User talk:Cathodography/Archive 1

Hello, Cathodography, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:JKLM.fun, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! OutsideNormality (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:JKLM.fun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. OutsideNormality (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Cathodography! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 08:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Americanas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § Americanas until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plays "High Gospel", you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Skinny. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your edits to Brazilian music and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tribalistas (2002 album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mixing, G1 and Mastering.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

I assume your massive edit of Tribalistas (2002 album) is based on another Wiki, but I could see no attribution, per Wikipedia copyright policies. Did you mean to add it later? Muhandes (talk) 10:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

While I'm at it, please consult the documentation using certification tables. The article had a perfectly valid table, which you destroyed and I had to reconstruct. Muhandes (talk) 11:24, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, sorry that I was not aware of the copyright policies, I wanted to give attribution, but I didn't know the template for it or how to. The Wiki I translated from was from the most recent edit from the PTWiki page. Cathodography (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

You can read about the requirements at Help:Translation#Attribution, and you should probably read the entire page, as well as Wikipedia:Translation. Muhandes (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Prince of Erebor was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Cathodography, this article is well-written and I think it is very close to being moved to the mainspace. But when I spotchecked the sources (I reviewed all the sources where 30praum is mentioned in the title, please let me know if there are any other sources currently in the article that you would like me to look into), most of them cover other stuffs and only briefly mention the record label a couple of times. Are there any additional sources that provide significant coverage of the record label itself?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:30praum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 06:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Good evening, thank you for your quick review on the draft. Currently, in the draft, there are two sources that I may consider that provide significant coverage of the subject. The one with 30praum in the title is a Billboard Brasil interview and the one that doesn't have it in the title, a Meio e Mensagem interview, both covering the emergence and management of the record label, the interviewee being co-founder and businesswoman Clara Mendes.

Please note that I'm not sure of the general consensus on the reliability of interviews, if you could link or give a brief explanation it would help. Thanks! Cathodography (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

A fox for you

Ciroratos (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wiu (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiu (rapper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Amitbanerji26 (talk) 08:08, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

A goat for you

Ciroratos (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noites do Norte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Conductor and Bass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of A Foreign Sound at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Leafy46 (talk) 06:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

On 14 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A Foreign Sound, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that A Foreign Sound includes a song that Caetano Veloso called "a fake American song written by a Brazilian", and a song he called "a fake Brazilian song written by Americans"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Foreign Sound. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A Foreign Sound), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 12:02, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

On 1 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amazonas, o maior rio do mundo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1922 Brazilian film was presumed lost for more than 90 years until a copy was rediscovered in 2023? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amazonas, o maior rio do mundo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Amazonas, o maior rio do mundo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Admirável Chip Novo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Época (magazine).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Cathodography. I appreciate your DYK review of Robert Maxfield. It's been a long time since I'd been active on DYK, and much has changed. I did my first QPQ review and have a few questions about the process, in particular, updating the template "y", "n" entries.

If there is an initial "n", and the issue is addressed, should the reviewer go back and change the "n" to "y" for that issue? For the article I reviewed, it initially had a couple "n"s. The issues have been addressed and I went back and changed the "n"s to "y"s. What should I have done?

After I completed my final review, I found that you'd given the Maxfield DYK a good-to-go Y, but that the Ns were still on the template. Did I make the update in my DYK review in error? — ERcheck (talk) 06:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @ERcheck, the way I handle it is that I leave the "n" as it is, and once the issues are resolved, I mark the nomination as good to go with a or (the latter tick used for off-line and foreign sources, generally approved with good faith). The "y" and "n" entries in the template track the review process, but the final approval comes from the green tick. Your approach of updating the "n" to "y" isn’t necessarily wrong, but it’s not required. Cattos^💭 11:34, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, especially the diffentiation with or — ERcheck (talk) 13:06, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clube da Esquina (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 14:43, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Check out Make America Kittens Again, available for Firefox, Chrome, Safari. Polygnotus (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Also, perhaps you can merge User:Cathodography/Brazilian sources with Wikipedia:News_sources/Americas#Brazil? Polygnotus (talk) 03:38, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

On 4 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tribuna da Imprensa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tribuna da Imprensa was shut down in 2001 after losing a lawsuit over an article that referred to a judge as "PC Salomão"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tribuna da Imprensa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tribuna da Imprensa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 03:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

On 5 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fruto Proibido, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rita Lee tracked down two boa constrictors from a concert by Alice Cooper in São Paulo, and later brought them to her recording sessions for Fruto Proibido? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fruto Proibido. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fruto Proibido), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 01:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited África Brasil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baião.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

On 16 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Admirável Chip Novo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pitty recorded Admirável Chip Novo with a band hastily assembled from Salvador musicians after rejecting Rio de Janeiro's session musicians because it felt "strange"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Admirável Chip Novo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Admirável Chip Novo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Tribalistas (2002 album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tribalistas (2002 album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Tribalistas (2002 album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ieslie -- Ieslie (talk) 01:24, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

The article Admirável Chip Novo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Admirável Chip Novo for comments about the article, and Talk:Admirável Chip Novo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ieslie -- Ieslie (talk) 18:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Cathodography. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Tribalistas (2002 album).
Message added 08:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)