User:AndGG97/sandbox
Addition to Epigenetic Clock Wiki page, Relationship to a cause of biological aging section
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Submission declined on 2 December 2025 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Comment: If "Epigenetic clock" is the title of the draft it should be in the first line. Theroadislong (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Epigenetic clock
Ageing is associated with genome-wide changes in DNA methylation at CpG sites, which support epigenetic clocks. Reviews have argued that these methylation patterns may reflect regulation at the chromatin level, rather than independent changes at individual CpG sites. [1] [2]
CRISPR-based epigenetic editing techniques have been used to modify DNA methylation at age-associated CpG sites, including sites near loci used in epigenetic clocks (PDE4C and FHL2). Liesenfelder and others reported that methylation changes at selected loci are followed by modifications at genomically distant CpGs. The authors propose that these modifications may be mediated by chromatin folding that brings distal regulatory regions physically closer.[3]
DNA methylation
CRISPR-based epigenetic editing has been used to alter DNA methylation at selected age-associated CpG sites (including loci in PDE4C and FHL2), reporting methylation changes at many additional, genomically distant CpGs. [4] Reviews have mentioned that age-related methylation differences may occur in a coordinated “co-methylation” module, consistent with chromatin-level modifications rather than isolated CpGs. [5] [6]
In the 2025 study, the authors proposed that distant effects could be influenced by three-dimensional chromatin organization.[7]
CpG site
Large epigenome-wide association studies have identified many CpG sites whose DNA methylation levels change with age. Reviews have discussed that age-associated methylation changes often occur in coordinated patterns and are linked to chromatin and genome organization. [8] [9]
In a 2025 study, CRISPR-based epigenetic editing was implemented to alter methylation at selected age-associated CpG sites (including loci associated with age-related hypermethylation such as PDE4C and FHL2). Authors reported that editing was accompanied by methylation changes at multiple genomically distant CpGs [10]
CRISPR gene editing
PDE4C
DNA methylation at CpG sites near PDE4C has been reported to show age-associated changes, and has been used as one of several loci in biological age-prediction models in blood and other tissues [14] [15] [16]
DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3A
DNMT3A has been used alongside inactive CRISPR-Cas9 (dCas) constructs for epigenome editing purposes. In this system, guide RNAs direct the dCas9–DNMT3A construct, where it can induce DNA methylation in targeted loci. [17]
dCas9–DNMT3A has been used to modify age-associated CpG sites in genes like PDE4C and FHL2, to observe its effects on the epigenetic clock. [18]
Epigenome editing
Catalytically inactive CRISPR Cas9 (dCas9) can be fused with effector domains for epigenome editing at targeted loci. [19] [20]
In a 2025 study, dCas9–DNMT3A was used to modify age-associated CpG sites in genes like PDE4C and FHL2, to observe its effects on the epigenetic clock. [21]
Ageing
DNA methylation related to aging may be coordinated methylations regulated by the three-dimensional architecture of chromatin. [22] [23] [24]

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.