User:Armeym/sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Personal Resource Center
Wikipedia Task Center
Wikipedia Guidelines
Best Practices & MOS
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style
- Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources WP:RELIABILITY
- Wikipedia:Citing sources WP:CS WP:CITE WP:REF
- Help:Footnotes
- Wikipedia:Inline citation
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view WP:NPOV WP:Neutrality (Template:POV {POV})
- Conflict of Interest Guide WP:PLAINSIMPLECOI
- WP:COPYEDIT
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch MOS:WEASEL
- Wikipedia:Relevance of content, Wikipedia:Relevance, Wikipedia:Out of scope (OOS), WP:TOPIC / WP:OFFTOPIC, Wikipedia:WikiProject scope creep
- Sources are addressed in body: MOS:CITELEAD MOS:INTRO
- Articles worth existing/being written: Wikipedia:Notability
- MOS:BLOCKQUOTE
- Formality: WP:TONE WP:SLANG
- Don't surprise readers: Principle of least astonishment WP:ASTONISH WP:SURPRISE
- How'd I get here? (Redirects): WP:RASTONISH WP:RSURPRISE
- Crime: WP:CRIME WP:VICTIM WP:PERPETRATOR WP:CRIMINAL
- Labelling Criminals: Wikipedia:Crime labels MOS:CRIMINAL MOS:CONVICTEDFELON
- Anti-Victimization: WP:AVOIDVICTIM WP:VICTIMIZE
- Innocent Until Proven Guilty (also: no pre-guilt crime references for non-public figures) : WP:BLPCRIME WP:SUSPECT
- WP:COMMONNAME
- Wikipedia:Recentism
- WP:IMPROVEIT WP:PRESERVE WP:POTENTIAL WP:FIXIT Wikipedia:Somebody else's problem
- User:Jimbo Wales/Statement of principles
List of policies and guidelines
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
- Wikipedia:Etiquette WP:COURTESY
- Wikipedia:Vandalism WP:VANDAL
- Wikipedia:Disruptive editing WP:DISRUPTIVE
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not WP:PROMOTION WP:NOTADVERT WP:NOTPROMO WP:SOAPBOX WP:NOTADVOCACY WP:NOTOPINION WP:NOTSCANDAL WP:NOTCENSORED
- Wikipedia:Civility WP:CIVIL WP:NICE WP:POLITE
- Wikipedia:Conflict of interest WP:COI
- Wikipedia:Assume good faith WP:GOODFAITH
- Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers WP:BITE WP:NOBITING WP:DONTBITE WP:NEWBIES
- Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
- Wikipedia:Editor integrity
- Wikipedia:Copyright violations
- Wikipedia:Article titles WP:CRITERIA
- Wikipedia:Merging Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers
- Wikipedia:No disclaimers
- Wikipedia:Spoiler
Misc
- Icons
Running with scissors is too dangerous for Wikipedia! - Redirect Page Maker and How-to
- Wikipedia:List_of_discussion_templates
- Wikipedia:Template index/Maintenance
- Wikipedia:Barnstars
Sign using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the current date.
Use {Col-begin} {Col-break} {col-end} for columns.
Tutorials
Administrative
- User reporting for vandalism
- Wikipedia:Arbitration
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard
- User Warnings
- Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings#Commitment to civility
Warning templates
|
You are not logged in or registered. You can log in or create an account here.You are logged in.
Pending changes protected
You are not logged in, so you are not autoconfirmed. Your account is autoconfirmedis not autoconfirmed.
Semi-protected
You are not logged in, so you are not extended confirmed. Your account is extended confirmed.does not have the extended confirmed flag, but you are an administrator, so your account is extended confirmed by default.
Extended confirmed protected
- Wikipedia:Protection policy, Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase, [Protection Request Forum]
- Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard - For determining whether a specific editor has a conflict of interest (COI) for an article.
- Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Overview_of_page_protection
Infoboxes & Flags
Works in Progress
- Inline, comment-level templates
Task complete.
Being worked on- Template:Done/See also
- Template:Resolved/See also
- Template:In use
- Template:Under construction Being reconstructed over time, replace with IN USE when actually editing.
- Template:Recently revised
Current Events, Recentism, & Speculation
- Wikipedia:Current event templates {Current related} {current} {Current event editnotice}
- Wikipedia:Recentism WP:RECENTISM
- Template:Recentism
- Template:Speculation
Span Flags
- Template:Multiple issues
- Template:Copyedit
- Template:Context
- Template:Technical
- Template:More citations needed
- Template:Cite check Use when the article or section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations
- Template:self-published
- Template:primary sources
- Template:one source
- Template:BLP
- Template:Third-party
- Template: Unreferenced
- Template:Unreferenced section
- Template:More citations needed
- Template:More citations needed section
- Template:Sources exist
- Template:Update

This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. (August 2016) - Template:Update section

Parts of this user page (those related to this section) need to be updated. The reason given is: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ). Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. (April 2024) - Template:Confusing
- Template:Overly detailed
- Template:Very long
- Template:Long plot
- Template:Too many see alsos
- Template:Lead too long Template:Lead too short
- Template:Expand section
- Template:Missing information
- Template:How-to
- Template:Fan POV
- Template:POV
- Template:Weasel
- Template:Cleanup reorganize Template:Cleanup Template:Organize section
| This user page may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Unusual formatting, repetition and overuse of terms like "for example". Please help improve this user page if you can; the talk page may contain suggestions. |
- Template:Confusing to mark sections (or entire articles, though this is undesirable because it makes it unclear what exactly needs to be improved)
- Template:Globalize
- Template:advert
Notice and Warning Templates
Long/Short Expansion/Lists
- Template:Expand section
- Template:Expand list
- Template:Very long
- Template:Inc-up for a list that is frequently updated
- Template:Dynamic list for lists that may never be able to satisfy certain standards for completion
- Template:Dynamic a-list for articles that contain lists that may never be able to satisfy certain standards for completion
Inline Flags
- [needs context]
- [jargon]
- [needs copy edit]
- [additional citation(s) needed] - the present source is insufficient but should be retained
- [not specific enough to verify] - a reference is too imprecise or ambiguous to enable it to be verified
- [better source needed]
- [clarification needed] to mark individual phrases or sentences
- [definition needed] to mark a term as ambiguous or unclear and in need of a definition
- [example needed] to mark individual phrases or sentences which require examples for clarification
- [further explanation needed] to mark individual phrases or sections which require further explanation for general (i.e. non-expert) readers
- [non sequitur] to mark individual mentions of someone or something in an out-of-context way, the relevance of which is unclear
- [example needed]
- [clarification needed]
- [who?] [when?] [where?] [how?] [why?]
- Wikipedia:Vagueness [vague] [specify]
- Wikipedia:Citation needed [citation needed]
- words[citation needed]
- Template:Failed verification [failed verification]
- test[failed verification]: Use when inline citations have been supplied which support some portion of the statement in question, but not all of it.
- [text–source integrity?]: Use when multiple inline citations to a source are given, but not all of them support the same information.
- [unreliable source?]: Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.
- [unreliable source]: Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is an unreliable source.
- [verification needed]
- [dead link]
- [excessive detail?]
Hatnotes, Disambiguation, & Clarity
mbox
| AAA |