Talk:ProfNet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I ran through this article and pulled any qualitative (marketing) modifiers (convenient was the only one I pulled). It is intended to be informative only, not prejudicial. The term "expert" is not a qualitative reference, rather it is a reference to "expert news sources" that the media uses to support arguments in an article, etc. That's the main function of this company, to provide a resource for journalists and event planners, etc., to get into contact with knowledgeable sources of information on the subject that they are covering, frequently from the acedemic community.
| The content of the ProfNet page was merged into PR Newswire#ProfNet on 4 September 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
I'd greatly appreciate any help on how else I could modify this article. Thank you.
Merger?
I'm not tagging the article right now, but it seems like this article should be merged into PR Newswire. Arllaw (talk) 22:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)