User talk:Anarchyte/Archive 9

Hello Dear respected Administrator.

This article was created in past by few people but it was deleted as no notable references were found but now it has notable links including BBC Asia Network , Tribune and Dawn. This page is drafted since a month can i request you to approve this as i have fixed the article and have added notable links which is clearly passing WP Artist Notability.^[1]

Thank you Memon KutianaWala (talk) 13:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Memon KutianaWala. The article in question was deleted because of two AfDs (one, two) and I'm not sure it'd survive another one, even with these new sources. I won't overturn the five deletions and protections done by other administrators. Your best bet would be to contact the people involved in that discussion (and perhaps RHaworth, the protecting admin) or go to WP:TEAHOUSE where people may be more familiar with the content matter. Anarchyte (talk | work) 13:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok thank you so much :) Memon KutianaWala (talk) 13:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Could you please block user:69.58.36.5 ASAP. She clearly won't stop until blocked. CLCStudent (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

60h. Hopefully that's enough to bore them. Anarchyte (talk | work) 15:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Willbb234. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Daniel DiMaggio, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 15:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

More information Rank, Username ...

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

Close

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Tornadoes of 2020 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:44, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, you recently declined a speedy deletion tag I placed on Autocerfa. A Google search turned up nothing for news coverage. ZXVZ (talk) 05:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

@ZXVZ: That's where AFD comes in. A7 is for articles with no claims of importance or significance. Being sourced plays no part. Anarchyte (talk | work)

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXX Lunar Calendar

Anarchyte,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – 2020 is a leap year – news article.
   – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:36, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXX Lunar Calendar

Anarchyte,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – 2020 is a leap year – news article.
   – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– Utopes (talk) 09:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Greetings Anarchyte and a happy new year to you. As the protecting editor I wonder if you could look at Keir Starmer's page? I will admit I have no enthusiasm for persistent WP:BLP editing to push uncited WP:POV and it appears to be a single IP. Regards JRPG (talk) 18:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

@JRPG: Gave it another week. Anarchyte (talk | work) 05:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks JRPG (talk) 22:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

Administrator changes Dreamy Jazz • Newslinger • Rosguill Deor • Spartaz • Xeno Angusmclellan • clpo13 • Edgar181 • Matthewedwards • NCurse

CheckUser changes Bradv • Casliber • David Fuchs • Maxim • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy • Xeno Oversight changes Bradv • Casliber • DGG • David Fuchs • Maxim • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy • Xeno Someguy1221

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
• A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
• Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.

Arbitration

• The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted rather than reasonably construed.
• Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.

Miscellaneous

• This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!

Dear Anarchyte,

In December, you deleted a very large portion of my Wikipedia site, including the entire section about my literary career. I thank you for patrolling my site, but I would like to discuss with you how to restore portions of it in an acceptable manner. My site was created by the editors of Wikipedia about 15 years ago. Since then, I have updated it myself and have not tried to hide behind a third party for changes. Evidently, I put in too much material, and some of it in undocumented form. Over the last day, I have restored the most important parts of the site (this took me several hours, as I did not have a backup copy of the site). I attempted to be as spare as possible and also attempted to document all documentable statements.

Please take a look at the site and let me know which portions remain to be documented.

I am not familiar with all of the bells and whistles on Wikipedia. I would be grateful if we could correspond by email. My email address is lightman@mit.edu.

with appreciation, Alan Lightman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightmanalan1 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

@Lightmanalan1: I will try to send you an email explaining some of this in the coming week. I'm quite busy at the moment unfortunately. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Dear Anarchyte,

I have been working with another editor at Wikipedia who told me how to source all of the references properly. I did restore the most important part of the website (that I could remember) and spent a full day looking up sources and adding them in the footnotes in the proper manner. Someone else has also modified some of my sources. I think that all is in order now. When I, are someone else, updates my site in the future, we will make sure to put in proper sources and leave out any unsourced material. Thank you for your help. Lightmanalan1 (talk) 13:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fable (2004 video game)/Archive 1. Since you had some involvement with the Fable (2004 video game)/Archive 1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

Administrator changes Ergo Sum • Nick Moyes • QEDK • Wugapodes Dennis Brown Aude • BrownHairedGirl • CALR • Jengod • John Reaves • J.smith • Kim Dent-Brown • K1Bond007 • MECU • Refdoc • RHaworth

CheckUser changes Opabinia regalis • Premeditated Chaos Interface administrator changes Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
• The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

Technical news

• Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
• When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title.

Arbitration

• Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!

This was a very appropriate use of the phrase! SmartSE (talk) 10:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

@Smartse: No it wasn't. The top comment is quite literally telling people to go to the article and revert the redirection. Anarchyte (talk | work) 14:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello Anarchyte,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).

Administrator changes Money emoji Athaenara • DeltaQuad Fishhead64 • Kudpung • Mikaey Bureaucrat changes DeltaQuad

CheckUser changes DeltaQuad Oversight changes DeltaQuad

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
• A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.

Technical news

• Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
• The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.

Hello! And then of course, but just like so how much experience would I be needed to accumulate in order to be approved as a pending changes reviewer on Wikipedia? Because afaik there was no minimum requirement allotted on the list when I checked it and reviewed the last time. Thank you very much! A Red Cherry (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@A Red Cherry: I'm pretty inactive at the moment. I don't remember what you're talking about, sorry. Anarchyte (talk | work) 03:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).

Administrator changes Cabayi • Lee Vilenski Boing! said Zebedee Jonny-mt • MarkGallagher • PeaceNT Money emoji → Moneytrees Bureaucrat changes SilkTork • WereSpielChequers

CheckUser changes NativeForeigner Oversight changes Someguy1221 Daniel Case

Guideline and policy news

• There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.

Technical news

• There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.

Arbitration

• Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.

Miscellaneous

• The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.

You told that user talk pages don't get deleted but User talk:Widr farted was a user talk page only but it got deleted as reason "talkpage of harassment username with no meaningful talk history. Also delete User talk:My password is poopy as the same reason. 117.97.162.141 (talk) 14:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:SimplePlanesLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Dear Anarchyte

I would request you kindly provide/approve rollback rights. I intend to use this tool to stop vandalism. I have gone through WP:VANDAL and WP:ROLLBACK and have reverted few times vandalism and helped in increasing the page protection on the basis of attacks. I have also made a Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback. Thank you. Amkgp (talk) 17:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amkgp,
With respect, I think it may be in poor form to independently ask multiple admins in addition to lodging a request at RFP/R. Anarchyte and I may have different personal criteria for granting rollback, and without knowing that you'd also asked the other admin, we'd then be at risk of inadvertently overriding the other's decision. I'll defer. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

As we are going through a hard time due to pandemic, I decided this path. Sorry Juliancolton and Anarchyte, if this way has caused inconvenience. In future will stick to the proper way. Thanks Amkgp (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Amkgp. I feel like either decision I make now could be seen as having been influenced by this notice. I'll abstain. Anarchyte (talk | work) 07:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

I just need to request you that please delete page [redacted] as the speedy deletion criteria G6: WP:DENY or the reason "talkpage of harassment username with no meaningful talk history" just like User talk:Widr farted got deleted. Thanks. 182.64.39.88 (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

User talk pages do not get deleted. Anarchyte (talk | work) 13:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Why do you think that talk pages don't get deleted? Then why did User talk:Widr farted got deleted? Do delete [redacted] as the same reason ("talkpage of harassment username with no meaningful talk history"). 122.161.220.177 (talk) 09:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

User talk pages do not get deleted. Anarchyte (talk | work) 06:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Obsession with usernames + geo-location indicate that the IPs are socks of WP:LTA/NSMUTTE. Favonian (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

We are waiting for reply. Do delete page [redacted]. 182.64.214.24 (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

User talk pages do not get deleted. Anarchyte (talk | work) 06:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

• I am enlisting your request at WP:MfD. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 07:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

  Duplicatively  Done. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 07:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

I see that you have closed this requested move instead of being relisted. Relisting should be appropriate for this RM because I changed the request after the oppose !votes. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 06:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

@Soumya-8974: They opposed any widespread changes. Do them one at a time on their respective talk pages. Anarchyte (talk | work) 07:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --Soumyabrata ^{stay at home} _{wash your hands} ^{to protect from coronavirus} 07:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

That was quick. I was in the process of tagging it for G11, but G12 also be used whenever there is copyvio. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: Yup. Sorry about the talk page notification; I guess you moved it a few seconds before I tagged it. Anarchyte (talk | work) 14:55, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes. Twinkle normally notifies all of the editors who created or moved the page being tagged. I commonly get those notifications on G13 for drafts that I moved from a sandbox to draft space, that are then ignored for six months. No harm as long as the original creator does get the notification. In the specific case of G12, I do appreciate having the notice erased, because the G12 template is sort of harsh, and we want to be sort of harsh with regard to copyright. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Please see the associated talk page. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 16:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pierpao (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello! And then of course, but just like so how much experience would I be needed to accumulate in order to be approved as a pending changes reviewer on Wikipedia? Because afaik there was no minimum requirement allotted on the list when I checked it and reviewed the last time. Thank you very much! A Red Cherry (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@A Red Cherry: I'm pretty inactive at the moment. I don't remember what you're talking about, sorry. Anarchyte (talk | work) 03:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I had meant to refer to that time when you rejected my application to become a pending changes reviewer on Wikipedia. A Red Cherry (talk) 04:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

@A Red Cherry: You'll need to familiarise yourself with the vandalism policies and so forth, as well as accumulate a few hundred edits (on top of what you currently have) to demonstrate that you understand it. It's the least restrictive permission to get, so you'll be ready soon enough. Anarchyte (talk • work) 08:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

...user:Steel1943/VersionPageList/1 per the nomination on WP:RFD I just saw. Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

...Also, see my comment at the discussion pertaining to Muslims (version 2). That seems to be the preferred action for redirects like these, and then suppressing the leftover redirect per WP:G6. Steel1943 (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Articles may be submitted for this as well as the regional Challenge you usually contribute to at the same time. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 19:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).

Administrator changes

Gnangarra • Kaisershatner • Malcolmxl5

CheckUser changes

Callanecc

Oversight changes

HJ Mitchell

Guideline and policy news

• Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
• Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
• A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
• A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.

Technical news

• The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
• Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.

Miscellaneous

• A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi Anarchyte, you granted me the PCR rights for a month and it will expire on Tuesday, so I'm requesting you for renewal of the rights. Thanks. Antila333 (talk) 05:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@Antila333: Done. Anarchyte (talk • work) 07:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Administrator,

    This is with reference to the article on Great Gama which has been semi-protected by you. As I had mentioned earlier, there is a deliberate attempt to portray the Great Gama as a Pakistani wrestler. The Great Gama was born in India, wrestled in India, and represented India throughout his career when he traveled abroad. Pakistan was created only in 1947, when Gama was 69 years old, and he shifted Pakistan at the age of 69. It is absolutely false to claim that the Great Gama was a Pakistani wrestler when any google search of a neutral website (non Pakistani website) will refer to him as an Indian wrestler. Even the links cited - next to the claim that he was a Pakistani wrestler - do not mention that he was a Pakistani wrestler anywhere. I request you to remove his nationality in the first line if you think it is ambiguous because it is absolutely false for a respected website such as wikipedia to portray him as a Pakistani wrestler when there was no such country during his wrestling career.

   My other point of contention with this article is the last line of the second paragraph that states "he lived for the rest of his life in Lahore" when the link that is cited for this clearly states that Gama shifted to Lahore in 1947. Gama was 69 years old at that time. Again this is a deliberate attempt to portray him as a Pakistani. 

   I request you to remove his nationality from the first paragraph and then replace the last line of the second paragraph which is "He lived for the rest of his days in Lahore." with the line "The Great Gama shifted to Lahore (Pakistan) in 1947 and stayed here till his death." which is exactly what is mentioned in the cited reference for that line. This is my request to maintain the authenticity of an article on a famous person on wikipedia.

thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaoticdays (talk • contribs) 14:19, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

@Chaoticdays: Please request any changes to the article on the talk page. Anarchyte (talk • work) 04:57, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte, Chaoticdays is a sock and disrupted the article on multiple Ips for more than dozen of times here , here and here to mention a few. Once you have semi protected the article, they have been forced to come out of hiding and I strongly suspect other sleeper accounts also. Can you please look into this or may be indef them?-Kthxbay (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

@Kthxbay: Hi, who are they a sock of? I don't follow SPIs all that closely, so unless you can make it obvious to me (or a different admin) that they're a sock, open an SPI (though their edits do look quite duck-like). Anarchyte (talk • work) 06:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

This 'Deacon Vorbis' guy appeared out of no where once the sock puppet put a semi-edit request here and started same type of disrupting editing and removal of references here . I am pretty sure that they are the sock of Deacon Vorbis. Sorry I have dragged you in this situation but since long these socks are disrupting the article so do you think with the evidence I provided, you can take some action against the sock at least?-Kthxbay (talk) 07:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@Kthxbay: Both of those users are pretty established. You'll need to start an SPI. Deacon Vorbis responds to edit requests regularly, so that would explain why they responded to the request. Anarchyte (talk • work) 08:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay thank you very much. I would rather resort to wait and see strategy and try to gather more evidence (:. Grateful for your concern.-Kthxbay (talk) 08:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

May you please take the no editing feature because 6ix9ine's record label is Scumgang and Create Music Group . Create Music Group isn't on there . So please take the feature off so I can put Create Music Group on there .

Thank you , Branwen Branwen Brettle (talk) 17:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

@Branwen Brettle: Make an edit request on the article's talk page. Make sure you provide a source. Anarchyte (talk • work) 17:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

On basis of a complaint from a reverting vandalizer, who is utilizing a 1993 outdated biased source,:-

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/956244092

You have put this page into protection:- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Maratha_(caste)

At least revert the vandalism to the last edit by the respected experienced user materialscientist:-

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/956237830

Caste is a sensitive topic in India, and misinformation is being spread due to your action preventing us from correcting the matter. Do respond ASAP. 115.96.103.214 (talk) 14:31, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

This would be showing support for the other revision; I do not endorse whatever version is live. Full protection is always a delicate task but as I protected that version I can no longer change it unless a consensus is reached on the talk page. Anarchyte (talk • work) 14:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

You can very well revert the page, since the vandalizer utilizes a 1993 source which is well outdated by Wikipedia Reliability standards. The profile itself has engaged in nothing but back to back defacing of the "Yeoman" Maratha castes as if is a confederacy of other completely different castes based on a single source.

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/956244092

Also this vandalizer has not referred to which Talk section on the Talk page we must indulge him in, this marks the insincerity of the actions. With this you are in fully legitimate authority to support the action of your other experience Editor comrade materialscientist. 115.96.103.214 (talk) 14:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

It's been three hours. I'm not changing the article until there's a consensus on the talk page even if the discussion doesn't include them. Anarchyte (talk • work) 14:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Here you go Sir, I have raised up most of the issues:-

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Maratha_(caste)#Vandalism_of_the_Page

115.96.103.214 (talk) 15:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Sir(Anarchyte), I did some research and yeoman is the correct word to use. Please change back to yeoman. I am marathi myself (a Pathare Prabhu) and caste issues are sensitive, marathas and prabhus are warrior castes. Yeoman summarizes it correctly. The objection raised is correct. I think individual caste names are unnecessary. Thanks 117.199.52.192 (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I came across your reply at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback#User:Landihan and just wanted to let you know that STiki hasn't been working since March. Thanks! ◢   Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 09:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

You protected the Różan article, and this is the talk 'discussion' we get - pure WP:NPAs. Can you block the IP vandal (not that it will do much good since he already uses dynamic IPs: , ) and change the protection to semi, since that editor is clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, but to edit war and attack others with, for now, impunity? Also, as I said, we are very likely dealing with a sock of an indef (and topic-banned) vandal, the following makes it even more obvious as he was active in the same article before removing same or related information: compare and , also see this ArbCom evidence for a pattern (reminder: that editor got topic banned, and shortly afterward, indef banned). PS. Also as I noted on talk, the source added to Rozan violates ArbCom's ruling; but what's the point of edit warring with a sock that will happily ignore any rules, restrictions and bans? Isn't this what a semi is for? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus: Hi, thanks for giving diffs to prove the LTA. I've lowered it from full to semi for the remainder of the protection period. Anarchyte (talk • work) 04:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Could we just semi it for a longer period? I am pretty sure the anon will be back as soon as the semi expires, but leaving it in a semi might help draw out some long-term socks (I am in the process of writing up an analysis for SPI, let me know if you'd like to be pinged there). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus: Given how on and off the editing is, I'm inclined to leave it at its current length. If they come back after I'll reprotect it. Anarchyte (talk • work) 04:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. And we already have a bite. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello A. I hope you are well. Regarding this protection removal the fact that the PP template is still on the page means the redirect eventually shows up in the Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates. If you can remember to remove the template that would be great. Now it is not a big deal if you forget - those of us who monitor the cat will find it and zap it in time like I did here. Thanks for your time and stay safe. MarnetteD|Talk 02:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi again. It just dawned on me that you might have thought Musikbot would get those PP templates. To find out whether that bot is set up to do that I started this thread User talk:MusikAnimal#Question to find out what is what. Regards. MarnetteD|Talk 02:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi MarnetteD — yes, I was under the impression that a bot would remove those tags if the page became unprotected. If it turns out that MusikAnimal's bot doesn't do this, I'll start removing the tags myself after I unprotect a page. Anarchyte (talk • work) 11:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello again. MusikAnimal found this situation odd too. The more I look at it the more it seems like a one off but if you see it again you might let MA or me know about it. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 18:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

@MarnetteD and MusikAnimal: Hermetic Lunar Week Calendar has the semi-protected rcat. Let's see what happens. Anarchyte (talk • work) 12:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up A. MarnetteD|Talk 15:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I need to request you that please delete the revision as RD3 as that revision was purely disruptive or delete as the reason WP:RD2 as it also violates a biography of a living person or delete as the reason "Vandalism" because that revision is not supposed to be visible. Thanks. 182.64.162.148 (talk) 14:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Done. Anarchyte (talk • work) 15:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• no to rollback
• has been caught using sockpuppets in the past
• recently been reported for admin intervention
• constantly edit wars and breaks 3rr

@Cardomahalay: really now? You have just created an account and the first thing you do is slander me eh? You say constantly edit wars and breaks 3RRs, sounds like you're one of those users that I've either reported for sockpuppetry or for edit warring. You say recent, but you forget that the user got the boomerang because the IP user that reported me got banned. Gardo Versace (talk) 21:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Anarchyte. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford: Replied. Anarchyte (talk • work) 13:19, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Wrong template ;-)) Thanks anyway. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello Anarchyte. Please check my reply . Wished my request is granted by now. Thank you! KMagz04 (talk) 22:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

This is an article that you semiprotected and set pending changes for back on May 1 (PC is still in effect, but the semiprotection period ended on the 3rd). I am concerned about a series of edits that has led to semiprotection of the article, and is still occurring, with IPs and even registered accounts which have not reached confirmed/autoconfirmed status continuously altering the write-up on the character of Gibby, writing clearly false and slanderous content, such as this most recent edit (). If you could review the edits since May 3, or even watch this article for a while, I'd appreciate it. It may be borderline as to whether to let pending changes continue without further article protection, and actually needing this article to be semiprotected again. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

The names are almost identical, but the Lausanne-Geneva railway is redirected to Jura Foot Railway. Should it be redirected to Lausanne–Geneva railway? Or should both be redirected to Jura Foot Railway?--Horizon Sunset (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

@Horizon Sunset: Lausanne-Geneva railway should point to Lausanne–Geneva railway. Put {{R from alternative hyphenation}} on it. Anarchyte (talk • work) 06:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!--Horizon Sunset (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I have created the page Abey Belasco, but this boxer's name was usually referred to as Aby Belasco by the major publications of the day, particularly Puglistica, the most important source. Can you provide a link or merge so that if someone types Aby Belasco, the Abey Belasco page, already created, will display. I have had trouble trying to do this myself. If you don't know how to do think, can you refer me to someone who does?

Dcw2003 (talk)dcw2003

@Dcw2003: someone has already made a redirect at Aby Belasco. Do you want me to move the article to that title too? From a quick google search and the sources in the article, it does seem like "Aby" is the most common spelling. Anarchyte (talk • work) 07:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

It's also possible Abraham Belasco would be a suitable name too, though I'm not familiar with the naming of boxers. Anarchyte (talk • work) 07:42, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Dcw2003 (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC) Anarchyte- I inadvertently changed the font on my source pages (When I edit any wiki article) to bold font, and can't seem to change it back. Do you know the pull down series to fix this? Thanks...……

I've also noted you are an administrator with five years of experience on wiki. I've written 100s of articles and would like a few admin privlidges, though I wouldn't use them extensively. For example, it would be nice to have put in a link to an article I had written in its entirety, though I didn't mind asking you as an admin, and I greatly appreciated your help. Apparently, I can't put in redirects myself if they go to articles that have been edited, even if I was the sole writer on the article. I could use a redirect Abraham Belasco to Abey Belasco, but that's up to you. Unfortunately I titled the article Abey Belasco, and I've very rarely seen that abbreviation used, its always Aby Belasco in both Puglistica and Boxiana, the two primary sources for nineteenth century English boxing. Either way, thanks for your help.

David

Hi Dcw2003, I'm not entirely sure what you're requesting. We can't distribute admin permissions outside of being an admin, with the exception of those listed at WP:PERMS. No one except admins can overwrite pages with more than one revision so the way to get around it is to create a requested move on the talk page. Anarchyte (talk • work) 07:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Anarchyte, I was wondering if it is enough to add the edit summary "please discuss it on the talk page" was enough to initiate a rollback, or should I pertain to only to my personal area of interest. I now only refer to the red marked edits at the recent edits page. In two edits I was unsure, (both had a consensus final, the 1st I corrected and the 2nd one someone else corrected ) and I'd like to have further counseling. Can I rollback red marked edits with the edit summary "discuss it at the talk page" or not. Thank you for your advice. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

@Paradise Chronicle: I'm not sure what you mean by red marked. Do you mean on recent changes how possibly bad edits are marked in red? If so, simply being marked as such is not enough justification for rollback. You should only use rollback for edits where anyone could view it and say "that's vandalism". If there's any ambiguity, use the undo tool or Twinkle. Anarchyte (talk • work) 05:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for the helpful explanation.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).

Administrator changes

CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth

Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL

CheckUser changes

SQL

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
• The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.

Arbitration

• A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.

I looked at my preferences, and I saw that my rollbacj rights expried in a day. I was wondering if you could extend them? Regards. Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 ^{(talk | contribs)} 20:35, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Done. Your rollback permission no longer has an expiry date. Anarchyte (talk • work) 04:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!! Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:59, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, since my rollback rights have just expired, I was wondering if I could receive a renewal? Rollback rights have made it faster and more convenient for me to revert vandalism and disruptive content. Thank you, ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to request for the pending changes reviewer rights. I know there is a page to request that but I prefer asking individual administrators who can look through my work independently. If you can take a look at My contributions I have tried to help Wikipedia get rid of vandals and maybe try help those same vandals make constructive contributions for the better of Wikipedia. I mostly specialize in BLP and I know most if not all of the guidelines and policies regarding them. I currently have rollback which I have used efficiently and would like to extend my work to pending changes. If you don’t like my work, don’t worry I’ll understand and I don’t mind if you will reject my application. Thank you for your precious time. Regards Got a smart idea^{Tell me about it📩} 09:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

@Get a smart idea: As it stands, you've only made 44 non-automated edits in mainspace. Pending changes requires the user to understand content policy, not just how to detect vandalism, and I don't think you can demonstrate this yet, especially given your most edited article has only 10 edits and they're all reverts. Anarchyte (talk • work) 09:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Anarchyte, I understand, Thanks for your time. Got a smart idea^{Tell me about it📩} 09:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect History of the world. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 14#History of the world until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello Anarchyte,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Please unblock me. I have been blocked for a long times. I friendly request to you to unblock me. Yours Loving Sarbashis Kumar Paul

Dear Anarchyte,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).

Administrator changes Malcolmxl5 John • TheCoffee • Tim! Creffett → GeneralNotability DeltaQuad → AmandaNP

CheckUser changes Bbb23 Interface administrator changes TonyBallioni

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.

Technical news

• Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).

Arbitration

• Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community.
• The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2020, the project has:

233 Featured Articles 84 Featured Lists 10 Featured Topics

34 Featured Pictures 1,574 Good Articles 30 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements WP:VG Talk Page Digest

Feature: Let's mention the Request board Interview: TheJoebro64

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Quick facts Three years! ...

Precious

Three years!

Close

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello! And then of course, but just like so how much experience would I be needed to accumulate in order to be approved as a pending changes reviewer on Wikipedia? Because afaik there was no minimum requirement allotted on the list when I checked it and reviewed the last time. Thank you very much! A Red Cherry (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@A Red Cherry: I'm pretty inactive at the moment. I don't remember what you're talking about, sorry. Anarchyte (talk | work) 03:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I had meant to refer to that time when you rejected my application to become a pending changes reviewer on Wikipedia. A Red Cherry (talk) 04:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

@A Red Cherry: You'll need to familiarise yourself with the vandalism policies and so forth, as well as accumulate a few hundred edits (on top of what you currently have) to demonstrate that you understand it. It's the least restrictive permission to get, so you'll be ready soon enough. Anarchyte (talk • work) 08:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Okay, no worries I'll definedly do that for sure (and indeed have already check out the vandalism policies beforehand). Should I simply re-apply once this criteria has been met, and sorry about the hassle! A Red Cherry (talk) 17:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

@A Red Cherry: Yes - when you think you're ready again, simply reapply. Anarchyte (talk • work) 08:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Stardust has been nominated for merging with Template:Housemarque. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 14:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).

Administrator changes

Red Phoenix

Euryalus • SQL

Jujutacular • Monty845 • Rettetast • Madchester

Oversight changes

GB fan

Keegan • Opabinia regalis • Premeditated Chaos

Guideline and policy news

• There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
• Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
• Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
• There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.