Talk:Zenyatta (Overwatch)/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 08:37, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 00:28, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I'll take on this GAN. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 00:28, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Kung Fu Man. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 22:14, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Alexeyevitch Got everything, sorry for the wait, believe I got everything. As for the Support-class being capitalized, classes are treated as proper nouns in Overwatch, so in this instance it's referencing to those characters classified as such in game vs in-general.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:22, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Ty. Passing now. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 00:35, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

More information Rate, Attribute ...

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	[...] utilized in the game's story content in a meaningful capacity - too wordy instead chose to have him only have two physical arms → instead gave him only two physical arms Zenyatta was the second Support-class character they had implemented into the game → Zenyatta was the second Support-class character implemented for the game Why is "Support-class" capitalised? and often into areas a character like Mercy would not want to go - missing word, I think I'd personally remove the quotemarks here: [...] Zenyatta began as a concept of a "cyber monk" created by artist Scott Mercer They choose instead [...] - typo "silver-colored" and "oval-shaped" should be hyphenated 3x3 grid - unnecessary, I think Particular skins of note include [...] → Notable skins include [...] To promote Overwatch and the character, he was one of twelve heroes [...] - replace "he" with "Zenyatta" Manga can be linked [...] meanwhile argued that several of his skins, particular the "Djinnyatta" [...] - typo This contrast and its effects on players utilizing the character at a high-level of competitive play was the subject of a study by Peter Braun, Alfredo Cuzzocrea, Timothy D. Keding, Carson K. Leung, Adam G.M. Padzor and Dell Sayson in the journal Procedia Computer Science - listing all the names is definitely clutter Clarify what "tremor" is referring to in this article.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	I think yaoi should be italicised (MOS:FOREIGNITALICS) [...] represented "Orientalist" views [...] (MOS:SCAREQUOTES) A link to "Middle East" is probably an overlink
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	References are properly listed
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I don't have any complaints with the reliability of the sources. One of the source is from YouTube, but the author of the video is qualified to talk about the subject.
	2c. it contains no original research.	[3] check, [6] check, [8] check, [9] check, [10] check, [11] check, [12] check, [15] check, [16] check, [17] check, [20] check, [21] check
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Earwig flags quotes, so no issues there. I did not find anuthing of concern
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Coverage is good
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issues here
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No issues here
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article is stable with no ongoing edit wars
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	File:Overwatch-Zenyatta.png Fair Use Y
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	the only caption is satisfactory
	7. Overall assessment.

Close