Talk:Scofield Reference Bible
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scofield Reference Bible article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Geneva Bible
If one examines the 1599 Geneva Bible, available at Amazon, you will find it first had a commentary known as the notes of the reformers. It is said these notes so aggravated the King James that he had an "Authorized" translation made without notes. Someone please take note of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.74.250 (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2008 (UTC)