Talk:Soviet submarine Shch-214
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Soviet submarine Shch-214 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 25, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 20,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 07:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
GA review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet submarine Shch-214/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 18:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 18:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decapitalize "Power" in Axis Powers
- Why? It's a proper noun.
- I don't think it is - the Rome-Berlin Axis is a proper noun, but "Axis powers" isn't (in the same way that "Axis countries", "Axis alliance", etc. wouldn't be) Parsecboy (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- You convinced me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think it is - the Rome-Berlin Axis is a proper noun, but "Axis powers" isn't (in the same way that "Axis countries", "Axis alliance", etc. wouldn't be) Parsecboy (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Why? It's a proper noun.
- Were the 4 reloads for the forward tubes, I assume?
- Added
- You have 2 sentences in a row that start with "the submarine" in the Construction and career section - recommend rewording the first one along the lines of "Captain Vlasov Vladimir Yakovlevich commanded the submarine..."
- Good idea.
- Shouldn't MAS-571 be italicized?
- Good catch
- File:Shadowgraph Schuka class X series submarine.svg - license is fine, but since it's user created, we should have the sources they used to create it. He is still active, so presumably it should be doable to have him add the sources.
- Queried. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
