Talk:Ross Ulbricht
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ross Ulbricht article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Ross Ulbricht, along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Photo crop
I cropped the picture mostly because I didn't like how much weight it gave to the red tie. I saw it as manipulative of the viewer and unrepresentative of Ross's politics. Of course a man will give a show of thanks to his liberators, but that shouldn't define him for all time. However, after reading Ross's twitter, watching his speech at the Florida Turning Point rally, and seeing how personally involved Charlie Kirk was in securing Ross's pardon, (according to Ross, anyway) I now believe that I was wrong. Ross has as much right to wear a red tie as anybody. Sorry for the bother. ~2025-37042-49 (talk) 07:59, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Lead section neutrality
Hello, @Quetstar, why did you revert my edits to the lead section? diff
The first sentence of this biography should state his role, such as politician, entrepreneur, activist, etc., not just his nationality. For example, Bonnie and Clyde were "outlaws".
Also, why is it necessary to prominently plug the editorial position of the Libertarian and "Free Ross" movement? I think that it can be excluded or re-phrased in a more neutral tone. Right now it sounds like it's giving a lot of weight to their opinion instead of just describing the fact that a movement grew up around the cause of leniency in his case. ~2026-12431-34 (talk) 22:45, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ulbricht's claim to notability is his criminality. Look up any mobster, usually the lede and short desc will explicitly say they were a mobster and maybe say which gang or criminal activity they are noted for. For example:
- Tony Accardo ...
was a mobster in the American Mafia
. - Al Capone ...
was a an American gangster and businessman ... the co-founder and boss of the Chicago Outfit
- Johnny Eng ...
is a Chinese-American gang leader
- Tony Accardo ...
- I'm putting info back. Since people seem to like the "Silk Road" reference I will leave that in there.
- There have been several reverts and rewrites, flip flopping on this item. Anybody who wants "criminal" out of the lede and short desc please make your case here instead of edit warring. -- M.boli (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Formatting converted megabucks
An IP editor flagged the following sentence as sludgy:
... pay about US$183 (equivalent to about $249 in 2025) million in restitution
Much better would be:
... pay about $183 million (equivalent to $xxx million ...)
The weirdness is due to using the {{US$}} macro for the inflation calculation. I don't see an easy way to fix this, but I've posted a question to the teahouse. (The original talk-post was deleted due to excessive snark, but the question is legitimate.) -- M.boli (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)


