Wikiwand AI

User talk:BodhiHarp/Archive 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 10

Voiced nasal glottal approximant moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Voiced nasal glottal approximant. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of Template:IPA nasal vowels

Template:IPA nasal vowels has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Oklopfer (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Voiced linguolabial lateral fricative

A tag has been placed on Voiced linguolabial lateral fricative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ERcheck (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Didn't I already nominate it myself though? BodhiHarp 20:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

retroflex trill

i asked the icpla, and they thought the arrow was a good idea -- but for all sequential sounds, including affricates, leaving the IPA slur only for simultaneous sounds like double articulation. so i think unless we have attestation, we should stick to standard IPA. [also, it would be better to have the arrow above, which isn't supported by fonts yet.] — kwami (talk) 19:42, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

unattested theoretical sounds in excess infoboxes

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. oklopfer (💬) 05:57, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

@BodhiHarp please make a habit of explaining your changes in edit summaries. Nearly all of your user 2000+ contributions do not have one, and many times they end up being reverted or in an edit war dispute. In addition, your unreversions often add no additional information or sourcing, override the talk page discussions disputing the content you are adding, and lack any edit summary explanation as to why the information should be put back. oklopfer (💬) 19:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to Tap and flap consonants have been removed because the citation you added was to another Wikipedia article or an external wiki. As discussed at our policies on circular sourcing and self-published sources, Wikipedia and other wikis should not be used in citations because they are not considered reliable sources. You are welcome to re-add the information using a better reference, perhaps from the article you originally cited. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 00:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Nominating redirects for deletion

Hi BodhiHarp I came across Voiceless post-palatal nasal and noticed you had added a tag that the redirect might be deleted. Thank you for identifying that page, however the process at Wikipedia to delete redirects is at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. You can list a redirect there using the instructions at WP:RFDHOWTO or by adding Twinkle to you gadgets and nominating that way. Let me know if you have any trouble nominating that redirect. I have undone your edit in the interim. All the best! Casablanca 🪨(T) 00:55, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Should I make a new entry at WP:RFD? BodhiHarp 04:09, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
If you want to discuss it at RfD you can either install the twinkle gadget and use that or follow the three step process of: {{susbt:rfd|content=}}}} on the redirect, {{subst:Rfd2|redirect=|target=|text=}} ~~~~ at the daily RfD log, and {{subst:Rfd notice|RedirectName}} ~~~~. Casablanca 🪨(T) 14:01, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nasal velar approximant (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:29, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AncientSans

Hello BodhiHarp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AncientSans for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Shocksingularity (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether it meets this criterion. BodhiHarp 22:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on AncientSans

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page AncientSans, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks