User:Ham II/Sandpit A

Ensure that {{Old moves}} is added and complete in all the following places:

•  Done Talk:Gaza war protests
•  Done Talk:Gaza war protests at universities

  Partly done Talk:2025 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses (now merged into the above)

• Partly done Talk:Reactions to the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses
•  Not done Talk:List of pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in 2024
• Partly done Talk:List of pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in the United States in 2024
• Partly done Talk:List of pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in California in 2024
• Partly done Talk:2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in the Netherlands
•  Not done Talk:2025 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in the Netherlands
•  Done Talk:Columbia University pro-Palestinian campus protests and occupations during the Gaza war
•  Done Talk:Gaza war protests at Ohio State University
• Partly done (?) Talk:2024 Portland State University pro-Palestinian campus occupation
• Partly done Talk:2024 Radboud University Nijmegen pro-Palestinian campus occupations
• Partly done Talk:2024 Sciences Po pro-Palestinian occupation protest
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of Amsterdam pro-Palestinian campus occupations
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of California, Davis pro-Palestinian campus occupation
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of California, Irvine pro-Palestinian campus occupation
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of California, Los Angeles pro-Palestinian campus occupation
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of Oregon pro-Palestinian campus occupation
•  Done Talk:University of Oxford pro-Palestinian campus occupations
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of Southern California pro-Palestinian campus occupation
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of Texas at Austin pro-Palestinian campus protests
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of Virginia pro-Palestinian campus occupation
• Partly done Talk:2024 University of Washington pro-Palestinian campus occupation

It would be tempting to oppose because so many of the related terms – in their article titles, their category names and in general usage – use "art" as a synonym for the visual arts: "art history", "history of art" and "art museums" (actually "art museums and galleries" in the category tree, which I believe is to accommodate both American and British usage) are ones which have already been noted. There are category names including the words "visual arts" which might be more idiomatic if moved (back, in some cases) to names with "art": Category:Visual arts by animals (main article: Animal-made art), Category:Visual arts exhibitions (main article: Art exhibition), Category:Visual arts theory. Doing that would reverse this CfD from February 2020. That CfD was followed by a CfD in March 2020 to move the "...in art" categories at Category:Visual arts by subject to "...in visual arts" – a proposal closely analogous to this one – but that failed. So far, these are arguments for keeping "art", not "visual arts", in subcategories of Category:Visual arts. Where does that leave the parent category itself?

• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Subsequent use, especially MOS:GIVENNAME/MOS:PATRONYMIC
• WP:SUR:

• Shuttleworth, Christine (October 2006), "Italian names" (PDF), The Indexer, vol. 25, no. 2, Australian and New Zealand Society of Indexers, pp. C15–16: "Modern surnames with prefixes (usually prepositions) are indexed under the prefix:"
  • D'Annunzio, Gabriele
  • De Sica, Vittorio
  • Della Casa, Lisa
  • Di Stefano, Giuseppe

"During the Middle Ages and Renaissance, surnames as we know them today were not universally used, the person [often] possessing only a given name, along with a phrase to distinguish between persons with the same name. [...] Surnames became increasingly used as they were needed, especially during the Renaissance and in early modern times, and names from this period often show a mixture of forms and usage."

"Before the modern period [...] prepositions such as de, de', degli, dei and de li [sic] were not usually part of the surname, so Lorenzo de' Medici is indexed as Medici, Lorenzo de'."

"Patronymics and names derived from those of associates": index by given name, including for Andrea del Sarto

"Geographic names Derived from the individual's birthplace or home town. Leonardo da Vinci, to use a well-known example, came from the town of Vinci (the word 'da' means 'from'). The artists Caravaggio and Correggio also took their names from their home towns, and the name of Perugino is derived from Perugia."

• Antonello da Messina
• Caravaggio (Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio)
• Correggio (Antonio Allegri)
• Leonardo da Vinci
• Mino da Fiesole
• Palestrina, Giovanni Pierluigi da
• Perugino (Pietro Vannucci)

Historical Italian names containing a particle in lowercase (da, della, di, etc.) are most often sorted by the given name preceding the particle: {{DEFAULTSORT:Leonardo da Vinci}}. There are exceptions:

• Some instances of da: Caravaggio, Michelangelo Merisi da; Correggio, Antonio da; Maiano, Benedetto da; Palestrina, Giovanni Pierluigi da; Sangallo, Antonio da
• Most instances of de'
• Most instances of del: Sarto, Andrea del; Verrocchio, Andrea del (but del Monte, Francesco Maria; Sebastiano del Piombo).

Source; See also

• Yale Center for British Art, Sculpture and Ceremonial: Monuments to Queen Victoria

• WP:NCPEER
• Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Biography/2021_archive#Peerage_titles_and_honorifics_amendments

Burdett-Coutts Memorial Sundial, Cheylesmore Memorial, Shaftesbury Memorial Fountain

• Article naming conventions
  • "General rules"
    • Capitalization (and italicization)
      • Artworks. "Generic and non-generic name" distinction in WP:NCMUSIC may be helpful here; they always italicize non-generic names except for those of MINORWORKS. Do not use italics and sentence case together, except perhaps in languages other than English (per MOS:NONENGTITLE).
        MOS:NAMESANDTITLES: "Italics should be used for the following types of names and titles [...]: Major works of art and artifice, such as [...] paintings, sculptures". There are possibly no instances where italics would be the best option for a work of applied art.
        • When to use title case and italics.
          • There may be a case for treating all easel paintings as WP:MAJORWORKs. This would include phrases describing the physical painting itself, and not only the subject it depicts. While this may be true for easel paintings and frescoes, it may not be true of all mural paintings.
          • Sculptures, on the other hand, may be affected by other conflicting conventions which may take precedence; this is especially relevant for sculptures which are monuments or memorials.
          • Drawings? (e.g., Portrait of a Man in Red Chalk, Study of a Kneeling Nude Girl for The Entombment)
          • Prints (e.g., The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters), unless the title is a noun phrase such as Flammarion engraving or Stradanus engraving.
        • When to use title case without italics. Often noun phrases including words such as "Memorial", "Monument", "Tomb". San Damiano Cross.
        • When to use sentence case. Descriptive names which are not titles; these can be identified by their inclusion of generic terms such as "bust", "statue". But perhaps not "altarpiece" or "portrait" – because of these usually being paintings?
        • Titles in languages other than English: Titles of artworks are generally given in English, unless a title in another language is demonstrably the most commonly used name. MOS:NONENGLISH: Capitalization in non–English-language titles varies, even over time within the same language. Retain the style of the original for modern works. For historical works, follow the dominant usage in modern, English-language, reliable sources.
      • Series of artworks (including cycles of paintings?)

        The Disasters of War

      • Addendum: "Self-Portrait" or "Self-portrait" in title case? MOS:TITLECAPS: "The general rule in English is not to capitalize after a hyphen unless what follows the hyphen is itself usually capitalized in running text (e.g. post-Soviet). However, this rule is often ignored in titles of works. Follow the majority usage in independent, reliable sources for any given subject ... If neither spelling is clearly dominant in sources, default to lowercase after a hyphen, per the general rule."
      • Movements, periods and styles. Archaic (including Archaic smile; also pre-Archaic, etc.) and archaic, Classical and classical, Decorated and decorated, Flamboyant and flamboyant, Geometric and geometric, Impressionist and impressionist, Mannerism and mannerism, Orientalizing and orientalizing, Perpendicular and perpendicular, Realism and realism, Severe and severe, Symbolism and symbolism. Wat of Neo-Gothic versus neo-Gothic? -Isms. Broad tendencies (figurative painting, abstraction, classicism, minimalism, conceptualism) contrasted with more narrowly defined movements. Lower case for "school".
      • Exhibitions: title case. No italics for large-scale or recurring exhibitions; italics for others. Individual instances of these exhibitions follow the capitalization and (lack of) italicization of the series. What of First Impressionist Exhibition?

        Large-scale/recurring: Royal Academy Summer Exhibition, Venice Biennale, Documenta.

        Temporary "special exhibitons", monographic, etc.: Hajj: Journey to the Heart of Islam

    • Construction of article titles for artworks
      • Something on the way the titles of artworks have been devised historically?
      • When an artwork has several possible titles in use, all of which describe a generic artistic subject (e.g., a religious or mythological one), choose the most concise? Mystic Marriage of Saint Catherine not The Mystical Marriage of Saint Catherine of Alexandria, Saint Francis in Ecstasy not The Ecstasy of Saint Francis of Assisi. ("Saint" and "Saints", however, are spelled out in full rather than abbreviated in titles of artworks representing those saints. Agnostic on whether "Saint" should be retained in all constructions, e.g. Infant Saint John the Baptist, Mary Magdalene, Joseph the Carpenter) As well as concision, this would allow for consistency across depictions of the same subject.
      • Pseudo-precise titles for earlier works should be avoided; it should not be assumed that there is a single correct title for an earlier work, e.g. the museum's title – although the museum's title should be a redirect and a WP:BOLDSYN.
      • The. Often a redirect with or without an initial "The" is likely to be useful. MOS:AT: "Do not use articles (a, an, or the) as the first word ... unless it is an inseparable part of a name ... or the title of a work." MOS:THETITLE: "A leading A, An, or The is preserved in the title of a work, including when preceded by a possessive or other construction that would eliminate the article in something other than a title ... however, the is sometimes not part of the title itself, e.g.: the Odyssey."
        MOS:THENAME (for "names of individuals or groups"): "While English typically retains a leading The in the name of a published work, even when grammatically awkward (Stephen King's The Shining), this is not done otherwise (use a Beatles song, not a the Beatles song)."
        • Saints?
      • Avoid the construction "X's Y" – but not in Van Gogh's Chair, Hogarth's Servants
      • By type
        • Portraits (primarily painted ones)
        • Public commemorative sculpture
    • Disambiguation
      • Artists
      • Artworks
        • Disambiguate first by art form (WP:NCDAB point 3: "The word or phrase in parentheses should be ... the generic class (avoiding proper nouns, as much as possible) that includes the topic". This seems preferable for works by obscure artists and ones of uncertain attribution. The downside, however, is the potential for inconsistent disambiguation in works by the same artist.) (painting) and (sculpture) are usually preferred to (artwork).

          Fortitude (Botticelli) → Fortitude (painting); Fortitude (King) → Fortitude (sculpture)

          The Fountain of Life (painting); Gassed (painting); Princess Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (painting); Salem (painting)

          Leah (sculpture); Maman (sculpture)

          It would mean that Fred Foo (painting) would be a third acceptable style for portraits, in addition to Portrait of Fred Foo and (if Titian wasn't Fred Foo's only portraitist) Fred Foo (Titian)

          A reason it shouldn't be (Titian painting): Self-portrait (Titian painting) would have one redundant word.

        • If there are articles on multiple works of the same title by different artists, disambiguate by a short form of the artist's name (usually a surname). If the artist is referred to in brief (in reliable sources) by a given name (e.g. Piero della Francesca, who is referred to in brief as "Piero"), usually disambiguation should be by the full name as it appears in the article title on the artist. (Gentile da Fabriano is another example; he's not sufficiently recognisable from "Gentile" alone; ditto Rosso Fiorentino. Palma Vecchio and Palma Giovane. But then there's "Leonardo" for Leonardo da Vinci.) Given names which are effectively mononyms are a little different. [What about "(Jones painting)" and suchlike?
          • If a short form of the artist's name is insufficient for disambiguation because another article exists on a work of the same title by a similarly named artist, use longer forms of both artists' names.

            e.g., Portrait of Martin Luther (Lucas Cranach the Elder), Portrait of Martin Luther (Lucas Cranach the Younger).

          • If a work is from an artist's workshop or circle, or if the attribution to the artist is uncertain, how should it be disambiguated? Is concision the most important thing? Tobias and the Angel (Verrocchio); Virgin and Child with Saints and Donors
        • When no artist's name can be used, disambiguation by location only may be sufficient: The Triumph of Death (Palermo), The Crossing of the Red Sea (Sistine Chapel), Allegory of Painting (Le Mans)
        • If further disambiguation than the artist's name is required, add the by location (e.g., a city rather than a museum).
        • As a general rule, avoid disambiguating by material, year or museum – but one of this group may be needed if artist and city are not sufficient. Avoid using accession numbers, or catalogue numbers (e.g., Sugaring Off (Grandma Moses, 442)) as disambiguation.
• Lead sections
  • Checklist of things the opening paragraph of an article should mention: artist, date, medium, location, type, subject (where known, in all cases).
  • Is the specific medium too much detail for the first sentence?
  • Measurements in the lead section, or just in the infobox?
  • Should locations be given in the Location field of infoboxes for reproductive works (prints, possibly photographs)? Or should they just be in the captions? e.g. The Spanish Bullfight
  • "held at/in", "conserved at/in", "preserved at/in", "in the collection of", "now at/in", "on display at/in", "currently resides in", "currently housed at", "now hangs in", "kept in", "exhibited in"
• Image captions
  • Standardised format (template) for captions?

• Consistency with MOS:SAINT – and check existing art FAs on this.
• Per WP:CONCISE, "Madonna" and "Virgin" need not be preceded by "The" at the beginning of an article title? Would this also apply to more modern works, e.g. Dalí's The Madonna of Port Lligat?
• Title case for titles of artworks? Including ones from French, etc. (e.g. La Belle Ferronnière, Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe)? Follow usage in sources?

"This list is great! ... It's a model for what other cities could be doing!" ... "Very thorough, well-written, sourced, and would make an excellent travel companion" ... "Nice list: many sources, many images, good structure" ... "Delighted to see this" ... "A phenomenal and fascinating list and an astonishing body of work." ... "An impressive list – I was playing a little game with myself about how many artworks I had seen." ... "You have put a lot of work into this" ... "This is a prodigious article, of which Wikipedia can be proud. There's nothing to match it anywhere else that I can find online." ... "Happy to support this very fine page for promotion to Featured status. It gave me enormous pleasure, taught me a lot, and meets all the Featured List criteria in my view. Bravo!" ... "A very extensive and interesting list." ... "Wow, congratulations! What an undertaking... It is wonderful to have an example to use for similar lists... Very, very well done!" ... "That's a lovely list."

The mercenary Francesco Sforza had been elected Duke of Milan in 1450 and died in 1466; his son Galeazzo Maria Sforza sought to commemorate him with an equestrian statue. In 1472 two Milanese sculptors, the brothers Mantegazza, were commissioned to produce a memorial, but they seem to have turned the commission down. Galeazzo Maria's brother Ludovico Sforza ("il Moro") took an active interest in the project after he succeeded to the lordship of Milan in 1479. [Pope-Hennessy 207] Two drawings by the Florentine Antonio del Pollaiuolo survive for a scheme which envisaged a rearing horse, something hitherto unprecedented in equestrian statuary. [Pope-Hennessy 208 ?] In 1482 Leonardo da Vinci wrote a letter to Ludovico il Moro, for which a draft survives, in which he outlined his expertise in engineering, architecture, sculpture and painting, and recommended himself for the project of the memorial. There is no further mention of the statue until the summer of 1489, [Pope-Hennessy 210] when the Florentine agent in Milan wrote to Lorenzo de' Medici, asking for some Florentine sculptors either to assist Leonardo or to replace him. Nothing is known to have come from this letter, and in April 1490 Leonardo wrote that "I began the horse afresh". [Pope-Hennessy 211]

By 1493 a clay model of the horse was finished, and was shown in the courtyard of the ducal residence, but owing to the French invasion it was never cast. [Pope-Hennessy 211]

Tate Britain is an art gallery in Millbank, London, housing the United Kingdom's national collection of British art. It was founded as the National Gallery of British Art in 1897 and was financed by the sugar magnate Sir Henry Tate. Known informally at first, and then officially, as the Tate Gallery, it began to collect modern European art alongside British works. The modern collection moved to a new site at Tate Modern in 2000, when the gallery at Millbank received its current name. Tate Britain's collection includes works from J. M. W. Turner's bequest to the nation. These are housed in the Clore Gallery, an extension built in 198X by Sir James Stirling. Since 1984 Tate Britain has hosted the Turner Prize, an often controversial annual exhibition of contemporary art. It is the senior institution in the Tate network of galleries in England, which also includes Tate Modern, Tate Liverpool and Tate St Ives.