Talk:Wiktionary

I cannot imagine that people and academics have not been criticising the Wiktionary project. I know I have. Isn't there anything to mention in that area? Tomsintown 12:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Constructive criticism is great to improve anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.73.151.118 (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I have criticism. It is described as an English dictionary yet it is an American English dictionary. Standard English aka British English is the default English in 75% of countries where there is a default English. 194.223.59.136 (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

I would ask for the request as above. 2001:EE0:4BC4:C1D0:8C60:E4FE:CDA3:8239 (talk) 10:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Above. 2001:EE0:4BC2:16B0:2923:8EBD:8993:C44A (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

I am not sure where better to put this but ..

If i press Return on <https://www.wiktionary.org/> i go to <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=&go=Go>, which is annoying to say the least. Similarly after entering a word.

I believe this is a new behaviour. Please change it (back). 81.101.155.196 (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

It seems nobody noticed this, but the change has been made.

If anybody does read this, perhaps they could tell me how to report errors correctly.

Thanks! 81.101.155.196 (talk) 16:55, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

There is a template for this subsection stating that it needs secondary sources. I could not find any on this subject and think that the primary sources are sufficient in this instance. yutsi (talk) 18:49, 1 January 2026 (UTC)