Talk:Synurid

Protista Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Algae Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Algae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the photosynthetic organisms commonly called algae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AlgaeWikipedia:WikiProject AlgaeTemplate:WikiProject AlgaeAlgae
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no move. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Snoteleks (talk) 18:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Synurid → SynurophyceaeSynurophyceae – These sources support it: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1987.tb08616.x, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2020.1787679 and https://doi.org/10.23860/thesis-terpis-kristina-2021. Jako96 (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

@Jako96 Synurophyceae is not scientific consensus, plenty of taxonomic sources treat it as an order of Chrysophyceae and they phylogenetically branch within them, not apart from them. In any case, the common name "synurid" takes preference here, because it can refer to both the order Synurales and its monotypic hypothetical class Synurophyceae. I can provide sources when I get back home — Snoteleks (talk) 22:50, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

"Synurophyceae" has 2.620 hits in Google Scholar, "synurid" has 16 and "Synurales" has 563. Are you sure Synurophyceae isn't consensus? Jako96 (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

@Jako96 Yes, I can show you sources now: doi:10.1007/s13127-022-00554-y, doi:10.1111/jeu.12287, doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2022.125915, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_43, doi:10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00119.x. In summary, according to all phylogenetic analyses, synurids branch within class Chrysophyceae, with at least the orders Paraphysomonadida and Segregatales more basal than Synurales. All of these sources are taxonomic authorities on this topic (and on Chrysophyceae in general). I suspect that most of the hits on Google Scholar of "Synurophyceae" are from ecological surveys (especially dated 1999-2010), not articles that study the taxonomy itself. — Snoteleks (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

@Jako96 Do you have any other comments about this topic? — Snoteleks (talk) 18:32, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

No, just close it. By the way, are you interested in this discussion? Jako96 (talk) 18:36, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 31 August 2025

Related Articles