Talk:Shadow banning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shadow banning article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Conspiracy theory
After getting access to the article, the Moore ref (Moore, Elaine (13 March 2022). "The truth about 'shadowbanning' is more complicated than influencers think". Financial Times. Retrieved 12 June 2022.) appears to be an opinion piece. I've removed it. It might be helpful to look at the history of it's use in this article.
The "Controversies" section as a whole needs revisiting. There's more than just the 2018 jump in interest to cover, and even that part doesn't appear to be covered neutrally. - Hipal (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01634437221077174 doesnt appear reliable, but it looks like it might be a source for potential references. --Hipal (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)