Bot-reported

• ~2026-87012-8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:31, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-19068-32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:49, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
• Lalei20282 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

• ~2026-18798-70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 three times in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:04, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
• Paralela45tmp (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-19118-46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1351 (LTA 1351, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
• Lunarz10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

User-reported

• ~2026-19087-83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. Weird AI-generated spam, see edit filter log. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 11:52, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. ~Lofty abyss 11:55, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

  @Gurkubondinn I'd have happily blocked this one if they were actually promoting something but it looks like just ordinary slop rather than spam slop. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:45, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

  Yeah, I really wasn't sure what to make of this one. It's some kind of spam, I think? Hasn't tried editing anything else since so it is not a problem at least. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:08, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

  @Gurkubondinn if you see the same text again or the same editor does something else weird, feel free to let me know. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:16, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

  HJ Mitchell, this is a different user, and a different text but an adjacent article (likely not related to the TA):

  • Abiluvsdinos (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  • Example log entry: AbuseLog/43772192

  --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

• ~2026-99662-1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Keeps vandalizing, even after the block. Removed content on articles for no reason after being unblocked. Obviously is not here to build on the Encyclopedia. Robloxguest3 (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Norwich University

• Norwich University (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple registered accounts are vandalizing the article. Matt Deres (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:15, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Africa Cup of Nations

• Africa Cup of Nations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 12:15, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Azadi Tower

• Azadi Tower (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of Vandalism as the page keeps getting renamed and moved to it's former name Shahyad Tower by some editors. AhmadKermani1979 (talk) 13:23, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see only 1 such move done in recent history. – robertsky (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Abhira dynasty

• Abhira dynasty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Continued disruption by non-ECP editors. This subject covers Indian military history, such articles are required to be under ECP protection as per ArbCom ruling.. THEZDRX _{(User) | (Contact)} 13:58, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. more of IPA rather than IMH. – robertsky (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Akasa Air

• Akasa Air (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. underlying IP address(es) blocked for 31 hours. – robertsky (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Ahvaz

• Ahvaz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection: Ongoing disruptive editing by multiple anonymous users. Recently, several IP editors have repeatedly attempted to attribute legitimate updates to propaganda or baseless claims, leading to the removal or reversion of valid content and images. These actions have required frequent reverts, and the disruption is persistent and ongoing. Semi-protection is requested to prevent further disruption while allowing constructive contributions from established users. PayamAvarwand (talk) 15:09, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

@PayamAvarwand the photos are unnecessary though. – robertsky (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Spore (2008 video game)

• Spore (2008 video game) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I have a feeling that the LTA will never go away. See the recent edit filter logs. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 15:33, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Petaling Jaya City FC

• Petaling Jaya City FC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. tony 15:55, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Maria Hadden

• Maria Hadden (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Pending changes: Disruption in a CTOP (AP) BLP, apparently canvassed according to an edit summary a few days back. tony 16:21, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Mike White (filmmaker)

• Mike White (filmmaker) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High levels of vandalism from different IPs and sockpuppetry JoyfullySmile (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Cirie Fields

• Cirie Fields (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High levels of vandalism from different IPs and sockpuppetry JoyfullySmile (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Portal:Current events/2026 February 28

• Portal:Current events/2026 February 28 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

One person is killed and seven others are wounded in an Iranian airstrike on Zayed International Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, while four are injured in a similar airstrike on Dubai International Airport.

Regards! ~2026-13920-03 (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Protests against the 2026 Iran war

• Protests against the 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add Canada to the list. Examples of sources: (, , , ) ~2026-18942-55 (talk) 03:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add Lebanon to the belligerents list as they were attacked by a missile from Iran Source: https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603254211 alphabyte (talk / contributions) 13:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

2026 Iran war

• 2026 Iran war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Remove "Turkish soldier and civilian deaths". Because it's not related to the war. It's just a helicopter crash. ~2026-19080-40 (talk) 13:56, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Not done. The phrase does not appear in the article. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Third Gulf War

• Third Gulf War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Change the title "2026 Iran War" into "Third Gulf War" ~2026-19149-32 (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Not done Requested moves are out of scope at this venue as stated in the header of this subpage, and would require a discussion you cannot participate in. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 14:52, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

User:TinaLees-Jones

• TinaLees-Jones (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User has created over 900 live articles, mainly all relating to Asian people and places. None of the articles I've randomly spot checked have any major issues that would prevent them from passing muster in NPP. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike You might be more of a domain-knowledge expert on Chinese topics and be better positioned to evaluate this request (I don't see any obvious problems tbh). Sohom (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Sohom Datta Last time they requested this right I found worrying source-text integrity issues . I'd have to take another look to see if that has improved. I have no concerns about the notability of their creations. Toadspike [Talk] 07:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Veggiegalaxy

• Veggiegalaxy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I'm hoping to be considered for autopatrolled. I've created 77 live mainspace articles spanning biographies, film, NYC landmarks,and internet culture. My articles are well sourced and I consistently adhere to WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, etc. I'm also responsive - if one of my articles needs something, I'm responsive! I try to take care to go through the AfC process if I'm uncertain about notablility or something about my article.

I've also been getting more involved in other areas of Wikipedia — I review AfC submissions and participate in AfD discussions, both of which have made me a more careful article creator.

My one mainspace deletion was a lesson well learned — it taught me a lot about WP:NOTNEWS and has shaped how I evaluate topics going forward. I'd love to help reduce the review backlog! Veggiegalaxy (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Lanceloth345

• Lanceloth345 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

As long as i have been actively contributing to Wikipedia, particularly on biographical, artistic and geographical articles mostly about Albania, i would be honored to be considered for autopatrolled status, to continue contributing further to various projects. Thank you in advance. Lanceloth345 (talk) 12:21, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Note this previous request in July 2025. (Non-administrator comment) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:39, 24 March 2026 (UTC) (Edited. —TS)

User:RabidTuberculosis

• RabidTuberculosis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello friends! I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia by creating articles related to aerospace engineering, spaceflight missions, and the biographies of notable scientists and engineers. I've created more than 80 articles and gained an intimate understanding of WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS in the process. My guiding principles are humility, curiosity, and empathy, and I try to respond to feedback quickly and optimistically. I look forward to contributing much more and would be honored to spare patrollers and reviewers additional work. Please feel free to ask any questions about my expertise, areas of interest, or past work! RabidTuberculosis (talk) 23:24, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done

• There is some close paraphrasing/copyvio in Eugene Tu (see copyvio report). Also, why is Tu notable? Please remove the copyright violation and then request revdel.
• Why did you think J. Michael McCarthy was notable? Can you explain where you found his alleged date of birth?
• The citations in Bernardino Ciaffoni do not refer to particular pages in the sources.

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:41, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Voorts, just checking that a lack of page number did not contribute to the decline here, and it was just a recommendation? For shorter sources, this is not even needed at FAC. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:24, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

A recommendation. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:29, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

@Voorts Thank you for your review! I always appreciate the opportunity to improve.

• Tu meets WP:ANYBIO notability; he is the recipient of one of NASA's most prestigious awards and has been the director of a major NASA center for a decade. The copyvio report does not report a violation, if I understand it correctly, but I've nonetheless rephrased a few sentences to avoid similarity.
• McCarthy meets WP:NACADEMIC 5 as a distinguished professor at a major public university, as well as 1 and 3 as a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics who has published widely cited books and papers on kinematics. If I recall, his age was reported in a news source, so the birth date is approximated. I will dig up the source, or else remove the year.
• Good eye! I've added the page numbers for three books missing them; the other eight are fully cited.

Happy to answer other questions or consider other points for revision. Thanks again, RabidTuberculosis (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

The copyright report shows exact text copied from the webpage to the article. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:22, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

The report highlights common terms, almost all of which are proper nouns regarding NASA-specific information. RabidTuberculosis (talk) 01:04, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Original source vs. Permalink

−

In 2002, he was selected into the Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Program (SESCDP) and served in the Office of Biological and Physical Research at NASA Headquarters in 2003, and as the acting director for the Information Sciences and Technology Directorate at NASA Ames in 2004. After receiving his SES certification in 2005, he was selected as the Director of Exploration Technology at Ames.

+

In 2002, he was selected into the Senior Executive Service (SES) candidate development program. He served in the Office of Biological and Physical Research at NASA Headquarters in 2003 and was the acting director for information sciences and technology at Ames in 2004. After receiving his SES certification in 2005, he was appointed the director of exploration technology at Ames in November of that year.

voorts (talk/contributions) 01:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Regarding McCarthy, the version that got draftified was also lacking a bunch of citations: Special:Diff/1342493758/1345215747. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

User:SaTnamZIN

• SaTnamZIN (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am active in AFD, CSD, and PROD. Though I joined Wikipedia in 2022, I spent 3 years studying Wikipedia policies. In that period, I have studied and watched the AfD, ANI and RS related discussions that complies to the policies. Whichever articles I have created or edited, I have edited per the book.I am a regular editor of Wikipedia. But my fate is on the role giving Admin. Kindly have a visit and check my activities. I am in good faith that whatever I am doing is per Wikipedia policies. SatnaamIN (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Biplab Anand

• Biplab Anand (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Created lots of articles, new creations do not appear to require patrolling.

(Technical note: Biplab Anand is a m:Global rollbacker, so technically already autopatrolled. Per past consensus I have been manually marking their articles as unreviewed and am requesting here to stop having to do that. I also know I could technically grant the right myself, but I think it's best someone coming at this from a neutral perspective reviews. Ignore all of this and evaluate Biplab Anand exactly as you would any other autopatrolled candidate) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:07, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Rekhamoni Duari

• Rekhamoni Duari (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting file mover rights Rekhamoni Duari (talk) 07:03, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) It is extremely unlikely you will be given this right. You need a reason for requesting. Toast1454_TC 12:09, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Reason for declining file move rights voorts (talk/contributions) 14:23, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Panda Arun

• Panda Arun (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I request file mover rights. I have experience with file work and understand naming rules. I will use the tool carefully. Thank you. Panda 🐼 Arun (Talk) 14:44, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done I looked through your recent file namespace contributions and didn't see even a single {{rename media}} request. Please spend some time using that template first to prove you understand how file renaming works, and only then request this permission. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Absolutiva

• Absolutiva (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I should grant my page mover rights over a year and 14,942 edits, so I made requested moves, I understand this guide, it's for my third time. Absolutiva 23:04, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Chat-qui-Aboie

• Chat-qui-Aboie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been contributing to Wikipedia for a good amount of time now, and have made a relatively sizable amount of edits for what is common within that time period. I would like to expand the ways in which I can contribute to the English Wikis, and helping review the backlog of pending changes is one way to get that ball rolling. Chat-qui-Aboie (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Amateur History Luke 24

• Amateur History Luke 24 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have a reasonable editing history, and am committed to keeping content on Wikipedia as accurate and reference-based as I can. Amateur History Luke 24 (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: this user has been edit warring to restore WP:AISIGNS in mainspace. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:40, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

• Phlogiston Enthusiast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am Phlogiston Enthusiast. I would like a moment of your time to request rollback rights. I believe that I could use rollback permissions to assist in anti-vandalism in the recent changes tab. There are multiple reasons for this. For one, it would streamline reverts on articles that need them, and be a useful tool against vandalism. This is because if a user is making edits of a vandalistic nature, they are likely to have made multiple. Rollback would assist with these issues and prevent long and drawn-out revert wars by vandals. Second, I believe that I meet the qualifications for the role. I possess experience patrolling the recent changes section, and have reverted many vandalous edits. If need be, I can attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the articles on which I have combatted vandalism. Finally, I understand that it looks bad to have had two arguments over vandalism-related subjects in the past. However, I would argue that this is almost the opposite, as having a clean record with no mistakes would mean that I had no mistakes to learn from, and as well I have apologized to all parties involved in both. In summary, I believe that I should possess rollback rights as to better combat vandalism, and if need be there can be elaboration. If not, I completely understand.

Ammending: this was written roughly a month ago. I was told that I would need one month's experience more before I should re-apply. I have since aqquired more than this. I have been the cause for scores of blocks and have better since de-vandalized the Wiki. Following my embarrasing mishap recently reguarding confusion over the tool, I have better researched it and now believe I would be more fit to utilize this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 20:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Of note, possibly: Following my removal of every single known instance of a specific syntax error, I have gone up to 1030 edits. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also every instance of this one. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

This brings it up to 1053. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:22, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

After doing both again today I'm up to 1093. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:25, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) That isn't really relevant to rollback though; admins will check your edits when they review this, and reverts and counter-vandalism is what matters for rollback. HurricaneZeta^C 16:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to say I understand to an extent what does and does not break syntax. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:51, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Also worth ammending is that it would provide access to interceptor, which is a useful tool I believe I could do a great deal of antivandalism with in a way that is more efficient than the typical recent changes page. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also of note: I am now a Pending Changes Reviewer. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 14:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Phlogiston Enthusiast, an admin will review the needed information. I don't see how a lot of these notes are relevant to rollback; pending changes requires some overlapping skills with rollback (such as the ability to effectively determine what is vandalism), but it is an entirely different right for good reason, and does require different skills. Rollback's primary purpose is to assist with recent changes patrolling. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 21:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to put everything on the table here. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 02:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Adding comment so it is clear this is still open and so it doesn't get archived from inactivity. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Not to sound picky, just wanted to make sure two weeks of inactivity and lack of approval/denial wouldn't make this stagnate and die. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 19:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding another comment, since it has now been 22 without this being responded too and I don't want this to get archived. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

It has been twenty-seven days and there has been no administrator response, or even so much as a comment. In the most respectful way possible, I would like to know why, as other people have recieved responses in that time. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 13:12, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Not an admin, but happy to answer this. There is no specific set amount of time from requesting a permission to being granted it. Administrators review these boards in their own time and at their own discretion. There is nothing personal, don't worry. An administrator will respond eventually! 11WB (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Theeverywhereperson

• Theeverywhereperson (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to renew my rollback rights, because I have been using AntiVandal constructively, and the same other reasons as my most recent request. Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Namely:

1. I am a recent changes patroller and have been patrolling for a few months now,
2. I have made more than 700 edits in mainspace and more than 1700 edits in total,
3. Since I am already a pending changes reviewer, I am also used to reverting vandalism in some areas where it isn't visible to everyone yet, so I think I am trained for the job,
4. This would allow me to use tools like AntiVandal to revert vandalism easier and faster, for the benefit of Wikipedia as a whole.

Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 11:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am already doing antivandal/recent change patrol work, and am alredy familiar with Twinkle, but wish for rollbacker permissions to be able to use more powerful tools, such as AntiVandal. Thank you for your consideration in advance! Legendbird (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

This editor only has 148 non-automated mainspace edits, --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:OzmoOzmo

• OzmoOzmo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Recently I have been facing disruptive editors who have been making edits extremely quickly. For example, HermeneuticMind, who was adding LLM-generated content to articles en masse, and Goldfishgonnabedeadsoon.

With rollback, I will be able to revert these unconstructive editors much faster than pressing the [vandalism] button with Twinkle for every one of their edits, which is inconvenient, inefficient and slow. -- ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contributions) 11:38, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

And will also be able to use more powerful tools such as WP:HG and WP:ANVDL. Thank you, ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contribs) 06:19, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm a little concerned by the recent use of Ultraviolet to do a BLP revert on an article on someone who has been dead since 1984. Access to instant rollback needs to come with a pattern of not just automatically reverting without carefully checking the context. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:AriuCH

• AriuCH (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’d like to request rollback rights. I’ve been reverting clear vandalism and unsourced edits on several pages, using concise edit summaries and staying out of any edit warring. I understand the purpose of rollback and would use it only for obvious vandalism and disruptive edits. AriuCH (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 194 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 01:30, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Insufficient Recent Changes patrol experience. Please spend a few weeks to a month patrolling RC using tools that don't require rollback to prove you understand how it works. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:41, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

User:NuggFrog

• NuggFrog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I am requesting rollback rights today so that I can be more effective in my work within the CVU. My two primary areas I work in are counter vandalism and copyvio, and my job in both departments would be a lot easier if I had rollback permissions. I am very interested in trying tools such as Interceptor, AntiVandal, and Wikishield so that I can be the most efficient counter vandalism volunteer as I can. Thanks in advance :) 「NuggFrog」 (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Kadermonkey

• Kadermonkey (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Rollback permissions would be incredibly useful for what i do, which is mostly patrolling recent changes. I have a history of making good edits and while redwarn rollback is useful, actual rollback rights would be much more useful since i could actually use proper tools. Kadermonkey (She/Her) (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

User:CharlesEditor23

• CharlesEditor23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am once again requesting the template editor right. I have met the guidelines for granting, especially number 4, which is that I have had no behavioral blocks or WP:3RR violations for a minimum of six (6) months or more. The main reason why I am requesting the template editor right again is so that I may be able to make productive, meaningful contributions to protected templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data that are in line with established WP:CONSENSUS with many other editors. I believe that if granted the template editor right again, I can demonstrate that I will avoid the first criteria for revocation, which is performing obviously controversial edits without first determining WP:CONSENSUS. I will also demonstrate that I will only use wise & prudent template editing and test my changes in the sandboxes first. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

See and for previous requests — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm a bit torn. On the one hand, they have had all but one module edit request accepted (and the other partly done) since their last request in September. On the other hand, I am concerned about these edits; they were rightly made in the sandbox, but only because the /data module is template-protected. This is the same sort of thing that was happening as far back as 2021 and led to their rights being revoked. I also found this which is not the right way to make a dummy edit.

Now, have I done similar things in the past? Sure, I'm pretty sure there are a few from this year even. We shouldn't be expecting perfection out of a TPE, because that is just unrealistic. However, mistakes should be few and far between for a TPE or admin, and not happening often enough to get repeated warnings going back five years. Primefac (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

OK, so no, I guess I can never get approved again to get the WP:TPE right? What should I do or say to better my chances of being approved? CharlesEditor23 (talk) 07:10, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I never said that; I am considering some things, primarily another short-term trial, but am waiting on other admins to comment. Primefac (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)