User talk:Blukey6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Blukey6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  AntiDionysius (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

2026 QAFL season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2026 QAFL season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:22, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2026 QAFL season has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2026 QAFL season. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 QAFL season (March 20)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Under WP:SPORTBASIC I would be wanting to see at least one secondary source (typically a newspaper report), accepting that as the season rolls on that would be developed. If a NSEASONS article has only database and non-independent links it would be at risk of WP:PROD or WP:AFD.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:2026 QAFL season to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 12:32, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Blukey6! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 12:32, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI