User:Illusion Flame

• Illusion Flame (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:ShadowBallX

• ShadowBallX (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've created 43 articles overall (of which 31 have been made since I returned to semi-regularly editing en in January 2026), with two of those getting on DYK (plus a third in the queue, which is set to be on the main page on May 6, as well as three currently active nominations). I do have two articles that have previously been deleted, but both of them were originally from 2020, and eventually were recreated by others later. ShadowBallX (talk) 04:55, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

User:BilledMammal

• BilledMammal (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

AWB was removed for inactivity. I have now returned and intend to use it for completing WP:LUGSTUBS2. BilledMammal (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked (). — MusikBot ^talk 03:50, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

(I consider myself to be WP:INVOLVED here and hence unable to grant this request; some other admin should handle it) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

• Isn't this request moot due to the move functionality in AWB only being available to admins (as well as being really bad)? Trialpears (talk) 17:14, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

  No, the proposed AWB action as I understand it is turning articles into redirects, not page moves. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

  That would be LUGSTUBS3, if it passes; LUGSTUBS2 will involve moving the articles that are unimproved and have not already been redirected to draft space. I intend to use AWB as part of the post-move cleanup, including removing categories and applying the relevant template - moving the page will be done with a different tool. BilledMammal (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

User:Red0ctober22

• Red0ctober22 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I made a request last month to help with work I was doing on a college basketball template, and was told to wait a month due to issues in the changes I made. Since then, there have been no issues, and I have some other copyediting tasks I want to complete for other subject areas that this tool would help me with, in addition to the college basketball work I have been doing. Red0ctober22 (talk) 12:34, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 12:40, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

User:JarJarInks

• JarJarInks (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:Happypenguins82

• Happypenguins82 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I am reapplying for the Extended Confirmed permission following the resolution of an Arbitration Enforcement request the AE result from January 2026. My EC permission was previously revoked due to 'permission gaming' and a shift into contentious topics. According to the AE result, I was instructed to wait at least 30 days and complete 500 additional constructive edits before reapplying. It has now been over three months, and I’ve reached that milestone with 500 new edits. Since the initial block was removed, I’ve taken the advice I received here initial unblock request to heart and I’ve been using the "Preview" button every time before I publish changes just to double check my self, to avoid making too many small edits. I’ve focused on trying to know and better understand wikipedia, which i find fascinating, i joined a couple of projects, such as merge, redirect, short descriptions, and discovered how important it is to perform these maintenance edits to keep the encyclopedia better and safe, i plan on joining more projects, and improve my understanding of wikipedia. I'd appreciate it if you could reassess my edits and consider removing my current restrictions, and restore my EC. I would not repeat my previous mistakes. Happypenguins82 (talk) 11:37, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 11:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Admins please see User talk:Newslinger#Appeal request. TarnishedPath^talk 00:43, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

@Happypenguins82: Which CTOP areas and/or articles that are under ECP do you want to edit? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Voorts,

Thank you for the question. After my initial block was removed I took the time to better understand this massive platform. I've joined projects like Merges, Redirects, and Short Descriptions, every day I discover something new whether its templates or backlogs, this place is huge, and so much bigger than one single topic or a couple of them for that matter, and because I’ve discovered how important maintenance is, and good sources, and good content, I need the EC permission not for a specific single topic, but for handling technical and content related issues such as merges, or to be able to contribute quality edits to any topic I might come across, including contentious topics weather its Palestinian Israeli topic or Ukraine war or sudan or k pop figures, sports figures and music legends that might be EC protected. I discovered I like working with random options inside backlogs or articles, that's how I ended up in the PIA in the first place. but i can say that i learned so much in the past 3 months, and if I should come across a contentious topic, I would handle it with extra care and without repeating my previous mistakes. Happypenguins82 (talk) 06:53, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Let me ask you this. This is for my own interest so feel free to not answer. Would you regard it as a 'mistake' to advocate for or against any of the belligerents in the Arab-Israeli conflict in Wikipedia given that WP:NOTADVOCACY is policy? The reason I ask is because this and this resemble advocacy more than they resemble arguments based on reliable sources and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. So, I guess my question boils down to - do you think you can comply with WP:NOTADVOCACY even if you see other editors not complying (and of course you will see people not following the NOTADVOCACY rule probably everyday)? Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Of course I don't mind answering, I'm always happy to talk to fellow editors and I appreciate the question. I think everyone should follow all wikipedia's policy and guidelines, including the no advocacy policy, even if i have an opinion on the subject, or any topic for that matter its not relevant for a global encyclopedia, in here editors including myself should stick to dry secondary sourced facts, regardless to any editors opinion, however its not my place (not that im aware of) to instruct other editors how to behave. Happypenguins82 (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to answer, and I hope you succeed. Sean.hoyland (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Tagging @Newslinger incase they didn't see this. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Dr vulpes, thanks for the ping. I referred Happypenguins82 here for a second opinion, and do not have anything to add to User talk:Newslinger § Appeal request at this time unless anyone has additional questions. — Newslinger talk 09:23, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Wikipedian12512(alt)

• Wikipedian12512(alt) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Hello! My usual account (this) has extended confirmed rights. Can someone give my alt (wikipedian12512(alt)) the same rights? Thanks! Wikipedian12512 (talk) 02:07, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

This is for this account, my alt. Wikipedian12512(alt) (talk) 12:02, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:43, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Wikipedian12512(alt) (talk) 18:11, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:ZooBlazer

• ZooBlazer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:EaglesFan37

• EaglesFan37 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights

I'd like to help clear the current backlog by participating in the May backlog drive. I've been moderately active in AFD (with my votes/nominations predominantly aligning with the final outcome of the AFD). I have created four articles on Wikipedia (including one that is currently awaiting a second opinion for GA status . EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:29, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done for the backlog drive then we can reassess. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Crestfalling

• Crestfalling (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm interested in helping out with the May drive. I've helped write five GA articles (three of them having had minimal content prior to being rewritten), created a reasonably substantial new article, and participated in AfD three times with thorough votes each time. I also have experience patiently explaining policies and guidelines to new users, as can be seen with my answers to mentee questions on my talk page. Thanks for your time, and I'm open to answering any questions if needed. Crestfalling (talk/contribs) 00:26, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done for the drive. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:47, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:VortexPhantom

• VortexPhantom (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

This is to request permanent NPR rights as my rights will expire after 6 days from now . During my trial, I have worked significantly on reviewing new pages and experimenting on "how things are done using page curation". I want to continue reviewing pages and participate in current backlog drive. I am happy to answer all questions that have raised during my patrol. Thank you for considering this request. PhantomVortex (Contact here) 13:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 13:10, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done. I feel like you need some more experience so I'm going to give you another three months. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:14, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Flyingphoenixchips

• Flyingphoenixchips (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I had been working on removing promotional and non notable content particularly, SOAP and brochure-style language, tagging pages under notability concerns, and nominating for CSD G11 or AfD where sourcing relies entirely on the subject's own materials. I understand the distinction between articles that need improvement and those that cannot be salvaged, and I know to use the Curation Tool to tag and communicate rather than make unilateral calls that discourage good-faith editors. New pages are where promotional abuse hits hardest and earliest, and I want the NPR right to address it at that stage, consistently and correctly. I also would like to help with the backlog. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 16:22, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done for the drive. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:18, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Sir Banking

• Sir Banking (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I'd like to request New page reviewer rights, I have been actively contributing by creating multiple articles and improving existing content. I consistently aim to follow community guidelines and ensure the accuracy and quality of the information I add. I'd like to get more involved in the present day on Wiki and this seems a good place to start.

Thank you for considering my request. Sir Banking (talk) 06:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Sir Banking, this permission is normally given to people who have experience of evaluating articles and content because new page patrollers have to assess new articles for things like notability, promotion, and copyright. Do you have any experience of that? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:30, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Good morning sir, yes, I am experienced in terms of notability criteria, promotion, and copyright issues. I am familiar with the rules governing this Wikipedia and am willing to demonstrate this experience during a trial period if necessary. I would be happy to help. Thank you very much. Sir Banking (talk) 01:11, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

User:NuggFrog

• NuggFrog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I'd like to request NPP rights to participate in the May NPP drive. I primarily do counter-vandalism work, and I have rollback rights. I believe that I have gained enough knowledge from my vandalism work to warrant being eligible for NPP permissions, and I would love to be able to help during the drive. I believe that I meet all of the criteria, but if I don't please let me know what I can work on! Thanks in advance :) 「NuggFrog」 (talk) 12:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 406 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 12:20, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

So I totally glazed over the 500 mainspace edits part, so unless I am somehow eligible, I apologize for putting this in. I very much did not read the requirements properly 「NuggFrog」 (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

No worries NuggFrog, that's a common and understandable mistake.  Not done for the bot, feel free to reapply once you hit the prerequisite (I'd also encourage participating at WP:AFD and/or creating new articles yourself, as these are the main two areas of activity that are looked at for considering this permission and you don't appear to have been active there yet). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:46, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

I am curious, is the participation in XfD and New Article Creation just to show knowledge of how the wiki runs, or is it an actual requirement that can't be substituted? I feel very confident in my Wikipedia knowledge and how a good article is supposed to look from my CVU work, so would that be a substitute, or would I be required to participate in those areas? I'm very much more of a reviewer, not a writer, and to be honest internet discussions somewhat terrify me. Cheers, and I appreciate the advice. 「NuggFrog」 (talk) 16:46, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

NuggFrog, it's not a strict requirement, but generally speaking it's a much stronger signal that you understand the relevant core content and inclusion guidelines than CVU work, which often is a lot more about spotting and reverting problematic diffs rather than assessing a whole article. I'd add that if you do participate in new page reviewing, you should expect to end up at AFD fairly regularly to discuss articles that do not quite meet notability guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:05, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your clarification. I'm currently working on trying to get some AfD comments in now, so we'll see what happens. Cheers :) 「NuggFrog」 (talk) 19:20, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Beegskin

• Beegskin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I would like to assist with the May drive. I have created a fair number of articles and focus on improving existing content. I also spend time tidying pages where needed. I have read both WP:Page Curation and WP:NPP, and I would appreciate the opportunity to help. Please feel free to ask me any questions. beegskin • 🖂 • 🖉 • 15:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

User:NuggFrog

• NuggFrog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:Deiadameian

• Deiadameian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I don't have closed any requests, but I'd like to have this right to fix incorrect titles, particularly in relation with the set index articles and the articles sharing names with them. Deiadameian (talk) 18:58, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Insufficient page moving experience. Please at least spend some time requesting the moves you would like to make at WP:RMTR first so we can see that you understand when it is appropriate to use this perm. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:TypeInfo

• TypeInfo (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I often come across pages that require title corrections or technical moves, but I am currently limited when dealing with existing redirects or move restrictions, which makes the process slower. With the page mover (extendedmover) right, I would be able to handle such moves more efficiently while ensuring proper history preservation and correct redirect handling. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s naming policies, including WP:COMMONNAME, WP:TITLE, and WP:PRECISION, and will use this right responsibly, following consensus where required.TYPEINFO (talk) 16:33, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done You've made 11 page moves total and you haven't used RM/TR or participated in any RMs. Please get some experience in moves before reapplying. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Also, you need 3k edits total before this right is granted. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:16, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Somequeen2859

• Somequeen2859 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I regularly contribute constructive edits aimed at improving accuracy, clarity, and sourcing, and I am familiar with Wikipedia’s content policies, including neutrality and verifiability. Having pending changes reviewer rights would allow me to help efficiently review edits, reduce vandalism, and support maintaining the quality and reliability of articles. Somequeen2859 (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 26 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 08:30, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Insufficient experience. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:38, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Docagold1

• Docagold1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I was hoping that I would be able to review pending changes. I feel like I can help make sure that vandalism is denied, and make sure that Wikipedia pages are accurate and correct. Thank you! Docagold1 (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had an account for 6 days and has 15 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 03:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done per the bot. Sorry but this is a permission for experienced editors (normally at least months and hundreds of edits). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:33, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok, thank you! Docagold1 (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Starlet147

• Starlet147 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I do counter vandalism work, and have edited a lot more since I last requested. I'd like this so I can use the faster tools like Huggle and Interceptor. I also recently completed CVUA training. Please, may I have Rollback? Starlet! (Need to talk?) (Library) (Sandbox) 00:20, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:02, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Rht bd

• Rht bd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Need this rights to fight recent changes vandalism. I had this rights previously, but it was granted for a month only which had expired. Now I want extension to indefinite. Thanks. Rht bd (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC) Rht bd (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:04, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:MrActiniuM

• MrActiniuM (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been patrolling some articles and new users part-time, and I have reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits before. I've used Twinkle before. MrActiniuMtalk 09:04, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done for now. I'm not seeing much of a recent track of reverting vandalism or problematic edits. In fact, in several cases you've warned a user for vandalism but not reverted the edit and it's either still there or was later reverted by another editor. You don't have any AIV or UAA reports either, which is something I look for when considering granting rollback. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:14, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

It's fine HJ, no worries at all. MrActiniuMtalk 07:53, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Lijil

• Lijil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have done work in NPP and AFC, and recently started reviewing Recent Changes using DoubleCheck. I'd like to be able to use WikiShield which requires rollback permission. Lijil (talk) 21:20, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:18, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Cosmic840

• Cosmic840 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi. I want to request rollback rights because I'm relying on checking articles to make sure that there's no vandalism. The first one was declined in March because I was new to patrolling, and now I have come back here to request it since I did a lot of reverts in the past, and I am now doing AFC. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 21:27, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:22, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:TheClocksAlwaysTurn

• TheClocksAlwaysTurn (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am submitting a new request for rollback rights as I have reached the required main space edits. I have a history of counter-vandalism and I work on recent changes patrol. I use Twinkle's pseudo-rollback, but it can sometimes be too slow to counter fast-moving vandalism, so I need a faster way to revert vandalism. TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs) 14:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 14:30, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Your previous request was turned for inexperience barely a week ago. I'm looking for a track record of at least a month or two of reverting vandalism. Also, comments from newish at ANI are almost never helpful in resolving the issue. Please spend less time there and more at AIV. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Merely a question: I started recent changes patrolling on March 16, which is when I started using Twinkle. I had assumed my original request was rejected based on the fact I hadn't yet reached the required mainspace edits, which I've reached. Am I incorrect on this fact? (I'm counting my start of recent changes as when I started using twinkle. Or is it technically April 6th?) TheClocksAlwaysTurn (The Clockworks) (contribs)(rights) 17:34, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:Qzvm

• Qzvm (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have been actively contributing and reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. I use RedWarn to fight vandalism currently. I always try to let the user know when I've reverted one of their changes. Thank you! Qzvm ^(T•C•S) 19:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 188 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 19:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

User:VanFinda

• VanFinda (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}