User:Stroppolo/ToolBox

List of template messages for user talk pages From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CSD Log

This is a log of all speedy deletion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's CSD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

May 2014

  1. Click to Enter Hall Ticket No.: CSD A1 ({{db-nocontext}}); notified Suresh.chitty (talk · contribs) 19:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

  1. Lonesound: multiple criteria (A7, G12); notified Sir.vinyl (talk · contribs) 15:06, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
  2. Michael Gordon Clifford: CSD A7 ({{db-band}}); notified Cathchampagne (talk · contribs) 18:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
  3. Marko Bulat (footballer): CSD A7 ({{db-person}}); notified Lotom (talk · contribs) 18:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
  4. Optic Gaming: CSD A1 ({{db-nocontext}}); notified JustGaminglt (talk · contribs) 18:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
  5. Mary Tate: CSD A7 ({{db-person}}); notified Alebowgm (talk · contribs) 23:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
  6. Divas Snow Gear: multiple criteria (G11, G12); notified Daniraedivassnowgear (talk · contribs) 17:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
  1. Kieranfleming02: CSD A7 user notified
  2. Jack magnotta: CSD A1 ({{db-nocontext}}); notified Djhy5teria (talk · contribs) 01:24, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
  3. Paper Scissors: CSD A7 ({{db-band}}); notified Herbertsherbert (talk · contribs) 01:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
  4. Udesh Udayakumar: CSD A7 ({{db-person}}); notified Udesh Vtra (talk · contribs) 15:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
  5. Arijit Degaonkar: CSD A7 ({{db-person}}); notified AjitMD (talk · contribs) 12:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  6. Android appstore free: CSD G11 ({{db-spam}}); notified ImranHossainShanto (talk · contribs) 12:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  7. Aaron Michael Lee: CSD A7 ({{db-person}}); notified Kristen21 (talk · contribs) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  8. AaronLee: CSD A7 ({{db-person}}); notified Kristen21 (talk · contribs) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Message Templates

Search for templates

Standardized warning templates

All warning templates

Multi-level templates

More information Description, Level 1 ...

Contents

Show warnings
Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents.
Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 4im
Vandalism
Blatant vandalism {{subst:uw-vandalism1}} {{subst:uw-vandalism2}} {{subst:uw-vandalism3}} {{subst:uw-vandalism4}} {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}}
Subtle vandalism {{subst:uw-subtle1}} {{subst:uw-subtle2}} {{subst:uw-subtle3}} {{subst:uw-subtle4}} {{N/A}}
General disruptive editing not categorized elsewhere
Disruptive editing {{subst:uw-disruptive1}} {{subst:uw-disruptive2}} {{subst:uw-disruptive3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Gaming the system {{subst:uw-gaming1}} {{subst:uw-gaming2}} {{subst:uw-gaming3}} {{subst:uw-gaming4}} {{subst:uw-gaming4im}}
Behavior in articles
Using edit summaries or comments that are uncivil, inappropriate or otherwise unconstructive {{subst:uw-bes1}} {{subst:uw-bes2}} {{subst:uw-bes3}} {{subst:uw-bes4}} {{subst:uw-bes4im}}
Page blanking {{subst:uw-blank1}} {{subst:uw-blank2}} {{subst:uw-delete3}} {{N/A}} {{N/A}}
Removal of content without adequate explanation {{subst:uw-delete1}} {{subst:uw-delete2}} {{subst:uw-delete3}} {{subst:uw-delete4}} {{subst:uw-delete4im}}
Misleading edit summaries {{subst:uw-mislead1}} {{subst:uw-mislead2}} {{subst:uw-mislead3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Frequent or mass changes to genres without consensus or reference {{subst:uw-genre1}} {{subst:uw-genre2}} {{subst:uw-genre3}} {{subst:uw-genre4}} {{N/A}}
Image-related vandalism {{subst:uw-image1}} {{subst:uw-image2}} {{subst:uw-image3}} {{subst:uw-image4}} {{subst:uw-image4im}}
Improper humor in articles {{subst:uw-joke1}} {{subst:uw-joke2}} {{subst:uw-joke3}} {{subst:uw-joke4}} {{subst:uw-joke4im}}
Censorship of material {{subst:uw-notcensored1}} {{subst:uw-notcensored2}} {{subst:uw-notcensored3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Ownership of articles {{subst:uw-own1}} {{subst:uw-own2}} {{subst:uw-own3}} {{subst:uw-own4}} {{subst:uw-own4im}}
Inappropriate expansion of plot summaries {{subst:uw-plotsum1}} {{subst:uw-plotsum2}} {{subst:uw-plotsum3}} {{subst:uw-plotsum4}} {{N/A}}
Inappropriately changing pronouns of BLP subjects {{subst:uw-pronouns1}} {{subst:uw-pronouns2}} {{subst:uw-pronouns3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Disrupting the taxonomy templates {{subst:uw-taxo1}} {{subst:uw-taxo2}} {{subst:uw-taxo3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Talking in articles {{subst:uw-talkinarticle1}} {{subst:uw-talkinarticle2}} {{subst:uw-talkinarticle3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Removal of maintenance templates {{subst:uw-tdel1}} {{subst:uw-tdel2}} {{subst:uw-tdel3}} {{subst:uw-tdel4}} {{N/A}}
Editing tests {{subst:uw-test1}} {{subst:uw-test2}} {{subst:uw-test3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Uploading unencyclopedic images (image vandalism) {{subst:uw-upload1}} {{subst:uw-upload2}} {{subst:uw-upload3}} {{subst:uw-upload4}} {{subst:uw-upload4im}}
Triggering the edit filter {{subst:uw-attempt1}} {{subst:uw-attempt2}} {{subst:uw-attempt3}} {{subst:uw-attempt4}} {{subst:uw-attempt4im}}
Behavior towards editors
Not assuming good faith {{subst:uw-agf1}} {{subst:uw-agf2}} {{subst:uw-agf3}} {{subst:uw-npa4}} {{N/A}}
Harassment of other users {{subst:uw-harass1}} {{subst:uw-harass2}} {{subst:uw-harass3}} {{subst:uw-harass4}} {{subst:uw-harass4im}}
Personal or uncivil attack directed at editors {{subst:uw-npa1}} {{subst:uw-npa2}} {{subst:uw-npa3}} {{subst:uw-npa4}} {{subst:uw-npa4im}}
Improper use of warning or blocking template {{subst:uw-tempabuse1}} {{subst:uw-tempabuse2}} {{subst:uw-disruptive3}} {{N/A}} {{N/A}}
Adding promotions of objects or ideologies (also spam)
Using Wikipedia for advertising or promotion {{subst:uw-advert1}} {{subst:uw-advert2}} {{subst:uw-advert3}} {{subst:uw-advert4}} {{subst:uw-advert4im}}
Inserting fringe or undue weight content into articles {{subst:uw-fringe1}} {{subst:uw-fringe2}} {{subst:uw-fringe3}} {{subst:uw-generic4}} {{N/A}}
Not adhering to neutral point of view {{subst:uw-npov1}} {{subst:uw-npov2}} {{subst:uw-npov3}} {{subst:uw-npov4}} {{N/A}}
Paid editing without disclosure under the Wikimedia Terms of Use {{subst:uw-paid1}} {{subst:uw-paid2}} {{subst:uw-paid3}} {{subst:uw-paid4}} {{subst:uw-paid4im}}
Adding spam links {{subst:uw-spam1}} {{subst:uw-spam2}} {{subst:uw-spam3}} {{subst:uw-spam4}} {{subst:uw-spam4im}}
Inserting factual inaccuracies and/or libel
Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons {{subst:uw-biog1}} {{subst:uw-biog2}} {{subst:uw-biog3}} {{subst:uw-biog4}} {{subst:uw-biog4im}}
Defamation regarding article subjects {{subst:uw-defamatory1}} {{subst:uw-defamatory2}} {{subst:uw-defamatory3}} {{subst:uw-defamatory4}} {{subst:uw-defamatory4im}}
Introducing deliberate factual errors {{subst:uw-error1}} {{subst:uw-error2}} {{subst:uw-error3}} {{subst:uw-error4}} {{N/A}}
Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sourced material {{subst:uw-nor1}} {{subst:uw-nor2}} {{subst:uw-nor3}} {{subst:uw-nor4}} {{N/A}}
Addition of material that fails verification by the given citation {{subst:uw-fv1}} {{subst:uw-fv2}} {{subst:uw-unsourced3}} {{subst:uw-unsourced4}} {{N/A}}
Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material {{subst:uw-unsourced1}} {{subst:uw-unsourced2}} {{subst:uw-unsourced3}} {{subst:uw-unsourced4}} {{N/A}}
Large language model (LLM; Chatbot) misuse {{subst:uw-ai1}} {{subst:uw-ai2}} {{subst:uw-ai3}} {{subst:uw-ai4}} {{N/A}}
Unaccepted practices, unilateral action against policies or guidelines
Removing {{afd}} templates / refactoring others' comments in AfD discussions {{subst:uw-afd1}} {{subst:uw-afd2}} {{subst:uw-afd3}} {{subst:uw-afd4}} {{N/A}}
Removing {{rfd}} templates / refactoring others' comments in RfD discussions {{subst:uw-rfd1}} {{subst:uw-rfd2}} {{subst:uw-rfd3}} {{subst:uw-rfd4}} {{N/A}}
Removing {{tfd}} templates / refactoring others' comments in TfD discussions {{subst:uw-tfd1}} {{subst:uw-tfd2}} {{subst:uw-tfd3}} {{subst:uw-tfd4}} {{N/A}}
Triggering the abuse filter by attempting to vandalize {{subst:uw-attempt1}} {{subst:uw-attempt2}} {{subst:uw-attempt3}} {{subst:uw-attempt4}} {{subst:uw-attempt4im}}
Removing {{Prod blp}} templates {{subst:uw-blpprod1}} {{subst:uw-blpprod2}} {{subst:uw-blpprod3}} {{subst:uw-blpprod4}} {{N/A}}
Removing {{cfd}} templates / refactoring others' comments in CfD discussions {{subst:uw-cfd1}} {{subst:uw-cfd2}} {{subst:uw-cfd3}} {{subst:uw-cfd4}} {{N/A}}
Using LLMs to generate comments in discussions {{subst:uw-aitalk1}} {{subst:uw-aitalk2}} {{subst:uw-aitalk3}} {{subst:uw-aitalk4}} {{N/A}}
Using talk page as forum {{subst:uw-chat1}} {{subst:uw-chat2}} {{subst:uw-chat3}} {{subst:uw-chat4}} {{N/A}}
Adding non-compliant colours {{subst:uw-color1}} {{subst:uw-color2}} {{subst:uw-color3}} {{subst:uw-color4}} {{N/A}}
Creating inappropriate pages {{subst:uw-create1}} {{subst:uw-create2}} {{subst:uw-create3}} {{subst:uw-create4}} {{subst:uw-create4im}}
Undue use of euphemisms {{subst:uw-euphemisms1}} {{subst:uw-euphemisms2}} {{subst:uw-mos3}} {{N/A}} {{N/A}}
Removing {{ffd}} templates / refactoring others' comments in FfD discussions {{subst:uw-ffd1}} {{subst:uw-ffd2}} {{subst:uw-ffd3}} {{subst:uw-ffd4}} {{N/A}}
Uploading files missing copyright status {{subst:uw-ics1}} {{subst:uw-ics2}} {{subst:uw-ics3}} {{subst:uw-ics4}} {{N/A}}
Removing file deletion tags {{subst:uw-idt1}} {{subst:uw-idt2}} {{subst:uw-idt3}} {{subst:uw-idt4}} {{N/A}}
Removing {{mfd}} templates / refactoring others' comments in MfD discussions {{subst:uw-mfd1}} {{subst:uw-mfd2}} {{subst:uw-mfd3}} {{subst:uw-mfd4}} {{N/A}}
Manual of Style (Formatting, date, language, etc.) {{subst:uw-mos1}} {{subst:uw-mos2}} {{subst:uw-mos3}} {{subst:uw-mos4}} {{N/A}}
Malicious or bad page moves {{subst:uw-move1}} {{subst:uw-move2}} {{subst:uw-move3}} {{subst:uw-move4}} {{subst:uw-move4im}}
Creating malicious redirects {{subst:uw-redirect1}} {{subst:uw-redirect2}} {{subst:uw-redirect3}} {{subst:uw-redirect4}} {{subst:uw-redirect4im}}
Removing {{speedy deletion}} templates from self-created articles {{subst:uw-speedy1}} {{subst:uw-speedy2}} {{subst:uw-speedy3}} {{subst:uw-speedy4}} {{subst:uw-speedy4im}}
Editing, correcting, or deleting others' talk page comments {{subst:uw-tpv1}} {{subst:uw-tpv2}} {{subst:uw-tpv3}} {{subst:uw-tpv4}} {{subst:uw-tpv4im}}
Adding offensive, libelous, disruptive, or defamatory content to a sandbox {{subst:uw-sandbox1}} {{subst:uw-sandbox2}} {{subst:uw-sandbox3}} {{subst:uw-sandbox4}} {{subst:uw-sandbox4im}}
Description Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 4im
Close

Single-level templates

Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents.

More information Advisories, Description ...
Advisories
Show notices
Description Template
Third opinion request did not follow the guidelines {{subst:uw-3o}}
Not updating the access date parameter in citing templates {{subst:uw-accessdate1}}
After addition of {{subst:AFC draft|user}} or {{subst:submit|user}} {{subst:uw-afcaddition}}
New user is likely to be using multiple accounts {{subst:uw-agf-sock}}
Bad AIV report {{subst:uw-aiv}}
Bad AN/EW report {{subst:uw-anew}}
Suggesting a user archive their talk page {{subst:uw-archive}}
Adding signatures to article space {{subst:uw-articlesig}}
Article was undersourced and has been moved to draft space {{subst:uw-articletodraft}}
Creating autobiographies {{subst:uw-autobiography}}
Disrupting automatic calculation {{subst:uw-autocalc}}
Creating articles without categories {{subst:uw-catimprove}}
Adding incorrect categories {{subst:uw-badcat}}
Incorrectly tagging pages for speedy deletion (for NPP use {{uw-csd}}) {{subst:uw-badcsd}}
Adding non-notable list entries {{subst:uw-badlistentry}}
Misunderstanding proposed deletion of biographies of living people criteria {{subst:uw-badprodblp}}
Adding bare URLs as references {{subst:uw-bareurl}}
Adding gossip to biographies {{subst:uw-biog-not}}
"Biting" newcomers {{subst:uw-bite}}
Wikipedia is not for blogging or promotion {{subst:uw-blog}}
Conforming to "bold, revert, discuss" cycle {{subst:uw-brd}}
Citation style {{subst:uw-citevar}}
Conflict of interest, with an extended legal warning {{subst:uw-coi}}
Removing columns {{subst:uw-columns}}
Not attributing Wikipedia content {{subst:uw-copying}}
Submitting copyrighted images {{subst:uw-copyright-img}}
Cut and paste moves {{subst:uw-c&pmove}}
Not adequately or properly naming your images {{subst:uw-cryptic-filename}}
Adding speculative or unconfirmed information about future albums or events {{subst:uw-crystal}}
Incorrectly tagging pages for speedy deletion at NPP {{subst:uw-csd}}
Incorrectly formatting disambiguation pages {{subst:uw-dab}}
Unnecessarily changing date formats {{subst:uw-date}}
Adding content which will soon become dated {{subst:uw-dated}}
Removing proper sources containing dead links {{subst:uw-deadlink}}
Adding stub categories manually, rather than via templates {{subst:uw-directcat}}
Incorrect use of DISPLAYTITLE {{subst:uw-displaytitle}}
Linking to drafts from articles {{subst:Uw-draft-link}}
Userspace draft suggestion {{subst:uw-draftfirst}}
{{subst:uw-draftfirst-empty}}
{{subst:uw-draftfirst-nn}}
Draft has been moved to draft space {{subst:uw-draftmoved}}
Not using edit summary {{subst:uw-editsummary}} (for new users)
{{subst:uw-editsummary2}} (for more experienced users)
Adding external links to the body of an article {{subst:uw-elinbody}}
Not communicating in English (see also specific language templates) {{subst:Uw-notenglishtalk}}
Unnecessarily changing between national varieties of English {{subst:uw-engvar}}
Inappropriately referring to a person by a first name or an honorific prefix {{subst:uw-firstname}}
Misuse of flags {{subst:uw-flag}}
Fair use image removed {{subst:uw-fuir}}
Drive-by nomination of Wikipedia:Good articles {{subst:uw-ga-driveby}}
Grammar errors {{subst:uw-grammar}}
Editing against a Wikipedia guideline {{subst:uw-guideline}}
Overly hasty tagging of articles for speedy deletion {{subst:uw-hasty}}
Not completing an AfD nomination {{subst:uw-incompleteAFD}}
Unexplained edits to infoboxes {{subst:uw-infobox}}
Not italicizing books, films, albums, magazines, TV series, etc. within articles {{subst:uw-italicize}}
Adding excessive redlinks or repeated blue links {{subst:uw-linking}}
Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material for medical content {{subst:uw-medrs}}
Removing useful links {{subst:uw-removedlink}}
Wikipedia is not a memorial {{subst:uw-memorial}}
Incorrectly using minor edits check box {{subst:uw-minor}}
Adding machine translated content {{subst:uw-mt}}
Not following Wikipedia's naming conventions {{subst:uw-nc}}
Uploading replaceable non-free images {{subst:uw-nonfree}}
Creating articles with no evidence of notability {{subst:uw-notability}}
Reporting complex abuse to AIV {{subst:uw-notaiv}}
Adding a good article tag to an article without the nomination process {{subst:uw-notga}}
Incorrectly marking an edit as vandalism {{subst:uw-notvand}}
Using voting instead of consensus {{subst:uw-notvote}}
Creating talk pages for non-existent articles {{subst:uw-orphantalk}}
Failed ping fix {{subst:uw-pingfix}}
Not attributing public domain sources {{subst:uw-plagiarism}}
Not using preview button to avoid mistakes {{subst:uw-preview}}
Assuming another editor's gender {{subst:uw-pronoun}}
Creating poorly referenced articles {{subst:uw-refimprove}}
Not reverting vandalism to a 'clean' version of the page {{subst:uw-removevandalism}}
Recreating salted articles under an alternative title {{subst:uw-salt|Article}}
Rename request impossible {{subst:uw-samename}}
Giving undue special to scripture {{subst:uw-scripture}}
Experimenting in articles and reverting self tests {{subst:uw-selfrevert}}
Signature has design problems {{subst:uw-sigdesign}}
Signature has no link to userspace {{subst:uw-siglink}}
Using see links instead of redirects {{subst:uw-sl}}
Wikipedia is not a social network (e.g., Facebook, Twitter) {{subst:uw-socialnetwork}}
Flagging or deleting "spoilers" {{subst:uw-spoiler}}
Premature inclusion of a possible sports transaction {{subst:Uw-sportstrans}}
Adding or changing statistics without a source {{subst:Uw-stats}}
Leaving contact information {{subst:uw-suppressed-contact}}
Adding a cleanup tag without explanation {{subst:uw-tagged}}
Starting the same discussion on multiple places {{subst:uw-talkfork}}
Making an edit that broke a template {{subst:uw-tempbreak}}
Using thumbnails in infoboxes {{subst:uw-thumb in infobox}}
Not signing posts {{subst:uw-tilde}}
Adding talk page threads to the top instead of the bottom {{subst:uw-toppost}}
Reporting of username to WP:UAA not accepted {{subst:uw-uaa}}
Addition of unattributed Creative commons text {{subst:uw-unattribcc}}
Claiming that an article subject has died without a source {{subst:uw-uncited-death}}
Adding unreliable sources {{subst:uw-unreliable}}
User page in inappropriate category {{subst:uw-upincat}}
Using image from external source {{subst:uw-uploadfirst}}
Abandoned userspace draft {{subst:uw-userspace draft finish}}
NOINDEXing of userspace page {{subst:uw-userspacenoindex}}
Inappropriate use of user talk page {{subst:uw-usertalk}}
Creating inappropriate video game content {{subst:uw-vgscope}}
Not using user warnings after revert {{subst:uw-warn}}
Whitewashing properly sourced content {{subst:uw-whitewashing}}
Creating inappropriate article(s) {{subst:uw-wizard}}
Using inaccurate or inappropriate edit summaries {{subst:uw-wrongsummary}}
Using personal opinions as arguments in deletion discussion. {{subst:uw-xfdpersonal}}
Close
More information Warnings, Description ...
Warnings
Show warnings
Description Template
Violation/potential violation of the one revert rule {{subst:uw-1rr}}
Violation/potential violation of the three revert rule {{subst:uw-3rr}}
Affiliate marketing {{subst:uw-affiliate}}
Username matches well-known person (assume good faith) {{subst:uw-agf-wellknown}}
Creating attack pages {{subst:uw-attack}}
Bot username {{subst:uw-botun}}
Canvassing other editors {{subst:uw-canvass}}
Conflict of interest & username issue {{subst:uw-coi-username}}
Copyright violation {{subst:uw-copyright}}
{{subst:uw-lyrics}}
Final warning for uploading copyrighted images {{subst:uw-copyright-image-final}}
Linking to copyrighted works violation {{subst:uw-copyright-link}}
Copyright violation, for new contributors {{subst:uw-copyright-new}}
Removing the {{copyvio}} template {{subst:uw-copyright-remove}}
Promotion of hate speech and other derogatory content {{subst:uw-derogatory}}
{{subst:uw-hatespeech}}
Gaming extended confirmed status {{subst:uw-ecgaming}}
Extended confirmed restriction violation {{subst:uw-ecr}}
Edit summary that triggers abuse filter {{subst:uw-efsummary}}
A softer edit warring notice for new editors {{subst:uw-ewsoft}}
Edit warring notice {{subst:uw-ew}}
Hijacking pages {{subst:uw-hijacking}}
Creating hoaxes {{subst:uw-hoax}}
Username implies that the account is being shared {{subst:uw-isu}}
Making legal threats {{subst:uw-legal}}
Editing while logged out {{subst:uw-login}}
Inappropriate use of multiple temporary accounts {{subst:uw-multipleTAs}}
Close paraphrasing {{subst:uw-paraphrase}}
Personal info {{subst:uw-pinfo}}
Editing to illustrate a point {{subst:uw-point}}
Personal info about yourself as a minor {{subst:uw-selfinfo}}
Using Wikipedia as a social network {{subst:uw-socialnetwork-strong}}
Userpage vandalism {{subst:uw-upv}}
Username violation (custom) {{subst:uw-username}}
Userpage or subpage is against policy {{subst:uw-userpage}}
Close

Blocks

More information Show block templates, Generic blocks ...
Show block templates
Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents.
Don't forget to substitute these templates (more information) | Block templates are for admin use only.
Generic blocks Definite Indefinite
Anonymous users block {{subst:uw-ablock}} {{subst:uw-ablock|indef=yes}}
User block {{subst:uw-block}} {{subst:uw-block|indef=yes}} or {{subst:uw-blockindef}}
Specific abuse blocks Recent abuse Abuse-only account
Advertising block {{subst:uw-adblock}} {{subst:uw-soablock}}
Spam block {{subst:uw-sblock}}
Spam blacklist block {{subst:uw-spamblacklistblock}}
Suspected spambot block {{N/A}} {{subst:uw-spambotblock}}
Arbitration enforcement block {{subst:uw-aeblock}} {{N/A}}
Compromised account block {{subst:uw-compblock}} {{N/A}}
Community general sanctions block {{subst:uw-csblock}} {{N/A}}
Personal editing restrictions block {{subst:uw-cserblock}} {{N/A}}
Biographies-of-living-persons block {{subst:uw-bioblock}} {{N/A}}
Unapproved bot block {{subst:uw-botblock}} {{N/A}}
Content deletion block {{subst:uw-dblock}} {{N/A}}
Copyright violation block {{subst:uw-copyrightblock}} {{N/A}}
Disruptive editing block {{subst:uw-disruptblock}} {{N/A}}
Edit filter block {{subst:uw-efblock}} {{N/A}}
Edit warring block {{subst:uw-ewblock}} {{subst:uw-deoablock}}
Three revert rule block {{subst:uw-3block}}
Harassment block {{subst:uw-hblock}}
Legal threat block {{subst:uw-lblock}} {{N/A}}
Social networking block {{subst:uw-socialmediablock}} {{N/A}}
Non-free image block {{subst:uw-nfimageblock}} {{N/A}}
Creating nonsense pages block {{subst:uw-npblock}} {{N/A}}
Personal attack block {{subst:uw-pablock}} {{N/A}}
Sock puppetry block {{subst:uw-sockblock}} {{subst:uw-sockblock|indef=yes}} (including sock puppets)
Logged-out block evasion block {{subst:uw-ipevadeblock}} {{N/A}}
Unsourced content block {{subst:uw-ucblock}} {{N/A}}
Undisclosed paid editing and advertising block {{N/A}} {{subst:uw-upeblock}}
Vandalism block {{subst:uw-vblock}} {{subst:uw-voablock}}
Not here to build an encyclopedia block {{N/A}} {{subst:uw-nothereblock}}
Username policy blocks Good-faith Bad-faith
Username block {{subst:uw-ublock}} {{subst:uw-uhblock}}
Bot username block {{subst:uw-botublock}} {{subst:uw-botuhblock}}
Admin username block {{subst:uw-adminublock}} {{subst:uw-adminuhblock}}
Cause block (username violation and edits promoting a cause) {{subst:uw-causeblock}} {{N/A}}
Famous person or possible impersonation {{subst:uw-ublock-wellknown}} {{N/A}}
Promotional username block {{subst:uw-softerblock}} {{subst:uw-spamublock}}
Username closely resembles another user {{subst:uw-ublock-double}} {{subst:uw-uhblock-double}}
Username and vandalism-only account block {{N/A}} {{subst:uw-vaublock}}
Close
More information Unblock review, Template ...
Unblock review Template
Decline reason here {{subst:Decline reason here}}
Edit warring block {{subst:Ewblock}}
Close

Foreign-language contributors

All languages: {{subst:welcome-foreign|xx}}, where xx is the language code ('fr' for French, 'de' for German, and so on).

Other

More information Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents., Page headers ...
Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents.
Page headers Images Discussions and editing

{{anonblock|A header used to indicate a soft block on an IP address.}}

{{bottompostusertalk|Please post new topics at the bottom, with headers.}}

{{ISP|This IP is shared across an Internet Service Provider.}}

{{mobile IP|This IP is shared by customers of a mobile phone company.}}

{{Please archive|Requesting a user to archive their talk page}}

{{pp-semi-usertalk|IP talk page semi protected to prevent warning removal.}}

{{pp-usertalk|User talk protected to prevent blocked user from vandalizing.}}

{{repeated abuse|IP has been repeatedly blocked.}}

{{schoolblock|Please log in at home to edit. Your school is blocked.}}

{{shared IP|This IP is shared by (organization).}}

{{shared IP address (public)|This IP is shared by users on public terminals.}}

{{shared IP edu|This IP is shared by an educational organization.}}

{{subst:sharedIPAdvice}}

{{user talk top|Guidelines for posting on a user talk page.}}

{{usercomment|Welcome to my talk.}}

{{usertalkcriticism}}

{{usertalkpageheader|Welcome to my talk, guidelines for posting on a user talk page.}}

{{whois|A less-specific form of sharedip that doesn't commit to the actual use of the IP.}}

{{subst:di-replaceable fair use-notice}}

{{subst:fdw|File:name}}

{{subst:fdw-cp|File:name}}

{{subst:fdw-iw|filename}} for images under deletion discussion on Wikimedia Commons or another project or language site

{{subst:file copyright request|File:name}}

{{subst:file source|File:name}}

{{subst:images on userboxes}}

{{subst:nld}} if an image has a source but no licensing information

{{subst:nrd}} if an image has no fair use rationale

{{subst:nsd}} if an image has no source indicated

{{subst:orfud}} if an image has a fair use tag but isn't used in any articles

{{subst:rfu}} if an image has a fair use tag but could be replaced by a free image

{{subst:un-commons|File:name}}

{{subst:uploaderHints}}

{{subst:ping fix}}

{{reply to|a/k/a 'ping', send a notification to a user in a talkpage thread.}}

{{subst:sofixit}}

{{talkback|Notify user they have a message on another page.}}

{{talkbacktiny|Notify user they have a message on another page.}}

{{talk header|This is the talk page for (article), to discuss improvements.}}

{{subst:warn}}

New user Deletion notifications Other notifications

See also Welcome templates
and Welcome templates/Table
{{subst:first article}}

{{subst:firstredirect}}

{{subst:register}}

{{subst:usernameAllowed}}

{{subst:usernameDiscussion}}

{{subst:w-basic}}

{{subst:w-graphical}}

{{subst:w-link}}

{{subst:w-screen}}

{{subst:w-short}}

{{subst:w-shout}}

{{subst:welcome}}

{{subst:welcome cookie|Your username}}

{{subst:welcome-anon}}

{{subst:Welcome-anon-unconstructive}}

{{subst:Welcome-anon-npov}}

{{subst:Welcome-belated}}

{{subst:welcome-copyright}}

{{subst:welcomeg}}

{{subst:Welcomelaws}}

{{subst:welcomenpov}}

{{subst:welcomespam}}

{{subst:welcometest|Article}}

{{subst:welcome-unconstructive}}

{{subst:Welcomeunsourced}}

{{subst:Welcome non-latin}}

{{subst:Welcome to Wikipedia}} or {{subst:wtw}}

{{subst:nn-userfy|Article}}

{{subst:nonsensepage|Article}}

{{subst:uw-salt|Article}}

AFD nominations

CSD nominations

CSD deletions:

CSD declined:

CSD requests to wait:

  • {{CSD5|I'm uninvolved and investigating a rewrite; wait five minutes before deleting.}}
  • {{hasty|Speedy tagging may be too hasty; wait an hour to see if article is added to by creator.}}

MFD nominations

PROD nominations

Placement and removal of CSD tags:

Close

Meta-templates

More information Click here to show warnings, Description ...
Click here to show warnings
Hover over the curly braces to see a summary of the contents.
Due to their nature, substitution of these templates is required.
Description All levels
Gives title and date to make it quicker to warn users {{subst:AntiVandal}}
Close
Huggle Manual

Soft redirect to:Manual
This page is a soft redirect.

ACC Manual

More information This is the request an account guide ...
This is the request an account guide

This page is the standard operating procedure manual for ACC tool users and ACC tool administrators.

If you're looking to request a new account, click here to be redirected to the correct page.



Close

The Account Creation Interface (or ACI) is an application comprising software that is hosted on the Wikimedia Cloud VPS, and is used to facilitate account creation requests on the English Wikipedia. Editors or users who are unable to create a new Wikipedia account themselves (either due to technical reasons or because their IP address is blocked) can instead use this interface in order to request the creation of an account to be performed on their behalf and then provided for them to use.

This is done by navigating to the account request application form page, filling out all of the required fields, and submitting the Account Request Application (or ARA) for review. From there, a qualified Wikipedia editor with the ability to handle submitted ARAs (referred to as an ACC Tool User) will evaluate and review it for any issues or concerns. After thoroughly reviewing the request and the information provided, and (if applicable) after any questions asked by the ACC Tool User have been addressed and answered by the submitter, the ACC Tool user will approve the request, create the account on behalf of the submitter using the information provided in the ARA, and send the credentials for the account to them.

This page serves as the official Account Creation Interface Standard Operating Procedures Manual (or ACC Standard Operating Procedures, ACC SOP, or simply the ACC guide page), and describes accepted practices, detailed instructions, relevant policies, and required steps and actions that must be followed in regards to the proper access and use of the Account Creation Tool User Interface (or ACC Tool User Interface). This includes, but is not limited to: the proper and correct handling, evaluation, scrutiny, and closing of ARAs (or requests) that are submitted using the Account Request Application Form webpage, and the proper and appropriate access and handling of all non-public information that is provided anywhere within it.

All ACC Tool Users and ACC Tool Administrators are required to review, understand, and reference – as well as obey, follow, fully complete, and remain within compliance of all instructions, processes, steps, procedures, and other requirements detailed and specified on this page – at all times. In addition, All ACC Tool Users and ACC Tool Administrators are required to obey, follow, and remain within compliance of all Wikipedia policies and guidelines specified on this project at all times. These requirements are strictly enforced and are a condition of holding ACC Tool User or ACC Tool Administrator permissions on the Account Creation Interface.

Introduction and prerequisites

This section provides important information, details, requirements, and instructions for editors who are interested in joining the project as an ACC Tool User, or who are registering an ACC tool account in order to access the interface as an approved ACC Tool User.

Terminology

It is important for new or prospective ACC Tool Users to familiarize themselves with the common ACC terms are used throughout Wikipedia ACC pages, the Account Creation Interface, the internal Tool User Interface, and in internal and external communications between ACC team members and outside editors and users. The common ACC terms used throughout the interface are listed, defined, and detailed below:

  • ACC - Refers to the entire Wikipedia request an account project and process in its entirety, including the software and application interface, all relevant Wikipedia pages, communication mediums, internal tool users and administrators, and all policies and guidelines associated with the project. Set as the primary shortcut on Wikipedia for navigating to Wikipedia:Request an account[note 1], this initialism became a widely and loosely used term throughout this and other related pages involving the request an account process. Unless the text specifies a specific area following the use of the term "ACC"[note 2], the initialism can be loosely referred to as the entire project as a whole.
  • Account Creation Interface (or ACI) - The application software hosted on Wikimedia Cloud VPS that is used to facilitate account creation requests on the English Wikipedia. This includes the web interface for users to request an account, the ACC Tool User interface, and all of the source code involved.
  • Account Request Application (ARA, or simply Account Request, ACC request, or Request) - The official request submitted by a Wikipedia user or editor to have a Wikipedia account created for them and on their behalf by filling out the account request application form webpage (see next term below).
  • Account Request Application Form (ARA Form, or simply the ACC form page or ACC form) - The externally hosted ACC webpage that editors or users must navigate to in order to fill out the required information and submit to the internal ACC Tool User Interface (see definition below) as an Account Request Application, so that it can be evaluated and approved by an ACC Tool User.
  • Account Request Submitter (or simply the Submitter or Requestor) - The editor or user who submitted the current Account Request Application for evaluation and approval using the Account Request Application Form webpage, and hence is requesting an account be created for them and on their behalf.
  • ACC Tool User Interface (Tool User Interface, or simply ACC Tool User page or Tool User page) - The internal ACC web interface accessed by ACC Tool Users in order to process and handle Account Request Applications (or ACC requests) that are currently open and needing review and closure. ACC Tool Users also use this interface to change internal account settings and access internal statistics, graphs, and other internal ACC functions and tools. It is accessed by ACC Tool Users by navigating here.
  • ACC Tool Account - An ACC project account that's created and registered by using this page on the Account Creation Interface to fill and submit the required information. ACC Tool Accounts generally refer to any ACC project account, regardless of its status or the level of access it has to the ACC Tool User Interface (if any).
  • ACC Tool User (or simply Tool User) - Any editor or user who has met all of the requirements listed on this page below, has been approved by an ACC Tool Administrator following a request to join the project as an ACC Tool User, and has an active ACC Tool User account in good standing – and hence currently has ACC Tool User-level access to the internal ACC Tool User Interface.
  • ACC Tool Checkuser (ACC Checkuser, or simply Checkuser) - Any editor or user who currently has Checkuser permissions on the English Wikipedia, as well as a current ACC Tool User account in good standing. All current English Wikipedia Checkusers have presumed approval and access to the ACC Tool User Interface as ACC Tool Users, but are also granted access to additional information that allow Checkusers to review and evaluate open Account Request Applications that have been deferred to them for further examination.
  • ACC Tool Steward (ACC Steward, or simply Steward) - Any editor or user who currently has global Steward permissions across all public Wikimedia projects. Just like with all English Wikipedia Checkusers, all Stewards have presumed approval and access to the ACC Tool User Interface as ACC Tool Users, but are also granted access to additional information that allow Stewards to review and evaluate open Account Request Applications that have been deferred to them for further examination.
  • ACC Tool Administrator (ACC Tool Admin, or simply Tool Admin)[note 3] - Any current ACC Tool User in good standing with access to the ACC Tool User Interface, but who has also been designated and appointed as an experienced ACC project leader and evaluator. They are granted access to additional tools, settings, and Account Request Application information on the ACC Tool User Interface, and are also tasked with additional responsibilities, such as managing ACC Tool User account approvals, controlling permissions and access to the internal ACC Tool User Interface, auditing and reviewing closed Account Request Applications for compliance, completeness, and correct handling, imposing appropriate warnings, reprimands, and remedies in response to ACC policy or process violations, and suspending ACC Tool User accounts and revoking ACC Tool User Interface access following a period of inactivity or ACC policy or process violations by ACC Tool Users. They also have the ability to ban ACC Submitters from being able to use the Account Creation Interface to submit Account Request Applications following reports of abuse or repeated submissions made in bad faith.
  • Account Creation Interface Standard Operating Procedures Manual (ACC Standard Operating Procedures, ACC SOP, or simply the ACC guide page) - Refers to this page, which all ACC Tool Users and ACC Tool Administrators are required to review and understand when performing any ACC Tool User or ACC Tool Administrator tasks, as well as obey, follow, fully complete, and remain within compliance of at all times. Compliance with the requirements stated on this page is strictly enforced and are a condition of holding ACC Tool User or ACC Tool Administrator permissions on the Account Creation Interface.
  • ACC Tool User mailing list - The private and internal mailing list that all ACC Tool Users must subscribe their email address to after being approved and granted access to the ACC Tool User Interface, which is located here. It's typically used for internal discussions with the ACC team and between all ACC Tool Users, and is where all important notifications, information, or notices (such as changes or updates to the ACC guide page, which is this page) are communicated and sent.

Qualifications and requirements

This section lists, describes, and details each of the requirements that must be completed before requesting ACC Tool User access, as well as each of the minimum requirements that must be met in order for any ACC Tool User requests to be considered for approval.

Editors must complete all of the following requirements listed below before requesting ACC Tool User access:

For an open ACC Tool User access request to be considered for approval, editors must meet all of the following minimum requirements below:

  • Have a Wikipedia account that is at least 6 months old and has made at least 1500 edits.[note 7]
  • Have a completely clean block log or a clean block history for at least six months to one year.[note 8]
  • Have a completely clean sanction or editing restriction record or a clean sanction or editing restriction history for at least one year.[note 9]
  • Have a demonstrable history of solid knowledge and understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and that show themselves to be knowledgeable users.
  • Have a demonstrable history of remaining positive and civil while under pressure, and that show themselves to be able to accept/acknowledge constructive feedback and criticism.

This list is not exhaustive; its purpose is to describe and detail the important minimum requirements, primary qualifications, and level of experience that ACC Tool Administrators will typically search for, locate, verify, consider, and take into account when reviewing open ACC Tool User requests and prospective candidates for consideration and approval. Finally, the acceptance, consideration, and approval of new ACC Tool User requests are subject to the discretion, judgment, and opinion of the reviewing ACC Tool Administrator or the ACC Tool Administrator team, and is primarily based on the candidate's tenure, demonstrable knowledge and experience, history and conduct, established trustworthiness, competence, and the apparent need for more ACC Tool Users.

ACC tool account registration

After satisfying all of the qualifications and requirements listed above, you must create and register a new ACC Tool account here if you don't already have one. When your registration is complete, your ACC Tool account and user information will then added to the list of open ACC Tool User access requests. You must then follow the instructions below in order to connect your ACC Tool account with your Wikipedia account.

Connection to your Wikipedia account

The tool will prompt you to connect your ACC Tool account to your Wikipedia account. This is done using the OAuth protocol, which grants the ACC tool with permission, as well as the necessary rights, to perform certain actions on Wikipedia, and on your behalf. This is primarily used to gain a cryptographically signed identity ticket from Wikipedia verifying that you have control of an account on Wikipedia. All tool users are required to connect their ACC Tool account to Wikipedia, but granting any additional permissions that are not necessary for completing this process are optional. This process must be completed before an ACC tool account can be approved for ACC Tool User access.[note 10]

You can see the information the tool stores about your on-wiki identity from your tool preferences.

Approval and access

If your ACC Tool User access request is approved by an ACC Tool Administrator, you will be notified of the approval through a message that's sent to the email address that you used to register your ACC Tool account, as well as a new message that's left on your English Wikipedia account's user talk page.

Declined access requests and appeals

If you have an ACC Tool account where the request for ACC Tool User access was declined, you need to submit an appeal by completing this form in order to have your ACC Tool account reviewed as an ACC Tool User access request again. Please wait a reasonable amount of time before appealing an account decline or suspension decision. In addition, excessive appeal requests without taking enough time to properly consider and address the original reasons that resulted in denial of your request will not be reviewed again or given consideration. Please do not create a duplicate new ACC Tool account, or create more than one ACC Tool account for yourself.

ACC tool user interface

A screenshot of the ACC Tool User interface main page. The default queue where submitted requests are saved currently has 11 open Account Request Applications that are awaiting review.

After logging into the ACC Tool User interface with your ACC Tool User account, you will be navigated to the main interface page (see screenshot). This page will show you, among other items, a list of the ACC request queues where open Account Request Applications are saved. Unless empty, each queue will have the number of open requests shown to the right of its display name, just like you'd typically see when viewing email address inbox folders. The number of open requests from each queue, when added together, will give you the total number of all open Account Request Applications that are awaiting review, action, and closure by an ACC Tool User. Clicking on one of the request queues will expand it, displaying a list of the open Account Request Applications currently located there.[note 11] Each Account Request Application queue listed on the ACC Tool User main page is detailed below:

  • Open requests - This is the default queue that all newly submitted Account Request Applications will be delivered to (if the ACC interface doesn't automatically sort it into another queue listed below).
  • Flagged user needed – Requests that need approval and action by an ACC Tool User with account creator user permissions on their Wikipedia account.
  • Checkuser needed – Requests that need attention, investigation, and review by a Wikipedia CheckUser.
  • On hold – Requests that have been reviewed, but where the ACC Tool User is waiting on feedback or a response from someone[note 12] before the review process can continue.
  • Proxy check needed – Requests that need attention, investigation, and review by an ACC Tool User with experience involving open proxies.
  • Steward needed - Requests that need attention, investigation, and review by a Wikipedia Steward.
  • ACC ban needed - Requests that need an ACC Tool Administrator to ban the requester, email address, or IP address.

Before an ACC Tool User can begin reviewing an open Account Request Application from the queue, they must reserve the request first. This both marks the open request as currently being reviewed to other ACC Tool Users that are logged in, and prevents another ACC Tool User from opening and reviewing it while it's reserved by your account. This is done in order to prevent more than one ACC Tool User from inadvertently spending their time reviewing the same Account Request Application at the same time.

To work on a specific request, click on the green Reserve button. You will be marked as handling the request and be navigated to a page that displays the request information, including the submitter's personally identifying information, so that you can review it for any issues. Buttons are also shown on the page that will allow you to create the account and close the request as 'approved', decline the request with a given reason, or email the submitter with any questions. This guide will detail the process that must be followed when reviewing an open Account Request Application, along with what buttons to click in order to properly handle and close the request, and send an email to the requester with information following the request's closure.

More information Buttons on the interface and what they do ...
Close

Automatic account creation

The two different interfaces - manual creation, and automatic creation via OAuth

The ACC Tool User interface supports both the manual creation of Wikipedia accounts as well as automatic creation (via OAuth) when reviewing and closing Account Request Application. To support the automatic creation of accounts using the ACC Tool User interface, your account connection must have the "High-volume editing" and "Create accounts" grants enabled (both of which are enabled by default). As of March 2021, the ability to use automatic account creation is also gated behind a separate ACC Tool User Account permission during the process of this functionality being slowly rolled out and deployed for use.

While currently viewing an open Account Request Application (the "View request" page) using the ACC Tool User interface, you should see a set of radio buttons next to the "account creation" buttons. These allow you to choose which method is used when you proceed to create the Wikipedia account for the particular request - either manually (using the existing process), or automatically. You can choose the default method of account creation that is selected for you when reviewing an account request in your preferences, under "Account Creation Mode". The automatic account creation method will handle the creation of the requested account when you click on the "Create and close" button within the interface; all you need to do once you have decided to accept the current open request is choose a close type.

In the background, the ACC Tool User interface will queue the request to be created and closed; you will see the request move to the "Job queue" status, and a creation job will appear in the "Job Queue" page, accessible from the "View job list" button above the request log. If you need to cancel the queued automatic account creation job for any reason, resetting the request will cancel the queued jobs. All request closures with automatic account creations will be given a time delay between the time that the request is added to the queue for execution and when the actual account creation is performed automatically - depending on the exact time the request was queued, this will likely be between two and four minutes.

Custom closes also support automatic account creation. To use automatic creation with a custom close, choose the "Create account & close request as created" option under "Action to take".

In the case of an account creation failure (for example, if an AntiSpoof hit is detected), the request will be deferred to a "hospital" queue and an announcement will be made by the bot on IRC. If this happens, you can check the list of jobs in order to discover exactly why the automatic account creation failed, and handle the creation manually from there. The most common cause of an automatic account creation failure is an antispoof or title blacklist hit, and the tool will not attempt to resolve this for you. In these situations, falling back to the manual account creation method will be required in order to resolve and close the request.

Automatic welcoming

The ACC Tool User interface can automatically leave a welcome template message on the user talk page of any new users that you create a Wikipedia account for. While this functionality has existed for several years by utilizing a bot in order to perform the edit and welcome the new user, utilization of the bot was deprecated in favor of the current system - which uses your user account (via OAuth) to perform the same task.

To support the feature automatically welcoming new users, your OAuth connection to your Wikipedia account must have both the "High-volume editing" and the "Create, edit, and move pages"[note 13] grants enabled (again, both of these grants are enabled by default). You must also choose the welcome template that you'd like to use in your new messages to new users by navigating to the "Welcome Template Management" page. If the template that you wish to use is not listed, please contact an ACC Tool User administrator for help, or ask Oshwah to add it for you.

Once you have chosen a template, every user that you create an account for while closing an open request using the ACC Tool User interface will automatically have their user talk page created with that welcome template added as the message. Additionally, a new switch will appear beside the creation button allowing you to skip sending the new user a welcome message for the specific request.

As with the automatic account creation method described above: in the case of a new user welcoming failure (for example, if the user account does not exist or the user talk page already exists), a job failure will be noted in the job queue, and an announcement will be made by the bot on IRC. If this happens, you can check the list of jobs to discover exactly why the automatic welcoming failed, and handle this manually if you so choose.

General rules and policies when using the tool

All Account Request Applications that are received and listed on the ACC Tool User interface are from users who couldn't create a new Wikipedia account for themselves using the account creation form, and we need to react thoughtfully with this in mind at all times.

It's perfectly acceptable to find yourself in the middle of a situation or a request and be unsure with how to proceed or not know which action you should take, and you will not be looked down upon, judged negatively, or harassed for asking other members of the team for a second pair of eyes or for assistance with a request. You will be seen in a much more positive light by others for asking a stupid question, requesting assistance with a request that's elementary, and handling the request properly and correctly vs not asking for help (for one reason or another) and incorrectly handling, processing, and closing a request.

There are always other ACC tool interface users online to confer with; the private IRC Channel for ACC tool users is available for use, and typically all users who are currently joined to that channel will be more than willing to assist you in situations such as these: #wikipedia-en-accounts connect.[note 14] In the event you don't receive a satisfactory response from someone, and if you still do not know which course of action to take in order to properly handle and resolve an open request, it is absolutely essential that you defer the request to other user for resolution rather than to undertake a wrong course of action and process the request incorrectly or improperly. If you ask another ACC tool user for help with an open request and if they need to see the private data contained within it in order to help you, you will need to provide them with the URL of the link shown on the 'zoom' page.[note 15]

The process of handling, reviewing, and closing open Account Request Applications is not a race! It is essential that all of the required checks are performed for each open Account Request Application in order to ensure that they are correctly handled, and the requested account is either approved and created when they should be, or declined if all of the necessary requirements are not met. ACC Tool Administrators have access to extended logs, account request data and tools, and other administrative and analytical information for smooth running of the project, and they typically review and audit closed requests regularly as part of their duties. If administrative ACC logs, timestamps, analytics and graphs, or other information indicates that you are rushing through open Account Request Applications, appear to be handling requests at a concerning or reckless rate of speed, or have closed a high volume of requests in a very short span of time (for example, at a rate where carefully performing all of the required checks would be unfeasible), you may be brought into a discussion and questioned by an ACC Tool Administrator, and (in extreme or non-ambiguous cases) you may have your access to the tool suspended or revoked - even if no explicit violations of policy and no reports of incorrect ACC request actions and closures have occurred.

Personally identifying information

The ACC tool contains personally identifying information and is subject to the privacy policy of the foundation. It cannot be shared outside of the interface.

Personally identifying information includes, but is not limited to:

  • IP addresses.[note 16]
  • Email addresses.
  • Real names.

In order to comply with Data retention policy:

  • Email communication must be limited to their name and email address, other information including IP address or other personally identifying information is prohibited.
  • Within the interface, no identifying information should be shared in the comments of a request.
  • Outside of the interface, no identifying information should be shared in any venue. See also § Messages outside of the interface.

Additionally, any action that might produce the following is prohibited:

  • Excessive information about a block that could allow the IP to be found in the block logs.
  • Information that could create a link between a request or username, and any other element of identifying information.

Users who violate this rule and share any personally identifying information outside the ACC tool interface risk immediate and indefinite suspension, as well as the possibility of their identified status being revoked.[note 17]

Reservations

If you reserve a request and then need to go offline without completing the request, please break the reservation beforehand, so that another user can complete the request, unless you have good reason to require the request to be handled by yourself, in which case you must leave a comment. If you do not do this, the request will remain reserved and cannot be created by other users; a tool admin may forcefully break the reservation if you have left no indication as to why you need to keep the request reserved.

In addition, if you are actively working on a request that you have reserved and it's taking some time to handle (generally, more than an hour), please leave a comment on the request indicating that you are working on it and what the issue delaying handling of the request is. This informs other users and admins that you are busy on the request and that you haven't forgotten about it.

In cases where a user has had a request reserved for a long time and they have left a comment explaining the long reservation time, a reasonable effort should be made to contact them before the request is broken. However, requests reserved without explanation for a long time may be broken by an admin without warning, especially if the user holding the reservation can't be found or reached quickly on IRC.

Script usage

Using a script or other program to automatically handle requests in any way outside that which the tool provides (includes reserving) is prohibited. If you are found to be using automation of any kind or if evidence strongly supports the probability that you are doing so, you risk account suspension for violation of this rule. Using an automated add-on or script to refresh the tool interface page, however, is allowed. The refresh time must be considerate to the interface's resources and kept to as low of a rate as possible. Please keep the rate to once a minute maximum. The #wikipedia-en-accounts channel on IRC contains a live feed of new requests and changes made to them by tool users. This feed is the preferred method to view and monitor than using the interface and any automatic page refreshing tools.

Activity requirements

For security purposes, ACC Tool accounts are routinely checked for activity, and ACC Tool User access is revoked from any account that is deemed to be idle. An ACC Tool account is considered to be idle if 90 days have passed since the user last logged into it. Access to all ACC Tool User interface pages, requests, functions, and mediums (including access to the private #wikipedia-en-accounts channel on IRC for ACC Tool Users) are revoked at this time. A revocation for inactivity is logged when such a revocation is performed so that other ACC Tool Administrators are aware of the reason.

Having ACC Tool User access revoked due to inactivity is not punitive and does not impact your overall standing as an ACC Tool User. If your ACC Tool account's ACC Tool User permissions are revoked due to inactivity and you decide to return later, simply contact an ACC Tool Administrator in order to request reinstatement of your account. You will need to resubscribe your email address to the ACC mailing list and let the ACC Tool Administrator know that you've done this. An ACC Tool Administrator will verify that your account is still listed on the nonpublic personal data policy noticeboard page as having sign the confidentiality agreement for access to nonpublic information, that you're subscribed to the ACC mailing list, your ACC Tool User access was revoked due to inactivity, and that your overall status was in good standing at the time of the revocation. After this is done, an ACC Tool Administrator will perform the necessary procedure in order to reinstate and restore ACC Tool User access onto your ACC account.

Guidelines for processing requests

Checking for multiple requests

You should check for multiple requests from an IP address or an email address. To do so, click on the request ID button or click on "Zoom" in the list of last 5 closed requests, or go to the logs and click a request number. At the end of the request line—like you see normally for all open requests, you will see the UTC date and time the request was submitted. Farther down the page you would also see a list of other requests—if any, from that IP address or e-mail address.

If there are multiple open requests (but no closed requests) from the same email address, it's possible the user wanted to change their requested username. Place all the requests from that email address on hold, and send an email to the user informing the user of Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts, listing the usernames of the requests we have received from them, and asking which one they would prefer. If there are multiple requests from an email but one of them has been recently closed as created, it's probably safe to drop the remaining requests.

Please keep in mind that shared IP addresses are common. If you have multiple requests from the same IP addresses but different email addresses, and the IP is static, defer to CheckUsers; if it's dynamic or otherwise obviously shared (for example, from a residential or mobile/cellular service provider, or an obviously shared IP like a school or library), continue handling the request (though ensure that you check for on-wiki blocks in this case).

Multiple requests to the tool are only grounds for a ban from requesting accounts in cases of clear abuse. If you have reason to think that an IP or email address has requested multiple accounts abusively, please inform a tool admin for further action. In and of itself, though, multiple requests for accounts are not grounds for a ban from ACC.

In cases where there have been a large number of requests from an IP address assigned to a school or other educational institution, especially if each request has a different email address, there is a "Educational Event or Student Edit-A-Thon" custom close template that by default defers the request to "On-Hold". This close is only intended for use in the case when there have been a large number of account requests from an IP assigned to a school, and we need more information about the desired usage of the accounts. For single account requests, use of the account as part of a school assignment or other educational use is not in and of itself grounds for a request to be rejected or held. If you aren't sure if the "Educational Event or Student Edit-A-Thon" custom close applies to a situation, please ask an ACC admin for guidance.

Blocked Network and IP Address Procedures

Please keep these points in mind when dealing with requests made from any kind of blocked IP address or range:

  • You should run the other checks first. If there are other reasons that would warrant denial from a blocked IP request, such as a username policy violation or similar username, then you should decline the request for that reason.
  • For IP addresses that are locally blocked, refer to § Local IP blocks for further instructions.
  • For IP addresses that are globally blocked, refer to § Global IP blocks for further instructions after checking any local blocks.
  • If you attempt to verify attributes on your own, such as creating or declining requests based on open-proxy, shared-IP use, etc., you take full responsibility for your actions.
  • If you are uncomfortable or uncertain with any request, the safest choice is to defer the request to CheckUsers.

When deferring a request to CheckUsers, Stewards, or proxy check, please include a brief statement on the reason for deferral. This is especially true if you are ignoring part of the guide (such as deferring an older school block).

Do not violate policy by adding any personally identifying information in a request comment – it's generally treated the same as if you did so outside of the interface (due to Wikimedia's privacy and data retention policies). See § Personally identifying information for more information.

Local IP blocks

Unless otherwise noted in this section, blocks for CheckUser-related reasons, you must defer the request to CheckUsers.

IP range blocks

These are blocks that affect a range of IP addresses, rather than just one. This is typically done to partially or completely block networks that can operate using more than one public IP address.

Any range block (affecting any kind of IP address) can be ignored only if any of the following are true:

  • The block is an {{anonblock}} or {{school block}}, or is for "simple" vandalism with no specific target (i.e., no specific subject or topic is the target of the vandalism) and there is no vandalism within the prior 72 hours of the request being entered at ACC.
  • The block is for disruptive editing with no further details (but if in doubt, ask a tool admin or an experienced ACCer)
  • The block is explicitly tagged as being ignorable by ACC (<!-- ACC ignore --> in the block reason)
  • The block does not have the "account creation disabled" parameter set.
  • The block is placed on an Opera Mini IP range, and solely because of the fact that it is an Opera Mini IP range.
  • You placed the block yourself, and you are sure the requester is not the block target.
  • The block is a soft (anon. only) CheckUser block for spam and there are no spam concerns from the request.

Any hard (not anon. only) CheckUser block for spam should be declined with the Registered ISP Email or New range email template.

If there is any other range block on the requesting IP (or any indication of sockpuppetry), defer the request to CheckUsers. Users who create accounts from requests that are in such cases and without consulting a CheckUser risk account suspension.

Single IP blocks

These are blocks that are made to a single IP address, and is commonly done to block single users (such as a residence or network with one public IP address).

Single IP blocks can be ignored if there is a non-recent (i.e., older than 72 hours) block for "simple" vandalism with no specific target (i.e., no specific subject or topic is the target of the vandalism). This includes blocks with the reasons of {{anonblock}} or {{school block}}. The fact that a blocked IP belongs to a school is not in itself an exemption.

If you have a request that you are going to decline or drop due to a single IP block, you need to either:

  • be 100% sure that this is the only person on the IP – identifying an IP as static is not sufficient, as multiple users may be connected from the same IP; or
  • have approval from a CheckUser or tool admin which is documented on the tool, before you carry out any action.

If you do not have either of these, then defer it to CheckUsers, even if it's already been there.

Global IP blocks

Check for and address local blocks first.

  • Blocks that do not have the "account creation disabled" parameter set can be ignored.
  • For IP addresses that are globally hard (not anon. only) blocked (regardless of single IP or range blocks), you should defer the requests to the Stewards.
  • Soft (anon. only) global IP address blocks (regardless of single IP or range blocks), can be ignored unless it is believed that the requester is the block target or the block reason is unusual. If in doubt, ask an ACC tool administrator, or defer the request to the Stewards.

Open or anonymizing proxies, web hosts, or Tor exit nodes

Any request from an IP address that is blocked with {{blocked proxy}}, {{webhostblock}}, {{colocationwebhost}} or {{zombie proxy}} as the reason should be deferred to the proxy check queue unless you are capable of confirming that the block reason is still valid yourself. If the request's IP is confirmed to be an open proxy, the request should be closed as "Open Proxy". If there's any indication in the block reason, or if anything comes up in other checks, that suggests that the IP address or range was used for sockpuppetry abuse, the request must be deferred to CheckUsers instead.

Soft (anon. only, with or without account creation disabled) P2P proxy/VPN blocks (e.g., {{blocked p2p proxy}}) can be ignored.

Requests stating that editing via a VPN is necessary should be referred to WP:IPECPROXY using the IPBE for VPN email template.

If there is no block indicating that an IP has been blocked as a proxy, be very careful about using the IP Check service on Toolforge or similar services. These services are frequently incorrect in determining proxy status. While other suspicious network activity may be occurring, unless the IP is static, it rarely indicates anything negative towards the user filing the request.

If you are going to defer to proxy check, have evidence not including the IP Check Service, any site listed on the IP Check Service, and any "proxy checker" website. Proper deferrals include a port number that can be tested for proxies or evidence that the ISP provides access to its own servers (web hosting, cloud services & data storage, colocation & IP transit).

Username policy procedures

All username requests must follow Wikipedia's Username Policy in order to be created. Please refer to this guideline for any policies and procedures that are not explicitly defined here. Creating accounts that violate Wikipedia's username policy will result in account suspension depending on the severity or blatancy of the username violation. Repeated violations of this rule will result in account suspension.

Real names relating to famous, popular, etc. persons

Where the requested username is a real name relating to famous, popular, etc. person the requester's identity needs to verify through the VRT system. The standard in the username policy is that the name or nickname has to relate to a "specific, identifiable" person. In terms of a test for ACC they should be notable enough to have a Wikipedia article; however, having an article doesn't necessarily mean that they are specific and identifiable and that there is a likelihood that someone is trying to impersonate them. If you believe that they are specific and identifiable and that them having the name may cause confusion, you will need to close the request as "Notable Person". If you aren't sure whether the above test is met, consult with a tool admin or experienced user, it is better to create the account in good faith (remembering that they can be blocked) than to send it to VRT to deal with.

Once VRT has verified the identity of the requester, the requester will be sent back to ACC, either by the request being reopened (if possible) with the VRT ticket number provided as a request comment, or by the requester sending in a new request and including the VRT ticket number in the request comment. However, the request must not be handled until someone with VRT access has verified in the request comments that the VRT ticket contains sufficient proof of the requester's identity and is tied to the ACC request (if you have VRT access, you may do this check yourself; just make a note in the request's comments that you verified that the ticket contains sufficient proof of identity and that the email addresses on the account request and the VRT ticket match). Once the ACC request has been positively tied to the VRT ticket, perform all other standard checks, and if everything looks good, create the account. If you create the account successfully and are a VRT user too, add the {{Verified account}} template to the top of the new user's talk page, including the VRT ticket number tied to the ACC request. If you are not a VRT user but still created the account, please as soon as possible ask a VRT user to add the {{Verified account}} template to the new user's talk page – possible venues for making this request include the VRT noticeboard, #wikimedia-vrt connect on IRC, or contacting a VRT user you know directly. Remember to include the name of the user you just created and the relevant VRT ticket number in such a request!

A request containing a VRT ticket number in the comments is not sufficient proof of identity – the validity of any mentioned VRT tickets must be verified by an ACCer with VRT access, with such verification logged in the request comments, before they are accepted!

Current ACC users with VRT access

Promotional usernames

Requested usernames should only be declined as a username policy violation where it is clear that they are – remember to assume good faith. If you are in doubt, create the account and watch it. If it is engaging in promotional editing, report the user to WP:UAA (as you would with any other promotional username and editing).

Shared usernames

If a requested username implies shared use, the request is to be closed because Wikipedia's policy on usernames state that they should not be shared between more than one individual. If you come across a request that implies such, close the request as not created utilizing the "Shared Username" option. This directs them to WP:ISU as well as takes the opportunity to link them to WP:COI, WP:PROMO and more relevant policies or guidelines.

Username conflict procedures

Wikipedia will not allow you to create an account if the requested user name:

A. is a perfect match of an existing global account,
B. too similar to an existing local account, or
C. previously used by another user.

This section will explain the procedures and policies when handling requests that meet one of those two situations.

Perfect match

A perfect match conflict occurs when the requested user name is 100% identical to a username that already exists on Wikipedia (this includes capitalization and use of symbols). If you discover that the requested username is a perfect match, then you must decline the request.

Starting in April 2015, all new accounts that are created result in the creation of a Unified Login across all Wikimedia Projects instead of simply creating a local login to one Wikimedia Project site. To prepare for this process change, all local accounts created before April 2015 whose username was taken on another project were automatically renamed, adding ~<Home Project Site> to the end in order to make them unique across all Wikimedia Projects (see the announcement here to learn more). If the requested username was previously taken but was systematically renamed as part of the preparation for SUL Finalization rule change, it will appear as a log entry and list a username such as "RequestedAccount~enwiki" in the User Page and User Creation Log.

  • If the account is taken because someone else has created an account with the exact name first, decline the request as "Taken (Standard)".
  • If the account is taken because it is taken but systematically renamed as part of the preparation for the SUL Finalization process change, decline the request as "Taken (SUL Finalization)".

If the requested account is taken, but has a different casing ("Apple" versus "APPLE") or otherwise just appears very similar (not an exact match), then refer to the "Too similar" guidelines below.

Too similar ("Flagged user needed")

Similar account flowchart

A Similar Username conflict occurs when the requested user name is similar, but not 100% identical, to another username that exists on Wikipedia. This typically occurs with requests that would normally be a perfect match to an existing account, but differs with capitalization or the use of symbols or other letters that could resemble the spelling of the existing account (i.e. "Jοhn Doe" vs "Jóhn Đoe" or "J0hn Doe"). These "similar" requests will trip the AntiSpoof extension, and flag the request for additional scrutiny under a separate queue ("Flagged user needed"). Although the ACC tool allows any user to reserve and decline requests in the "Flagged user needed" queue, only ACC tool users with the account creator flag are able to override the AntiSpoof check and create the accounts.

ACC requests that are flagged as similar can only be approved if all similar existing accounts are determined to be both unestablished (have less than a total number of local edits, global edits, and log entries) and inactive (no edits or log entries have been made within a certain time period from today). Similar existing accounts are considered both unestablished and inactive only if they meet all of the requirements in the Similar Account Flowchart, or meet all of the requirements listed below:

If the similar account has made zero (0) contributions to the English Wikipedia, the similar existing account must:
  • Have been created over six (6) months ago.
  • Have fewer than fifteen (15) total global contributions.
  • Have made their last global contribution over six (6) months ago.
If the similar account has made fewer than fifteen (15) contributions to the English Wikipedia, the similar existing account must:
  • Have been created over one (1) year ago.
  • Have fewer than fifteen (15) total global contributions.
  • Have made their last global contribution over one (1) year ago.
  • Have made their last log entry in any Wikipedia logs over one (1) year ago.
If the similar account has made fifteen (15) or more contributions to the English Wikipedia:
  • The similar existing account is considered established, and the ACC request cannot be approved (see below). The similar account's activity is irrelevant.

The ACC request cannot be approved if a similar existing account fails any of the requirements above, and hence is considered to be either established for having 15 or more global contributions, or active because their last edit or log entry was made too recently. Decline the request and use the Too Similar close email template.

If all similar existing accounts meet the requirements and hence are unestablished and inactive, the ACC request can be approved and you can proceed with creating the account (provided you are a flagged user). If you do not have the account creator flag, you must break your reservation to allow a flagged user to create the account. Creating such an account should only be done after you have conducted all relevant checks required for any new account request. In order to create the account, you must check the "Ignore spoofing checks" box on the account creation page. This tells the MediaWiki software to ignore any similar existing accounts that are identified and create the account anyway.

Previously used by another user

AntiSpoof will also trigger when attempting to create an account with a username that was used before another user was renamed.

Do not override this unless the renamed account could be ignored per the § Too similar flow. If you are unsure, contact a tool admin or place the request in the Steward queue.

Temporary Russian Wikipedia queue

For the time being, the Russian Wikipedia is directing account requests to ACC for handling in some cases like CAPTCHA issues. In the medium-term future, once multi-domain support (currently in development) is built in ACC, these will be directed to a separate, isolated ACC domain with requests being handled by volunteers from the Russian Wikipedia and not visible to English Wikipedia volunteers. Until then, however, the requests are being directed to the main application with English Wikipedia requests, but the requests will be directed to a separate "Russian Wikipedia requests" queue.

These requests should be handled in the same way as all other requests, following the guidelines outlined in this document, except that requests should be reviewed from the perspective of the Russian Wikipedia (e.g., consulting ruwiki's block log instead of enwiki's), and if an account is created it should be manually created on ruwiki instead of using the built-in OAuth account creation. Likewise, please exercise increased caution when evaluating these requests and use common sense, but there are otherwise no special handling requirements.

For additional context, please see this comment on the GitHub issue.

Guidelines for closing requests

General notes

  • When requesters fill out the request an account form, they are given the option to fill a "Comments" field. Any context added is shown in their request, and should be taken into consideration when processing a request.
  • If the exact wording of the documentation prevents you from creating an account that you feel should be created, leave a comment explaining why, and break the reservation for someone else to create.
  • If your check of the "Creation log" shows that the user created the account themselves, just drop the request, as they don't need to be confused with any of our other messages. Please leave a comment saying they created the account themselves, so that other users know why you dropped the request.
  • The requesting user can not see any comments left in the request itself, all comments there will only be visible by other tool users (or only administrators if you choose to mark the comment as "Admin only").
  • On "creates" where there are no issues with the request such as vandalism, similar names, etc. there is no need to leave a comment like "Everything looks good with this request".
  • If there is a comment on the request asking for, or suggesting, an action and you wish to do something different you must justify this in another comment. If the comment is from a tool admin or CheckUser acting in that position, there must be another comment from a tool admin or CheckUser respectively authorizing you to ignore it. Discussion on IRC is not an excuse, it must be documented on the tool.

Block evasion

If a request reveals through personally identifying information or the comments field that they may have been blocked on another account, proper procedure is to close the request as not created by using the "Block target – appeal" option. This allows the requester to get information on how they can appeal the block on their existing account either through the form of requesting on their talk page, or if unable, emailing the UTRS.

COI risk

If a request reveals through personally identifying information or the comments field that they may have ties to a company or other entity but the username policy is followed, proper procedure is to close the request as created by using the "COI risk" option. This directly invites the requester to read our relevant policies or guidelines on conflict of interest or promotion. (i.e. WP:BPCA, WP:PSCOI, and WP:PROMOTION)

Creating accounts

Once you have reserved a request, and decided that the account should be created, click the Create! link next to the desired username. This will bring you to the MediaWiki account creation form. The name and email will be filled in automatically and the "Use a temporary random password" option will be automatically selected. Do not deselect this option and type in a password. If you do accidentally type in a password and click Create Account, go to Special:PasswordReset, type in the username and click Reset password. Make sure you are logged-in to avoid disclosing your IP to the requester. If a message appears – stating the username is forbidden (example here), defer the request to an account creator who can override the Title blacklist using the "Ignore the blacklist" option. Once an account has been created, click Created! next to the request on the ACC tool.

Custom closes

All custom closes should end with an email signature. It is recommended that you add this to your preferences so it is automatically appended to any request closures you perform. If you do not, then you must add your signature at the end of your message every time you custom close a request.

Messages outside of the interface

Important things to note:

  • If you need to ask the requester a question or confirm information to continue with the request, either click the "Custom" button or click the arrow beside "Custom" to select a standard email template to preload. While waiting for a response, please defer the request to the "On hold" section.
  • Unless you are a tool admin, all requests sent from the interface carbon copy (CC) the accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org mailing list. If the content of your email is sensitive and shouldn't be sent to the mailing list, consider asking a tool admin to handle the request instead.
  • If you are responding to an email sent to the mailing list by a requester, make sure you select "reply all" or manually carbon copy (CC) the accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org mailing list. If you believe the email should not be sent to the ACC mailing list, or if it relates to the actions of tool users, you should carbon copy it to the tool administrator's mailing list, enwiki-acc-admins@googlegroups.com.
  • If you are emailing the mailing list to communicate with other tool users, please list "LIST ONLY" in the subject and text fields to make it clear that the communicate is only to other tool users and not a requester.
  • The mailing lists and IRC channel are relatively secure so personally identifying information may be discussed there. However, exercise good practice; if you don't need to share it, then don't do so – linking to a request is a good way to avoid discussing IP addresses and emails without naming them.
  • Releasing any kind of private information supplied from the ACC tool, the ACC or admin's mailing list, or the ACC or admin's IRC channel outside of those places is an extremely serious violation and will result in an indefinite suspension. Also, the Foundation takes the tool as seriously as they do with the checkuser tool, as our interface contains similar data available to tool users. Breaching this rule may result in the loss of identified status at meta and the inability to identify in the future. See this email for more information.

Tool administrators

Tool administrators (tool admins) are trusted users who can, among other things, edit interface messages (using the Edit! buttons in Message management and Template management), and have access to a fifth option invisible to other users, User management, which allows them to approve, promote, demote, and suspend users. However, abuse of these tools is not tolerated, and the interface is not a toy.

Administrators, in addition to the main mailing list all users are subscribed to, have a private mailing list for discussion of administrative issues of the tool. Any user who wants to report an anomaly with the handling of a request, or otherwise has information they would rather share privately with only the tool admins should send an email directly to that mailing list at enwiki-acc-admins [at] googlegroups [dot] com. Please be patient, as depending on the issue, it may take us a day or two to get back to you.

A list of tool administrators can be found on the tool user list here

Interface developers

The interface developers are the team who have commit access to the tool, and as such can modify the latest development version of the tool in the code repository. If you want something to be changed or added, or find a bug, you can contact one of them, but it's probably better to file a bug in the bug-tracker on GitHub.

The tool roots are stwalkerster and FastLizard4. They have access to the server that runs the tool, and are the only people who can modify the configuration of the tool, and update the tool to a new version. The tool roots also act as the liaison between the Cloud Services administrators, and the rest of the tool users. The tool developers and roots reserve the rights to modify the tool as necessary, and to remove access to the tool for any reason as they see fit.

CheckUsers

CheckUsers on Wikipedia will automatically be granted CheckUser-only information and basic administrator capabilities on the tool in order to carry out duties relating to requests requiring a CheckUser. The tool ability is granted by a tool root or another checkuser granting you the "checkuser" role within the user management area.

If there is an urgent need to locate and contact a CheckUser who is currently online and active on Wikipedia, you can do so by requesting the attention of a checkuser on IRC, or by using this tool or this tool to locate a checkuser who is online and currently editing Wikipedia so that you can reach out to them.

Notes

  1. Short for account creation.
  2. An example is the "ACC page" which usually refers to the Wikipedia main ACC page, or the "ACC guide page" which refers to this page.
  3. ACC Tool Administrators are not the same as English Wikipedia Administrators; editors or users who are designated as ACC Tool Administrators should not be presumed to also be English Wikipedia administrators and vice versa.
  4. This is a Wikimedia Foundation policy requirement due to the nonpublic information that ACC Tool Users have access to in order to review and evaluate open Account Request Applications.
  5. Any submitted requests to join this project as an ACC Tool User will be rejected by an ACC Tool Administrator if this requirement hasn't been completed first. If your ACC Tool User access request was rejected for not meeting this requirement, you can submit an appeal in order to have your ACC Tool User access request reviewed again after you've signed the agreement and have been added to the list of users on the nonpublic personal data policy noticeboard page.
  6. After being approved as an ACC Tool User, your email address must be subscribed to the ACC mailing list by signing up here. Notifications regarding changes to the ACC Standard Operating Procedures are sent to all ACC Tool Users using this medium, and all ACC Tool Users are responsible for keeping up with them. The ACC mailing list is the communication method that Account Request Submitters typically use in order to ask the team for help, and is one of the primary discussion mediums for ACC project members (the other being the #wikipedia-en-accounts IRC channel).
  7. Cases of new accounts being created due to lost passwords etc will be considered on a case-by-case basis — be sure to let us know, probably by email to the mailing list.
  8. ACC Tool Administrators can require a longer clean block history from a user before considering their ACC Tool User access request for approval. The exact length of time required is set at the sole discretion of the ACC Tool Administrators, determined on a case-by-case basis, and can change or completely disqualify a user from consideration for approval depending on the nature and severity of any blocks that are found in the user's account history, as well as any other information found that is deemed to be relevant.
  9. Users who have a history of repeated sanctions or editing restrictions, or been subject to more than one different sanction occurrences in the past, may be required to have a longer clean history depending on the severity or circumstances. This is especially true for users that have been found to have violated any of their sanctions, bans, or editing restrictions while currently in effect, had disciplinary action enacted upon themselves in response to a violation of a sanction or restriction, or have a history of any kind or level of abuse.
  10. Failure to complete this step will result in your ACC Tool User access request being declined, as we cannot prove the connection between your registration with the ACC interface and your Wikipedia account. If you accidentally cancel the OAuth authorization process, you can restart it by simply logging in to the ACC interface using the password you specified during signup, and continuing the authorization process.
  11. If there are more than 25 open Account Request Applications stored in the same queue, expanding that queue will only display the top 25 open requests that are saved there. A link will be generated that you can click on in order to view all of them.
  12. Usually the requester, but can sometimes be an ACC Tool Administrator, CheckUser, or someone else.
  13. This is quite a wide group of permissions to grant, but unfortunately it is the only one which allows creation of talk pages (createtalk).
  14. If you are not using webchat, you must connect to Libera Chat using TLS.
  15. This is only necessary if the user providing you with assistance is not an ACC Tool Administrator.
  16. See this email for more information.

See also

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI