Talk:Warren Buffett/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is an archive of past discussions about Warren Buffett. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Semi-protected edit request on 26 May 2020
This edit request to Warren Buffett has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change “philanthropist” to “potential philanthropist, as he has pledged to donate 99% of his wealth but has yet to do so.“ Lcshall (talk) 09:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Warren Buffet has only pledged to donate 99% of his wealth to the Gates Foundation, however, that has not occurred yet. Until the , he is not a philanthropist but a potential one. Lcshall (talk) 09:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2020
Change request “Qwest Center” to “CHI Health Center“ in the personal life section.Kingwebster (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Buffett's House
Why is there a picture of his house in the article (with coordinates to boot)?
That seems like a pretty blatant WP:BLPPRIVACY violation.
Frescard (talk) 20:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Please note, the image, image description, and image data is on commons (commons:File:Dundee_HD_Omaha_NE.JPG) so discussion about deleting the image all together can not be resolved here - discussion if it is appropriate to include in the article or not while it exists can certainly be continued to be discussed here. — xaosflux Talk 17:17, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I don't think taking an image of someone's house (and even publishing it) is illegal in the U.S., but the WP guidelines seem to be a lot stricter than the law, and discourage the publication of a person's address. So we can probably only remove the link here. Frescard (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Logic
Warren has bought shares in Barrick, after deriding gold repeatedly. His bad logic has been mentioned already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.244.227.244 (talk) 14:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
"Oracle of Nebraska" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Oracle of Nebraska. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 23#Oracle of Nebraska until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 01:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
New picture of Warren Buffet
I was scrolling through Warren Buffets wikipedia page and i couldn't help notice that a very low quality picture has been chosen. I would like to give the advice to change it because he has a lot of better pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:981:9514:1:D037:4E91:5AB1:8939 (talk) 19:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2021
This edit request to Warren Buffett has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could someone change "Buffet" to the correct spelling "Buffett" in 4 locations on this page please? I don't have sufficient rights to do it myself. TinEye (talk) 02:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Done Thank you. Deauthorized. (talk) 05:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2021
This edit request to Warren Buffett has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change:
Buffett had long stated his intention to give away his fortune to charity, and in June 2006, he announced a new plan to give 83% of it to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).
TO:
Buffett had long stated his intention to give away his fortune to "charity"[1], and in June 2006, he announced a new plan to give 83% of it to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). 149.233.42.173 (talk) 06:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Not done: ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Template talk:Infobox person#Deprecating the net worth parameter?
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox person#Deprecating the net worth parameter?. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 19:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Again being used by spammers
Why doesn't Wikipedia seem to have any mechanism to discourage spamming scammers from abusing Wikipedia's credibility to help push their stinking scams? Seems to be the obvious approach would be to temporarily flag the abused article with a warning to the potential suckers. Also a link to a detailed explanation of the category of spam. Today's example is pretty obviously a 419. Shanen (talk) 07:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)