Talk:Vilkha

@FDW777: please stop removing article references and afterwards information it was referencing. This violates WP:Vandalism.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 22:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

I refer you to these comments, as well as the earlier ones in the same thread regarding the unreliability of the references you keep restoring. FDW777 (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

For maximum clarity, they have been deemed unreliable at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 320#defence-blog.com and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344#armyrecognition.com. FDW777 (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Actually no. They're not. The talk was not closed and a couple of unreferenced unproved statements without any discussion are not representing any consensus.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Discussions at RSN don't require formal closing, especially when there is no doubt the websites are nothing more than a hobbyist's personal website with no reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. FDW777 (talk) 13:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)