Talk:Social competence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social competence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Strikerforce (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment: Appears to be a user essay (albeit a rather strong one), not an encyclopedia article. It was contested by Tideflat (talk · contribs) with the comment: While it definitely as some tone problems they are not enough to need deletion. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 6 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Js11323.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Expert opinion
This looks more like someone's research essay than an encyclopedia article. An outside opinion would be appreciated.--Strikerforce (talk) 19:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Sentence broken?
Under "Approaches", this passage. I'm going to highlight four pronouns to make the problem apparent. "These approaches define social competence based on how popular one is with his peers. The more well-liked one is, the more socially competent they are."
"His" with the antecedent "one" is unusual today, but documented as correct. However, after that usage, the antecedent of "they" can only be "peers". The fact that my peers like me is official evidence of their social competence? Well, I'll buy that, but it sounds like a pretty subjective criterion. —Wegesrand (talk) 09:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Industry Theory and Practice
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 September 2022 and 19 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Autumn1297 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Noveljams, Thedailyplanet1938.
— Assignment last updated by MammothSunflower (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review by noveljams
While the article seems to support each section appropriately with references and working links it does seems to read like a dissertation or scholarly study on social competence related to children specifically. I feel that this may be why Wikipedia mentions the article may not reflect the sites encyclopedic tone. Wikipedia mentions the article needs additional citations for verification however every reference I clicked worked and went to a scholarly source that supported the articles content. I did identify 2 bare urls; reference #3 and #9. #3 goes to a retired MSU site and #9 goes to a seemingly removed Scribd site. Seems like it would be easy enough to remove them and find other supporting references. While the information is relevant and delivered in a neutral way it does seem to over represent the theory of social competence solely in regards to children or adolescents. The article has good bones and seems to be a few steps away from meeting Wikipedia standards. Noveljams (talk) 03:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)