User:Rhythmnation2004/sandbox

Footnotes

References

Bibliography

• Barr, Lockwood (1946). Ancient Town of Pelham, Westchester County, State of New York. Richmond, Va.: Dietz Press. pp. 13, 34–35.

[p 13] Tradition says that every one of Anne Hutchinson's Company perished in the massacre--save one little girl who became the wife of an Indian Chief, residing in a settlement near the Split Rock. That territory was long known as the "Land of Ann Hook". Tradition says that Thomas Pell--the 3rd Lord of the Manor, married an Indian Princess--a descendant of this Hutchinson girl, and Anhooke.
[p 34] The children of Sir John Pell and Rachel Pinckney, were as follows - all born at the Manor House in the Manor of Pelham: Thomas* --(1675-1752) 3rd Lord. *Married Aeltje Beeks--according to the Dutch--or Anna, the daughter of the reigning Indian Chieftain of Westchester--according to Pell family tradition . . . a descendant of the Hutchinson child, who escaped the massacre, and Wampage, alias Anhooke.
[p 35] The children of Thomas Pell, 3rd Lord and Ann, his Indian Princess, were: [...] Mary

• Bell, Blake A. (2004). Thomas Pell and the Legend of the Pell Treaty Oak. New York: iUniverse. pp. 1, 8, 18–20, 59–60.

[p 1] Tradition says that beneath the branches of that oak on November 14, 1654, Thomas Pell signed a "treaty" with representatives of Siwanoy Native Americans. With that agreement, he acquired lands that we know today as Pelham, New Rochelle, portions of the Bronx and lands including those east of the Hutchinson River northward to Mamaroneck.
[p 8] "[...] He is repeatedly mentioned as 'treating' with the Indians, notably with Wampus, Wampage or John White, as he was variously called..." Wampage, who reportedly also referred to himself as "Anhõõke," was among those Native Americans who signed the treaty with Thomas Pell beneath "Thomas Pell's Treaty Oak."
[p 18] On that day long ago in 1654, Thomas Pell and a small band of Englishmen reportedly gathered beneath what some say was the Treaty Oak along with a Native American named Anhõõke, also known as Wampage, and four other Native Americans who have been described as "sub-chieftains". Wampage was widely believed to be the murderer of Anne Hutchinson. After her death, he reportedly took the name "Anhõõke," supposedly following a tradition of taking a form of the name of a notable victim personally killed.
[pp 59-60] Know all men by this present yt we Shawanarockqúot: poquorum: Anhõõke: Wawhãmkus: Mehumõw: Beinge ye true owners & ye only Lawffull Heyres & proprietors off a piece of land Bounded by ye Sea to ye South wth yt Tract off land Called by ye English Longe Island; to ye west & west & by South wth ye bay & River & River Diawockinge Acqueonunge (Chemaqūanaock to ye East) wth all ye Islands yt are in ye salt water to ye South South East & South West Against yt Tract off Land wch is Beffore expresd; wh all trees medowes & all Land wh in ye tract off Land wch is Beffore Expressed: doo sell & deliver to Thos Pell now inhabitinge in Fayrffield his heyres & assignse to hould injoy improove plant as hee shall see cause to his Best to be improved ffor & to him & his heyres fforever wh out any molestation on our pt And doo herby ingage our Selves to make good our selves against all Claymes intayled either by Dutch or Indyans wt ever & doo deliver it into ye posession off ye sayd Thos Pell & his Assignes: markinge ye bounds to ye mayne Land wch is & shalbe ye present bounds to ye mayne Land: only Liberty is ffreely graunt ffor ffeedinge offe cattle & Cuttinge off timber beyound those Bounds; & wee doo Acknowledge to have Reseved in full for it ye trou valew & just Satisfaction Accordinge to our Estimate to wch we sett our hands beffore these wittnesses off English & Indyans this twenty seaventh off June 1654.
Saggamores (Markes) +Shawanórõckquot +Poquõrúm +Anhõõke +Wawhamkus +Mehúmõw
English Wittnesses Richard Crabb Magistrate Thomas Lawrence John Ffinch
Articles of Agreement
We also as lovinge neighbours & ffriends doo mutually ingage our Selves to send too men off Each yr one Day in ye Springe every yeare to marke ye Bounds of ye Land yt a Right Knowledge may be kept wh out injury to Either side yt Mutuall peace & love may be mayntayned 2nd Wee allso doo promise Each to other if any plotts on either Side yt may be to hurt off Either yt we Seasonably Discover ym as Lovinge Neighbours & friends yt peace & love may be mutually preserved
Indyan Wittnesses Marke + Cockho Mark + Kamaque Marke + Cockinsecawa
This wrightinge was signed & wittnessed Beffore A great multitude off Indyans & many English we who are under written do testify
mark Henry + Accorly William Newman
This is A True Coppy off ye originall written
Thos Pell

• Bolton, Robert (1881). The History of the Several Towns, Manors, and Patents of the County of Westchester. Vol. II. New York: Chas. F. Roper. pp. 36, 40.

[p 36] In 1675 the Indians must have been still residing on the neck in considerable numbers for at a General Court of assize held the same year in New York, it was resolved, "that the Indyans at Mr. Pell's or Anne Hook's Neck, be ordered to remove to their usual winter quarters, within Hell Gate, upon this island; and further, that all canoes belonging to Christians or Indyans on the north side of Long Island to the east of Hell Gate shall be (within three days from the publication of this order) brought to the next towns and delivered to the constables to be secured near the Hook house; any canoes found upon the sound after that time to be destroyed." "This order is said to have been made to prevent the Indians of Long Island joining King Philip against New England."
Near the entrance of Pellam neck, is situated the favorite burying ground of the Siwanoy's tribe, to which the Indians were in the habit of bringing their dead over from Greenwich for interment. Numerous mounds are still visible near the water's edge, on the Rapelyea estate. Two of the largest mounds are pointed out as the sepulchres of the Siwanoy's sachems, Ann-hook and Nimham; both of whom are said to have lived to advanced ages.
[p 40]
Hon. Thomas Pell,
dat. 1686; 3d Lord of Pelham Manor; ob.
1739; buried on Bartow Place. Will, 3d
September, 1739
[married]
Anna, da. of
the reigning Indian Chief of
Westchester

• Bradhurst, A. Maunsell (1910). My Forefathers: Their History from Records & Traditions. London: De La More Press. pp. 16–17.

[p 16] [...] daughter of the Hon. Thomas Pell, 3rd Lord of Pelham, by Anna, daughter of Wampagè, the reigning Indian Chief of that district which forms the County of Westchester. The name of the chief rests solely upon family tradition; it should be pronounced in three syllables, as though the final e were a y.
[p 17] Sir John died in 1702, and his son, Thomas Pell, 3rd Lord of Pelham, was the father (by Anna, the Indian) of a large family, one of whom was Anne, wife of Samuel Bradhurst. Her Indian mother had been baptized by the name of Anna, and her autograph, as "Anna Pell," is still preserved. She, doubtless, belonged to the Siwanoys, a clan of the Mohegans, the "Enchanted Wolf Tribe."

• Bunker, Mary Powell (1895). Long Island Genealogies. Albany, N.Y.: Joel Munsell's Sons. pp. 65–66.

Mary Pell was daughter of Thomas Pell, whose wife was said to be the daughter of an Indian chief, so say the records. Town records say that, "in 1684 Indians granted to Henry Pell 50 acres at Matinecock, L.I., as he has married an Indian woman named Jane, one of our own nation, the Narragansetts."

• "Foreign correspondence, 1st series, 1661-1748". Connecticut State Archives. Vol. vol. I. p. 14a. {{cite encyclopedia}}: |volume= has extra text (help)

After Our hearty Commendations. Whereas John Wampus alias White has, by Petition humbly represented unto his Majesty That he is by Marriage of Anne the Daughter of Romanock late Sachem of Aspatuck & Sasquanaugh, upon the death of the said Sachem, become sole Proprietor of those Tracts of Land where the Town of Fairfield in ye Colony of Conecticut is built, That the Petitioner’s said Father in Law did about Nineteen years since deliver up ye Possession of the said Lands, to the Petitioner, who some time after sold part thereof unto Captain Denison, Amos Richardson & others of Conecticut Colony for the Sume of Three Hundred and Fifty pounds or thereabouts, And that by the evill practices of Major Nathan Gould and other Inhabitants of Fairfield, he is not only kept out of his just Rights, but was also imprisoned by them in May last when he went to demand Possession of his Estate. Withall complayning of ye great hardships & Miserys he and other Native Indians are subject unto by the Laws of that Colony. His Majesty taking into his gracious Consideration the miserable Condition of the Petitioner And declaring his Royall Pleasure that not only the Petitioner but all such Indians of New England as are his Subjects and submit peaceably and quietly to his Majesty’s Government shall likewise participate of his Royall Protection. Wee do by his Majesty’s express Commands signify the same unto you, Requiring you to do the Petitioner such Justice as his Case may deserve, and for ye future to proceed in such manner as his Majesty’s Subjects may not be forced to undertake so long & dangerous Voyages for obteyning Justice which His Majesty expects shall be speedily & impartially administered unto them upon ye Place. And so not doubting of your ready Complyance herein, Wee bid you heartily farewell. From ye Council Chamber in Whitehall the 28 day of March 1679

• Judd, Frances Ida Schureman (1940). "American Ancestry of Samuel Tompkins and Martha Alphena (Todd) Schureman and their Descendants". Detroit Society for Genealogical Research Magazine. Vol. III, no. 10. University of Michigan. pp. 213–214. Retrieved 2020-06-08.

[p 213] Thomas Pell, born ca. 1675, inherited from his father the Manor of Pelham, thus becoming the Third Lord of Pelham. He married Anna --- who tradition asserts, was a charming Indian Princess, daughter of Ninham, or Wampage, also known as "Ann Hoock", chief of the Westchester Indians. [...] Children of Thomas and Anna Pell:
[p 214] IX. Mary Pell, m. Samuel Sands (son of Samuel and Dorothy Ray-Sands, and grandson of Capt. James and Sarah (Walker) Sands).

• Mackenzie, George Norbury, ed. (1966). Colonial Families of the United States of America. Vol. I. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Company. p. 410.

Thomas Pell, third Lord of the Manor, b. circa 1676; d. circa 1739, the year in which his will was dated; m. (by tradition) Anna, dau. of Ninham or Wampage, an Indian Sachem.

• Pedigree of Pell of Walter Wellingsley Lincolnshire, Norfolk and Pelham, Westchester Co., N.Y. 1881. LCCN 10004375. OCLC 934636058.

Hon Thomas Pell
Nat 1686 Third Lord of Pelham Manor
Obit 1739 Buried on Bartow Place
Will 3 Sept 1739
[married]
Anna dr of the reigning
Indian Chief of W. Chester

• Pell, Howland (1917). The Pell Manor: Address Prepared for the New York Branch of the Order of Colonial Lords of Manors in America. Baltimore.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

[p 8] The Rev. and Right Honorable John Pell, D.D., was born March 1, 1610, at Southwick, a small town near Brighton, County Sussex, where his father, Rev. John Pell, was Rector of the Parish. His mother was Mary, daughter of George Holland of Halden, Kent. She died in 1615, and her husband fifteen months later.

[p 9] In 1661 Dr. Pell was ordained in the Church of England

[p 11] He married, July 3, 1632 - Ithamaria, daughter of Henry Reginolles of London, and his surviving son John became the second Lord of Pelham Manor. [...] Thomas Pell, the first Lord of the Manor of Pelham, and only brother of Dr. John Pell, was born in 1608 at Southwick, and came to America 1635 in the Ship "Speedwell." [...] In 1654, as before stated, he purchased the land from the Indians which subsequenty was created into Pelham Manor, and located several families on the plantation

[p 12] Thomas Pell married 1646 Lucy, widow of Thomas Brewster, and died at his home in Fairfield in 1669, shortly after his wife. Having no children he left all his property [...] to "My Nephew John Pell living in ould England, the only sonne of my brother John Pell, D.D." [...] John Pell, generally styled Sir John Pell, the Second Lord of the Manor, mentioned before, was born in London February 3, 1643

[p 14] John Pell, Second Lord of the Manor, was drowned in the Sound from his yacht about 1702, leaving by his wife, Rachael, daughter of Philip Pinckney, his eldest son Thomas, who became the Third Lord of the Manor. He was born in Pelham Manor about 1675, and the date of his will in September 3, [p 15] 1739. He succeeded his father as Vestryman in the church and held other offices of honor. He married Anna, by tradition said to be the daughter of the reigning Indian Sachem Ninham-Wampage or Annahock.

• Pell, Robert T. (1965), "Thomas Pell II (1675/76-1739): Third Lord of the Manor of Pelham", Pelliana: Pell of Pelham, New Series, I (3): 25–48
• Powell, Charles S. (1935). History and Genealogies of the Powells in America. St. Petersburg, Fla. pp. 72–73.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Saunders, James B., ed. (1991). The Pelham Manor Story: 1891-1991. Pelham Manor, N.Y.: Village of Pelham Manor. pp. 28–29.

Sir John Pell and Rachel Pinckney Pell had five children, Thomas II, John, Philip, Ithamaria and Mary. [...] Sir John's eldest son, Thomas II, married Anna, the daughter of Wampage II, who had grown up on Hunter's Island next to the manor house. By 1702 Thomas II already had two children. He and Anna went on to have ten more, seven sons and five daughters in all.

• Williams, Cornelia Bartow (1915). Ancestry of Lawrence Williams. Chicago. pp. 244–246.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

[Thomas Pell] married Ann, daughter of the reigning Indian Chief of Westchester. Children: [...] vii. Mary; m. ----- Sands.

Additional reading

• Goddard, Ives (1978). "Delaware". In Bruce G., Trigger (ed.). Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 15: Northeast. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-0160045752.
• Hodge, Frederick Webb (1912). Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico. Vol. 4. p. 913. ISBN 9781582187518. Retrieved 2020-06-06. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
• Mays, Victor (1962). Pathway to a Village: A History of Bronxville. Nebko Press. p. 14. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
• Ultan, Lloyd, and Barbara Unger (2000). Bronx Accent: A Literary and Pictorial History of the Borough. Rutgers University Press. p. 5. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Koehler, Robert T. (2020). Through the Blood of Anhõõke. Tampa, Fla. ISBN 9781716805448.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

Pelliana

• Pell, Robert T. (1965), "Thomas Pell II (1675/76-1739): Third Lord of the Manor of Pelham", Pelliana: Pell of Pelham, New Series, I (3): 25–48

[p 35]In a word, as Thomas Pell II grew from boy to man at Pelham, against a background of primeval forests, wild animals and savage Indians, his landscape was bounded by West Chester with its nonconformists, the Baileys and the others, with whom his family was on

[p 36] far from cordial terms; by East Chester, with whose residents his parents had consistently friendly relations; by New Rochelle with its French speaking Huguenots who were the special wards of Sir John Pell, his father. Above all, Pelham was a refuge for the Siwanoys, who has a "castle" on Pelham Neck, another on Hunter's Island and still another at New Rochelle. The Indians were invariably welcomed by the Pells, and doubtless as a boy Thomas II hunted and trapped with the young Indians and learned the ways of the woods and streams from them. Without a doubt, too, he courted the Indian maidens, and this leads to the mystery of his marriage in 1700 to Anne or Anna, the Princess of the Siwanoys.

"Anna" has been described as the "daughter" of the Siwanoy Chief Wampage I from whom Thomas Pell I bought Pelham. Wampage I, as what the English called "king" of the Siwanoys, headed one of the six nations of the Mattabesec Indian Confederation, and he died in 1681/82 according to contemporary Connecticut records. This has led competent genealogists to challenge the claim that Anne, who was about eighteen years old when she married Thomas Pell, was his daughter. As a consequence they are inclined to dismiss the "Indian Princess story" in the Pell family history and insist that Anna was someone else - just who, they do not explain, although they pounce upon the fact that a Thomas Pell married an Aaltje Beek at the Dutch Reformed Church in New York City in March, 1702. Aaltje was clearly not Anne, and this Thomas was very evidently not Thomas, third Lord of the Manor of Pelham, but probably a member of one of the two Pell families from Norfolk, England, which had settled in New York by then. Thomas of Pelham already had two sons by March 1702/03 and it is most improbable that he married a member of the Dutch community since the relationship between the Pells and the Dutch was anything but friendly.

Now it is well to recall that at the time Wampage I was "King of the Siwanoys" and Thomas Pell I was first Lord of the Manor of Pelham, which he bought from Wampage, there were sixteen Indian nations in the territory covered by modern Connecticut, Long Island and Westchester County, New York. Originally, they were grouped in four Confederations: the Narragansetts, the Pequots, the Mohegans (Mohicans) and the Mattabesecs or Wappingers. In 1636/37 the English eliminated the Pequots, and the English, Mohegans and Mattabesecs divided territory between them. Thus, when

[p 37] Thomas Pell I established himself at Pelham, the Indian Confederations were three.
The Indian Confederation which interests us is the Mattabesecs, which grouped six nations: the Hammonassets, Naugatucks, Quinnipiacs, Paugusetts, the Uncowas and the Siwanoys, sometimes called the Ramapos. The territory of this Confederation ran from well beyond the Connecticut River deep into Dutch territory, including what today is Westchester County, New York, where the Siwanoys were installed, lapping over into Connecticut, with their capital at Fairfield. Furthermore, the Indian nations on Long Island were included in the Mattabesec Confederation; that is, the Montauks, the Shinnecocks, the Uncachogues and the Poosepatucks.

Now, over this Mattabesec Confederation there rules a Paramount Chief who in Thomas Pell I's day was Romaneck, sometimes called by the English "Joseph," a warrior whose authority none dared to challenge. He had an only daughter, Prasque, and she became the bride of the Chief of the Siwanoys, Wampage, whom we shall call Wampage I, or as it was spelled in the Mohegan dialect, Wamponneage, and mispronounced by the English as Wampus or Wampers. Wampage I was also sometimes called "Ann Hook," because he was lord of the territory, hook meaning neck of land, where in 1634 he and his tribesmen killed Anne Hutchinson and her fellow colonists in Westchester whom he accused of trespassing on Indian territories.

Some time after this, Wampage I became a close friend of Thomas Pell I, who was the Indian Commissioner in Fairfield, and Wampage I and Thomas Pell I concluded much business together. Wampage I sold Pelham to Thomas in 1654, and in 1657, on March 10, he and Commissioner Pell negotiated the definitive treaty between the English and the Siwanoys whereby their respective positions were delineated. In fact after the signature of that treaty the Siwanoys “melted away (from Connecticut, that is. ed.) to parts unknown”, according to Mathias Spiess, who prepared the Report on the Indians of Connecticut for the Connecticut Tercentenary in 1933. But they remained for another hundred years in Westchester County, and in both Connecticut and Westchester County they merged through intermarriage with the English settlers.
This friendship of Thomas I with Wampage I continued, at all events, into the lifetime of Sir John Pell, the second Lord, and it was Sir John who supported the petition of the Siwanoy Chieftain when

[p 38] the Privy Council in London came to consider it on March 28, 1679/80. This, in fact, was without a doubt the reason why Sir John and Lady Rachel Pinckney Pell crossed the ocean to visit London in the spring of 1678, it is now ascertained, on the eve of the hearing. After all, the validity of Sir John's own claim to Pelham was directly involved, and as a consequence he was eager to act as Wampage's witness before the Privy Council. Previously, it was with Wampage I, in 1676, that Sir John Pell negotiated a Treaty of Peace which kept the Mattabesec Confederation out of King Philip's War. This treaty, it will be recalled, was signed with Wampage I and the lesser chieftains, sitting on the lawn at Pelham under the Treaty Oak to which Thomas Pell I had nailed his arms many years before to proclaim his right to the Manor.

Thereafter Sir John Pell kept his faith with the Indians. But his loyal attitude was not echoed by many of his contemporaries, who were inclined to disregard the treaties and engagements made with the Indians and reneg on solemn pacts and contracts. Offender like the rest, but perhaps a little more so, was Major Nathan Gold, chief magistrate in Fairfield. He held that the English held their lands by right of conquest and that contracts of sale between Indians and English had no validity. To make his position clear, when the elderly Wampage came to Fairfield, formerly his capital, to collect on a bill of sale of Major Gold had him beaten and thrown into jail. Sir John Pell, hearing of Wampage's predicament, intervened to have him released on his surety, and it was in subsequent conversations between Sir John and the Indian chief, who had been baptized by this time, taking the name of John White and his wife that of Anna, or Anne, White, that the decision was taken to appeal to the Privy Council, the highest legal body in England. This decision was motivated on Sir John's part by the fact that if the Gold doctrine was maintained, his rights in Pelham, which his uncle Thomas bought from Wampage, might fall. Accordingly, in the spring of 1678, Sir John with Lady Rachel set out for London to represent Wampage before the Privy Council. After Sir John had renewed his contacts at the Court of Charles II and very probably with the King, Sir John in John Wampage White's name duly submitted a petition for redress. Hearings were held by the Privy Council with Sir John as witness in Wampage White's behalf, and on March 28, 1679, the Council ruled in favor of the petitioner

[p 39] and despatched the following notification to the Governor of Connecticut:

From the Lords of the Council to the Governor and Magistrates (of Connecticut) After our hearty Commendations. Whereas John Wampage, alias John White, has, by petition, humbly represented unto His Maty that he is by marriage of Anne, the daughter of Romaneck, late Sachem of Aspatuck and Sasquannaugh, upon the death of said Sachim, become sole propetor of those tracts of land where the Town of Fairfield in ye Colony of Connecticut is built, that the Petrs said Father in law did about nineteen years since deliver up ye possession of the said lands to the Petr who, some time after, sold part thereof to Captain Denison, Amos Richardson and others of Connecticut Colony, for the sum of Three Hundred and Fifty pounds or thereabouts, and that by the evil practices of Major Nathan Gould and other Inhabitants of Fairfield, he is not only kept out of his just rights but was also imprisoned by them in May last, when he went to demand possession of his Estate, Withall complaining of ye great hardships and Miserys he and other native Indians are subject unto by the Laws of that Colony. His Maty taking into his gracious consideration the miserable condition of the Petr, and declaring His Royal Pleasure that not only the Petr but all such Indians of New England as are his subjects and submit peaceably and quietly to His Maty's Government, shall likewise participate of his Royall Protection, wee do by his Maty's express commands signify the same unto you, requiring you to do the Petr such justice as his case may deserve and for ye future to proceed in such manner as his Maty's subjects may not be forced to undertake so long and dangerous Voyages for obteyning Justice which His Maty expects shall be speedily and impartially administered unto them upon ye Place. And so, not doubting your ready compliance herein, we bid you heartily farewell. From ye Council Chamber in Whitehall, the 28 day of March, 1679. Your loving Friends Anglesy Clarendon Ailesbury J. Bridgewater Faucenberg J. Ernle To Our Loving Friends the Governor and Magistrates of His Mty's Colony of Connecticut in New England (See Connecticut, Foreign Correspondence I, 14a)

[p 40] This order in Council was received at Hartford on May 17, 1680, possibly carried there by Sir John Pell in person because he returned to America at that time. Wampage I died soon afterwards, possibly from anguish over the continued refusal of the magistrates to bow to any authority other than their own, even the King’s. A year later, on July 27, 1681, Richard Thayer, attorney for Wampage's estate, wrote Governor Leete of Connecticut stating that he was "employed by the Executors of John Wampage, dec'd., to make inquisition after the estate which his father (sic) Romaneck gave him," that he has applied to William Hill, Recorder of the Town of Fairfield, for further information, replied that he "had the evidences in his custody but would not deliver them nor copies thereof without the advice of Major Gold." Moreover on July 22nd Mr. Thayer sumoned Mr. Hill to give his evidence "before authority." This Mr. Hill refused to do. It is at this point that attorney Thayer appealed to Governor Leete, who issued the requested order to the magistrates of Fairfield. Unfortunately we do not know what sequence was given to the Governor's order or if the heirs received any funds, legally due, from the recalcitrant townsmen of Fairfield.

Now, who inherited from John Wampage White? The evidence in the hearing before the Privy Council in London speaks of a first son who inherited his father's name and title and was to be called Wampage II, Sachem of Ann Hook and other places. There was a second son known as John Wampage White. John Wampage White's wife was none other than Elizabeth French, stepdaughter of Thomas Pell I, and their children were Elizabeth, Mary and Nathaniel White. These are the three children mentioned in Thomas I's will in 1670. To Elizabeth White, Thomas Pell, it will be recalled, bequeathed [...]. Elizabeth White, named after her mother married John Tompkins of Fairfield, to whom Sir John Pell made a grant in Westchester adjoining Pelham in 1681, upon his return from England. There John and Elizabeth Tompkins raised their six children listed by Tompkins in his will dated September 2, 1684. They were Anna, named after his wife's grandmother, Anna or Prasque; Elizabeth, named after his wife and her mother; Rebecca and Nathaniel, named after his uncle, Nathaniel White. John Tompkins named his

[p 41] brother-in-law Nathaniel White as his executor. The girls married Eastchester men; Anna married Isaac Odell.

Now, the cousins of the Tompkins children, the grandchildren of Wampage I, the children of Wampage II, were growing up on the threshold of Pelham as full blooded Indians. They were the only playmates, probably of Thomas II as a boy and his closest friends in his young manhood. In time the eldest, Anna, usually spelled Anne, named after her grandmother, the wife of Wampage I, became his fiancee. Anne, it is the theory of Mr. Morgan H. Seacord, President of the Huguenot and Historical Association of New Rochelle, probably grew up on Hunters Island where Wampage II had his stockaded "castle," and about the time of her marriage to Thomas, the ownership of Hunters Island passed from Wampage II to Sir John, and then to Thomas. Perhaps Hunters Island was Anna's dot.

Without a doubt Sir John encouraged the marriage of Anne and Thomas because this union would bring together all the skeins of Pell, Wampage and Romaneck, and put a firm seal on the ownership of Pelham. Sir John, who was clearly a man of affairs and who was deeply concerned all his life with reinforcing the title to Pelham, may have had this in mind when he permitted the courtship. Certainly he could not have been averse to the marriage of the heir to Pelham with the heiress of the Indian Sachem. We have to stretch our imagination to picture the wedding of Thomas and Anna at the Manor House. It must have been a festive occasion, crowning a friendship between an English and an Indian family through two long lives.

Thomas II, in any event, who succeeded to the Manor, lived a very active life, representing Pelham on many public occasions, and serving as vestryman in the combined parish of Pelham, New Rochelle, East Chester and West Chester. Evidently he was not martially inclined and so it was his brother John who became Captain of the Manor of Pelham and commanded the Pelham Horse. Sir John, the second Lord, gave John, his second son, Travers Island, and there he built a house, but he occupied it rarely, preferring to live at the Manor, and he never married. Ithamaria, the eldest of Thomas' two sisters, married James Eustis, son of one of the original Ten Proprietors of Eastchester to whom Thomas I made the grant on June 14, 1664. The second sister, Mary, married Samuel Rodman of the tract of land successively known as Ann Hook Neck, Pelham Neck and Rodman Neck.