User:Timpo/Ethics
revise ethics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ethics is the study of the complex constraints and duties that regulate the interplay between love and hate within a two-way master - servant relationship that intends to secure the safety, survival and prosperity of any social group and all of its individual members, ideally via collective intelligence networking rather than an hierarchy although most organizations employ some hybrid meritocracy
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Timpo/Ethics. |

Ethics explores
- the impositions by society on the intentions and actions (both good and evil) of each individual member of the group which is ones personal or private motivation ethically known as morality
- by means of a collective expression of either acceptability or censure the mechanism of political science
- which social controls are intended to ensure the best outcome in terms of
- safety, survival and prosperity of the group as a functional entity.
Etymology
Ethics is a compound of ἦθος ethos (behavior) or ἔθνος ethnos any distinct group of people[[2] and Theos together with λόγος [logos]] reason.[3]. It therefore reltes to an ethnographic group whose purpose is to develop informed decisions as to the best way for individuals within the group to conduct its business. Ethics is central to philosophy, whose purpose is to distinguish rational facts from emotional truths or presuppositions
Philosophy is also a compound of a particular group φιλία Philia: friendship or collegiate rather than the more common love plus σοφός sofos to satisfy rater than wisdom[4] Note also πρεσβύτερος presbuteros meaning elder or sage, related to precocious[5]
Examples
Ethical control is exerted in mist collective enterprises including :
- quality assurance overall control authority and individual peer review within a project
- best practice imposition upon individual practitioners within a particular profession such as medicine,
- law enforcements applied to anyone found within a national jurisdiction,
- dogmatic coercion to compel orthodoxy among those committed to a particular religion or ideology.
Moral psychology
Moral philosophy i sometimes used as an alternative term for ethics because, while it is central to "brotherly" (Philia/ φιλία) ) human relations it should be considered that the love of wisdom it may also be considered the wisdom of love
If the purpose of philosophy to help people to survive and thrive cooperatively.[6] Moral philosophy encompass several important ethical branches;[7]
- descriptive ethics - the connection between knowledge, persuasion and the discrimination of needs and wants
- normative ethics - (or prescriptive ethics) idealizations of standards within a group and censure for disrespect of
- applied ethics - practical considerations of controversial issues such as abortion or euthanasia performed by by medical practitioners or cosmetic docking of animal tails or ears by veterinarians.
- metaethics - general or global principles that might support the survival and prosperity of any group
One and Other
Philosophically and ethically humanity includes all of the genus Homo being the entirety of human experience ("others") from homo habilis some seven millions of years ago who discovered how to control fire how to organized hunting parties and set up a tool-making industry until the present. No one person is an island, completely independent of the vast continent of humanity.
History
The Phenomenology of Spirit (Hegel,1807) makes the distinction between”internal or real” moralität, which refers to an individual's private learning and judgment, and sittlichkeit, pertaining to one's “external or virtual” (imaginary) social rights and obligations as defined by one's relationship with others.
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development (1958) suggests morality is viewed as several stages of personal evolution such as external training in childhood (input) listening, reading, discussing, internal cogitating
- Elliot Turiel in 1983 outlined three domains of knowledge acquired in parallel during childhood
- Moral principles of how individuals ought to treat one another,
- Societal regulationsdesigned to promote the smooth functioning of social groups
- Psychological discrimination of one’s self, autonomy and individuality plus one’s beliefs about others
internal education during adulthood - social development (output)
- fairness the balance between on'e desires and the needs of others
- welfare considerations of self and support community
- rights entitlements of self from support community
- obligations the price to be paid for benefits received
Jaques Derrida (1972) develops dual inter-connection between the word chain pharmakeia–pharmakon–pharmakeus (pharmacist, medicine, executioner) and the absence of pharmakos (sacrificial victim). In do doing he highlightd the implied distinction between inside (“one”) and outside (“other”), Pharmakos canalso be said to be related to other Derridian terms such as "Trace" meaning implied, virtual, decernable only through study.
Natural and legal persons
Today every single living person ("one") upon birth becomes subject to the jurisdiction in which we are present and the Legal protection from our assigned nationality. A state (nation or federation) is called a "legal person
All legal persons (or corporations and governments) consist of:
- a Chief executive officer usually a single president or prime minister that ratifies decisions then orders things done
- a Board of directors or Cabinet that does the thinking and comes to reasoned decisions
- a Cadre or management framework that does the organizing of activities
- many citizens or operatives who work and pay taxes to support the several "legal persons" and are also supported by those social groups (the "social onion" of states, communities, and civil societies on which our very lives depend)
All natural persons (and robots) are similar in that they have
- a soul that emotionally decides what to do and when (programmer)
- a spirit that reasons as to the best course of action (application]])
- a mind which receives and processes touch, taste,sight and sound sensations from the body (Operating system)
- a body that does locomotion and manipulation as well as providing power generation and energy distribution (actuator )
A legal person is essentially a strategy for survival that exploits different human traits through several natural persons with diverse skill sets who are able to apply tactics to resolve specific difficulties as, where and when they arise, To be ethically efficient it is necessary to balance moderate progressive initiative with reasonable conservative caution within some standard deviation of a normal distribution. The danger to human happiness and the potential destruction of any society lies in failing to curb ethical extremism in the coduct of both individual natural persons and the collective entity of which they are members.
The Importance of ethics
Ethics is one of the main branches of philosophy because human survival absolutely depends on preventing social collapse. In the natural state one individual human being has not adequate claws, teeth or speed needed to outperform predators and has only rather poor innate survival skills so training received from others is essential. As children we are all completely dependent on the goodwill of adults for our survival. Even as adults, the process of securing the essentials of survival – clean water, nutritious food, protective clothing shelter from the elements requires a vast range of skills and interdependence to manage the constant upheavals of poor harvests and disasters caused by calamities such as floods, fires drought, plague and war.
The challenge of human survival depends on four fundamental group interventions. The first is to change the form of plants inti food, for example, as wheat into grain, and break minerals such as stone or iron-ore into manageable lumps. Next we change of nature of these raw materials, for example grain into flour, and bread, rocks into steel and grindstones to make knives and all the other commodities we need. These functions are interconnected by transportation (change of place) and some sort of trade which facilitates the change of ownership between the various collectors, the processors, the transporters and the end-users.
Ethics is the "mortar" that holds all these diverse building block functions into the sustainable edifices that we call our various human civilizations. To cement together all these functions performed by distinct social groups within a civilized society we have to define what individual behavior is beneficial and which harmful to the and wrong, both within our immediate functional companies and between the complicated web of organizations so that we can all sustain a reasonably good life. Some of the key ethical questions are "How should one live?" and "What gives meaning to life?".[8] Perhaps as Jean-Paul Sartre suggests: life has meaning only if we choose to state it?
Further reading
All ethical cultures depend on stories. This article is only a brief overview of a vast topic and mentions some stories above. Below is a selection of Wikipedia article to indicate but a tiny approximately chronological selection from a vast range of more notable ethical thinkers and a few of their seminal treatises:
- Tao Te Ching by Laozi and many ancient Chinese sages
- Analects by Confucius
- The Buddhist canons by Siddhartha Gautama and others
- The Republic by Plato a compendium of many Greek philosophers
- The Guide for the Perplexed by Moses ben Maimon
- Leviathan by Thomas Hobbs
- Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant
- The Will to Power by Friedrich Nietzsche
- Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution by Pyotr Kropotkin
- The banality of Evil by Hannah Arendt
- Culture's Consequences by Geert Hofstede
- Software of the Mind by Geert Jan Hofstede & Michael Mintov.
- Universal ethics in the 21st century by Siddharth Mallavarapu