User talk:CabinetCavers

Hello, I am from The Aveland History Group, a local community history group that operates across all 32 villages and the town of the ancient Aveland Wapentake. I would like to note in the "modern usage" section of the Aveland page that we are relevant to this page too, along with an online archive Aveland Archive that we manage. How do I add this and attach the webpages for the Archive and History Group? --Avelandhistorygroup (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Can you link the article? CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah you're welcome dear how long have you been my fan of mine.!? Keanureevessn (talk) 08:47, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

What are you talking about? CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:55, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi CabinetCavers! You recently recreated the redirect Celsius 233 per a request at WP:AFC/R; were you aware that it had been previously deleted per this disussion?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:47, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

No. I am so sorry. Please re-delete it. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 23:22, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

No big deal. I'm never sure how much deleted history a non-admin can see, so I wasn't sure whether you could see the link to the RfD.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

I couldn't. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:54, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi CabinetCavers. Thank you for your work on Testament of Francis of Assisi. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources. Please also establish notability as per WP:NBOOK. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mariamnei: I created that page as a redirect through someone's request at WP:AFC/R. I have nothing to do with this full-fledged article. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:54, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out to me. It appears to have been created as an article by an IP, although the current version has been approved and I'm willing to mark it as reviewed. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

You too! CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 13:47, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello @cabinetcavers, I just saw you tagged this draft with a speedy deletion request. I don't see how the article can be unambiguously promotional when the draft was just created a day ago and edit is still ongoing to populate the page properly. I find it more comfortable and easier to edit in the draft space so I can preview what the draft looks like before submitting for review. Kindly help remove the speedy deletion tag so I can keep editing the draft and populate it with credible content, Thank you. Here's the reason I left in my contest "The page was just created and not submitted as a draft yet, it was to be edited and populated with credible content before submission. It cannot be up for speedy deletion when the article is not done or ready yet. As shown in the edit history, the draft was started a day before, I find it more comfortable and easier to edit in the draft space. When the article is done and properly populated with credible information, it will then be submitted for review. Good faith should at least permit for that to happen first." Olakunle Rufai (talk) 16:06, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

WP:AGF states that "editors should remember to not disregard patterns of harmful editing, nor should they overlook obvious attempts to deceive, vandalize, or push a biased agenda". I may be wrong, but I believe the promotional aspects of this draft could be taken as pushing a biased agenda. If you can make the article not read as promotional, I can remove the template. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 16:29, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I have looked at the draft and it does not appear to be unambiguously promotional. I have removed the tag. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 17:11, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

I am so sorry, I wasn't trying to cause any issues. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 17:20, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

I can't help wonder whether "no consensus" was the right result (FFD discussion). Normally or sometimes, "delete" would be the default, right? George Ho (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I counted 4 keeps and 3 deletes. I don't believe this shows any clear consensus either way, which is why I closed it as no consensus. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 14:41, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Assuming arguments of one side neither weigh nor were clearer than of the other, right? —George Ho (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Looking at that FfD, it looks like there weren't any arguments to keep, just votes. I suggest reconsidering the close. lp0 on fire () 22:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I'm quite concerned about your non-admin closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethan's Rock. You very quickly closed it after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Grove, Georgia and I think there might be reason to believe the full discussion wasn't taken into account. As you can see this is controversial and we all really want to put this to rest. I would appreciate it if you would revert your closure and allow an admin to do it with a full closing rationale. Thank you, MediaKyle (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

How do I revert a closure? CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 14:47, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Like you would anything else -- just go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethan's Rock, Talk:Bethan's Rock, and Bethan's Rock and revert your most recent edits. It would be helpful to leave a note on the AfD explaining what happened, or I can do that. Thanks, MediaKyle (talk) 14:49, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Everything has been reverted now. Would you check to see if my edit summary on the AfD is good? CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 14:54, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate that, thank you very much. Believe me, I hope it does close as keep, but when I saw that I just knew it was going to end up being contested. You really don't want to end up at WP:DRV, from what I hear it's not a pleasant experience... I'll leave a clarifying comment on the AfD. Cheers, MediaKyle (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm just here to help as much as I can. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

The 'Keep' close seems the correct option here, so you got it right. Not sure if it would have been contested, but if it closes as 'delete' it surely will (that pathway just isn't there). Randy Kryn (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

How did you find your way here? Also, would you like me to re-close it as keep? CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 18:40, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Randy Kryn and CabinetCavers, we're all on the same page here. Keep seems like the most reasonable result, maybe no consensus. My concern is that we need this to be a strong close that nobody will contest, otherwise we might end up with another week of this. I really want this to be over already but those with dissenting opinions deserve the certainty that their arguments were at least taken into account... I don't want to sit here and pick apart your close but how swift it was and the fact that there were no comments wouldn't have sat well with some. There's a reason it's sitting there as the only unclosed AfD from that day, someone's going to have to read through all of that and understand the context. I think it would be in everyone's best interest to wait for an administrator, or at least someone well-acquainted with closing discussions like this. MediaKyle (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Right, you shouldn't come back in and re-close something after one round of closing and then changing your mind. One thing about closings is that we all, in a perfect world, would like to think of the closer as an honored role, indicative of a deep read of the discussion to understand all points of view and to only then decide the topic. Some discussions are very long, and contradict within themselves, point-by-point, before sometimes wandering into insults. My favorite discussions for just enjoying the banter, by far, were the AfD and RfC on Barbenheimer. This one on the rock is interesting too, at how wide the differences-arc covers. Closing is a responsibility of trust that often means reading lots of words, which takes time. Thanks again for your initial close. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Also, I am new to closing, and it's a common pattern in my editing for me to get into something new, mess up and get complaints, and finally get it and start doing some good. It happened when I first got into AfC/NPP and speedy deletion, and I have no reason to believe this will be any different. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 17:26, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

What is your rationale for "no consensus" on the TFD for Template:BibTeX? The nomination rationale was "No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions to explain why it exists." Those things are still true. The template is used only in one editor's sandbox, and it doesn't work. No evidence was presented that this template is useful or could be made useful; not being useful is a TFD reason to delete. It looks like you are making some questionable non-admin closures; it might be wise to revert all of them until you have more experience participating in XFD discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:40, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

I saw 2 people saying keep and 3 people saying userfy, which isn't consensus, and none of the rationales given by other people seemed to stand out as anything special. I stand by my reasoning, but I will go ahead and revert the closure. Also, this is somewhat normal for my editing whenever I go into something new. I mess up and get a few complaints, and soon after, I do much better. I promise my closures should get better over time, and I won't work in TFD anymore for a while. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 17:21, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Well, I would, but people have made edits after mine, so I don't think I can revert my closure without reverting the edits after it. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 17:22, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

A manual revert will work fine. Click "edit" to edit the section, and remove the top part (up to "deletion review.") and the bottom part (starting with "The above"). As for your closures getting better over time, I strongly recommend that you participate in and follow XFD discussions for at least six months before doing any closures. You will learn a lot and avoid many future mistakes. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:01, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

OK, will do. I've done some XFD work in the past, but I've mostly moved on to AfC, NPP, and recent changes, so it makes sense as to why I would be a bit rusty. Also, thank you for telling me there was an issue! CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 00:16, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done, I have fixed the closure. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 00:18, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for engaging in good faith. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:46, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

And you are welcome! CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:55, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

How do i create a page? --Missmae4 (talk) 12:52, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

@Missmae4 It is strongly advised that newcomers avoid creating articles, but if you decide to ignore this advice, click on this link, click the big blue button, and draft away. If you are in any way connected to the subject, make sure to declare your conflict of interest. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 17:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, CabinetCavers. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:28, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:53, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Use the edit icon to 📌 device --Ravigill0001998 (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

@Ravigill0001998 I'm sorry, but what are you asking? CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 16:55, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Looking at your contributions I see many successful efforts to revert vandalism on Wikipedia. Thanks! Your work is very appreciated! FrostbornSage (talk) 12:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Also, I really like your signature! Spamton is a great character! FrostbornSage (talk) 12:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

I see at the bottom of the page that you are in the categories of Wikipedians that have been awarded this Barnstar. Unsure whether this is my doing or not, I am relatively new to this stuff. Oh well! Another one can't hurt, right? FrostbornSage (talk) 12:12, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Also, I believe you are the only person who has understood my signature and told me about it. Also, I have never got a Barnstar before, so this is not a duplicate. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:54, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Yay!! FrostbornSage (talk) 13:37, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

hi i just wanted to say i love your signature!!! awesome deltarune reference --ImageWizard (talk) 01:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

You are so welcome! CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 17:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Someone cloud use my image and footprint face ID that previous I am lost my pass key they always find me and harassment me and change all CC licence Paisa legally and microsen is privacy and conditions bicycle licence how can others modify and use is there is any modified an immediately mark them down and following law and regenerate all the licence Google cc --Gangb0980 (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I can't understand what you want. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 17:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: SGP1203's mentor MuffinHunter0 is away.

Hello, 🙏 How do I create the citation? --SGP1203 (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@SGP1203 What citation and where? CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

I am always be myself from myself, that the reasons why of all things I do. 🥰 SGP1203 (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello CabinetCavers. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Re: Minnie The Tea La, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:43, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm glad you could understand the draft's content. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:08, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

It is horrifically written but I do get the gist of it which means it isn't patent nonsense. -- Whpq (talk) 12:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

That is true. As long as someone could understand it, then it isn't nonsense. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:40, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Someone posted erroneous data about the March record for Harry Reid airport. It is 95 as of yesterday. It could be broken today, but it's not 99 (yet) --Billluc1982 (talk) 22:38, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, how do I put my pic as a profile --Timothy Akpan Samuel (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't have a profile picture system. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 13:00, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 15:30, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, apparently you are my wikipedia mentor and as such I have been forwarded to you to ask some questions!

I am mainly on wikipedia to edit/ add information to a couple subjects I am knowledgeable on that didnt have the information when I searched it up.. Koryu Uchinadi the Martial art (karate) is the main subject I am hoping to edit, I have checked the page and it has 3 languages but not one in english, additionally using a basic google translate application alot of the information is just plain wrong.. I personally have the entire printed handbook of information regarding KU and was wondering 3 questions: 1. How do I fully create a page in English 2. How do i upload an image or pdf as proof im not just making things up 3. Is it good nature to rewrite (correct) the information currently out there as although it is theoretically correct it remains ambiguous..

thank you for your time :) --SconeNZ (talk) 21:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

1. New users are generally advised to not create articles, but if you want to create a page, go to here and follow the instructions from there.

2. Under the "Contribute" tab on the left of your screen, click "Upload File" and follow instructions from there.

3. When it comes to correcting information, you should always be able to provide a reliable source. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 12:02, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you :) SconeNZ (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

You are welcome! CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:53, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi I have used Wikipedia for many years. I donated a few thousand dollars over the years. I am a musician, but primarily a songwriter. My Sister wrote this for me. What do you think I should do. --JimiCioli (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

@JimiCioli Jumping in because you've asked this question multiple times in different places, which is discouraged on Wikipedia. As you've already been told, your draft needs to demonstrate notability–you need reliable, independent sources. Your sister is connected to you, and thus has a conflict of interest. Wikipedia isn't the place for promotional content. Your draft, as others have said, would need a lot of improvement before it could be accepted.

Also, how much money you've donated does not at all affect your article or its likelihood of being published. Thanks. 🏳️‍🌈JohnLaurens333 (Ping me!) 22:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

im trying to add to the personal life section and add resource to my thingy I added but I cant figure out the archive part of it --LDP2218 (talk) 21:52, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I see a reference to History of Joseph Smith 1858 with no citation. I have not been able to find this volume in Worldcat, Library of Congress, LDS Church History Library, or BYU Library. Can you clarify the refetence? --SamSmith1953 (talk) 23:28, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

History of Joseph Smith is an alternate name for the subject of the article. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:55, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Im referring to the book published in 1858. SamSmith1953 (talk) 19:17, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

I can't help you here, sorry. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:52, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I find no such book. Although the Manuscript History, from which the beginnings of History of the Church is taken, was serialized in the Times and Seasons and then the Deseret News the manuscript was not completed until 1858. Indeed, the completed manuscript was reviewed by Brigham Young. The completion was noted in the Deseret News on 20 Jan 1858. But the serialization, including in the Deseret News, predates this notice and continued after it.

I suggest that the sentence in question be deleted. SamSmith1953 (talk) 23:45, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

I am studying Notable Women in Freemasonry. This is my first time posting an article. I posted it on my user page. Is that how drafts are posted and reviewed? Im having a hard time navigating this site and understanding how it works --DRuckus92 (talk) 22:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

To get a draft that is reviewed by experienced editors, go to WP:AFC and follow the links. From there, copy and paste your user draft into the AFC draft and submit it for review. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:56, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm actually looking to translate an existing article from English into Japanese. I've noticed that a lot of articles from similar backgrounds do not have a Japanese translation and I would like to prepare them. Anything I should know to start? --CDEMUSE (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

I know nothing about translation procedures here, so I may not be the right person to answer, but WP:TRANSLATE has instructions on translation procedures, so start with reading that. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:54, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Afadisu --Afadisu (talk) 11:58, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello how can i post or publish my article now --Girmalorenso (talk) 22:07, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey there! I've been looking at the Wikipedia Article for the List of next general elections (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_next_general_elections) and I've noticed that some elections (Benin Presidential, Hungarian Parliamentary, Peru Chamber of Deputies + Presidential) have already occured, with confirmation or near confirmation of results. Specifically in Hungary, election results have been confirmed, but the probable incoming government of Tisza has not been sworn in yet. Should I wait until a person, chamber or cabinet be sworn in to make changes or are changes made as of right now acceptable? --ThisIsntRehowl (talk) 13:28, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I would say that you should change any entry with confirmation of results. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 15:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Understood. I'll update Hungary and maybe Peru, Benin's results are still unconfirmed as far as I understand. ThisIsntRehowl (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Why has desktop mode suddenly stopped working in Chrome on my Android device?

Has the Wikipedia website changed something?

I've got it set to desktop mode in every setting I can find. It suddenly switched to mobile mode a few minutes ago, I didn't change anything before that. --Late Night Coffee (talk) 07:51, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

It seems like you are dealing with a bug. Bugs can be reported at mw:Phabricator. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 11:55, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, are you able to take a look at my most recent submission and advise or edit if required? I am new to this so all support is appreciated so I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Natasha_Saunders --SRTteam (talk) 13:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I reviewed it. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 14:23, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Am here to study! Am I on the right side --Mohamed khadar mohamed (talk) 18:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

What are you here to study? As for whether you are on the "right side" or not, I don't know, as I am unsure as to what you mean. CabinetCavers----DEPOSIT OPINION, [valued customer] 19:11, 17 April 2026 (UTC)