Talk:Service governance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| == Copyright problem removed ==
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 03:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
| |||||||||||
Improvement by including more perspectives
It is a good point about improving the perspectives. I'd be interested in any specific recommendations as to which perspectives should be included.
Service Governance works in countries where there is a move towards modern comply-and-explain governance (as in the ISO-309 standard), it is less relevant in countries where they still have the old-fashioned tick-box 'governance' - stuff like Sarbaines-Oxley. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fustbariclation (talk • contribs) 18:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Right now the main perspective is that of recommended good corporate governance in common law jurisdictions based on South African and British research into best practises. Some comparison to other best practises and how the concept has been applied globally would be of use. Of additional consideration would be what alternative best practises have been put forward, both historically and from different sources of modern corporate governance theory. Perhaps some additional attention to how it is used in IT environments. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- The ISO standard for Governance, ISO 37000 has entered its final stage before publication, and it supports the values and principles of Service Governance Fustbariclation (talk) 10:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)