User:Leutha/Archive 9 (Oct 2016)

Hi, Trying to get back into contributing to the wikipedia.

I'd like to add an article about Richie Riley, a Jamaican born dancer and community activist. He has a broadsheet obit but next to nothing published about him over a few brief lines. However, he has oral history interviews at Black Cultural Archives and the British Library. Unfortunately both have fairly brief catalogue descriptions. Is it possible to use the oral history interviews as references?

This page gives some guidance but I'm still not sure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Cultural_Professionals#As_References

Thanks for your help Eartha78 (talk) 17:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Eartha78

Hi, the place to check is Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources. According to the policy it is Ok to use primary sources provide you are careful about infroducing any interpretation that could be original research. Leutha (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Cheers! Eartha78 (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Eartha78

Hi. It was a real pleasure meeting you at the science conference. I'm sorry we didn't get to spend more time together. (I'm the Australian guy.) You mentioned you might point me to your paper on Neurath. I'd like to read it, if you'd still like to share it. Your summary when we first met, and a comment you made after one of the presentations, have piqued my interest. (Don't expect anything like informed criticism from me, though. I know next to nothing about 20th century philosophy.) --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 10:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Thank you, Tony, it was great to meet you. The paper will be ready in two weeks,it's my MSc dissertation. After that I will be sharing it. In fact it looks at Neurath in a broader context than philosophy, I kind of feel he got involved in philosophy because that was what was required for his conception of broader democratic access to knowledge, so don't worry about it being over philosophical. I am also doing work ready for when Neurath goes out of copyright in January,. Leutha (talk) 10:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Cool. I look forward to it. (There's a nice photo of you and Jacob talking in the lunch room on Commons.) --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 02:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, you are welcome to discuss page deletions and undeletions on my talk page. It is not an exclusive conversation, and anyone who is interested is welcome to comment. But I am inviting you because you have shown an interest in this subject in the past. The exact link location is User_talk:Guy_vandegrift#Thoughts_on_page_.22rescuing.22 --Guy vandegrift (talk) 00:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Leutha! Hope you're OK. Two of our recent Wikipedia-and-food participants have asked me a question which amounts to "What does it mean when I get an email to say that my sandbox was patrolled? Is it threatening?" I didn't know -- I have been a Wikipedian since 2005 without ever knowing of this feature -- but by searching I found the MediaWiki page about patrolling, so now I think I understand what it is. We even have it on the Latin Vicipaedia. You live and learn. But, after having read the MediaWiki page, I still can't see why anyone would patrol a sandbox page (resulting in a disturbing email to the sandbox user). Can you perhaps understand it? Do you think it was, in essence, a mistake? Or does it happen to nearly everybody? I have user subpages too, but I never got an email about any of them ... Andrew Dalby 18:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

I agree it does sound a bit menacing. Basically when people are still quite new, the pages get patrolled for vandalism. Most vandalism comes from new accounts, as the old accounts get blocked quite quickly. You haven't experienced this, I guess, because you already had plenty of edits when it was introduced a while ago. Even user subpages can be problematic if they are attack pages, so I suppose that's why they get patrolled as well.Leutha (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Of course, there can be attack pages lurking in userspace -- never thought of that angle. I'll pass the explanation on. Andrew Dalby 08:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Catmando999. Leutha, thanks for creating Dieter Langewiesche!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I suggest that you reference sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 09:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I have read your message on my talk page. I have removed the tag saying it was an advertisement. Catmando999 Check out his talk page! 09:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

It's not an article, so why to write something?Xx236 (talk) 06:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Time is a great healer. Leutha (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Leutha,

I just wanted to inform you that I have moved your article from the mainspace to the Draft namespace from Sergei_Senkin to Draft:Sergei_Senkin. If you're wondering why I moved your article, please read WP:Verifiability or leave a note on my talk page, and I would be happy to address any questions, comments, or concerns you would have. Happy editing! --JustBerry (talk) 22:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

I was a bit miffed last night, but I'm over it now. I understand where the editor was coming from, but I feel that they were forcing their own ideas of how Wikipedia should run rather than considering that other editors work in different ways. A 24 hour wait before enforcing moved etc, is not too much to ask and it doesn't damage the encyclopedia. I hope your experience wasn't too damaging, but sometimes you just need to put things down to experience and move on. Happy editing FruitMonkey (talk) 22:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

It also looks like other editor took up our baton and s/he has decided to no longer move to draft, so that's a result. Thanks for the update to the Plebs' League article too. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

	Social
	Hi Leutha, I am based in East London and look forward to meeting you at the meet-up in Canary Wharf on November 23rd! I am new to Wikipedia and so look forward to tips on what can be done and how? kind regards Armond Dean (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Leutha,

Of course, I mean the meeting at Canary Wharf on Tuesday 24th November.

How will the Wikipedias recognise each other? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armond Dean (talk • contribs) 15:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Condemned Hole page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi - I actually think we can create a better version of the University extension ourselves. I have enrolled you in a mock course at v:Wright_State_University_Lake_Campus/Mock_Course_1010. If you sort by name, you will see that the number 1 instructor is me. If you want, I can make you number 2 instructor. --Guy vandegrift (talk) 02:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

oh the link on your 'versity talk comes here! check it out what do u think!? wikiversity:Outer Spaceways Incorporated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dx (talk • contribs) 16:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

I strayed over to Semi-detached- culled a bit and started to look for references. That was easy- but how do I play it http://www.pia-journal.co.uk/articles/10.5334/pia.404/ has everything and the whole text is tagged as CC BY 3.0. It is almost the article we need. It is fully referenced to our standards. I have never come across that before. Does that allow me to cut and paste- how do I credit it- how do I fight off the plagiarism bots. Have you any advice on this?

Prefabs in the United Kingdom is nearly there, Public housing in the United Kingdom is a little cleaner and Council house is still barely started. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at London Action Resource Centre. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mujinga (talk) 19:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Savvyjack23 (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Savvyjack23 (talk) 07:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

This is confirmed for the 13th. They are promoting it in the next few days and say they already have a lot of interest. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC) Thanks for that. I can confirm I shall be there as well! Leutha (talk) 13:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. This is just to let you know that the next wikimeets in North-West England will take place in:

• Manchester on 23rd January 2016
• Liverpool on 27th February 2016

Please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page if you can make them! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Neonchameleon/Drafts/NotabilityForBeginners Thoughts? Neonchameleon (talk) 00:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I have created a page on the Wikimedia UK wiki where we can develop this event: wmuk:Projects in incubation/Refugee Council Archive. I think I have left a message for everyone who was involved in the discussion about this, but please do check! Thryduulf (talk) 01:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

More information Invitation ...

Invitation
	Black Women's History online edit-a-thon 1 to 15 February 2016 Hosted by Women in Red Sponsored by AfroCrowd Supporting Black WikiHistory Month

Close

--Ipigott (talk) 10:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Leutha. It was good to meet you at the recent London meetup and thanks for bringing the banner - which I'll put to good use next week. You mentioned some possible contacts with connections to Hitchin (the college, a makers club(?), and a Wiki UK person?). If you get a chance to give them a reminder about the Hitchin meetup that would be good. I've also emailed Hitchin Camera Club on the off chance that some of their members might be interested. Hope to see you in the near future at Hitchin or London. Cheers Robevans123 (talk) 15:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Leutha Thank you so much for your comment! Disheartening doesn't cover it, but your message has given me new hope! Every time I think I've cracked it and it normally comes back with unhelpful feedback about "tone of voice" or referencing. Your comment about circular referencing makes sense, I wish I'd picked up on that sooner and will look at finding external references when I next get chance. Thank you! katefaxen Katefaxen (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC) ^[1]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Worsley Old Hall page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 22:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the session. It was a great experience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meenakshiy (talk • contribs) 07:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I got into research on her by chance (Alfred Gurney, a lesser figure in fact, and he came via the Oxford Book of English Mystical Verse). I'm now not understanding why there hasn't been an academic biography of her.

The latest addition I found to make (there can be more) is the one about Octavia Hill and her 1898 speech: five people mentioned, only one being in the Victorian mainstream (William Shaen was a radical lawyer (in the ODNB), and Sydney John Cockerell was the father of Sydney Cockerell the well-known curator). Charles Matthews (talk) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi - I think I've found the right link! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colinetto (talk • contribs) 11:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Apodicticity page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

I made the African-American liberalism article out of your suggestion. Thank you. Informant16 26 March 2016

Hi Leutha, I was hoping you might be able to help me on an article. -- Marek.69 ^talk 23:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Leutha, I wondered if you had some time to help with History of South America, which I'm currently working on. -- Marek.69 ^talk 18:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

On 1 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Althea McNish, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Althea McNish is not American, but she is descended from a Merikin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Althea McNish. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

In your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedism you mentioned "Hayek's critique of encyclopedism". Could you point me to what you mean? Is it specifically a critique of Neurath's encyclopedia and/or, say, logical positivism, or about encyclopedias generally? This is for my own interest. Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

I may have found it. In Individualism and Economic Order there's this:

This second and altogether different strand of thought, also known as individualism, is represented mainly by French and other Continental writers-a fact due, I believe, to the dominant role which Cartesian rationalism plays in its composition. The outstanding representatives of this tradition are the Encyclopedists, Rousseau, and the physiocrats; and, for reasons we shall presently consider, this rationalistic individualism always tends to develop into the opposite of individualism, namely, socialism or collectivism. It is because only the first kind of individualism is consistent that I claim for it the name of true individualism, while the second kind must probably be regarded as a source of modern socialism as important as the properly collectivist theories.

So Diderot and company and their individualism-cum-socialism that's expressed through the Encyclopedie rather than encyclopedism or encyclopedists (lowercase e) in general? (The string "encycl" doesn't look to appear again in Individualism..). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Actually I was also thinking of Hayek's The Counter-Revolution of Science, the second part "The Counter-Revolution of Science". The focus is on Saint Simon, but he does touch on Neurath. Leutha (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Lucille Spann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RES2773 (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

There is not much to report on the musician, and there is already some information on the Otis Spann page. I respectfully believe it should not remain a standalone article. Thank you! RES2773 (talk) 23:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I disagree. She did not just exist in the shadow of her husband.Leutha (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Help and reception requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Shaking hands! ˜˜˜˜kavmeister — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavmeister (talk • contribs) 10:38, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

The article Charles Wenzel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Ruhr Industrial Heritage Trail, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 19:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Module talk:Sandbox/RexxS/WdRefs Leutha (talk) 15:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

@Leutha: Stinglehammer and TheTrabiMechanic want to set up Wikipedia courses in the coming academic term but do not have the relevant rights to create a course page via the extension. This page tells me that only admins can grant such rights, and I'm wondering whether you can help. All the best, --Flycatchr 17:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

I no longer have co-ordinator privileges, which is what is needed. Please see this: Wikipedia:Education noticeboard.Leutha (talk) 17:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

So nice to meet you yesterday at the London meetup, thank you for the friendly welcome! Zeromonk (talk) 08:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Leutha. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tiger Jack Payne, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Tiger Jack Payne to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 14:37, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

• I've got this covered. A biography of Barbara Stanwyck indicates that Tiger Jack went on to be a leading man – John Payne (actor). Andrew D. (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks! I'm learning a bit more about the Marryats on the way. I rather like Fred's naval novels, do you? I have six altogether, but you have to be lucky or they turn out rather expensive. Best wishes, Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

I must admit I am not familiar with Fred's novels. I was drawn to this because of Joseph senior's involvement in anti-abolitionism. Joseph junior and his brother Charles both owned substantial number of slaves, but it looks like Fred kept clear of any involvement! Leutha (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

My only criticisms as Joe stands at present are 1) it's more usual to keep bibliographic details in the references, just the title in the text, and 2) if subtitled sections are only a line or two, the page begins to look a bit like a club sandwich! Anyway, look forward to seeing more, he sounds an interesting guy, starting banks and stuff. Amazing how important East Anglia was to the English economy even in the 18th century. They all seemed to come from there. Bmcln1 (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Just love those Joseph Marryat titles you've just added. However, the information about the first is now in twice. Bmcln1 (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, did you get my previous emails? The editathon at 198 is going ahead this Saturday - would be great to see you if you're free. Drop me a line. Eartha78 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add your source.Xx236 (talk) 06:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Council of Workers' and Soldiers' Delegates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Specto73 (talk) 11:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I've revamped the contest page into this, based on the new British model. Long term goal, but I've added entries since the beginning of July to give it some initial life. Please add anything you've done then this then too! I hope it proves productive long term. The contests are still planned, but will be more tools towards increasing bulk output in overall goal. It's a permanent goal now, and open! I would be grateful if you could keep a record of all your articles you do there, as I really think seeing the combined efforts will encourage others to create more content too! Please spread the word to the others, cheers!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Organic centralism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organic centralism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Pariah24 ┃ ☏ 22:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Please finish.Xx236 (talk) 09:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Clem - I finally got around to doing some more work on the Rachel Gadsden page. I've more to input but have run out of time today. Any tips? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Gadsden Hope you're well Colin (from disability arts online) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colinetto (talk • contribs) 14:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

The article EuroMayDay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:N and has zero references (WP:V). Based on some research, it looks like a defunct holiday that was never really notable in distinction from May day. I can't find any evidence that this has been celebrated since 2014.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlexEng^(TALK) 03:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)