User talk:Addshore/Archive 18

Following a community discussion ending August 2015, consensus was reached to remove the bureaucrat permissions of users who have not participated in bureaucrat activity for three years.

To assist with the implementation of this requirement, please see Wikipedia:Bureaucrat activity. Modeled after Wikipedia:Inactive administrators and similar to that process, the log page will be created on 1 September 2015. Bureaucrats who have not met the activity requirements as of that date will be notified by email (where possible) and on their talk page to advise of the pending removal.

If the notified user does not return to bureaucrat activity and the permissions are removed, they will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFB. Removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon the affected user in any way.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. –xeno^talk

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliptio congaraea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliptio congaraea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakesyl (talk • contribs) 01:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Good Day, I just had this message pop up: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.3.142.177&redirect=no

It says that I was engaging in vandalism regarding something called Bangkok Dangerous? I'm sorry but I have no idea what that is. I did apply to become a user a long time ago but haven't used it in a while. I hope I wasn't hijacked! Please do let me know what I can do to resolve this. Thanks, Debra Krol [my real actual name] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.142.177 (talk) 00:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal ^talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

wjwxzsws s as oI xp we j  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.243.230.147 (talk) 21:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

I see! ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 07:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

What is happening to Orain? I can't connect to the website. Did you have an hacker attack? --95.249.27.93 (talk) 15:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Palm1055Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Addshore. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

14.139.242.195 (talk) 10:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

C T C. MR NELSON BANKER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.211.53.19 (talk) 14:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 103.6.159.89 (talk) 12:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:BADGER. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:BADGER redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.

Do you know anything about this redirect, or why it redirects to your User page? Natg 19 (talk) 19:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.57.91.121 (talk) 02:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi! ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 10:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Qaraghaj, Tabriz —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nanuvutpanther (talk) 07:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Is this right? It doesn't look right. Tunop (talk) 01:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, that is right! :) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 14:35, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Helo Addshore, it's been roughly two, maybe three years and I just happened to come by your talk page to say thank you for what you did for me in the past, especially in the case of Fut.Perf.. After that debacle, I took your advice later down the line and have vastly improved since then. I will also say that out of all of the Administrators and Bureaucrats that I have come across, you are the one that has been the nicest and for that, you have my utmost respect!

Sadly, with college happening and things just not being the same around here, I am leaving for better things. I will make a few more contributions here and there and make sure to secure previous contributions that I have made in the past so another hazard so to speak will not ignite, but beyond that, I am pretty much going the route a few other users have gone such as my talk page and leave Wikipedia. It was a fun ride, but I have other stuff to do! I will still be around for perhaps a few more weeks, but that's it. You can come over to my talk page anytime before I leave as anyone is allowed to, but I just wanted to thank you for giving me the helpful tips you have to me 2 years ago. It really helped on Wikipedia!:)

Cheers! Kirby (talk) 14:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 22:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Is your presentation on WikiData posted anywhere online? A link would be useful because the slides went by very fast. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

They sure are! https://twitter.com/addshore/status/688416917141516288 ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 00:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm going to be a bureaucrat, administrator, rollbacker, reviewer, autopatrolled, file mover, template editor and ip block exempt by Addshore CanselLal4156 (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Good for you! :D ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 14:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Algerian handball competitions to Category:Handball competitions in Algeria Hugo999 (talk) 00:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Silliest question, but I'm really very new here and can't think of a username, can you help? I have an obvious one in mind, but it's too similar to ones I use outside of wikipedia. I'm already lacking the creative juices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.51.11 (talk) 12:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I found you on Wikipedia_administrators_willing_to_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles. I mistakenly moved a talk page for an article I was developing in my userspace, instead of the article itself. Now I can't find the article. Can you recover it? This it the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jtamad/2013-2014_Zika_fever_outbreak_in_Oceania Thanks in advance for your help. juanTamad (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Nevermind, looks like its ok. juanTamad (talk) 05:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/Paoc3030 and be a bureaucrat and admin 112.134.80.13 (talk) 09:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

on may 15 2016 addshore do user rights 112.134.80.69 (talk) 15:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Rollback request EducatedBlackman (talk) 22:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello Addshore,

can you review my article "Bunto", please? I want to move it to the main namespace soon.

Thanks a lot.

Suriyaa Kudo (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I've just fixed an Addbot edit that added an orphan tag in the wrong place, whose commit message said to report bugs here.

The problem was that the page already had a hatnote, and the orphan tag got added right at the top of the page, before the hatnote. [[WP::HNP]] states that the hatnote should be the very first thing before everything else, and indeed the hatnote not being first breaks Wikiwand (which is where I first spotted the problem with this page: the hatnote appeared as the first paragraph of the content rather than via the disambiguation icon at the end of the page title). So on a page with a hatnote, the orphan tag should be added somewhere after the hatnote.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smylers (talk • contribs) 09:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks for the report! The bot is no longer running so this will not be an issue in the future! :) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 10:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Request for comment on Hard science fiction edit history --Tim (talk) 01:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Can you please delete  ? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 Done ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 09:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:50, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, can you please reinstate as a draft the removed edit for this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.101.133.76 (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for quickly deleting the revision last time I asked. Could you please delete these revisions. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:213.205.198.251&oldid=742439498 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:213.205.198.251&oldid=742439563 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Emir_of_Wikipedia&oldid=742440846 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emir_of_Wikipedia&oldid=742443359 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Emir_of_Wikipedia&oldid=742446285 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:213.205.198.129&oldid=742449546 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Emir_of_Wikipedia&oldid=742561947Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

 Done them all, under RD3 ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 16:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for helping with that, but I'm sorry I said their were RD2 and not RD3. Can you please explain the difference to me? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Simply these seemed more like RD3 to me "Purely disruptive material" ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 10:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

url = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efstratios_N._Pistikopoulos start = 09:34, 13 October 2016 end = 09:35, 13 October 2016 reason = Possible defamatory information.

Hi Addshore.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Addless! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily revoked. If you do not resume editing within the next week your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II (talk) 19:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Request deletion under R2 for . Gluons12 ^☢|☕ 02:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC).

Withdrawn as already done. Gluons12 ^☢|☕ 16:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC).

On the Hollywood walk of fame stars page, I was wondering if there could be a couple of paragraphs about how the stars are actually constructed and materials used. Thank you very much. J. Bailey — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.223.150 (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

There can be, if someone writes them! :D Your best bet is asking at Talk:Hollywood_Walk_of_Fame ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 10:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Godsy/Bureaucrat chat

I would be grateful for your input in the above discussion. Many thanks, WJBscribe via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

I was insulted and abused by User:Cagwinn, a blocked user who has also threatened to continue edit warring once he is unblocked. Despite him insulting me profusely and calling me insane (despite asking me for my sources), an admin called User:Doug Weller is trying to waive the insults and saying it's "my fault" for not leaving when Cagwinn said I was "harassing" him (despite asking me for my sources and immediately insulting me afterwards). Cagwinn seems to have known Doug Weller would be biased towards me, as he specifically pinged him to "have me dealt with". He expressed wishes of me being banned from Wikipedia for showing him sources that prove him wrong. I'm asking you as an impartial source to act as is required. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cagwinn UtherPendrogn (talk) 19:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

You are. Meltingwood ^meow 02:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Urm... Thanks! :D ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 17:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

If you have a few minutes, I am working on an article-rescue, of the upmerge-to-new-broader-topic variety.

For context please see recent afd of the 2004 group run by Atbashian, and the proposed new in-progress Draft_talk:Oleg_Atbashian, for sources gathered thus far to achieve the rewrite-as-BLP.

I am seeking admin help to please restore this deleted content, for myself and any others that may wish to plumb the edit-histories in draftspace:

• Communists for Kerry --> Draft:Communists for Kerry
• Talk:Communists for Kerry --> Draft_talk:Communists for Kerry

Much appreciated. Ping deleting-admin in case they wish to comment further here, RoySmith in this case. 47.222.203.135 (talk) 23:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Good morning/evening/whatever-your-timezone-is. At User_talk:Cacycle/wikEdDiff#Problem: wikEdDiff not showing most of the times editors have been complaining that WikiEdDiff sporadically does not work. Around September you made this edit to the script, which I suspect is the reason for the malfunction. Specifically the line wikEd.DiffSetup(); which I believe should be wikEd.DiffStartup(); Since I don't know what was the reason for the edit, I'm very hesitent of changing this myself, and would appreciate your input. Rami R 09:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi! The change was made to fix the issue that is described at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T143199. The call to wikEd.DiffSetup is correct. What the change does is listen to the wikipage.diff hook, which is fired when the diff on a wikipage is reloaded, and then re add wikEdDiff.

I just enabled wikEdDiff (as I don't usually have it turned on) and managed to load 10/10 diff pages where wikEdDiff loaded and worked correctly. I can only imagine people are experiencing some sort of odd interaction with WikEdDiff and some other gadget. Does anything pop up in the javascript console?

·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 08:23, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

17:21:10.169 TypeError: wikEd.head is null 1 index.php:254:2
	wikEd.DiffSetup https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php:254:2
	<anonymous> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php:1585:2
	jQuery.Callbacks/fire https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php:45:104
	jQuery.Callbacks/self.add https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php:45:656
	<anonymous> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php:1582:1

Perhaps moving the hook-listen after wikEd.DiffStartup(); at the script's end would solve the problem? Rami R 15:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

It could be! I have made the change, let me know if anything changes with the issue. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cacycle/wikEdDiff.js&diff=761597994&oldid=741585034 ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 20:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Seems to have solved the problem. Thank you! Rami R 07:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

@Rami R: it looks like my fix here actually broke something else as reported at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Improved_diff_view. But an additional little tweak solved that one! ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 07:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I realized that an article, which some time ago was useful to make an article about Kobi Arad was deleted from the wiki, I do not know the reason but I think it is unfortunate since the music of Mr. Arad provides a very important Contribution to musicians and (as myself) musicologists from all over the world. His works are worthy of the most rigorous studies for Western musicians due to the complexity they possess. His work is also well supported by several referents through the internet, and web press. Without further reference I would like the article on Kobi Arad to be republished for future reference by the different communities of academic musicians from all over America. Attached is a link of the article that was written by me, which contains the references of which I mentioned previously.

http://u.wn.com/2017/01/22/Insight_Into_Kobi_Arads_Masterful_Musicianship/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josecarlostenor (talk • contribs) 03:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I would like to add the following articles to the Nick Egan wikipedia page

http://media.wix.com/ugd/952582_8be4725a6911482c82ad879ba6c090f8.pdf

and

http://media.wix.com/ugd/952582_567a68c7e77b482a86295aee28606ed9.pdf

and

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE1Onix1Qnc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Egan (talk • contribs) 11:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Just had a message from you re an edit to 'Archduke Ferdinand' back in 2008.

It wasn't me!

It's a regular problem on Wiki because some folk's ISP addresses change all the time.

I'm not logged on to Wiki today, so that the ISP address I've been given today may have been used by someone else yesterday (and in 2008) and may be used by someone else again tomorrow.

One (and only one) Wiki editor has regularly accused me of being a sock puppet; he clearly doesn't understand that his misunderstanding is with the system, not with me.

It is of course best practice to always log on to Wiki. But there is no requirement to do so, and I can't always be bothered.

I expect this problem will go on causing confusion forever.

Best wishes

Cassandrathesceptic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.123.180 (talk) 09:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GoldenRing/Bureaucrat chat

I would be grateful for your input in the above discussion. Many thanks, WJBscribe (talk) 12:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Addshore, at the moment I am building a system to add artists and related information to Wikidata with the addwiki library. I'm trying to figure out the documentation. With the documentation I am now able to add statements and to create new items, see here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/HannolansBot However, I don't see documentation how to create a new item and fill that new item with a label and some properties before saving. It's not documenten as far as i know. Could you help me? This is the code i use currently: //Create a new empty item. $saver = $wbFactory->newRevisionSaver(); $edit = new Revision( new ItemContent( Item::newEmpty() ) ); $saver->save( $edit ); --Hannolans (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! You need to take a look at the code in the Item class! You can do something like this.

$item = Item::newEmpty();
$item->setLabel( 'en', 'Foo' );
$item->setDescription( 'de', 'Bar' );
$item->addSiteLink( new SiteLink( 'frwiki', 'Berlin' ) );

$statementCreator = $wbFactory->newStatementCreator();
$someStatement = $statementCreator->create(
        new PropertyValueSnak(
            PropertyId::newFromNumber( 1320 ),
            new StringValue( 'New String Value' )
        ),
        'Q777'
    );
$item->getStatements()->addStatement( $someStatement  );

$saver = $wbFactory->newRevisionSaver();
$edit = new Revision(
    new ItemContent( $item )
);
$saver->save( $edit );

Sorry the docs are currently lacking... If you find the above helpfull and find time to make a PR for some more docs that would be great!

·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 17:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

can your bot archive user talk pages?The garmine ^(talk) 14:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Nope, see Category:Wikipedia_archive_bots ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 12:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. The garmine ^(talk) 14:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi there,

I would like a copy of the deleted article about swimmer Jack Goselle (deleted after 2nd AfD listing in 2011). I understand that the deleted article needs much work, but sometimes clean up and expansion is easier than creating a new article from scratch. Since original article was deleted in 2011, Groselle has been honoured by the International Swimming Hall of Fame, received coverage in Swimming World and SwimSwam, broken multiple Masters world records etc. ----

Hi there! It looks like you gave the wrong title of the article. What was it actually called? ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 06:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Title is correct - Jack Groselle. Here's the AfD discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jack_Groselle_(2nd_nomination)

You missed the r in the link in your initial message :) here you go ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 15:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

I didn't know about that deletion criteria. Can I have that page please. --NoToleranceForIntolerance (talk) 23:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! The talk page or the article? ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 11:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi. As the admin with the misfortune to be the first listed in CAT:RFRD, could you take a quick look at the PII included in the most recent revision to Talk:Shillelagh (club) and consider whether REVDEL is appropriate. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 00:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Guliolopez: this is done, feel free to leave that editor a talk page message. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Xaosflux :) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 08:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Ok User:Addshore, can you please delete the Maiorana article? I've weighed it up and believe it should be deleted, because there are virtually no notables with the name, it is far too detailed and big, when you look at Sinatra (disambiguation), the most famous Italian surname is just a disambiguation page, which isn't right, but it has a notable family of individuals and is well-known by people. Maiorana ,being the length it is, is confusing to people who already won't recognise it from anywhere. "Farrimond" and "Ascroft" have far more notables on Wikipedia, but don't have articles at all, I believe Maiorana should be deleted as an article (perhaps better to move it to Majorana article) or it should be formatted and reduced to the size of Walmsley or Ogden (name), but even these have articles related to them. Maiorana would be a pretty rubbish disambiguation page even, as there's no other articles with the name (people or places). Hope you can help 👍--Theo Mandela (talk) 23:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

You should perhaps take a look at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 08:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Addshore, does Addbot orphan tag removing ignore incoming from dabs per Wikipedia:Orphan#Criteria? Sorry I didn't find a FAQ, thanks for Addbot, regards Widefox; talk 11:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! The bot no longer runs and the code is also now old / outdated. So the answer to the question is, I guess, I don't know! ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 14:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Oops, thanks. Widefox; talk 14:54, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Addshore. You were involved in an AfD nominted by Nonsenseferret back in January 2013, which you closed as delete. There's no mention of the AfD on the current talkpage (I assume that's just an oversight): I think what happened is you deleted it in January 2013, Snoobysoo worked on it in a sandbox, adding references, and then you arranged for it to be redeployed on 10 January 2015. Something like that.

I've not reviewed the references, but in my (admittedly not extensive) experience, a page that looks like Jeff Kent (author) (with massive overcite, insane article length for anyone this side of a major head of state, etc.) is a puff piece that's been created by the subject. In this case, Snoobysoo has uploaded a picture that confirms they're, at the least, intimately connected with the subject. As they appear to be almost single-handledly responsible for the current article, that's not good.

At a glance, do you think the article will survive a new AfD? I've edited one of these before, spent a looong time reviewing all the spurious (conveniently offline) cites, only to have the finished article AfDed. Obviously, I'd like to avoid that this time! What do you recommend? Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 12:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

For what it's worth my view remains unchanged from the original deletion discussion. Wikipedia is better without this sort of local paper sourced autobiography. ℕ ℱ 21:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Texas coop Power august 2017 is very interesting but at same time is not of importance to me although I need the practice with seeing in the dark and reacting to newfound world. What Lurks in the Murk is the title just in case your having trouble. I'll read on it some more but I'm tired – — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · §

<174.131.223.186 (talk) 10:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)>

Facto Post – Issue 12 – 28 May 2018 ScienceSource funded The Wikimedia Foundation announced full funding of the ScienceSource grant proposal from ContentMine on May 18. See the ScienceSource Twitter announcement and 60 second video. A medical canon? The proposal includes downloading 30,000 open access papers, aiming (roughly speaking) to create a baseline for medical referencing on Wikipedia. It leaves open the question of how these are to be chosen. The basic criteria of WP:MEDRS include a concentration on secondary literature. Attention has to be given to the long tail of diseases that receive less current research. The MEDRS guideline supposes that edge cases will have to be handled, and the premature exclusion of publications that would be in those marginal positions would reduce the value of the collection. Prophylaxis misses the point that gate-keeping will be done by an algorithm. Two well-known but rather different areas where such considerations apply are tropical diseases and alternative medicine. There are also a number of potential downloading troubles, and these were mentioned in Issue 11. There is likely to be a gap, even with the guideline, between conditions taken to be necessary but not sufficient, and conditions sufficient but not necessary, for candidate papers to be included. With around 10,000 recognised medical conditions in standard lists, being comprehensive is demanding. With all of these aspects of the task, ScienceSource will seek community help. Links d:Wikidata:Lexicographical data, Wikidata's multi-lingual dictionary project gets going Ordia tool, a basic search interface for Wikidata lexemes and forms OpenRefine tool 3.0, May update allows wrangling of tabular information into Wikidata d:Wikidata:WikiProject British Politicians pushes ahead with data modelling and imports #1Lib1Ref Returns for a Second Time in 2018, IFLA blogpost 25 May 2018, second chance this year to participate in referencing Wikipedia To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below. Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. ScienceSource pages will be announced there, and in this mass message. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018 Milestone for mix'n'match Around the time in February when Wikidata clicked past item Q50000000, another milestone was reached: the mix'n'match tool uploaded its 1000th dataset. Concisely defined by its author, Magnus Manske, it works "to match entries in external catalogs to Wikidata". The total number of entries is now well into eight figures, and more are constantly being added: a couple of new catalogs each day is normal. Since the end of 2013, mix'n'match has gradually come to play a significant part in adding statements to Wikidata. Particularly in areas with the flavour of digital humanities, but datasets can of course be about practically anything. There is a catalog on skyscrapers, and two on spiders. These days mix'n'match can be used in numerous modes, from the relaxed gamified click through a catalog looking for matches, with prompts, to the fantastically useful and often demanding search across all catalogs. I'll type that again: you can search 1000+ datasets from the simple box at the top right. The drop-down menu top left offers "creation candidates", Magnus's personal favourite. m:Mix'n'match/Manual for more. For the Wikidatan, a key point is that these matches, however carried out, add statements to Wikidata if, and naturally only if, there is a Wikidata property associated with the catalog. For everyone, however, the hands-on experience of deciding of what is a good match is an education, in a scholarly area, biographical catalogs being particularly fraught. Underpinning recent rapid progress is an open infrastructure for scraping and uploading. Congratulations to Magnus, our data Stakhanovite! Links Wikipedia goes 3D allowing users to upload .STLs for digital reference, Beau Jackson for 3dprintingindustry.com, February 22 2018 WikiCite report (video) Formal publication and announcement of ISBN citation dataset, see Twitter post, February 23 2018 Plotting the Course Through Charted Waters, workshop on data visualization literacy from Mikhail Popov, Wikimedia Foundation Using Wikidata to build an authority list of Holocaust-era ghettos, Nancy Cooey, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, February 12 2018 Why Should You Learn SPARQL? Wikidata! Mark Longair, blogpost November 29 2017 Back to the future: Does graph database success hang on query language?, George Anadiotis for Big on Data, March 5 2018 To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below. Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 11 – 9 April 2018 The 100 Skins of the Onion Open Citations Month, with its eminently guessable hashtag, is upon us. We should be utterly grateful that in the past 12 months, so much data on which papers cite which other papers has been made open, and that Wikidata is playing its part in hosting it as "cites" statements. At the time of writing, there are 15.3M Wikidata items that can do that. Pulling back to look at open access papers in the large, though, there is is less reason for celebration. Access in theory does not yet equate to practical access. A recent LSE IMPACT blogpost puts that issue down to "heterogeneity". A useful euphemism to save us from thinking that the whole concept doesn't fall into the realm of the oxymoron. Some home truths: aggregation is not content management, if it falls short on reusability. The PDF file format is wedded to how humans read documents, not how machines ingest them. The salami-slicer is our friend in the current downloading of open access papers, but for a better metaphor, think about skinning an onion, laboriously, 100 times with diminishing returns. There are of the order of 100 major publisher sites hosting open access papers, and the predominant offer there is still a PDF. From the discoverability angle, Wikidata's bibliographic resources combined with the SPARQL query are superior in principle, by far, to existing keyword searches run over papers. Open access content should be managed into consistent HTML, something that is currently strenuous. The good news, such as it is, would be that much of it is already in XML. The organisational problem of removing further skins from the onion, with sensible prioritisation, is certainly not insuperable. The CORE group (the bloggers in the LSE posting) has some answers, but actually not all that is needed for the text and data mining purposes they highlight. The long tail, or in other words the onion heart when it has become fiddly beyond patience to skin, does call for a pis aller. But the real knack is to do more between the XML and the heart. Links Crossref as a new source of citation data: A comparison with Web of Science and Scopus, CWTS blogpost 17 January 2018, Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy Sugimoto Citations with identifiers in Wikipedia, figshare dataset Making women more visible online—with Wikidata tools!, Wikimedia blogpost 29 March 2018 by Sandra Fauconnier Village pump discussion, Turn on mapframe? We’re ready if you are reaches conclusions The Power of the Wikimedia Movement beyond Wikimedia, Forbes 28 March 2018, Michael Bernick Tracing stolen bitcoin, blogpost 26 March 2018 by Ross J. Anderson To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below. Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018 m:Grants:Project/ScienceSource is the new ContentMine proposal: please take a look. Wikidata as Hub One way of looking at Wikidata relates it to the semantic web concept, around for about as long as Wikipedia, and realised in dozens of distributed Web institutions. It sees Wikidata as supplying central, encyclopedic coverage of linked structured data, and looks ahead to greater support for "federated queries" that draw together information from all parts of the emerging network of websites. Another perspective might be likened to a photographic negative of that one: Wikidata as an already-functioning Web hub. Over half of its properties are identifiers on other websites. These are Wikidata's "external links", to use Wikipedia terminology: one type for the DOI of a publication, another for the VIAF page of an author, with thousands more such. Wikidata links out to sites that are not nominally part of the semantic web, effectively drawing them into a larger system. The crosswalk possibilities of the systematic construction of these links was covered in Issue 8. Wikipedia:External links speaks of them as kept "minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article." Here Wikidata finds more of a function. On viaf.org one can type a VIAF author identifier into the search box, and find the author page. The Wikidata Resolver tool, these days including Open Street Map, Scholia etc., allows this kind of lookup. The hub tool by maxlath takes a major step further, allowing both lookup and crosswalk to be encoded in a single URL. Links What galleries, libraries, archives, and museums can teach us about multimedia metadata on Wikimedia Commons, Wikimedia Foundation blogpost, 29 January 2018, by Jonathan Morgan and Sandra Fauconnier m:The Wikipedia Library/1Lib1Ref/Connect, 2018 institutional participation in the #1lib1ref campaign Newspeak House queries, created at 3 February 2018 event in London led by Magnus Manske Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative, Wikipedia Signpost special report 5 February 2018, by JenOttowa What is the Last Question?, 5 February 2018 To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below. Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

More information Bots Newsletter, March 2018 ...

Bots Newsletter, March 2018

Greetings! Here is the 5th issue of the Bots Newsletter (formerly the BAG Newletter). You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: ARBCOM Magioladitis 2 happened, leading to further restrictions on Magioladitis (decision, summary). Betacommand 3 was proposed to be amended to lift the indefinite ban on Δ, but was unsuccessful (decision). A motion concerning Crosswiki issues (mostly concerning Wikidata) was passed (see discussion). BAG Hersfold was removed from the BAG due to long term inactivity. BRFAs We currently have 6 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing! Discussions While there were no large-scale bot-related discussion in the past few months, you can check WP:BOTN and WT:BOTPOL (and their corresponding archives) for smaller issues that came up. New things WP:BOTDICT, a dictionary of common bot-related terms (see discussion). 6 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey happened. Two bot-related proposal passed, #6 deploy Article Alerts to other languages and #10 Commons deletion notification bot, although other entries may affect bots as well. Category:Wikipedia bots and its subcategories has had some cleanup. Bot-related pages that were historically important but are no longer of interests can be found in Category:Wikipedia bots (historical) The edit summary limit has been increased to 1000 characters (see T6715). If a bot you operate relied on the old truncation limit (255 characters), please review/update your code, as overly long summaries can be disruptive/annoying. If you want to use extra characters to have more information in your edit summary, please do so intelligently. You will soon be able to ping users from the edit summary (see T188469). If you wish to use this feature in your bot, please do so intelligently. Upcoming HTML Tidy will be phased out in June 2018, or possibly earlier. This may affect some bots (see FAQ). Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 03:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC) (You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Close

السلام عليكم اخواني — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.66.96.222 (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)