Talk:Virality (EP)/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Gdshordy (talk · contribs) 21:03, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Camilasdandelions (talk · contribs) 07:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Hi Gdshordy. Unfortunately, I decided to quickfail this article, as it still needs significant problems that should be addressed.
- Various MOS violations; the
|date=and|access-date=in references are not recommended format (YYYY-MM-DD), you should use {{Use American English}} template for this (See MOS:NUM). Also there're some words unnecessarily capitalized (UPROXX, VIRALITY, TIDAL etc.), and they should be addressed per MOS:ALLCAPS. MOS:CURLY is also found in this article. Additionally, you'd better see MOS:LEADCITE for citations in lead, which are unnecessary at all. - The article is kinda short, as you see it is only supported by two sections. You'd better seperate, and expand them.
- Awkward sentences, such as "On one of the lead singles".
- Reliability: DJBooth, Our Generation Music, Kazi Magazine - are they reliable at all?
Overall, the article needs more development to be GA status. Please re-nominate this article after you addressed these problems, and also I recommend you to refer other GA or FA articles for its more better quality. Good luck.