Talk:Quill.org

This draft was created with the intention to adhere to Wikipedia’s neutral tone and notability guidelines, using independent sources. I have a conflict of interest on the partnerships team at Quill and welcome review. Please flag anything sounding at all promotional. Katejmcneil (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: The "Products" section especially reads like an advertisement, the goal is not to provide a listing of all the website's features, but present information from sources in a neutral point of view, and we need to give due weight to both sides, not just talking about the subject in a positive way. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: See my question at User talk:Katejmcneil § Quill.org. Perryprog (talk) 21:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
• @Kjm9211 I have published the draft but I would like to note a few things. First, the lead is rather short and should be expanded. Second, a few studies were commissioned for Quill.org, which means they should probably not be used for any claim that can be contentious. I would also review the reliability of the sources in general. However, I do think that this is a relatively decent draft, which is why I let it be published. Hope you keep making work! Thanks, ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 10:47, 24 April 2026 (UTC)