Talk:Software engineer/Archives/2012

From the status of software engineering section: The word engineering within the term software engineering causes a lot of confusion because it is a shallow analogy. 'a lot' of confusion, 'shallow' analogy. The wording is poor, and it is not neutral to call it a shall analogy. 64.228.157.75 (talk) 11:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

This article should probably just redirect to software engineering. Paladinwannabe2 (talk) 04:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I restarted this article with a collection of text from other wikipedia articles which all focuss on the profession of the software engineer. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 20:14, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

At the moment there are 303 Wikipedia article, who link to this article. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 20:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Mix engineer, programmer, developer, craftsman, productive people vs.

Hausfrau WikiEditresses — Preceding unsigned comment added by MajorVariola (talk • contribs) 22:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I think introduction part should be rewritten. For example "These people work long hours and may be asked to work overtime." is not a nice "wiki-style" introduction sentence. Two suggestions:

• It is possible to reduce this introduction part to a single sentence.
• It is possible to extend this introduction part over the first sentence.

144.122.71.120 (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

The following commented-out content was removed from the "Education" section: --Cybercobra (talk) 08:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

This is really too much, too detailed, to contemporary data. It is beginning to look like like spam:

... in engineering faculties such as McMaster University, the University of Waterloo, the University of Ottawa and the University of Western Ontario, the University of Calgary, the University of Victoria, École Polytechnique de Montréal, McGill University the ETS in Montréal and the Université Laval in 2006.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}