Talk:Scott Glosserman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Leslie
Leslie Vernom seems notable to me: http://books.google.fr/books?id=Xl45W6XT5igC&pg=PA115&dq=Scott+Glosserman&hl=fr&ei=NRfQTM68IoPFswbS3ayPAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Scott%20Glosserman&f=false
And Scott Glosserman too: http://www.google.fr/search?tbs=bks%3A1&tbo=1&q=Scott+Glosserman&btnG=Chercher+des+livres Koko90 (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Revising this Article
SchlurcherBot undid a comprehensive revision of this Article, stating, "Remove AI-generated promo, puffery, and external links in body text undo Tags". This rationale is subjective. The biography states facts that are cited. It follows Wikipedia's guidelines. The Article had not been updated in 15 years. The previous version consisted of 2 tables and scant prose. The revised Article is substantive. If there are statements within the article with which SchlurcherBot takes issue then SchlurcherBot should consider editing them. However, a wholesale undoing of a comprehensive Article update is knee-jerk, unscholarly, and punitive to the Article's editor. ~2025-40832-05 (talk) 05:41, 16 December 2025 (UTC)