User:Komonzia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am a male UK-based Zillennial, and speak two languages fluently. English is one of them. I work in tech.
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. |
I take a casual interest in articles about things like economics, sociology/anthropology/social issues, war, religion, biology/health/medicine - as well as places in Britain and its ex-colonies.
| Free time is valuable to this user, who also respects your time. Expect sporadic edits, concise discussions. |
| This user can program in JavaScript, and code for the web (HTML, CSS). |
| This user has access to the Wikipedia Library. |
| This user sometimes uses AI tools like ChatGPT carefully, including to research & edit Wikipedia articles. |
| This user is asexual. |
| This user often has challenges identifying his own feelings but definitely has them. |
"Someone reverted my changes!"
Sorry that your change didn't stick. If I reverted your change, I likely made clear why on your talk page. For help, you should reply to that message or read up here: Help:Introduction
If you were meaning well with your change, common reasons are:
- Your edit introduced material which isn't sourced or verifiable
- Instead, you could: search online or in a library / journal for a verifiable, reliable source.
- You tweaked material in a way that no longer reflect the source
- Instead, you could: move the tweaked material elsewhere in the same article and provide additional sources.
- Your edit broke something on the page
- Don't worry, just use the "show preview" button.
- Click here for a good starting point if you are brand new to editing.
- The reason is in my edit summary
- Mention me on a talk page if you need clarification. If you think it is a dispute, read WP:DISPUTE. (Do not be afraid to tell me I should also go read WP:DISPUTE, because I might not realise you regard it as such!)
"I still want to make my changes to improve Wikipedia. I'm not sure I understand the guidance. How should I proceed?" → If you keep trying the same thing, you could be blocked from editing (not by me, I can't do that). So, it's best to take a step back and collaborate with others: ask if the source you found meets the standard, if you're unsure, etc. Click the links in this section to start learning how we collaborate.
|
Remember that Wikipedia has other languages too. If you would rather edit in a different language, click here to get started.
Komonzia's history with this place
I have been editing Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikidata, and/or Wikimedia Commons since 2005, on-and-off. Deep edits and new articles are rare for me, and I usually reserve them for Commons.
Editing has been a gateway to learning about various other technical pursuits, learning how to research, as well as teaching me (with some trial and error) about human nature in online communities.
In that way, despite its numerous flaws, Wikipedia is something we can collectively attempt to improve, while in parallel learning and trying to improve individually though these actions. This is why I keep finding myself coming back.
I only use one account at a time. This one was started as a WP:CLEANSTART. My previous account(s) had just over 7000 edits.
Significant contributions
These are all things that cannot be classified as housekeeping, anti-vandalism, copyediting, updates to graphs & maps, etc. - the majority of my edits - but are instead something I see as cooler than that.
- Talk:List of countries by GNI (PPP) per capita/table generator.py - A script to take a specific World Bank dataset and convert it into Wikipedia table syntax, to make future updates much easier.
- Crisis accommodation - article that was converted in good faith from a stub into a bad Wikipedia article (decent essay, though dodgy sourcing) that I'm fixing.
- Ah, I don't have any others yet. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Favourite tools
- Article maintenance:
- Citation hunt - though can easily be a springboard for spending an entire weekend improving one article/topic
- Wikipedia:Backlog and Wikipedia:Task Center - The work never ends
- User:Komonzia/SortSelected.js - a small script to sort whatever is selected, inline, without having to refresh the page or anything. Currently makes a lot of assumptions about the nature of what is selected, so it has some shortcomings that would only be identified through use.
- Review of previous edits:
- Edit history analysis: WikiBlame, XTools Blame
- Anti-vandalism tool: Ultraviolet
- Searching, researching, and verifying:
- Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library - Very useful for most paywalled journal/academic articles and some books
- AI searching tools like Consensus and ChatGPT with searching enabled and telling it what types of sources I want. Also useful as a semantic search tool: for trawling through very lengthy sources where Ctrl+F hasn't sufficed, and providing initial guidance on the extent to which a source supports a claim.
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Easy traffic light indication for perennial sources, and chronicles how/why the general opinion changes for some sources.
- The Refideas template - Sometimes finding sources is easier than writing balanced prose.
- Talk page templates:
- Others I forget now.