User:SeismicShrimp/sandbox4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Petrolia Formation | |
|---|---|
| Stratigraphic range: Early Permian, Leonardian (Sakmarian?–Artinskian?) | |
Outcrops of the Petrolia Formation | |
| Type | Formation |
| Unit of | Wichita Group |
| Underlies | Waggoner Ranch Formation, Beaverburk Limestone |
| Overlies | Nocona Formation |
| Thickness | 120 metres (390 ft) |
| Lithology | |
| Primary | mudstone |
| Other | limestone, sandstone, siltstone |
| Location | |
| Region | Texas, Oklahoma |
| Country | United States |
| Type section | |
| Named by | Hentz & Brown, 1987 |
History
The stratigraphic layers that currently make up the Petrolia Formation have been studied since 1890, when Cummins coined the "Wichita Beds" or Wichita Group. This original description of the group, it was a large, undifferentiated rock unit rather than multiple formations.[1] The Wichita Group was later split into a total of seven formations by Plummer and Moore in 1921, though none of the formations coined by the authors are used today.[2] The formation coined during this time that makes up a majority of the stratum now assigned to the Petrolia Formation was the Belle Plains Formation. Plummer and Moore originally defined the formation as the thick limestone strata between the Elm Creek Formation and the Bead Mountain bed.[3] Between this 1921 publication and the late 1980's, the Belle Plains Formation was used to define these layers of rock in northern Texas. In 1988, however, Tucker F. Hentz published a complete revision of the Wichita Group which would cause the Belle Plains Formation to become an obsolete term for theses layers of rock. Instead of the seven formations defined in 1921, the Wichita Group was instead condensed into three formations: the Nocona, Petrolia, and Waggoner Ranch Formations. This revision placed the base of the formation as equivalent to the Elm Creek Formation rather than above it along with the undifferentiated Jagger Bend and Valera Formations. This change in the base of the formation causes some of the strata originally assigned to the upper Admiral Formation to also be included into the Petrolia Formation. However, unlike in the original interpretation, the Admiral Formation is strictly a part of the more southern Albany Group rather than being the basal-most formation of the Wichita Group.[2] Since the 1988 paper by Hentz, the stratigraphy of the Petrolia Formation has stayed consistent, though the term "Belle Plains Formation" will be mentioned in papers covering fossils found in the past due to the now-obsolete name's long history of use.[4]
Geology
The Petrolia Formation has had exposures found in both northern Texas and southern Oklahoma with the southern-most limit of the formation, like other formations within the group, being where the formations of the Albany formations begin. This cutoff is represented in the Brazos River within southern Baylor County. Exposures of the formation are found throughout drainage areas of the Red Rivers located in the Archer, Baylor, Clay, and Wichita counties of Texas along with the Jefferson county, Oklahoma. The stratotype of the formation is located in Wichita county, being represented by a mudstone escarpment that underlies the Beaverburk Limestone.[2]
As a whole the Petrolia Formation, has a maximum depth of between 110–120 metres (360–390 ft). Within the group, the formation represents a transition between the more sandstone-rich underlying formations and the more mudstone-rich overlying formations. This is shown by the higher prevalence of mudstone when compared to the lower formations along with the presence of limestone that is only present in the upper formations. Even with this being the case, the sandstones seen within the formation have more similarities to the underlying Nocona Formation. The formation can be differentiated from other more continental portions of the red beds by the presence of the overlying Beaverburk Limestone, though this can only be used south of the South Fork of Buffalo Creek. Below are the descriptions of the constituent lithologies within the formation.[2]
| Lithology | Estimated Percentage | Thickness | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mudstone | 80 to 95% | at least 9–30 metres (30–98 ft) | The most common lithology of the formation with the layers having planar crossbedding. These beds range in color between dark reddish-brown and yellowish-brown, being made up of clay and silt. The beds that make up these layers are irregularly stratified and contain nodules made up of calcium carbonate. Though very uncommon, some mudstone layers contain desiccation cracks and lamination. Vertebrate fossils are present, though very uncommon. |
| Sandstone (mapped) | 5 to 20% | 1–8 metres (3.3–26.2 ft) | The second most common lithology, showing a general similarity to the sandstone layers seen in the underlying formations. Sandstone layers are both grayish-red and olive-grey. The grain size of these layers range between medium to very fine with the finer grains being found in the upper sections of the formation. Similar to the mudstone layers, the sandstone layers are thickly cross-bedded though lamination is much more common. Also like the other beds, nodules are common. However unlike in the mudstone layers, these are made up of both calcium carbonate and mudstone. |
| Sandstone and siltstone (unmapped) | Around 1% | 0.3–2.5 metres (0.98–8.20 ft) | This lithology is represented by lenses with a color and grain similar to the more common sandstone, though lenses are grayish-red. Cross-lamination is common within the lenses though features such as planar lamination, parting lineations, and ripples are also found throughout the layers. These lenses represent channel-fills and are where a number of trace fossils are found. |
| Shale and claystone | Around 1% | 1–4.5 metres (3.3–14.8 ft) | These lenses are most commonly found in the southwestern range of the formation and are light to dark grey in color. Thin beds of conglomerate and sandstone overlap the lenses, with this either only being on the margins of the lens or completely covering it. The shale found at a specific layer (N3) is also interbedded with limestone. Vertebrate fossils are the most common fossils in these lenses though plants, conchostracans, and marine pelecypods are also found. |
| Conglomerate | Around 1% | 0.2–1.5 metres (0.66–4.92 ft) | These lenses are made up of clasts ranging in size from pebble to granule along with nodules and other lithologies that are located nearby. Similar to the sandstone and siltstone lenses, conglomerate lenses represent channel-fills. The only sort of more structured layers within the lenses is a single instance tabular crossbeds. Vertebrate fossils are more abraded and marine invertebrates are more common than in other layers. |
| Limestone | Around 1% | 0.2–1 metre (0.66–3.28 ft) | Unlike other lithologies, limestone is only present as either thin interbeds or isolated beds. In either of these cases, the beds are always light gray. The grains within these layers wildly range between very fine and very course. Clay is commonly found within the beds, with some areas being intraclastic. A number of feature such as desiccation cracks and algal lamination are commonly found in the limestone. Burrows are often found at the base of these beds. These are only found at the base of the formation near the Baylor and Archer Counties. |
Paleofauna
Synapsida
| Synapsids of the Petrolia Formation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Notes | Images |
Paleoflora
Gymnospermae
| Gymnosperms of the Petrolia Formation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Notes | Images |
| Agathoxylon[5] | A. sp. | ||
| Cordaites[5] | C. principalis | ||
| Dorycordaites[5] | D. sp. | ||
| Ernestiodendron[5] | E. sp. | ||
| Samaropsis[5] | S. sp. 1 | ||
| S. sp. 2 | |||
Lycophytes
| Lycophytes of the Petrolia Formation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Notes | Images |
| Sigillaria [5] | S. brardii | ||
Polypodiophyta
Progymnospermopsida
| Progymnosperms of the Petrolia Formation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Notes | Images |
| Russelites[5] | R. sp. | ||
| Tingia[5] | T. sp. | ||
Pteridospermatophyta
Lyginopteridales
| Lyginopteridales of the Petrolia Formation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Notes | Images |
| Sphenopteris[5] | S. cf. macilenta | ||
Medullosales
| Medullosales of the Petrolia Formation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Notes | Images |
| Odontopteris[5] | O. genuina | ||
| O. cf. osrnundaeformis | |||
| O. sp. | |||
| Callipteridium[5] | C. cf. pteridium | ||
| C. virginianum | |||
Peltaspermales
| Peltaspermales of the Petrolia Formation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Species | Notes | Images |
| "Callipteris"[5] | C. conferta | ||
Paleoenvironment
The strata that make up the Petrolia Formation represent both freshwater and marine environments with a coastal plain with evidence of meandering rivers, lakes, and marshes being present within the more continental areas of the formation. The muddy point-bar deposits are similar to what is seen in suspended-load rivers found in the midwestern US and eastern Australia. Along with these more permanent bodies of water, ephemeral streams are also found within the formation. These streams most likely represent a number of things such as tributaries, splay channels, and other more short-lived bodies of water. Though rare, only being present in the uppermost portion of the formation near Wichita County, marine environments are preserved within the formation. These represent the beach and shallow marine areas surrounding the more continental environment.[2] Two separate floras are seen at the formation with those being a more water-dependent tree-fern-dominated assemblage and a more drought tolerant conifer-dominated assemblage. This is most likely due to the tree ferns being much more common near the margins of the rivers and marshes than outside of them.[6] Based on this, the formation most likely represents a seasonally dry tropical environment. This would suggest a largely dry climate with short but extreme wet seasons, similar to what is seen in the slightly younger Clear Fork Group.[7]