Wikiwand AI

User talk:Amandajm/Archives/2026/March

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Architecture of the medieval cathedrals of England

Hi there, I'm just letting you know that the above Good Article (promoted between 2006 and 2009) is very far away from the the current good article criteria (specifically criterion 2b); I was going to nominate it at WP:GAR before I noticed that you, the original nominator, are still semi-active. If you would like to work on it to try and retain the rating, or if you feel that you can't bring it to current standards, please ping me and let me know. Best wishes, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi. I haven't been able to get onto my computer much lately. but that situation has improved. I will take a look at the article. Amandajm (talk) 19:46, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
I am just looking at some of the nonsense in the discussion. Such as "It's the bit about "Winchester, St. Albans and Peterborough" having short towers. :I took it out. You put it back! --Northernhenge (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)" .
Oh dear! I suppose that MY knowing the heights of these towers and saying that the three are short is OR. Even i9f they are from 140-144 feet high, which is low for a cathedral. The reason why the statement needs to be in the article is to give a FULL pi8cture of what the cathedrals ar4e like, in comparison with each other. Universally, central towers on cathedrals aren a rare form. They are very much part of ENGLISH cathedral architecture. So the statement is not random or out of context. Even those Cathedrals where the tower is LOW, still have a tower.
Does an encylcopedia needs EXPERT contribution to articles?
Or does it simply need references?
The article on Gothic architecture has been effectively ruined by t5wo people capable of finding references, but very short on real knowledge.
I got sick of the arguments and took a long sabbatical.
If you look at a number of my older articlers, you may find that quite a number do not conform.
My suggestion is that they remain intact with a Grandfather clause.
You eithern want well-written, logically composed articles that a student might use, or jumbles of well-referenced facts, that meet the ever-tightening criteria imposed by people with the mentality of Dolores Umbridge. imposing rules is the easy and untalented thing to do.
Amandajm (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!

I just had the pleasure of reading a section of Italian Renaissance painting—so informative and it brought me back to the pleasurable year in school that I first everstudied that subject. Your contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated! best, jengod (talk) 14:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Happy New Year! Amandajm (talk) 14:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)



Season's Greetings
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Talking of Pisa, I forgot to send you this! All the best for the New Year, & I hope you are well, Johnbod (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you, John! And a Happy New Year to you! Amandajm (talk) 14:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks