User:GregariousMadness/Sources

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vylet Pony sources

More information Citation, Source ...
Source assessment table
Citation Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? GNG?
"Vylet Pony Learned to Embrace Her Queer Identity Through the Music of a Saturday-Morning Cartoon" Willamette Week No; interview, and Willamette Week is a local Portland newspaper and does not count toward WP:GNG. Yes Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail No
"Love & Ponystep" Pitchfork Yes Yes Yes; Borderline for notability, as most of the review focuses on the album. However, there is some amount of coverage that should barely pass WP:100W. I personally would count it for notability, but more stringent editors may disagree.
Excerpt from article (~190 words of coverage)
"In a 26-page lyric booklet, Lulamoon credits part of her inspiration to a breakup, an experience mirrored in the narrative of her pony protagonist. Lulamoon’s response to everything she’s been through, and the putrid state of the internet, isn’t to give up or go dissociative. Rather, it’s to throw herself headlong into creating anything-goes experiments that urge listeners to be kind and live their truest lives. [...] Lulamoon once said that her artistic goal was to land “pony music” on Monstercat, and Love & Ponystep excels at smashing together trashy pop and bonkers brostep. She seems to relish breaking boundaries—not for the sake of provocation but to expand the Overton window that regulates which sounds represent the perceived limits of tasteful self-expression. Lulamoon has also described growing up in a household where her parents strictly controlled her media diet, feeling her brain split open when she first heard Scary Monsters & Nice Sprites. It’s easy to imagine how a fixation like My Little Pony, never mind also being queer and trans, might leave you feeling alienated as a kid, and how that could later translate to eccentric, anarchic taste in music."
Yes
"Interview: Vylet Pony" Sonemic No; interview Yes Yes No
"Paging Through ‘can opener’s notebook’ with Vylet Pony" Ringtone Mag No; interview Partial Yes No
"Interview: Vylet Pony On CUTIEMARKS, Collaboration, And Confronting The Personal" The Fandomentals No; interview Partial Yes No
"Vylet Pony’s I Was the Loner of Paradise Valley breaks down barriers and builds a unique sonic landscape." Firebird Magazine Yes Partial No; the source discusses the subject's music, not the subject directly. Little coverage about Vylet Pony herself. No
"Vylet Pony Lands a Really Sick Trickshot on Love & Ponystep" Ringtone Magazine Partial; this review was written by the same person who interviewed Vylet previously in the same publication Partial No; the source discusses the subject's music, not the subject directly. Little coverage about Vylet Pony herself. No
"Lamenting on trauma by creating a fictional world with Vylet Pony: “Monarch of Monsters”" The Daily Campus Yes Partial Yes No; student newspapers do not count toward notability per previous AfD's and WP:UNIGUIDE
"Vylet Pony’s ‘Carousel’ Takes Listeners on the Ride of a Lifetime" Ringtone Magazine Yes Partial No; the source discusses the subject's music, not the subject directly. Little coverage about Vylet Pony herself. No
Close

15.ai sources

The strongest sources have been organized in the following table.

More information Citation, Source ...
Source assessment table
Citation Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? GNG?
"Put words in game characters' mouths with this fascinating text-to-speech tool" Rock Paper Shotgun Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"Make Portal's GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things" Game Informer Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"Make the cast of TF2 recite old memes with this AI text-to-speech tool" PC Gamer Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"這個AI語音可以模仿《傳送門》GLaDOS講出任何對白!連《Undertale》都可以學" United Daily News Yes Yes; one of the three major national newspapers of Taiwan and listed as reliable per Chinese WP:VG/RS Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"『Portal』のGLaDOSや『UNDERTALE』のサンズがテキストを読み上げてくれる。文章に込められた感情まで再現することを目指すサービス「15.ai」が話題に" Den Fami Nico Gamer Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト「15.ai」公開中。『Undertale』や『Portal』のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる" AUTOMATON Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"这个网站可用AI生成语音 让ACG角色“说”出你输入的文本" GamerSky Yes Yes; listed as reliable per Chinese WP:VG/RS Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"讓你喜愛的ACG角色說出任何話! AI生成技術幫助你實現夢想" Yahoo! Kimo Yes Yes per WP:YAHOONEWS; the article is original reporting from Yahoo and not syndicated content, thus reliable Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"Insolite : un site permet de faire dire ce que vous souhaitez à GlaDOS (et à d'autres personnages de jeux vidéo)" Clubic Yes Yes per WP:NEWSORG Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
Close

15 (programmer) sources

The subject passes WP:CREATIVE per their work on 15.ai. In addition, the subject also passes WP:GNG. The strongest sources have been organized in the following table.

More information Citation, Source ...
Source assessment table
Citation Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? GNG?
"Voiceverse Is The Latest NFT Company Caught Using Someone Else’s Content" Kotaku Australia Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS, which states News posts from Kotaku between 2010 and 2022 are considered reliable. This January 2022 article was posted as a news post and not a blog one. Yes; The source focuses on the creator of 15.ai rather than 15.ai itself in their coverage; its coverage of 15.ai is a brief mention compared to its coverage of its creator. Starting with In their most recent scandal, and ending at with terms for use that ask the user to accept before proceeding., a direct word count shows ~350 words of coverage, easily passing WP:100W. Yes
"15.ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon" The Guardian Yes Yes per WP:NG/RS. Yes; The source discusses the subject directly and in detail Yes
"Troy Baker-backed NFT firm admits using voice lines taken from another service without permission" Eurogamer Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS. Yes; The source focuses on the creator of 15.ai rather than 15.ai itself in their coverage; its coverage of 15.ai is a brief mention compared to its coverage of its creator. Starting with However, in now-deleted tweets, and ending at We will make sure this never happens again.", a direct word count shows ~275 words of coverage, easily passing WP:100W. Yes
"Voiceverse NFT admits to taking voice lines from non-commercial service" NME Yes Yes per WP:VG/RS. Yes; The source focuses on the creator of 15.ai rather than 15.ai itself in their coverage; its coverage of 15.ai is a brief mention compared to its coverage of its creator. Starting with As reported by Eurogamer, and ending at Go fuck yourself", a direct word count shows ~170 words of coverage, passing WP:100W. Yes
Close

GA nomination source reliability checklist

This table will list every single reference used in 15.ai in preparation for a GA nomination. Since WP:GNG has already been established by the table above, this table will only focus on the reliability of each source. When the table is finished, the article will be cleaned up accordingly. This table is only here for the sake of organization. Only sources that mention 15.ai directly are included in this table (i.e. articles supporting statements in the Background section are not included if they do not mention 15.ai). This table has been transcluded from this userpage.

More information Citation, Source ...
Source assessment table
Citation Source Reliable?
"The MIT Project That Paved Way For Modern Voice AI" Independent Nigeria Yes per WP:NG/RS
"Troy Baker-backed NFT firm admitted using voice lines from another service without permission" Mobidictum Yes; WP:USEBYOTHERS, peer-reviewed journals that use the source include and books from reputable publishers include
"Voiceverse NFT caught plagiarising voice lines from AI service" AIAAIC Yes; AI incident repository used by researchers, journalists, and policymakers
"Grupo NFT do ator de voz de The Last of Us apanhado a roubar vozes de outro serviço" OtakuPT Yes; used 81 times in the Portuguese Wikipedia. Uses in journals/books include . Editorial policy is here. They claim to be the largest manga/anime news outlet in Portugal, which actually seems to check out.
"La compañía de NFTs que se alió con el actor de voz de Joel de The Last of Us la ha liado bastante parda" Sport.es Yes; WP:NEWSORG
"Make GLaDOS, SpongeBob and other friends say what you want with this AI text-to-speech tool" Byteside Partial; was only able to find one instance of WP:USEBYOTHERS at , probably best used with attribution and not for stating facts, or just omit entirely. This source is used exactly once as of the current revision, in the reception section, used with attribution.
"NFTs Are Bad. So Why Do People Keep Making Them?" The Herald (Arkansas State University) Yes; per WP:UNIGUIDE the source is generally reliable, but does not count toward notability
"Troy Baker’s NFT Partner Company Caught Claiming Voice Lines From Another Service As Their Own" PlayStation Universe Yes per WP:VG/RS
"Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning" Towards Data Science Yes; author has IEEE publications on NLP and machine learning. As long as we follow WP:EXPERTSPS's advice of Exercise caution when using such sources, this is a reliable source.
"Make the cast of TF2 recite old memes with this AI text-to-speech tool" PC Gamer Yes per WP:VG/RS
"Make Portal’s GLaDOS and Other Characters Say Whatever You Want With This New App" GLITCHED Partial; a discussion is ongoing
"Faça GLaDOS, Bob Esponja e outros personagens falarem textos escritos por você!" Arkade Yes; used 49 times in the Portuguese Wiikpedia. Has been on the jury for the Brazil Game Awards along with other industry outlets like IGN and Forbes Brazil. Uses in peer-reviewed journals include
"Voice Actor for Joel Receives Backlash after NFT Tweet" ClutchPoints Yes; the consensus from RSN is that ClutchPoints is not unreliable, but can have "clickbaity" titles. Clear editorial standard.
"15.ai已经重新上线,版本更新至v23" EquestriaCN No per WP:FANSITE; However, even though EquestriaCN is a My Little Pony fan site, I feel like this is an exceptional circumstance (as written in WP:GUNREL) and WP:IAR may apply for an uncontroversial description of the app. 15.ai spawned from the brony fandom and started with pony voices, so I believe having one sentence with attribution (i.e. not stating any facts from the source in Wikivoice) is reasonable. This source is used exactly once as of the current revision, in the reception section, used with attribution.
"模型参数过亿跑不动?看MIT小哥,少量数据完成高质量文本转语音!" QQ News Partial; according to the Chinese Wikipedia's RSN, (translated) Content published by accounts verified by government, corporate, and other organizations can be used as the primary source for the publisher's claims. and Content published by news media organizations' verified accounts can be used based on the media's own reliability. The article in question was published by the official verified account of XinZhiYuan, a Chinese AI startup. Probably can be used sparingly for uncontroversial statements, preferably with in-text attribution.
"『Portal』のGLaDOSや『UNDERTALE』のサンズがテキストを読み上げてくれる。文章に込められた感情まで再現することを目指すサービス「15.ai」が話題に" Den Fami Nico Gamer Yes per WP:VG/RS
"这个网站可用AI生成语音 让ACG角色“说”出你输入的文本" GamerSky Yes; listed as reliable per Chinese WP:VG/RS
"Трой Бейкер отказался от партнёрства с NFT-платформой Voiceverse и извинился за резкое высказывание в поддержку токенов" DTF Yes; Russian WP:VG/RS says DTF is generally reliable with the note Wikipedia considers only editorial content reliable; it is marked with a ✔ after the title and is placed in a separate feed. The article in question indeed has a ✔ after the title and clicking on it brings the user to the editorial feed.
"Troy Baker-støttet NFT-virksomhed indrømmer at have stjålet indhold" Gamereactor Yes per WP:VG/RS
"Troy Baker's Partner NFT Company Voiceverse Reportedly Steals Voice Lines From 15.ai" Tech Times Yes per WP:VG/RS
"15.ai" Hacker News Yes per WP:ABOUTSELF for uncontroversial self-descriptions
"Proyek NFT Troy Baker Ketahuan Mencuri Aset Suara AI Tanpa Seizin Pemiliknya" Gamebrott Yes; Popular ( ) Indonesian gaming news website. They have a solid editorial staff and Google Translated versions of their articles seem to pass the smell test. Uses in peer-reviewed journals include
"Brony Musicians Seize The Means of Production: My Eyewitness Account to BABSCon 2025" Alex Irpan Yes per WP:EXPERTSPS; author of the article is a senior research scientist at Google DeepMind with over 13,400 citations on their Google Scholar profile
"Voiceverse Is The Latest NFT Company Caught Using Someone Else’s Content" Kotaku Australia Yes per WP:VG/RS, which states News posts from Kotaku between 2010 and 2022 are considered reliable. This January 2022 article was posted as a news post and not a blog one.
"Un algoritmo que convierte texto a voz «con emoción y sentimiento» e imita a personajes y voces conocidas" Microsiervos Yes; while Microsiervos is one of the most popular Spanish technology blogs, it is a self-published source. However, according to , the author of the article in question (Álvaro Ibáñez) is a director of technical publications and author of information technology books. WP:EXPERTSPS states that Self-published sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. On further research, the author of the article has a Google Scholar profile and has been cited 46 times; the author has published reliable, peer-reviewed books and articles (Web 2.0, Cómo buscar y encontrar información en Internet, Internet y el correo electrónico en español). An even further search shows that the publishers of these books are independent of the author (the publisher of the first book does not list the author as a member, La página del idioma español is a reputable journal, etc.) It's probably best to err on the side of caution and try to use as little of it as possible with in-text attribution if applicable, but as long as we follow WP:EXPERTSPS's advice of Exercise caution when using such sources, this is a reliable source.
"这个国外的语音合成网站,可以让玩家操控二次元角色说话" NetEase News Partial; Chinese WP:VG/RS places NetEase News as a situational source. Chinese Wikipedia advises: General information about NetEase may be used, but specific conclusions should be drawn from other reliable sources. Currently the article uses the citation exactly once: it supports the reception section at Ji Yunyo of NetEase News called the technology behind 15.ai "remarkably efficient" but also criticized its emotional limitations, writing that the emotional expression was relatively "neutral" and that "extreme" emotions couldn't be properly synthesized, making it less suitable for not safe for work applications. Ji also wrote that while many deepfake videos required creators to extract and edit material from hours of original content for very short results, 15.ai could achieve similar or better effects with only a few dozen minutes of training data per character. which seems appropriate and within the boundaries of the Chinese Wikipedia's advice, especially since everything is attributed in-text and verifiable by other sources. This source is used exactly once as of the current revision, in the reception section, used with attribution.
"NFT в геймдеве: проблемы регулирования, гнев игроков и поспешные решения разработчиков" Skillbox Yes; Skillbox is a very well-known Russian online education platform. Surprisingly, there have been zero previous RSN discussions on the platform on both the English and Russian Wikipedias. The author of the article in question, Pavel Khibchenko (Павел Хибченко), is a prolific journalist at Igromania (profile) and Kanobu.ru (profile), which are listed in WP:VG/RS and Russian WP:VG/RS, respectively, so in the worst case scenario, we can still invoke WP:EXPERTSPS to confirm its reliability.
"NFT-штука Троя Бейкера ворует чужие работы". В сети уничтожают известного актера озвучки" GameGuru Yes; Russian WP:VG/RS says GameGuru is reliable
"ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト「15.ai」公開中。『Undertale』や『Portal』のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる" AUTOMATON Yes per WP:VG/RS
"Incident 277: Voices Created Using Publicly Available App Stolen and Resold as NFT without Attribution" AI Incident Database Yes; AI incident repository used by researchers, journalists, and policymakers
"Insolite : un site permet de faire dire ce que vous souhaitez à GlaDOS (et à d'autres personnages de jeux vidéo)" Clubic Yes per WP:NEWSORG
"Shonen Jump Learns That When You Tease at an Upcoming Announcement, You Gotta Tell Us, Upfront, That It’s Not NFT Related" The Mary Sue Yes per WP:RSPSS
"语音开源项目优选:免费配音网站15.ai" Zhihu Yes per WP:EXPERTSPS; the author of the article has a Google Scholar profile with over 1,100 citations
"Voiceverse NFT Service Reportedly Uses Stolen Technology from 15ai [UPDATE"] Wccftech Partial; normally, this would follow WP:VG/RS (which puts Wccftech as a generally unreliable source), BUT this particular article was explicitly used in the court documents of Lehrman v LOVO to prove that Voiceverse stole work from 15.ai (see the bottom of page 38: 29 VoiceVerse Docs, “Vision,” docs.voiceverse.com/whitepaper/english/vision. Separately, VoiceVerse has already been found to have stolen technology from another company. See Ule Lopez, WCCF Tech, “Voiceverse NFT Service Reportedly Uses Stolen Technology from 15ai,” (Jan. 16, 2022), https://wccftech.com/voiceverse-nft-service-usesstolen-technology-from-15ai/.). Per WP:USEBYOTHERS in this special case, since this Wccftech is good enough for use in court, this article can be used sparingly for non-controversial statements of fact. Note that context matters: generally unreliable does not mean always unreliable.
"Spongebob Can Now Narrate Your Writing" AI Daily Partial; has editorial staff but a cursory search was unable to find sources that prove WP:USEBYOTHERS. Actually, the book Tech Trends in Practice published by Wiley (a reputable publishing house) uses the source without comment for facts. The book was written by Forbes contributor and futurist Bernard Marr. So, there is an argument to be made that this source is reliable.
"Put words in game characters' mouths with this fascinating text to speech tool" Rock Paper Shotgun Yes per WP:VG/RS
"15.ai, el sitio que te permite usar voces de personajes populares para que digan lo que quieras" Qore.com Yes; owned by the same parent company as LevelUp, which Spanish Wikipedia has deemed reliable. Peer-reviewed journals that use the source include

Still, probably best used sparingly and preferably with in-text attribution.

"讓你喜愛的ACG角色說出任何話! AI生成技術幫助你實現夢想" Yahoo! Kimo Yes per WP:YAHOONEWS; the article is original reporting from Yahoo and not syndicated content, thus reliable
"Troy Bakerin tukema NFT-yhtiö kärähti – Kaupitteli ääninäyttelyä luvatta" Muropaketti Yes per WP:NEWSORG
"NFT-företaget som Troy Baker marknadsför tog ljudklipp från annan tjänst" FZ Yes per WP:NEWSORG
"Voice Cloning for the Masses" The Batch Yes per WP:EXPERTSPS; the author of the article is Andrew Ng
"This Website Will Say Whatever You Type In Spongebob’s Voice" Anime Superhero News Partial; formerly known as ToonZone. A Previous RSN discussion brought up good points that high-quality professional publications like Time, The Atlantic, The A.V. Club, and Space.com have used ToonZone / Anime Superhero News as their source ( ). Honestly, if it's good enough for Time, The Atlantic, The A.V. Club, and Space.com (all solidly green in WP:RSP per WP:TIMEMAGAZINE, WP:THEATLANTIC, WP:AVCLUB, and WP:SPACE.COM) I don't see why its usage with attribution for this article should also not be okay per WP:USEBYOTHERS. This source is used exactly once as of the current revision, in the reception section, used with attribution.
"Like them or not, NFTs are here to stay" The Journal (Webster University) Yes; per WP:UNIGUIDE the source is generally reliable, but does not count toward notability
"Troy Baker-backed NFT firm admits using voice lines taken from another service without permission" Eurogamer Yes per WP:VG/RS
"Создателей NFT-голосов, которых поддержал Трой Бейкер, уличили в краже голосов в тот же день" iXBT Games Yes; Russian WP:VG/RS says iXBT Games is generally reliable with the note User blogs are not considered reliable sources; they can be identified by a disclaimer under the title: "This post was published on iXBT.com blogs; its author has no affiliation with the iXBT.com editorial team." which does not apply to our article in question
"Everything You Need to Know About 15.ai: The AI Voice Generator" Play.HT Yes per WP:EXPERTSPS and WP:PRIMARY; will only used with in-text attribution
"¡La decepción, hermano! Proyecto NFT apoyado por Troy Baker usó tecnología ajena" LevelUp.com Yes per WP:NEWSORG; also considered reliable per Spanish Wikipedia
"Make Portal's GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App" Game Informer Yes per WP:VG/RS
Equestria Daily Yes; see WP:EQD (an essay I wrote) for a detailed explanation
Трою Бейкеру пришлось извиняться за решение сотрудничать с NFT-компанией StopGame Yes; Russian WP:VG/RS says StopGame is generally reliable with the note User-generated content is located in the "Blogs" section; only editorial content may be used as sources. which does not apply to our article in question
15.AI: Everything You Need to Know & Best Alternatives ElevenLabs Yes per WP:PRIMARY and WP:EXPERTSPS; will only used with in-text attribution
"15.ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon" The Guardian Yes per WP:NG/RS
"Troy Baker’s NFT Partner Company Voiceverse Caught Using Voice Lines From Another Service Without Permission" Geek Culture Yes per WP:VG/RS
"這個AI語音可以模仿《傳送門》GLaDOS講出任何對白!連《Undertale》都可以學" United Daily News Yes; one of the three major national newspapers of Taiwan and listed as reliable per Chinese WP:VG/RS
"Descubre 15.AI, un sitio web en el que podrás hacer que GlaDOS diga lo que quieras" LaPS4 Yes per WP:NEWSORG; a discussion is ongoing, so you can consider this partial until the discussion is closed
"Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?" Analytics India Magazine Partial; English Wikipedia has ~179 uses of it as a source, but there has been no previous discussion about this on RSN. Author of the article has published plenty of other AI-related articles . A search on Google Scholar shows a bunch of uses in scholarly journals. Some clearly peer-reviewed, high-quality journals that use AIM as a source include:

At worst, marginally reliable. Possibly reliable source if taken to RSN. This source is used exactly once as of the current revision.

"Troy Baker angers the internet with NFT partnership" Checkpoint Gaming Yes per WP:VG/RS
"15.ai: All about 15.ai and the best alternative" Speechify Yes per WP:PRIMARY and WP:EXPERTSPS; will only used with in-text attribution
"Voice actor Troy Baker announces his involvement in "voice NFT" project Voiceverse with an antagonistic tweet, shortly before it's revealed that the project stole work" Web3 Is Going Just Great Yes per WP:EXPERTSPS and will only used with in-text attribution
"Voiceverse NFT admits to taking voice lines from non-commercial service" NME Yes per WP:VG/RS
"Troy Baker-backed NFT company admits to using content without permission" Stevivor Yes per WP:VG/RS
"Why Biden, Trump, and Obama Arguing Over Video Games Is YouTube's New Obsession" Inverse Yes per most recent discussion in WP:VG/RS
"Website Lets You Make GLaDOS Say Whatever You Want" (alternate Kotaku Australia mirror) Kotaku Yes; WP:VG/RS notes editors are cautioned of blog/geeky posts that have little news or reporting significance, which some editors have categorized this article as, as they view the "Odds and Ends" section as such. I strongly disagree with such categorization, since if you actually look at the article that is listed in WP:VG/RS as an example of an article with no reporting significance, you get this pitiful article, which is clearly nowhere near the same realm as the Kotaku article covering 15.ai. Anyway, we can invoke WP:USEBYOTHERS; clearly reliable sources (per WP:VG/RS) that directly cite this Kotaku article include PC Gamer, Rock Paper Shotgun, Game Informer, GamerSky, and Den Fami Nico Gamer. Per How accepted and high-quality reliable sources use a given source provides evidence, positive or negative, for its reliability and reputation. The more widespread and consistent this use is, the stronger the evidence. this is a pretty obviously reliable source.
"Создателей голосовых NFT, поддерживаемых Троем Бейкером, обвинили в воровстве голоса" Shazoo Yes; popular Russian gaming news website that is used 203 times on Russian Wikipedia. Per WP:USEBYOTHERS, peer-reviewed journals that use the source include
YouTube, Twitch Yes per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. As it turns out, there is an essay that directly supports my hunch. Per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be used. Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such as when you are supporting a direct quotation., which is exactly how the primary sources are being used in this article. Partial per the policies outlined by WP:PRIMARY, as long as there is no independent interpretation or analysis based on the source according to the second bullet point. Per WP:PRIMARY, the source may only be used to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. The article only uses these primary sources to quote the voice actors without any external analysis or interpretation.
The AI revolution coming to Skyrim and The Witcher 3's mod scenes PCGamesN Yes per WP:VG/RS
"The most underrated talent in AI?" Marginal Revolution Yes per WP:EXPERTSPS. Tyler Cowen is a world-renowned economist and Marginal Revolution is his own blog.
"Troy Baker ends partnership with NFT company Voiceverse" NME Yes per WP:VG/RS
“15.ai ”, Fifteen-kun & Project 2020 and March 2020 News Gwern Yes; world-renowned pseudonymous writer of AI, psychology, and statistics; hundreds of citations on Google Scholar, used in 232 English Wikipedia pages
Close

Unused sources

More information Citation, Source ...
Source assessment table
Citation Source Reliable?
"‘The Last of Us’ actor Troy Baker reverses course on NFTs amid fan backlash" We Got This Covered No per WP:WEGOTTHISCOVERED
"Free 15.ai Character Voice Cloning and Alternatives" Resemble.ai No per WP:EXPERTSPS; unclear who wrote this, unlike the other voice AI company articles, which were written by their CEOs
"NFT firm Voiceverse admits it stole work after announcing Troy Baker deal" Metro Partial; per WP:METRO this would normally be a no, but I saw that this article specifically was used as a source in the AI Incident Database and the AI, Algorithmic, and Automation Incidents and Controversies , both reputable databases for AI incidents that are used by researchers and policymakers. Probably good enough to use as an example of news outlets that described the incident as "stealing".
"La société NFT soutenue par Troy Baker admet avoir utilisé des lignes vocales provenant d’un autre service sans autorisation" Tech Tribune France Partial; can't really find much information about this. They do have an editorial staff and they seem to be a legitimate news organization but I may have to do some more searching
"Six 15.AI Alternatives You Need To Try Out Today!" Stay Ahead of AI No
"《小马画吧》人工智能成功合成紫悦,宇宙公主等角色声音" Baidu No per WP:BAIDU
"Demystifying 15.ai: How AI Generates Ultra-Realistic Text-to-Speech Voices" TheLinuxCode No
"15.ai – Natural and Emotional Text-to-Speech Using Neural Networks" HashDork No
"Troy Baker 的 NFT 合作夥伴公司 Voiceverse 在未經許可的情況下使用其他服務的語音線路被抓獲" 0x资讯 Unknown
"15.AI: All You Need to Know & Best Alternatives" Murf.ai Unknown
Make GLaDos And Other Characters Say What You Want Gamezo Unknown
"Troy Baker’s Partner Voice NFT Platform Voiceverse Admits to Stealing Audio" NFTGators No
"Voiceverse NFT stole work days after being endorsed by Troy Baker" NFTEvening No
"The NFT Company That Troy Baker Markets Took Audio Clips from Another Service" GamingSym.in No
"При помощи AI можно озвучить набранный текст голосами GlaDOS, Мисс Полинг и других персонажей игр" Rampaga Unknown
"게임 캐릭터 음성으로 영어를 읽어주는 소프트 15.ai 공개." Tistory Partial; I believe this can be used as a WP:PRIMARY on what the author wrote about 15.ai, not for facts about 15.ai itself
Shock Report: AI-Assisted Voice Cloning Is The Newest Cyber Threat — And Indians Are The Most Vulnerable (URL changed due to blacklist) Swarajya No per WP:SWARAJYA
Close

Discord (Odyssey Eurobeat song) sources

More information Citation, Source ...
Close

Odyssey Eurobeat sources

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI