Talk:Trinity/GA1 - Wikiwand

FarmerUpbeat (talk · contribs) initially conducted this GA review, and the result was a pass. However, this was FarmerUpbeat's first time reviewing a good article nomination, and there were some aspects of the good article criteria that were missed. After a discussion with the user on their user talk page, FarmerUpbeat has agreed to let someone else review this GAN.

For this reason, I have removed Trinity from the good articles list for the time being and re-added the {{GA nominee}} template to the talk page. The new GA review should be created at Talk:Trinity/GA2. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Brent Silby (talk · contribs) 15:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: FarmerUpbeat (talk · contribs) 23:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Overall, looks good. The main things are that capitalization, especially for Trinity/Trinitarian, should be standardized, some places require commas, and, in regards to criteria 3a, Nontrinitarian beliefs could at least have slight context to each of them. Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 23:40, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

@FarmerUpbeat thanks for reviewing the article! I believe I have fixed all the issues that you have mentioned. Brent Silby (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Sounds good, thank you so much! I will look over it again :) Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

@FarmerUpbeat I am always happy to work on the article! Looking forward towards your thoughts. Brent Silby (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Could you also standardize capitalization of Nontrinitarian/nontrinitarian?

Also, could you confirm that you added a bit of context to nontrinitarian beliefs? Thank you so much for your dedication to this important article! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

@FarmerUpbeat I think the capitalization in the article is consistent. "nontrinitarian" is always written from a non-capital letter. But also, yes, I have added context for the nontrinitarian beliefs like Arianism. Brent Silby (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles