americans have never and will never play Pokemon Go. I think the article should reflect that because someone reading the article as it is now would get the mistaken impression that literally everyone in america is playing it when that's no even near being remotely true. A lot of americans have never even heard of Pokemon to begin with. TimeaMese7w98 (talk) 15:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@TimeaMese7w98:, what gives you that impression? And Wikipedia doesn't mention when something isn't played, so how should the article reflect something that isn't happening, according to you? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 17:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Also, where did you find 75%? And if 75% in fact hasn't played the game at this point, why should they never play the game? Also, 25% of the United States playing the game is a huge number, if you have the source we should definitely include that. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 17:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

@TimeaMese7w98: As stated on my talk page, any claim like yours would require reliable sources per Wikipedia policy. The entire claim at this point would be considered original research because the information presented is unsourced and potentially not reported by third parties. Without sources, your contribution to the article is in effect saying "believe me I know I'm right". I do not believe that anyone would have the impression that "literally everyone in America is playing it". Dane2007 (talk) 18:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Oh boy, a chance to plug my draft essay on negative claims. Still could use a lot of polish. —Farix (t | c) 00:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Murcia is the first city in the world to pay for Pokemon go avatars and to offer prizes here in Murcia .tourism is booming as they come from Madrid and S an Francisco to hunt em down .weird affect of augmented reality but the marketers here in Murcia are shrewd astute and Harvard educated . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.230.72.80 (talk) 19:44, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

...your point being? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

A form specifically for requesting to be de-listed as a PokéStop is (back?) up at Niantic as of 8 August:

• An article: http://www.polygon.com/2016/8/8/12402674/pokemon-go-disabled-request-hiroshima-memorial
• the form: https://support.pokemongo.nianticlabs.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=341148

The form lets the requester specify the reason(s) for requesting removal, including because the site is private property, dangerous, or "other" (which I would imagine covers it being inappropriate). The requester can even attach an image of the site. -- Random the Navigator (talk) 07:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Apparently not everyone feels safe playing Pokémon Go; in particular, members of some minority groups have expressed concerns that wandering in certain neighborhoods could give the police the wrong impression. I've seen this mentioned around the Web almost since the game's release, but as far as I know it hasn't been covered here...

• https://medium.com/mobile-lifestyle/warning-pokemon-go-is-a-death-sentence-if-you-are-a-black-man-acacb4bdae7f#.3xgfma8mm

• http://www.themarysue.com/pokemon-go-experience-affected-by-race/ (references the above)

• http://www.vox.com/2016/7/11/12149664/pokemon-go-augmented-reality-racist

• http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/07/iowa-football-faith-ekakitie-police-pokemon-go (a couple of weeks later)

• http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2016/07/23/faith-ekakitie-iowa-city-police-pokemon-go/87473984/ (same incident)

• http://collegefootball.ap.org/post-gazette/article/bodycam-video-shows-iowa-football-player-searched-park (ditto)

Is this aspect something that should be covered in the article? Random the Navigator (talk) 05:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

I've since read the referenced article about how the distribution of PokéStops in the US reflects American demographics, and there's a link in that one to the medium.com piece I listed. People are thinking and talking about that not all players are enjoying the same comfort level using the app; maybe it does need its own mention. Thoughts?

(If I do this, any help with wording on a touchy subject will be greatly appreciated!) -- Random the Navigator (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Most likely, it would just be added into an already existing sentence. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 08:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Why Pokemon Go isn't on this list? Dawid2009 (talk) 12:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Is PGo...sold? TimothyJosephWood 12:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

To elaborate, @Dawid2009:, Pokémon Go is a free-to-play game, while List of best-selling video games is about copies sold. Perhaps an article about video games having the most revenue or profit is a good idea though. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 14:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Or maybe we could just have a separate list, "List of most downloaded (or played) free-to-play video games", with at least a million needed to qualify? Just a thought. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 00:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

I'd support such an article. It's only logical with the current trend of digital distribution which moves away from physical CDs (etc.) to digital downloads (& streaming) as well as the current trend towards free-to-play games. There already is the list of most downloaded Android applications btw. I'd favor: List of most downloaded free-to-play video games. It would be nice if someone here created it. --Fixuture (talk) 12:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Do you think free-to-play may muddy the waters some with the whole micro payment thing? TimothyJosephWood 12:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

List of most downloaded iOS applications get delted Dawid2009 (talk) 13:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

@Fixuture:, while I'm certainly not against such an article, that would be different from a list of free-to-play games with the most revenue. Pokémon Go might be downloaded the most, a game like Clash of Clans has an estimated revenue of 1,5 million dollars a day. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 17:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

http://venturebeat.com/2014/02/21/report-finds-free-to-play-microtransactions-make-up-79-of-u-s-app-store-revenues/ - Mybe it would be interesing. Dawid2009 (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

@Soetermans: Exactly - personally I'm not really interested in free-to-play games with the highest revenue but I'd like to know which games are played most (these are the games people apparently like most and are most present in society etc.). A list of free-to-play games with the most revenue would make for a nice 2nd list though (I'm not sure if it's problematic to get the revenue-information of these games btw.).

@Dawid2009: It wasn't deleted but merged into: App Store (iOS)#Most downloaded apps (btw. imo that list is way too short and missing information).

@Timothyjosephwood: In which ways? I don't know. Maybe they are. For instance more games might become more pay to winy and intricate games might be hard to finance etc.

--Fixuture (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I see your point. Besides, while informative, revenue of free-to-play games might be harder to find sources for, since developers and/or publishers aren't always open about their finances. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

VentureBeat share up to date leading statistics but I don't know it is enaught. BTW I have started disscussion in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Dawid2009 (talk) 20:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

An article about revenue would be slightly harder to find sources for than one just about how many copies have been downloaded, but in either case, an article like this should exist. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

I suggest create two article: just List of the largest video games developers (There is List of video game developers) and List of most downloaded free-to-play video games (due to the fact it is easier to found some sources).

In List of best-selling video games there aren't the most renuve series of the games (In List of best-selling books there are not just single books but also book's series). Which game series is the most popular? Counter-Strike? The Sims? or mybe FIFA? This list would make for a nice ( Featuring Mario games would be classified in this list like to European Union here, due to the fact featuring Mario isn't serie of the games). In my opinion information about most renuve game series is more important than informations about most downloaded and renuve free to play games and should be in wiki before. Dawid2009 (talk) 10:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC) There is List of best-selling video game franchises

@Dawid2009:, I am against a list of largest video game developers. First, what is "large" in this context? Total of employees? Office size? Revenue? Total of games developed? Amount of people playing their games? Second, what would be the point of such a list? The size of a developer - no matter how you define size - doesn't say anything about the games they produce; quality, reception, units sold, etc. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

What's the relevancy of the "largest" game developer here? Would Niantic all of a sudden be considered more important than a company that's been around far longer, but sold slightly less games? ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

We can create page: Most downloaded free-to-play games. https://www.surveymonkey.com/ is vere easy source to dispose this list (after registed you have got free premium during 14 days and acces to a lot of things). Similar website also is https://www.statista.com/statistics/popular/. I also have found source by which in 2013 most downloaded mobile games there were Angry Birds, Fruit Ninja and Temple Run: http://www.pocketgamer.biz/news/50604/the-app-stores-most-downloaded-games-of-all-time-angry-birds-fruit-ninja-and-temple-run/ (It is AppStore's opinion).Dawid2009 (talk) 20:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

http://mashable.com/2016/07/19/pokemon-go-economics-making-money/#84PUNtxJ5qqX - profit from pokemon go is common, http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/21/middleeast/what-pokemon-go-looks-like-in-syria/ - and even sources like CNN report on this. Dawid2009 (talk) 20:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Why Pokemon go there isn't on this list? Dawid2009 (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

That's a question for Talk:List of Internet phenomena, not this talk page. -- ferret (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

This edit request to Pokémon Go has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2601:147:4200:D980:5575:76CF:1944:BF42 (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Pokemon go to the poles

 Not done I don't understand what this request is about.

On August 22, 2016, a wild Snorlax appeared in Taiwan this has caused hundreds of people to approach it. It was reported by the following:

• http://time.com/4460911/pokemon-go-taipei-stampede-snorlax-mob-xinbeitou-taiwan/

• http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/videos/pokemon-go-players-hunt-rare-snorlax-cause-stampede-20171

• http://metro.co.uk/2016/08/23/incredible-stampede-after-someone-found-a-rare-pokemon-6085096/

Yoshiman6464 (talk) 15:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I would argue this is trivial and giving WP:UNDUE weight to such an insignificant event but given the reliable sources you included prove otherwise. Meatsgains (talk) 01:56, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

I thought that incident looked pretty impressive from the footage. A bit like Rhodes, which I visited - the number of people was amazing...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

I'd say hold off on including it as WP:NOTNEWS at this point as the Time piece (the only one of those 3 sources that says more about it than a caption to the video) says at least twice that the video is unverified: "The unverified video was first posted on Facebook...In it, we see a mob pushing through an intersection in what looks like the city’s Xinbeitou district...While TIME has not authenticated the clip..." (my emphasis). —PermStrump(talk) 04:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

I tried this before, but I think I understand Wikipedia's policies better now, and I want to give it another shot.

I don't think we have sufficient sources to be able to say in the info box that the game has a single-player mode. Yes, one can find sources that say things to the effect of "it feels like a single-player game sometimes," "more multiplayer features are coming later," and claims that it's "predominantly a single-player experience." I believe this is sufficient evidence to write a sentence or two in the article about how some reviewers describe it as "predominantly a single-player experience," but not sufficient evidence to put a single-player mode in the info box. Especially when other sources give evidence that Pokémon GO conflicts with Wikipedia's definition of a Single-player video game: "A single-player video game is a video game where input from only one player is expected throughout the course of the gaming session." Pokémon GO always has inputs from multiple players, and there is no way to opt out.

If we want to keep this in the info box, we need to find a source that proves it has a single-player mode. Howrad (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

• Despite the fact you can fully play this game without need for other live people? It's not the normal version of what we'd considered single player, but what other evidence do you need? ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

World of Warcraft can be fully played without the need for other live people too. If every other person in the world stopped playing, you could play it all by yourself. Does that give it a single-player mode in the info box? No. Howrad (talk) 11:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I would agree that there's not much here that qualifies as a traditional conception of a single player game. If it's going to stay in the infobox, we should probably have a source calling it single player, which there doesn't seem to be. TimothyJosephWood 21:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

But do you also need other people to play as well, as is the definition of multiplayer? You could argue the same for multiplayer, as is there any source that calls it multiplayer too? I've already asked if we should change the infobox from video games to the software one, as it would fix this issue without getting rid of anything important. Pokémon Go is not a traditional video game, and is more of an app using mobile technology with a Pokémon skin, but that's just my opinion. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 21:58, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I absolutely agree with you that Pokémon GO is not a traditional video game, and that's part of what I'm trying to expand upon when I write about different genres. It doesn't really fit any particular mold, because it's something new. However, I think this is actually very different from the Fitbit, which is an example of a mobile app and device that's primarily a utility with light elements of gamification. Pokémon GO is first and foremost a game. Wikipedia's definition of a Multiplayer video game: "A multiplayer video game is a video game in which more than one person can play in the same game environment at the same time." Can play together, not must play together. Howrad (talk) 22:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

If nobody can provide additional evidence or sources, I propose that we remove "single-player" from the infobox and add a sentence in the article about how some reviewers describe it as "predominantly a single-player experience," but it is impossible to opt-out of the multiplayer aspects of the game. Howrad (talk) 21:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

I agree it should be removed. It is fundamentally a different type of game, and without a source, it seems very synthy to try to fit it into these categories. TimothyJosephWood 21:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

But calling it a multiplayer only game isn't really correct either, so I again propose that we could move the infobox to the software one, which doesn't have need for "mode". ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 01:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Is it impossible to leave "mode" empty in an "Infobox video game?" When I try an edit, setting it to empty and previewing it, it's like nothing happened. Anyway, how do you feel about setting the "mode" to "Massively multiplayer online game," as it is with Clash of Clans and Game of War: Fire Age? I feel like in some ways, these are the closest comparisons, and I think it's a more accurate description than either "single-player" or "multiplayer." Howrad (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Those two articles are wrong. The template documentation says that mode should only contain single player, multiplayer, or both. It can be omitted, no field is strictly required. Corrected all three articles. There is an issue with the infobox template that is causing it to display Wikidata when it shouldn't. I am working to fix now. -- ferret (talk) 18:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Infobox issue is fixed. -- ferret (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Great, now it has no modes, which I think is for the best, but I think we should add a sentence somewhere to encapsulate this discussion we've been having. Howrad (talk) 18:47, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

@Ferret: Off topic to this game, but can the same "suppressed" code be added to the distributor field? We shouldn't be seeing the publisher also listed as the distributor unless they differ. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 19:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

@Dissident93: Wikidata will be suppressed as long as the field is on the article, even if it is empty. As for suppressing automatically if they match, drive by the template talk page. Adrian brought this up earlier this week. I have fix in sandbox but have not pushed it live yet. Check the distributor sub-section. -- ferret (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

This edit request to Pokémon Go has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Santhosh Panjala (talk) 12:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. KGirlTrucker81 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 14:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Why is the plural in English given as "Pokemon" rather than the obvious "Plkemons"? 64.53.191.77 (talk) 22:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

• WP:NOTFORUM - You should be asking Nintendo, not Wikipedia. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

I propose the section for Pokemon GO titled "Third-party apps and websites" be altered to include other useful sites, or a list of useful sites in addition to the current content. I recommend websites like PidgeyCalc.com, PokeAssistant.com and PogoToolkit.com to be added to the Wiki for visitors looking for useful links. There are also resources online that compile a list of useful sites such as:

https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemongo/comments/4txrqe/everything_you_need_to_know_pokemon_go_links/ http://pogolist.com

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasilva333 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Second-to-last paragraph in the section on Regional Availability breaks down as though further effort authoring in English was abandoned. Perhaps someone became distracted by the game and wandered away? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.171.107 (talk) 07:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

There should be a mention of Pokémon Go's inclusion on the newly announced Apple Watch during the yearly Iphone event provided by Apple. Should someone at least include some information about this? Zacharyalejandro (talk) 03:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

@Zacharyalejandro: I added it the article the other day, but I don't see it now. Someone must've reverted. —Mythdon 04:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

I removed it because does it really belong in the lead? I'm not familiar with them, but doesn't it run on iOS too? ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 04:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

If you felt it did not belong in the lead, then you probably could've just put it in another section. Secondly, Apple Watch runs its own operating system, watchOS. Also, the reference I used stated that the Apple Watch version had differences, including which players still have to use their smartphone for capturing Pokemon. —Mythdon 04:48, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

It should be added to a subsection first, then the lead. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 04:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm surprised that there is no mention of the urban bias of the game and how it is nearly unplayable for those not in a large urban environment. The only hint about the problem is the line in Gameplay section about how Niantic was taking requests for more new PokéStops and gyms in rural areas only to shut the forum down within days. This problem has been covered by major news outlets, including Kotaku, RollingStone, and the Minneapolis Star Tribune. Is this a matter of no one getting around to writing about it? If so, here is a quick list of potential sources about this particular problem.

• http://www.gamenguide.com/articles/35008/20160727/pokemon-go-cheats-tips-tricks-players-in-rural-areas-complaining-niantic-now-working-for-a-new-update-will-it-now-give-fair-number-of-monsters.htm
• http://www.startribune.com/urban-vs-rural-why-playing-pokmon-go-in-the-suburbs-could-be-hurting-your-game/388985262/
• http://heavy.com/games/2016/07/pokemon-go-rural-areas-play-how-to-remote-small-towns-add-poke-stops-complaints-niantic-response-comic-con/
• http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/why-pokemon-go-sucks-in-the-suburbs-w430342
• http://www.gamespot.com/articles/pokemon-go-players-in-rural-areas-upset-over-lack-/1100-6441696/
• http://www.gamespot.com/articles/pokemon-go-rural-trainers-log-nothing-here-but-us-/1100-6441771/
• http://comicbook.com/2016/07/09/pokemon-go-isnt-great-in-rural-areas/
• https://www.inverse.com/article/18774-pokemon-go-small-towns-vs-big-cities
• http://kotaku.com/even-pokemon-gos-biggest-fans-are-turning-against-it-ri-1784654305
• http://www.polygon.com/2016/7/12/12150414/pokemon-go-nintendo-rural-country
• http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/Android/Pokemon+GO/feature.asp?c=70801
• http://www.dailydot.com/parsec/pokemon-go-rural-divide/

This should be enough for someone to start adding a paragraph about the urban bias. As for why I don't add it myself, I don't have enough knowledge to identify which of these are reliable sources, and which are not. —Farix (t | c) 10:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

• @TheFarix: Check out WP:VG/S for reliable video game sources. The majority of these are fine. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
• I imagine its just that no one's gotten around to it. Most of those sources are acceptable, and it's definitely a sentiment covered by a variety of reliable sources elsewhere too, though I don't know if there's much more to say other than "there's less stuff happening in rural areas, and people from rural areas don't like that". Regardless, it'd be a good point to inclusion in the reception section, whether it be a sentence or a paragraph. Sergecross73 msg me 12:15, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
• This is probably a WP:DUE topic, given the sources. Speaking from personal experience, my wife downloaded the game when it first came out, and basically hasn't played it at all, because it's unplayable here. TimothyJosephWood 12:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
• There used to be a statement about this in the article, but I'm not sure if it's still there. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 00:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
  • In the second paragraph of the "Criticism and incidents" section: Players in rural areas also complained about the lack of Pokémon spawns, PokéStops, and gyms in their area. (supported with 3 refs) – Not really sure if there's much more to say beyond this to be honest. Only thing that would expand on this is if it's amended. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:57, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Yeah that's it, and adding more sources to that would just be overkill. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
      • Only the first sentence of that paragraph was in the article until I added it. That first sentence was also buried deep in the previous paragraph. —Farix (t | c) 00:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
        • If we wanted to add another sentence on this topic, we might clarify the "derived from the portals of Ingress, Niantic's science fiction-themed augmented reality game" to make it clearer that Niantic is not biased against minority neighborhoods and rural areas, but rather the players of Ingress were biased against them. Portals and PokéStops are user-generated content, and it was the users who were biased, not the developer. The quoted source ("There are fewer Pokemon Go locations in black neighborhoods, but why?") already makes this clear, but the Wikipedia article does not. Howrad (talk) 20:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Mwillen (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)This article does little to explain the viewpoint from those who do not live in urban areas. It is biased towards cities and urban areas, focusing mainly on how they are impacted by Pokemon Go.Mwillen (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

In the Technical issues section under the Glitches subsection, it says "Some legendary Pokémon were also obtained by players in a glitch, though they were later removed." I have no idea what this means and I assume most people without intimate knowledge of Pokemon won't either. What are legendary pokemon, how were the obtained and how were they removed? Can someone who understands add more context there? —PermStrump(talk) 06:58, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

• Not a Pokémon player myself, but those are usually the rare and powerful ones. I'll edit the sentence to better explain it. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 10:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Mwillen (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)This article seems biased toward the younger generation-- the ones who would understand what "legendary pokemon" are. It assumes that many people know about the game or have played the game before. I think the introduction on gaming needs to have a simpler overview of Pokemon Go to fully explain how the game works to those who are unfamiliar with it.Mwillen (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Pokemon Go's dark side grows! Linkedin reports: "New York sex offenders will be violating parole by even downloading Pokémon Go . . . The rationale (at least for Pokémon Go) is a study which found dozens of pokéstops and gyms within half a city block from 100 registered sex offenders. The game also included lures, which have already been used to bring unsuspecting victims to muggers".^[1] Should we include this in the main article? Santamoly (talk) 07:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

According to the BBC, it's a bit more specific than that: sex offenders released from state prison while on parole. Interestingly, the government is also apparently working with the developer to incorporate the registered sex offender list with game locations to keep spots from spawning near their homes. TimothyJosephWood 09:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Mwillen (talk) 03:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Although no incidences are known, the New York Governor has attempted to ban sex offenders on parole from playing Pokemon Go and from using other social media in attempts to protect citizens engaging in such activities.Mwillen (talk) 03:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC) ^[2]