User:TinaLees-Jones

• TinaLees-Jones (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User has created over 900 live articles, mainly all relating to Asian people and places. None of the articles I've randomly spot checked have any major issues that would prevent them from passing muster in NPP. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike You might be more of a domain-knowledge expert on Chinese topics and be better positioned to evaluate this request (I don't see any obvious problems tbh). Sohom (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Sohom Datta Last time they requested this right I found worrying source-text integrity issues . I'd have to take another look to see if that has improved. I have no concerns about the notability of their creations. Toadspike [Talk] 07:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Veggiegalaxy

• Veggiegalaxy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I'm hoping to be considered for autopatrolled. I've created 77 live mainspace articles spanning biographies, film, NYC landmarks,and internet culture. My articles are well sourced and I consistently adhere to WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, etc. I'm also responsive - if one of my articles needs something, I'm responsive! I try to take care to go through the AfC process if I'm uncertain about notablility or something about my article.

I've also been getting more involved in other areas of Wikipedia — I review AfC submissions and participate in AfD discussions, both of which have made me a more careful article creator.

My one mainspace deletion was a lesson well learned — it taught me a lot about WP:NOTNEWS and has shaped how I evaluate topics going forward. I'd love to help reduce the review backlog! Veggiegalaxy (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Lanceloth345

• Lanceloth345 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:Dog Oxide

• Dog Oxide (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to automatically update outdated parameters in all pages with a certain infobox, and I believe AutoWikiBrowser might be a good option for this. DoO2 04:53, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Dog Oxide Is this about Template_talk:Infobox_building#Deprecating_parameters? If so it would be a nice courtesy to talk to Zackmann08 who seems to actively be working on it. Trialpears (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Ah, that IS what I was going to use it for. DoO2 15:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Friday1189

• Friday1189 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights Friday1189 (talk) 10:02, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Reason for declining request. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:40, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Magwitch49

• Magwitch49 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am requesting Auto Wiki Browser rights access; I want to continue to assist Wikipedia in the best way that I can. I find it fun and useful to assist with repetitive tasks, and I would like access to this tool that will help me to do that. I would like to use it for tasks such as fixing double words, correcting common typos, and maintenance tasks.

I am familiar with the rules for using this tool, and I am very familiar with the Wikipedia manual of style. I have a wide range of interests and would love to continue to help out while using this tool to help me to do so.

I fully intend to review every edit to ensure that I am complying with the rules and policies of Wikipedia Magwitch49 (talk) 14:06, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Sorry, you don't yet meet the minimum criteria for this permission as stated in the header. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:41, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:UnitedStatesian

• UnitedStatesian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:Slamforeman

• Slamforeman (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've made 2,142 edits to Wikipedia and created many new articles and redirects. I would love to be able to increase my contributions to Wikipedia through cleaning up the backlog of new articles. Slamforeman (talk) 02:28, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Losipov

• Losipov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I previously applied for this permission some years ago (August 2023), and was granted a 1-month trial. I then applied for full rights, but was declined due to some problems with nominations and approvals (including in draftspace). I've taken some time to review the basics for surviving AfD, and am requesting another shot at this (even if it is only for another month). I feel like I can contribute meaningfully to NPP, especially given that the backlog is rapidly growing. If it will not be granted due to those concerns, I completely understand.

Thank you for considering my request :) Losipov (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:BookishReader

• BookishReader (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've created, edited, and fixed a lot of articles. I mainly contribute to Pakistan-related articles and have been monitoring new articles feed for some time now. I think there are very limited number of active editors that specialize in Pakistani sources, so someone like me can help fill the gap. BookishReader (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

User:JournalJane

• JournalJane (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to apply for NPP and AfC reviewer permissions. I believe I meet the prerequisites for both.

I’ve continued contributing to Wikipedia, initially in sailing-related topics and now expanding more broadly. Following prior feedback, I’ve also spent time participating in AfD discussions, which has helped me better understand notability, sourcing, and distinguishing between articles that need improvement versus deletion.

I’ve enjoyed learning from other editors and my wiki mentors, and I would be glad to help reduce the backlog while continuing to improve my own understanding.

Thank you for your consideration. JournalJane (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @JournalJane, I hate to ask but are you using LLMs to vote in AfDs? All of your votes sound similar and have the LLM tone to it, and here one was even hatted. Remember that participation in AfDs is to determine if that page is worthy of inclusion, and generic LLM comments don't add much. Constructive, human-written comments improve the discussion and help admins to gauge your understanding of notability here. NPPs and AfC reviewers run into a lot of LLM-generated content that is in violation of a recently updated guideline and try to curtail it. HurricaneZeta^C 21:22, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out, I understand the concern.

I’m not using LLMs to generate AfD votes. I’ve been trying to follow a consistent structure in my comments so they stay neutral and policy-based, which may be why they read similarly. I can see how that comes across, and I’ll make an effort to vary my wording more and tailor each comment to the specific discussion.

I do take each AfD seriously, and all of my votes reflect my own assessment.

Appreciate the feedback. JournalJane (talk) 22:16, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I have raised this issue at WP:LLMN#Possible LLM-generated AFD participation. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:25, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: like the people at the LLM noticeboard I don't find your response credible (indeed it seems to be LLM-generated itself), and at any rate I don't think you have enough experience for this right at the moment. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Thilio

• Thilio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I was patrolling as NPP and I came across Adut Salva Kiir which does not meet WP:NPOL and qualifies for draftification, Also there is Draft:Adut Salva Kiir which is surprising, wow, for me to move that I would need PMR. I requested the PMR perm in January but I withdrew it 1, because I was like I thought I'm going to use it occasionally I don't need it but now I need the perm even though I still going to use it only occasionally, also I'm not going to participate regularly at WP:RMTR only occasionally, need it to help me with my NPP. I hope I'm making sense. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 11:33, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 11:40, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done initially for 3 months. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:46, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

@SilverLocust Thanks CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 10:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am a Recent Changes patroller, and well-acquainted with the general copyvio, vandalism, and BLP policies. I believe PCR could be a good, helpful lateral shift for me, to maybe stop myself from falling into a rut. Thank you for your time in advance! Legendbird (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:44, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:NuggFrog

• NuggFrog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I have quite a bit of time working with the CVU, as well as working a lot with copyvio works. I'd like to help out more in other places, and improve my wiki knowledgebase. NuggFrog (talk) 13:56, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 86 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 14:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment)Just some advice here, This request probably won't be accepted due to having under 100 mainspace edits and under 500 edits. Good luck though. ~~PolishHamster^yeah 20:24, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done insufficient experience. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:51, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:InfernoHues

• InfernoHues (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've responded to a good number of edit requests and (I hope) done a decent job, thus demonstrating that I can be trusted with this right. Thank you for your consideration. InfernoHues (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:52, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:VidanaliK

• VidanaliK (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I'm VidanaliK. I've been fighting vandalism for a week or so now, I make edits nearly every day, and I would like to become a pending changes reviewer in order to also add upon my normal article editing and anti-vandalism work with being able to help clear some backlogs here. VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 17:10, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Phlogiston Enthusiast

• Phlogiston Enthusiast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am Phlogiston Enthusiast. I would like a moment of your time to request rollback rights. I believe that I could use rollback permissions to assist in anti-vandalism in the recent changes tab. There are multiple reasons for this. For one, it would streamline reverts on articles that need them, and be a useful tool against vandalism. This is because if a user is making edits of a vandalistic nature, they are likely to have made multiple. Rollback would assist with these issues and prevent long and drawn-out revert wars by vandals. Second, I believe that I meet the qualifications for the role. I possess experience patrolling the recent changes section, and have reverted many vandalous edits. If need be, I can attempt to provide a comprehensive list of the articles on which I have combatted vandalism. Finally, I understand that it looks bad to have had two arguments over vandalism-related subjects in the past. However, I would argue that this is almost the opposite, as having a clean record with no mistakes would mean that I had no mistakes to learn from, and as well I have apologized to all parties involved in both. In summary, I believe that I should possess rollback rights as to better combat vandalism, and if need be there can be elaboration. If not, I completely understand.

Ammending: this was written roughly a month ago. I was told that I would need one month's experience more before I should re-apply. I have since aqquired more than this. I have been the cause for scores of blocks and have better since de-vandalized the Wiki. Following my embarrasing mishap recently reguarding confusion over the tool, I have better researched it and now believe I would be more fit to utilize this. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 20:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 20:30, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Of note, possibly: Following my removal of every single known instance of a specific syntax error, I have gone up to 1030 edits. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:17, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also every instance of this one. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

This brings it up to 1053. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 17:22, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

After doing both again today I'm up to 1093. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:25, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) That isn't really relevant to rollback though; admins will check your edits when they review this, and reverts and counter-vandalism is what matters for rollback. HurricaneZeta^C 16:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to say I understand to an extent what does and does not break syntax. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:51, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Also worth ammending is that it would provide access to interceptor, which is a useful tool I believe I could do a great deal of antivandalism with in a way that is more efficient than the typical recent changes page. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:33, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Also of note: I am now a Pending Changes Reviewer. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 14:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Phlogiston Enthusiast, an admin will review the needed information. I don't see how a lot of these notes are relevant to rollback; pending changes requires some overlapping skills with rollback (such as the ability to effectively determine what is vandalism), but it is an entirely different right for good reason, and does require different skills. Rollback's primary purpose is to assist with recent changes patrolling. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 21:53, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, sorry. Just trying to put everything on the table here. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 02:25, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Adding comment so it is clear this is still open and so it doesn't get archived from inactivity. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 16:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Not to sound picky, just wanted to make sure two weeks of inactivity and lack of approval/denial wouldn't make this stagnate and die. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 19:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Adding another comment, since it has now been 22 without this being responded too and I don't want this to get archived. (Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 18:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Theeverywhereperson

• Theeverywhereperson (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to renew my rollback rights, because I have been using AntiVandal constructively, and the same other reasons as my most recent request. Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:14, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Namely:

1. I am a recent changes patroller and have been patrolling for a few months now,
2. I have made more than 700 edits in mainspace and more than 1700 edits in total,
3. Since I am already a pending changes reviewer, I am also used to reverting vandalism in some areas where it isn't visible to everyone yet, so I think I am trained for the job,
4. This would allow me to use tools like AntiVandal to revert vandalism easier and faster, for the benefit of Wikipedia as a whole.

Theeverywhereperson talk here 11:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 28 February 2026 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 11:20, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

User:Referentis

• Referentis (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn, but I would like to use some of the tools that require the Rollback permission, such as Huggle and Interceptor. Before taking a wikibreak, I was a CVUA student and just had my final exam to complete. You can find my CVUA progress here. It looks like my instructor is no longer active, and the other instructors listed on the CVUA page appear to be on wikibreaks at the moment. Referentis (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:55, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Fcom1212

• Fcom1212 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi. I want to request rollback rights because I'm relying on checking articles to make sure that there's no vandalism. I use both RedWarn and Twinkle, and I already used Twinkle for most of the pages I reverted and notified several users. It would be useful for reverting large vandalism using this tool, in addition to reverting pages using Twinkle. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 10:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

 Not done being warned recently for insufficient care in reverts contraindicates rollback permissions. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:57, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Alright. I think I have to do some training for reverting and notifying several users for a few weeks before I come back here. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 00:15, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Legendbird

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I am already doing antivandal/recent change patrol work, and am alredy familiar with Twinkle, but wish for rollbacker permissions to be able to use more powerful tools, such as AntiVandal. Thank you for your consideration in advance! Legendbird (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

This editor only has 148 non-automated mainspace edits, --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:OzmoOzmo

• OzmoOzmo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Recently I have been facing disruptive editors who have been making edits extremely quickly. For example, HermeneuticMind, who was adding LLM-generated content to articles en masse, and Goldfishgonnabedeadsoon.

With rollback, I will be able to revert these unconstructive editors much faster than pressing the [vandalism] button with Twinkle for every one of their edits, which is inconvenient, inefficient and slow. -- ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contributions) 11:38, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

And will also be able to use more powerful tools such as WP:HG and WP:ANVDL. Thank you, ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contribs) 06:19, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm a little concerned by the recent use of Ultraviolet to do a BLP revert on an article on someone who has been dead since 1984. Access to instant rollback needs to come with a pattern of not just automatically reverting without carefully checking the context. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:26, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:AriuCH

• AriuCH (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’d like to request rollback rights. I’ve been reverting clear vandalism and unsourced edits on several pages, using concise edit summaries and staying out of any edit warring. I understand the purpose of rollback and would use it only for obvious vandalism and disruptive edits. AriuCH (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 194 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 01:30, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

User:CharlesEditor23

• CharlesEditor23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am once again requesting the template editor right. I have met the guidelines for granting, especially number 4, which is that I have had no behavioral blocks or WP:3RR violations for a minimum of six (6) months or more. The main reason why I am requesting the template editor right again is so that I may be able to make productive, meaningful contributions to protected templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data that are in line with established WP:CONSENSUS with many other editors. I believe that if granted the template editor right again, I can demonstrate that I will avoid the first criteria for revocation, which is performing obviously controversial edits without first determining WP:CONSENSUS. I will also demonstrate that I will only use wise & prudent template editing and test my changes in the sandboxes first. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

See and for previous requests — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm a bit torn. On the one hand, they have had all but one module edit request accepted (and the other partly done) since their last request in September. On the other hand, I am concerned about these edits; they were rightly made in the sandbox, but only because the /data module is template-protected. This is the same sort of thing that was happening as far back as 2021 and led to their rights being revoked. I also found this which is not the right way to make a dummy edit.

Now, have I done similar things in the past? Sure, I'm pretty sure there are a few from this year even. We shouldn't be expecting perfection out of a TPE, because that is just unrealistic. However, mistakes should be few and far between for a TPE or admin, and not happening often enough to get repeated warnings going back five years. Primefac (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Santiago Claudio

• Santiago Claudio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been editing modules and templates, and their sandboxes in my 10+ years here on WP. I'm confident that I've already met all six guidelines for editor rights, especially after having successful edit requests to the following, like the college template, the U.S. House of Representatives abbreviation, the comedian infobox, and sports results and table modules, all protected. I promise to be careful with my additive or subtractive edits by previewing them beforehand if I attain this permission. Santiago Claudio (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done, though I would note that your edit summaries are rather lacking, and would request that you work on improving that aspect of your editing, especially when it comes to editing protected templates. Primefac (talk) 11:23, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

User:AP 499D25

• AP 499D25 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I deal with block evaders and abusive editors on an often enough basis that I believe I would find this permission useful in some scenarios. For example, I suspect there is block evasion from a TA on the article Frankie & Johnny (1991 film). Another example of where I might use the access is on my user talk page, where a certain LTA keeps occassionally attacking it and several others' talk pages, and the info would be useful in renewing IP rangeblocks that had lapsed. Prior to making this request, I have read through the WMF's TAIV policy and understood what I can, and can't do with the information. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:08, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:04, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

User:Yerlo

• Yerlo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}