Talk:Signify N.V.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | On 4 September 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Signify. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Signify left Russia
They have suspended sales to Russia. Markthemac (talk) 15:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 4 September 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) jlwoodwa (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Signify N.V. → Signify – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. PhotographyEdits (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 14:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose the company has 2,416 views but the album has 1,396 and the OpenBSD has 21 and the OpenBSD may have more long-term significance. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Companies has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 14:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A search on Google Scholar shows many uses of the word in the sense of rhetorical signifying. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 23:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's a good point. I would suggest to move the *disambiguation* page to Signify (disambiguation) and make Signify a redirect to signifying. Do you agree? PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hm, maybe just add to the dab. There's an also article called Signified and signifier for the even more abstract concept. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Given that there are several uses I'd say just keep the DAB at the base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- That seems fair enough. Then we have consensus. PhotographyEdits (talk) 10:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Given that there are several uses I'd say just keep the DAB at the base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hm, maybe just add to the dab. There's an also article called Signified and signifier for the even more abstract concept. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's a good point. I would suggest to move the *disambiguation* page to Signify (disambiguation) and make Signify a redirect to signifying. Do you agree? PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.