Bot-reported

• ~2026-17274-92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:31, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

  Warned user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:39, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

• ~2026-17155-29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1307 (LTA 1307, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-17123-00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
• AHorseCalledOrb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 716 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user tagging or de-tagging article as FA/GA, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
• HifushkjH jhHF (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
• Kxrdish (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1376 three times in the last 60 minutes (Unusual edit count activity, details). Note: This filter has some false positives. Use caution before taking any actions. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:46, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User-reported

• ~2026-17253-70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) vandalism only - continued after a final warning - Arjayay (talk) 12:20, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
• TugSchlug (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning _signed, Kvinnen (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Educational Broadcasting System

• Educational Broadcasting System (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User keeps making unsourced change to article despite multiple asks from different people to add sources for claim. Their edits also often break page code. grapesurgeon (talk) 14:01, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User issued a final warning. Yue🌙 (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Yue🌙 (talk) 07:36, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Bushra Amiwala

• Bushra Amiwala (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EaglesFan37 (talk) 17:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

It's only one TA, I'm more inclined to block them than semiprotect. I gave a 3RR warning. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One

• The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 08:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Mardi Gras Indians

• Mardi Gras Indians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Bastup3 (talk) 09:17, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Declined I don't think we're at the stage of protecting just yet. As a first suggestion, revert all of the recent IP edits and see if anything happens, if POV pushing re-occurs, report on WP:ANI Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:37, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Ian Gow

• Ian Gow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Request indefinite semi-protection. Long-term content dispute involving the Best-known for IP (who is community banned and hence shouldn't be editing on Wikipedia full stop). See the talk page for disputes over trivial details which stretch back at least fifteen years Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:08, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected With the rather low level of disruption we have, this is a case for pending-changes protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Ginny McSwain

• Ginny McSwain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruption by TA hopper. FDW777 (talk) 10:15, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:34, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Ritchie333, it seems you forgot to set the protection to expire. BriDash9000 (talk) 11:40, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

I have done this with length intended :). Lectonar (talk) 12:13, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, must have not registered the mouse clicks properly. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:23, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Religion in Pakistan

• Religion in Pakistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – TA changing the distribution of muslims (shia-sunni). Rolluik (talk) 12:08, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In the infobox, change:

• • 90 naval vessels sunk or damaged^[1][a]

to

• • 90 naval vessels sunk or damaged, see list^[3]

The explanatory note only includes the sinking of IRIS Dena, which was near the totality of naval losses a week ago but the claimed losses have now substantially expanded. This would also bring the treatment of naval losses much more in line with aviation losses.

An alternate (in my opinion uglier) option would be:

• • 90 naval vessels sunk or damaged^[4]

2026 Minab school attack

• 2026 Minab school attack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Change "Minab girls' elementary school" to "Minab elementary school" in beginning of background section

The building was both a boy's and girl's school ohttps://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/03/usa-iran-those-responsible-for-deadly-and-unlawful-us-strike-on-school-that-killed-over-100-children-must-be-held-accountable/n different floors. 66 boys died, 54 girls according to Amnesty International. OverconfidentFox (talk) 00:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war#Casualties by country

• 2026 Iran war#Casualties by country (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

France | Killed 1 | Injured 6 (not "Several") References: 1. https://www.france24.com/fr/info-en-continu/20260313-premier-mort-et-six-blessés-dans-l-armée- française-dans-la-guerre-au-moyen-orient 2. https://information.tv5monde.com/france/premier-mort-et-six-blesses-dans-larmee-francaise-dans-la-guerre-au-moyen-orient-2813408 3. https://www.ladepeche.fr/2026/03/12/guerre-au-moyen-orient-six-soldats-francais-blesses-par-une-attaque-de-drones-en-irak-13269469.php Savukynas (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Remove the (WIA) for the infobox under Mojtaba Khamenei. Although there is much speculation he is dead or wounded, there is no reliable confirmation on this. Mrwho995 (talk) 00:47, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Gaza war

• Gaza war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Change 'The United States has funded 70% of the total costs of the Gaza war since October 2023.' to 'The United States has funded 70% of the total costs of the Gaza war since October 2023. ^{[citation needed]}.'

This is a significant quantitative claim that currently lacks an inline citation (WP:V). Tazekial (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Providing a source for this would be the far better option. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 23:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add Ali Larijani's name back to the list of Iran's commanders and leaders. ~2026-28076-0 (talk) 00:21, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I think it's worthy to mention somewhere in the article that islamic republic and state tv refers to it as "ramadan war".^[1][2]Glaceferoce25 (talk) 04:11, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I noticed in the Iraq section of the page some details of the Kuwaiti Friendly Fire incident and closure of the United States Embassy of Kuwait is still there, please remove that and put it in the appropriate section GeronimokuwaitGamws (talk) 06:38, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

US suffered over 3,200 casualties

• US suffered over 3,200 casualties (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A senior Iranian intelligence official, speaking exclusively to a Press TV correspondent, has revealed detailed estimates of damage inflicted on the American military in the region during the first seven days of the ongoing war.

According to the official, extra-regional sources provided Iran with a comprehensive assessment of American losses – both human and material losses from the Iranian retaliatory military operations since February 28.

The main finding indicates a critical depletion of air defense stockpiles for both the United States and the Israeli regime, a development described as "very serious" by the official.

The intelligence further details substantial casualties, reporting that at least 200 US military personnel were killed, with over 3,000 wounded in the first week itself. ~2026-17227-93 (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Not done – An intelligence official from one of the combatant countries is hardly a reliable source and in any case, a verifiable reference would be required. Favonian (talk) 10:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Umais Bin Sajjad

• Umais Bin Sajjad (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have created over 150 mainspace articles (primarily in the area of Film and TV). While some of my earlier creations were deleted, the majority of my recent articles remain live, and I have refined my sourcing and notability assessment standards over time. I am familiar with WP:N, WP:BLP, WP:V and WP:RS and I ensure that all new articles meet notability and sourcing standards prior to creation. As I continue to create new articles...I believe autopatrolled would help reduce workload for NPP, as my pages generally require minimal follow-up. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not done, unaddressed UPE concerns across older articles like PromptCloud, Jim Jewels or Zigma8. -- Sohom (talk) 03:28, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

That was nearly a decade ago. I acknowledged the issue at the time and faced the consequences, including a multi-year ban after disclosing those edits. Since then, I’ve made a conscious effort to contribute in good faith, including working on and improving notable articles in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines. I’m therefore disappointed that this past issue continues to be treated as a permanent mark against my credibility, despite the constructive contributions I’ve made since returning. Very disappointed with this review. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Replied on talk page. Sohom (talk) 15:58, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:TinaLees-Jones

• TinaLees-Jones (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User has created over 900 live articles, mainly all relating to Asian people and places. None of the articles I've randomly spot checked have any major issues that would prevent them from passing muster in NPP. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike You might be more of a domain-knowledge expert on Chinese topics and be better positioned to evaluate this request (I don't see any obvious problems tbh). Sohom (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Sohom Datta Last time they requested this right I found worrying source-text integrity issues . I'd have to take another look to see if that has improved. I have no concerns about the notability of their creations. Toadspike [Talk] 07:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:AjayDas

• AjayDas (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I mainly create articles related to Assam. Currently, I have around 100 live articles on Wikipedia. Auto-patrol rights would be helpful if you consider. Please let me know if there's any way to improve my contribution if it's rejected. AjayDas (talk) 06:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @AjayDas It looks like you're using AI for creating content. Jogesh Deuri, which is tagged with the AI-generated banner, has either failed verification or mild close paraphrasing. Sentences like

Beyond administration, Deuri has contributed as a researcher, public speaker and advocate for sustainable sericulture. His work emphasises integrating traditional knowledge with scientific approaches to improve productivity and strengthen rural economies.

are the type of AI source extrapolation/synthesis we try to avoid.

Your recent articles Tapan Kumar Saikia and Nuruddin Ahmed (artist) don't really demonstrate notability as much as they doe WP:BLP1E (winning the award) with their current sourcing, and Times of India isn't a reliable source. It's also not promising that you're adding redlinked categories. Please stop using AI to edit Wikipedia. HurricaneZeta^C 17:54, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done per above. Sohom (talk) 21:52, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Moondragon21

• Moondragon21 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Editor has created almost 10,000 articles in mainspace (I was wondering why xtools was taking so long to load), 99.6% of which are live. I've spot checked a dozen or so of their recent articles and all seems to be in order. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 23:53, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Not that this automatically disqualifies Moondragon21 from being granted the permission again, but it should be noted that this permission was revoked a few years ago per the consensus in this discussion. (Non-administrator comment) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done If this was just about articles, I would have granted the right, but and do not inspire the confidence that I need to grant the right. Sohom (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Mdewman6

• Mdewman6 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Editor has created over 450 live articles, mostly list indexes of ships. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 10:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Set index articles are similar to disambiguation pages from an NPP perspective — neither require the type of detailed checks that typically go into "content articles" — and the autopatrolled criteria discount disambiguation pages from its 25-article guideline. The "content articles" Mdewman6 has created (such as Disappearance of Gerry Largay) look well-written and without any obvious issues, but there are large periods of time in between most of them. I'll leave it for an administrator to decide whether that constitutes a satisfactory track record and enough of a workload on NPP for granting the permission. (Non-administrator comment) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, I'd forgotten about that aspect of the criteria but will remember in future. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done, per above. I agree with TS69 I don't see nearly enough engagement with actual article creation and given that set-index are very easy to review, don't see the urgency of giving AP. Sohom (talk) 03:16, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Nubelbariloe

• Nubelbariloe (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I mainly create articles related to Places and Biographies. Currently, I have around 90 live articles on Wikipedia. Auto-patrol rights would be very helpful because i just finished a course on patrolling on wikipedia and this will be an opportunity to practiced what i have learnt Nubelbariloe (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done I don’t think that you know what you are applying for. Either way, looking at your last two articles that you created (two BLPs), it’s clear that you don’t qualify for AP anyway. Schwede66 15:54, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Sadko

• Sadko (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have had rollback rights for many years, have read the policy on vandalism, and am an experienced user. I am requesting the additional right of pending changes reviewer. Thank you. — Sadko (words are wind) 20:21, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:47, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:CabinetCavers

• CabinetCavers (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I am CabinetCavers, and I have done a great deal of anti-vandalism work and am now requesting that I can review pending changes on top of my other work here. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 13:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am a Recent Changes patroller, and well-acquainted with the general copyvio, vandalism, and BLP policies. I believe PCR could be a good, helpful lateral shift for me, to maybe stop myself from falling into a rut. Thank you for your time in advance! Legendbird (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

User:NuggFrog

• NuggFrog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I have quite a bit of time working with the CVU, as well as working a lot with copyvio works. I'd like to help out more in other places, and improve my wiki knowledgebase. NuggFrog (talk) 13:56, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 86 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 14:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:InfernoHues

• InfernoHues (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've responded to a good number of edit requests and (I hope) done a decent job, thus demonstrating that I can be trusted with this right. Thank you for your consideration. InfernoHues (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:VidanaliK

• VidanaliK (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I'm VidanaliK. I've been fighting vandalism for a week or so now, I make edits nearly every day, and I would like to become a pending changes reviewer in order to also add upon my normal article editing and anti-vandalism work with being able to help clear some backlogs here. VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 17:10, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

• Phlogiston Enthusiast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am Phlogiston Enthusiast. I would like a moment of your time to request rollback rights. I believe that I could use rollback permissions to assist in anti-vandalism in the recent changes tab. There are multiple reasons for this. For one, it would streamline reverts on articles that need them, and be a useful tool against vandalism. This is because if a user is making edits of a vandalistic nature, they are likely to have made multiple. Rollback would assist with these issues and prevent long and drawn-out revert wars by vandals. Second, I believe that I meet the qualifications for the role. I possess experience patrolling the recent changes section, and have reverted many vandalous edits. If need be, I can attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the articles on which I have combatted vandalism. Finally, I understand that it looks bad to have had two arguments over vandalism-related subjects in the past. However, I would argue that this is almost the opposite, as having a clean record with no mistakes would mean that I had no mistakes to learn from, and as well I have apologized to all parties involved in both. In summary, I believe that I should possess rollback rights as to better combat vandalism, and if need be there can be elaboration. If not, I completely understand.

Ammending: this was written roughly a month ago. I was told that I would need one month's experience more before I should re-apply. I have since aqquired more than this. I have been the cause for scores of blocks and have better since de-vandalized the Wiki. Following my embarrasing mishap recently reguarding confusion over the tool, I have better researched it and now believe I would be more fit to utilize this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 20:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Of note, possibly: Following my removal of every single known instance of a specific syntax error, I have gone up to 1030 edits. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also every instance of this one. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

This brings it up to 1053. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:22, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

After doing both again today I'm up to 1093. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:25, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) That isn't really relevant to rollback though; admins will check your edits when they review this, and reverts and counter-vandalism is what matters for rollback. HurricaneZeta^C 16:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to say I understand to an extent what does and does not break syntax. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:51, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Also worth ammending is that it would provide access to interceptor, which is a useful tool I believe I could do a great deal of antivandalism with in a way that is more efficient than the typical recent changes page. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also of note: I am now a Pending Changes Reviewer. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 14:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Phlogiston Enthusiast, an admin will review the needed information. I don't see how a lot of these notes are relevant to rollback; pending changes requires some overlapping skills with rollback (such as the ability to effectively determine what is vandalism), but it is an entirely different right for good reason, and does require different skills. Rollback's primary purpose is to assist with recent changes patrolling. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 21:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to put everything on the table here. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 02:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Adding comment so it is clear this is still open and so it doesn't get archived from inactivity. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Not to sound picky, just wanted to make sure two weeks of inactivity and lack of approval/denial wouldn't make this stagnate and die. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 19:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding another comment, since it has now been 22 without this being responded too and I don't want this to get archived. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Theeverywhereperson

• Theeverywhereperson (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to renew my rollback rights, because I have been using AntiVandal constructively, and the same other reasons as my most recent request. Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Namely:

1. I am a recent changes patroller and have been patrolling for a few months now,
2. I have made more than 700 edits in mainspace and more than 1700 edits in total,
3. Since I am already a pending changes reviewer, I am also used to reverting vandalism in some areas where it isn't visible to everyone yet, so I think I am trained for the job,
4. This would allow me to use tools like AntiVandal to revert vandalism easier and faster, for the benefit of Wikipedia as a whole.

Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 11:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

User:EditorShane3456

• EditorShane3456 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am currently dealing with a TA (and might encounter many more vandals) so I would like to have this right to easily snap their edits to valhalla. shane (talk to me if you want!) 16:56, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 17:00, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done I can see no changes to your editing patterns since the last decline. CoconutOctopus talk 23:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Referentis

• Referentis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn, but I would like to use some of the tools that require the Rollback permission, such as Huggle and Interceptor. Before taking a wikibreak, I was a CVUA student and just had my final exam to complete. You can find my CVUA progress here. It looks like my instructor is no longer active, and the other instructors listed on the CVUA page appear to be on wikibreaks at the moment. Referentis (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Fcom1212

• Fcom1212 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi. I want to request rollback rights because I'm relying on checking articles to make sure that there's no vandalism. I use both RedWarn and Twinkle, and I already used Twinkle for most of the pages I reverted and notified several users. It would be useful for reverting large vandalism using this tool, in addition to reverting pages using Twinkle. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 10:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am already doing antivandal/recent change patrol work, and am alredy familiar with Twinkle, but wish for rollbacker permissions to be able to use more powerful tools, such as AntiVandal. Thank you for your consideration in advance! Legendbird (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

User:OzmoOzmo

• OzmoOzmo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Recently I have been facing disruptive editors who have been making edits extremely quickly. For example, HermeneuticMind, who was adding LLM-generated content to articles en masse, and Goldfishgonnabedeadsoon.

With rollback, I will be able to revert these unconstructive editors much faster than pressing the [vandalism] button with Twinkle for every one of their edits, which is inconvenient, inefficient and slow. -- ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contributions) 11:38, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:CharlesEditor23

• CharlesEditor23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am once again requesting the template editor right. I have met the guidelines for granting, especially number 4, which is that I have had no behavioral blocks or WP:3RR violations for a minimum of six (6) months or more. The main reason why I am requesting the template editor right again is so that I may be able to make productive, meaningful contributions to protected templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data that are in line with established WP:CONSENSUS with many other editors. I believe that if granted the template editor right again, I can demonstrate that I will avoid the first criteria for revocation, which is performing obviously controversial edits without first determining WP:CONSENSUS. I will also demonstrate that I will only use wise & prudent template editing and test my changes in the sandboxes first. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

See and for previous requests — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm a bit torn. On the one hand, they have had all but one module edit request accepted (and the other partly done) since their last request in September. On the other hand, I am concerned about these edits; they were rightly made in the sandbox, but only because the /data module is template-protected. This is the same sort of thing that was happening as far back as 2021 and led to their rights being revoked. I also found this which is not the right way to make a dummy edit.

Now, have I done similar things in the past? Sure, I'm pretty sure there are a few from this year even. We shouldn't be expecting perfection out of a TPE, because that is just unrealistic. However, mistakes should be few and far between for a TPE or admin, and not happening often enough to get repeated warnings going back five years. Primefac (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Santiago Claudio

• Santiago Claudio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been editing modules and templates, and their sandboxes in my 10+ years here on WP. I'm confident that I've already met all six guidelines for editor rights, especially after having successful edit requests to the following, like the college template, the U.S. House of Representatives abbreviation, the comedian infobox, and sports results and table modules, all protected. I promise to be careful with my additive or subtractive edits by previewing them beforehand if I attain this permission. Santiago Claudio (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2026 (UTC)