User talk:Afrowriter/Archive 87
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Afrowriter. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 80 | ← | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | Archive 89 | Archive 90 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda Pizzuti Henry (May 5)
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
While possibly a WP:N subject, because the individual is CEO of the Boston Globe we need more sources showing WP:SIGCOV outside the Boston Globe to meet the WP:INDEPENDENT criterion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda Pizzuti Henry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- @Chetsford
- Hello, Thank you for the review and feedback. However, I’m not sure if a thorough check was conducted. In addition to The Boston Globe, there are other reliable sources that meet the criteria for WP:SIGCOV , WP:INDEPENDENT and meet WP:PRODUCER as a Film producer Furthermore, winning more than two Emmy Awards supports the subject's notability.
- Here are some Links Afro 📢Talk! 07:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi - I don't think it meets any of the four criterion of PRODUCER. Insofar as the Emmy Awards, I'm a little conflicted as they're regional Emmys of which there are hundreds awarded annually across the 19 chapters of the TV Academy. However, I think this is a definite edge case and I don't want to unnecessarily hold this up from mainspace. I'm going to bring it up at AfC Talk and request another reviewer expeditiously review it. Please resubmit it. Chetsford (talk) 07:39, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Disregard this comment. You're correct, this should not have been declined. I've now accepted it. Sorry for the inconvenience. Chetsford (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Chetsford She has produced and co-produced more than two notable films and documentaries, which satisfies the criteria under WP:PRODUCER. I was about to resubmit the article myself, but I noticed you've already done so—thank you Afro 📢Talk! 07:48, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi - I don't think it meets any of the four criterion of PRODUCER. Insofar as the Emmy Awards, I'm a little conflicted as they're regional Emmys of which there are hundreds awarded annually across the 19 chapters of the TV Academy. However, I think this is a definite edge case and I don't want to unnecessarily hold this up from mainspace. I'm going to bring it up at AfC Talk and request another reviewer expeditiously review it. Please resubmit it. Chetsford (talk) 07:39, 5 May 2025 (UTC)