User talk:Bearcat/Archive 103

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 13th Canadian Screen Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allegiance (TV series).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 27 § 19th-century terrorist incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:The Bigger Lights albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:56, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 29 § British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies upmerge on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 07:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Please create this AFD article for Dave Boat as suggested by Explicit. Thanks, 82.77.77.96 (talk) 08:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

What does this have to do with me, when I've never had anything to do with that article at all? Bearcat (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hiya. I'd like to create a navbox template for Oregon State University presidents with content resembling Template:Reed College presidents, but I clearly don't know what the hell I'm doing. I spotted your name in a template talk and was wondering if you might consider building that for me. Some of the links need to be tuned up a little, but I can do that once it's up... Here's the complete list:

• Finley (1865–1871)
• Emery (acting, 1872)
• Arnold (1872–1892)
• Letcher (acting, 1892)
• Bloss (1892–1896)
• Miller (1896–1897)
• Gatch (1897–1907)
• Kerr (1907–1932)
• Peavy (1932–1940)
• Ballard (1940–1941)
• Gilfillan (acting, 1941–1942)
• Strand (1942–1961)
• Jensen (1961–1969)
• Young (interim, 1969–1970)
• MacVicar (1970–1984)
• Byrne (1984–1995)
• Risser (1996–2002)
• White (acting, 2002–2003)
• Ray (2003–2020)
• Alexander (2020–2021)
• Fesser (acting, 2021)
• Johnson (interim, 2021–2022)
• Murthy (2022–present)

Thanks! —tim ///// Carrite (talk) 00:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)  Done for Carrite at {{Oregon State University presidents}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1984 Toronto International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City of Gold (film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

While I really like cats I am thankful for the usernocat heads-up. I had meant to make the draft straight into an article but then realized I needed more sourcing so there it languishes. This message is funded in part by spite at the person at the top of your talk page complaining about the same. Cheers. Moritoriko (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi

I see you have made an edit to my draft. This is my first attempt at a new page (which I based on an existing one) and I’m a bit in the dark, so it would be helpful if you would you explain what I did wrong, and what you’ve done to correct it.

Also when trying to to submit if for review, it tells me it will likely be rejected due to having no references. Each table does have a source for its data, but there are no references. This is the same as the page I based it on. Will it be OK like this?

Thanks a lot

Phil Cricketnerd99 (talk) 17:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Bearcat,

This page was tagged for a CSD G6 speedy deletion as part of a "clean-up". Since you created the page, I thought you would be notified and I just wanted to see if the deletion of this page was okay by you. If it is still around when you log back on to the project, please tell me what you think. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

You removed a link to a French article that doesn't have an English counterpart without giving any reason. I have since reverted the change and included the proper link as style permits. In the future please note changes you make to an article with an Help:Edit summary thank you. Millsy0303 (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Azad (rapper) albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 01:06, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:August 2025 in Thailand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 06:58, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention. The article should not have been approved having this objection pending. The initial reviewer was replied that most of the material was edited from (now removed) content in Davies' old CV website, requesting that the article be deleted if that content was not found worthy. (When your family is from Wales and was Welsh-speaking, your name is not a disguise.) PwyllDafydd (talk) 16:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

A COI source disclosure footnote has been added. PwyllDafydd (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

FYI, this may be of interest, it's from the same user behind the downtown Brampton articles. "Four Corners" is the 1980s marketing name for the historic downtown, while the actual city hall of Brampton was in Bramalea. It's not a distinct neighbourhood from the downtown, which the same user also created an article about; I've moved it to draft. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 19 § Category:Category-Class 20th Century Studios articles of NA-importance on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 22:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 19 § Category:Redirect-Class 20th Century Studios articles of Low-importance on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 22:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 April 20 § Candidates in Ontario provincial election categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 00:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian women designers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_December_3#Category:Women_designers. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gjs238 (talk) 12:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

The Paperboys has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Bligh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Bligh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)