Talk:St. John Coltrane African Orthodox Church/GA1

GA review

Last updated: 07:58, 22 July 2026 (UTC) by 2x2x2x2x2

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

Fix error Pentacostalism to Pentecostalism in the Beliefs section

Cloud atlas: fixed!

1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

List incorporation covers gallery, see 6b

Cloud atlas: I added alt text to the images and a title to the gallery.

2) Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check

• See spot check

2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

confirm the sf.gov report verifies Brown's proclamation and the SFGATE piece verifies Breed's (or that both sources cover both), and adjust the citation placement if not.

Cloud atlas: I split these into two sentences, each with its own source.

2c) it contains no original research

See if the mayoral proclamation supports both mayor's proclamations (the sentence attributes separate proclamations of two different mayors (Willie Brown and London Breed) under one citation pair, confirm each proclamation, not just the general practice)

Cloud atlas: I split these into two sentences, each with its own source.

2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

see copyvio report. Close paraphrasing here "...for using her husband's name and likeness without permission." with this Must be fixed before GA pass

Cloud atlas: fixed!

3) Broad in its coverage

3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

Consider adding congregation size, it's a gap in a main aspect, the church as it is now.

Cloud atlas: I wanted this, too, but I simply could not find anything solid in the sources on the church's current size. I know it's probably "a few dozen" people, but that's just a sense from the images. The most recent numbers are from 25 years ago in the sources.

3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:

4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:

5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

No edit war, most, if not all, revisions were made by the nominator

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

Great rationale being used

6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Add alt text to the 3 image galleries (Coltranechurch1k.jpg, Coltranechurch1.JPG, Coltranechurch8.JPG)

Cloud atlas: done!

Overall:

I'm putting this review on hold until all the issues are fixed above. If there is no progress in 2 weeks, I will fail this review 2x2x2x2x2 (talk)

Thanks for your work, GA is passed2x2x2x2x2 (talk) 07:55, 22 July 2026 (UTC)