User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAprMay2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stuffed apples (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Minced meat

William, Count of Schaumburg-Lippe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Campo Maior

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the mass tagging of articles. Only trying to clean up the new pages cache. I'll probably stay away from it for a few days and re-read the deletion policy guidelines. Once again, apologies for any inconvenience/confusion I may have caused. Only trying to help. Ging287 (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

No problem! Bearian (talk) 19:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Ymblanter. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Chamling people, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Note to self - this has since been redirected. Bearian (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to A Beautiful Life (2008 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |author=JSpicer|date=|accessdate=April 3, 2014}}</ref>}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

More information NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square ...

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square

Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

Close

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

diff? seems strange to put a welcome template on a mainspace talk page. 22:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, that was a copy and paste error. Bearian (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Beautiful Life (2008 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Variety, Time Out and Heaven's Gate

Grace Church Van Vorst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Episcopal church

Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bonus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey ! Thanks for the correction .. Also .. How do i become a regular Wikipedia editor ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priyankafrancespereira91 (talk • contribs) 09:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Bearian, Esq. Enjoy. As you will note, it takes just a small pat on the head to get me going again. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Trying to improve this article. Please take a looksee. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Other than a couple of cites needed, I don't see any problems. I would !vote to keep if this arrived at WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't think we're at the AFD stage yet. Please Do check out my request regarding the name change on the talk page, please. Your thoughts would be helpful. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Thanks for all your contributions to WikiProject:Christianity related articles, especially your recent creation of Pram service! Keep up the good work! With regards, AnupamTalk 02:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, and Happy Easter! Bearian (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pram service, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Communion and Morning prayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

RE: Hey, did you forget to complete this article? Bearian (talk) 20:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

No, still on my list, just side tracked. ˥ Ǝ Ʉ H Ɔ I Ɯ (talk) 23:40, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

No problem! Bearian (talk) 12:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks for your comment. I am doing okay as of right now. The last few months have been rough for my family and myself-my younger brother died suddenly in November 2013. As for the Oakhill Christian School article, it should retained since it is also a high school. As for IP/anon editors, I get frustrated with them-they can be rude and wouldn't signed up for an account. It should be a requirement that anyone who edits Wikipedia be required to sign up for an account. Thank you again-RFD (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Can you userfy UFO sightings in outer space for me I am going to merge content to List of UFO sightings Valoem ^{talk contrib} 16:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Sure. Bearian (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm ... I am going to have to cut and paste from one of the many versions. See User:Valoem/UFOs. Bearian (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Actually can I get the full history as well, easier to edit for me. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm having brain flatus right now ... I am working on fixing the problem. Bearian (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh I definitely felt that way before. Take as much time as you'd like. :) Valoem ^{talk contrib} 20:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Here you go: User:Valoem/UFO sightings in outer space. postdlf (talk) 21:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

One has been started about you by an IP user; see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Abuse_of_administrative_privileges. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Might as well say it here too, but as I mentioned on the AN thread, I don't think you should've templated the IP editor with a test editing template (a prod wasn't all that unreasonable, really), and that kinda escalated things, so I'm unilaterally and abusively administering a wrist slap. Feel free to substitute trouts at your leisure. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

I've had worse. Bearian (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

I came close to blocking you for repeatedly harassing this user, especially as you faked a citation and then treated as vandalism the tag placed to alert readers of the citation fraud. I am going to unprotect this talk page momentarily — no vandalism has occurred, and you've violated the letter and the spirit of WP:INVOLVED. Do not restore it. Nyttend (talk) 21:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

I've already taken myself out of the substantive dispute, but thanks anyway for the trouting. Bearian (talk) 22:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Dear User:Bearian, thank you for the kitten! I really appreciate that! I hope you will reconsider your decision to refrain from editing articles on Christian camps and schools. I noticed the thread and feel that sometimes, mistakes happen - everyone, including myself, makes them. You've done a great job on 99% of the other articles on Wikipedia and that speaks much more on the brilliant work you do here! Have a great day! With regards, Anupam^Talk

Shouldn't these be Noindexed? Dougweller (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Probably. I am an absent-minded college teacher. Go ahead and do so wherever I have forgotten to do so. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I actually added {{userspace}} (although that can theoretically be removed and the noindex template can't). Dougweller (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the Minor Barnstar, Bearian! Ryan Razo (talk) 07:48, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bearian. You've proposed a merger of St Davids Lifeboat Station into the RNLI main article, but I can't access the relevant discussion page (I clicked on "Discuss" and it just took me to Talk:Royal National Lifeboat Institution, with no mention of the proposed merge). I'm new to merging - can you point me to the right place? Ta.

I wanted to oppose the merge on the grounds that there are other lifeboat stations with their own articles and the RNLI article is about the organisation rather than individual stations, and I'm happy to take on writing up this one if agreeable to everyone interested. Cheers, Tony Holkham (talk) 20:56, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

No problem, I'll remove the tag. Nobody else has been in favor except me. Bearian (talk) 15:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Never mind, it was done. Bearian (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bearian. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Regarding this edit, I don't know that I'd call the article on Anthony J. Klatch II a negative BLP. The article does talk about his accomplishments and career. (Actually, if you've checked the history, you'll see that the original was quite a glowing paean to the man!) The author of the article (Artlu) is likely related to Klatch's present endeaver, Artlu Media, so it is unlikely that they are trying to smear the man. The problem is that the only verifiable information about the man is that he is (or was) a crook, and not a very notable crook at that. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Can you point me in the direction of previous AFD discussions which might have some bearing on this case? PatGallacher (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Maria of Romania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria of Romania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PatGallacher (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Seriously? You think I'm a new user! Ha! Copacetic Kovacevic (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry -- I saw the red link at your talk page. Bearian (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda A. Tsuji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda A. Tsuji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Animalparty-- (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

updated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Suzannah_Lipscomb

Mosfetfaser (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know that your G6 "uncontroversial" removal of the Template:Infobox island broke ~25 pages who use it, including Oahu. Nasa-verve (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

I reverted myself and left a message on the other editor's page. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Please delete it again; and move {{Infobox islands}} there per the CSD template on that page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Can somebody else do it? I have ego depletion. Bearian (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello Bearian. I noticed User talk:DParlevliet#Final warning, though I'm not sure exactly what the vandalism would be in reference to. If you have been following issues about this editor, maybe you want to comment at a report of a dispute at WP:AN3, or close it yourself. It's a slow moving war where it is possible that one of the participants is out of his depth, but is continuing regardless. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

No, due to my own work in the field of physics, I will have to stay out of this topic hereafter. I issued the final warning to avoid having the user DParlevliet blocked without first, having a templated final warning. I probably should not have even gotten involved as far as I did. Oh, and for what it's worth, Ralph Alpher reviewed my work in the 1990s, and concluded that I was out of depth in quantum physics. Bearian (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

A lawyer AND a physicist? Too much expertise for any one person :-). EdJohnston (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Please userfy both page and talk page to my space. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 19:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I tried to up-date the Horiba Medical page in a neutral way and without any justification, not only you succesively revert my modifications but you finally delet the page !

Yes I am working on this company but I try to write in a neutral way and I am totally ready to modify it, if it's not compliant with your policy. If I don't tried to up-date this page it would stay with expired informations.

And this : This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unfortunately, your edits have come to the attention of the administrators of this website. Bearian (talk) 12:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC) is really uncorrect because I have not vandalize the page, I tried to complete it ! You talk without even have read the modification I have posted, because if you did, you would see that it is just an up-date and that all that I added was reliable facts.

And first you told me that I haven't enough legitimacy and then that I am too close to the subject??? Who will up-date it if it's not the company itself???

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertrandroche (talk • contribs) 12:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Please sign your posts on talk page. Bearian (talk) 12:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I come back to you to ask you how can I do to make an page about the Horiba Medical Company? For exemple another similar company "Beckman Coulter" have a wikipedia page and we would like to allow people to be able to find detailed informations about our company. And we have really understood that is not to promote us. We only want to present the company in a neutral way.

So how can we do that?

Thank you for you help,

Bertrandroche (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Bertrand ROCHE

Start with a userfied version of your article, which I can create. Then add independent news stories from reputable sources, such Bloomberg News, your local TV station, an independent industry newsletter, a footnote in a technical manual or college textbook, or a daily newspaper. Then come back to me or any other administrator to review your work. I suggest waiting until you can create a draft with at least two or three such stories. Bearian (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Of course, I already have given Bertrand some rather different advice on their talkpage the panda ɛˢˡ” 14:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

Yes I will appréciate if you could create this userfield version, this way I will be sure that everything is done in the good way this time.

Thank you,

Best regards,

Bertrandroche (talk) 13:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Bertrand

Thank you to have created the userfied version. I will do the modifications and come back to you for validation.

Best regards,

Bertrandroche (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Bertrand

Hi,

The probleme that I have, is that I don't have found any independent media (TV or medical magazine) in which there is the information about the company. So what I tried to do is to rewrite all the text to be the more neutral as possible, in order to submit it to you. I don't know if its possible but could you read what I have wrote and tell me if you find if that's not still enough neutral ?

Best regards,

Bertrandroche (talk) 11:59, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Bertrand

Even if you re-write the article as neutrally as possible, it wil not be notable if there are no independent media sources. I could write a neutral article about myself, but I would still not be quite notable enough. Bearian (talk) 16:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

What do you think of these edits? Some have already been reverted as inappropriate. Dougweller (talk) 13:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't see it as spamming, but I only looked at a few, unless Bar and Bench is not a reliable source. Some of these edits may be non sequiturs, however. I will be away for the long weekend, and will not be able to fix these. Bearian (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bearian: per your suggestion to add sources I posted at the AfD discussion to Head fake, I hesitate. Occasionally, I have received criticism for adding sources to articles, such as in Further reading sections. If I add all the sources, the article will be dominated by a list of sources, rather than content. I'm not particularly interested in spending a lot of time improving this particular article, so it's unlikely I'll spend my time to expand it with all of those sources. However, I ask your opinion regarding this matter, because the addition of sources would naturally be a positive step toward the article's potential expansion and improvement. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

No problem, I will take a crack at it later. Bearian (talk) 16

23, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Cool, and thanks for the response. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome, and the links. There's a lot to look through! Peturb (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks so much for protecting Karanvir Bohra. As of now I've added sources to article already 少林足球 (talk) 15:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

The sources have been removed. Bearian (talk) 16:05, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakersfield City Clerk. Thanks. Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC) --Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakersfield City Attorney. Thanks. Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC) --Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)