Bot-reported

User-reported

• Divyanshurathour77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Repeatedly adding promotional content to Vinod Kapri, including after being given a final warning. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 08:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

  This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to the conflict of interest noticeboard (or Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, if the case is serious). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

• AbbaszaGoat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. Non autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting sandbox edits. JoBo Gamer 10:08, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Slovak Volunteer Campaigns

• Slovak Volunteer Campaigns (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: It was an intense IP vandalism a year ago, we had also a talk page discussion. The page was protected in August. IP vandalism was in autumn, winter and now again. OrionNimrod (talk) 10:07, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Z

• Dragon Ball Z (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: There are data that are incorrect and need to be updated. Renzobc214 (talk) 08:08, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Declined The talk-page of said article isn't protected, so please use an edit request over there. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In the infobox, change:

• • 90 naval vessels sunk or damaged^[1][a]

to

• • 90 naval vessels sunk or damaged, see list^[3]

The explanatory note only includes the sinking of IRIS Dena, which was near the totality of naval losses a week ago but the claimed losses have now substantially expanded. This would also bring the treatment of naval losses much more in line with aviation losses.

An alternate (in my opinion uglier) option would be:

• • 90 naval vessels sunk or damaged^[4]

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Why are Palestinian civilians especially highlighted in casualty figures, even though they are not direct war casualties? And why are they the only ones for whom children are explicitly mentioned as victims?

In addition, Israel is often explicitly named as the one who has “killed” people. If one wants to be this precise, then the same standard should be applied in all other cases as well.

For example, reports should also mention the child who was killed in Kuwait by an Iranian drone, and just as clearly state that civilian casualties in the Gulf states were caused “by Iran” – in the same way it is phrased in the case of Israel. Cabri13 (talk) 04:47, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Not done. This is not an edit request, this is just a complaint. A proper edit request proposes a specific change in the form "change X to Y" along with policy based reasoning and citing reliable sources. This request fails on all counts. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Just revert off "edit requests" that are merely rants about the article content. Don't waste effort responding to them. Requesting immediate archiving... —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 06:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Umais Bin Sajjad

• Umais Bin Sajjad (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have created over 150 mainspace articles (primarily in the area of Film and TV). While some of my earlier creations were deleted, the majority of my recent articles remain live, and I have refined my sourcing and notability assessment standards over time. I am familiar with WP:N, WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS and I ensure that all new articles meet notability and sourcing standards prior to creation. As I continue to create new articles...I believe autopatrolled would help reduce workload for NPP, as my pages generally require minimal follow-up. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

User:TinaLees-Jones

• TinaLees-Jones (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User has created over 900 live articles, mainly all relating to Asian people and places. None of the articles I've randomly spot checked have any major issues that would prevent them from passing muster in NPP. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:AjayDas

• AjayDas (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I mainly create articles related to Assam. Currently, I have around 100 live articles on Wikipedia. Auto-patrol rights would be helpful if you consider. Please let me know if there's any way to improve my contribution if it's rejected. AjayDas (talk) 06:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Royal Turquoise

• Royal Turquoise (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to create some lancelet related articles which I am unable to due to my newness of my account so I am requesting this right. Royal Turquoise (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Umais Bin Sajjad

• Umais Bin Sajjad (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Requesting file mover rights to correct misnamed files related to TV and film articles. I frequently encounter files uploaded with incorrect names and would like to move them to accurate titles while preserving history. Example: File:Pakistan_Idol_(season_1).jpg actually contains the poster for MasterChef Pakistan season 1. I plan to fix similar straightforward naming issues in accordance with file naming guidelines. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 04:45, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Please make a few requests using {{rename media}} first to prove you understand the guidelines. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the review and suggestion. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Cadddr

• Cadddr (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm a recent changes patroller. I've read the policy on vandalism, the basic content policies, the basic legal policy, and the guideline on reviewing. As of recently, I have rollback rights. Cadddr (talk) 00:34, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:05, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Sadko

• Sadko (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have had rollback rights for many years, have read the policy on vandalism, and am an experienced user. I am requesting the additional right of pending changes reviewer. Thank you. — Sadko (words are wind) 20:21, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

• Phlogiston Enthusiast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am Phlogiston Enthusiast. I would like a moment of your time to request rollback rights. I believe that I could use rollback permissions to assist in anti-vandalism in the recent changes tab. There are multiple reasons for this. For one, it would streamline reverts on articles that need them, and be a useful tool against vandalism. This is because if a user is making edits of a vandalistic nature, they are likely to have made multiple. Rollback would assist with these issues and prevent long and drawn-out revert wars by vandals. Second, I believe that I meet the qualifications for the role. I possess experience patrolling the recent changes section, and have reverted many vandalous edits. If need be, I can attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the articles on which I have combatted vandalism. Finally, I understand that it looks bad to have had two arguments over vandalism-related subjects in the past. However, I would argue that this is almost the opposite, as having a clean record with no mistakes would mean that I had no mistakes to learn from, and as well I have apologized to all parties involved in both. In summary, I believe that I should possess rollback rights as to better combat vandalism, and if need be there can be elaboration. If not, I completely understand.

Ammending: this was written roughly a month ago. I was told that I would need one month's experience more before I should re-apply. I have since aqquired more than this. I have been the cause for scores of blocks and have better since de-vandalized the Wiki. Following my embarrasing mishap recently reguarding confusion over the tool, I have better researched it and now believe I would be more fit to utilize this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 20:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Of note, possibly: Following my removal of every single known instance of a specific syntax error, I have gone up to 1030 edits. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also every instance of this one. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

This brings it up to 1053. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:22, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

After doing both again today I'm up to 1093. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:25, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) That isn't really relevant to rollback though; admins will check your edits when they review this, and reverts and counter-vandalism is what matters for rollback. HurricaneZeta^C 16:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to say I understand to an extent what does and does not break syntax. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:51, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Also worth ammending is that it would provide access to interceptor, which is a useful tool I believe I could do a great deal of antivandalism with in a way that is more efficient than the typical recent changes page. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also of note: I am now a Pending Changes Reviewer. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 14:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Phlogiston Enthusiast, an admin will review the needed information. I don't see how a lot of these notes are relevant to rollback; pending changes requires some overlapping skills with rollback (such as the ability to effectively determine what is vandalism), but it is an entirely different right for good reason, and does require different skills. Rollback's primary purpose is to assist with recent changes patrolling. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 21:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to put everything on the table here. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 02:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Adding comment so it is clear this is still open and so it doesn't get archived from inactivity. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Not to sound picky, just wanted to make sure two weeks of inactivity and lack of approval/denial wouldn't make this stagnate and die. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 19:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Theeverywhereperson

• Theeverywhereperson (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to renew my rollback rights, because I have been using AntiVandal constructively, and the same other reasons as my most recent request. Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Namely:

1. I am a recent changes patroller and have been patrolling for a few months now,
2. I have made more than 700 edits in mainspace and more than 1700 edits in total,
3. Since I am already a pending changes reviewer, I am also used to reverting vandalism in some areas where it isn't visible to everyone yet, so I think I am trained for the job,
4. This would allow me to use tools like AntiVandal to revert vandalism easier and faster, for the benefit of Wikipedia as a whole.

Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 11:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

User:Absolutiva

• Absolutiva (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I need for rollback rights for massive reverts. So I frequently used Twinkle as a tool for massive reverts by manually, as I reverting five edits from a blocked user as per WP:BRV. Absolutiva 12:45, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Dafootballguy

• Dafootballguy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

My name is dafootballguy and I am a mobile editor. I applied for the permission in mid January and was turned down for not having 1 month of recent changes patrol. I have done more than 1 month and want to reapply so I can use counter-vandalism scripts like interceptor. I had asked an admin but I can't find the request. Thank you for your time. Dafootballguy (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 22:50, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Cadddr

• Cadddr (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been patrolling recent changes for a month. I've been using RedWarn, but I want to try out the tools that require Rollback as well. Cadddr (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:JoBoGamer

• JoBoGamer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Previously had temp rollback till 28th February and I was shown to go fine with it and be responsible. I did have a brief period where i was inactive to do exams however im back and i feel like i can use Rollback in my day to day wikipedia tasks. JoBo Gamer 11:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC) JoBo Gamer 11:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done trial extended for another 2 months. Since you were inactive for most of your trial we don't really have any evidence on which we could grant you it permanently. But, by the same token, nothing has changed since you were granted the trial permissions, so lets go. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:24, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:EditorShane3456

• EditorShane3456 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am currently dealing with a TA (and might encounter many more vandals) so I would like to have this right to easily snap their edits to valhalla. shane (talk to me if you want!) 16:56, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 17:00, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

User:VidanaliK

• VidanaliK (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've started reverting vandalism edits, with a pattern of revert, warning the user, and reporting to AIV if they have a history of vandalism and the warn is severe. Another user notified me on my talk page that I might find rollback useful, and it looks like it would definitely speed up reverting repeat offenders that were never reverted. VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 18:22, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:22, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Sayvhior

• Sayvhior (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’m requesting because i am interested in assisting to fight against vandalism on English Wikipedia as well as other sister projects. Sayvhior^Talk 02:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done No experience with recent changes patrolling. Please re-read the requirements in the header. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:21, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Referentis

• Referentis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn, but I would like to use some of the tools that require the Rollback permission, such as Huggle and Interceptor. Before taking a wikibreak, I was a CVUA student and just had my final exam to complete. You can find my CVUA progress here. It looks like my instructor is no longer active, and the other instructors listed on the CVUA page appear to be on wikibreaks at the moment. Referentis (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2026 (UTC)