User talk:Chumpih/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Chumpih. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Chumpih. Thank you for your work on Rhysida (hacker group). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 14:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Arthur Gill (priest)
I think that you meant to nominate the article for deletion due to lack of notability. You nominated the talk page for miscellany for deletion, probably by accident. If you wanted to nominate the article for deletion, please be sure that you are viewing the article and not the talk page when you click the XFD tab. By the way, it's an easy mistake that I have seen happen before, and easily corrected because the editors at MFD have seen it happen before. I am not nominating the article for deletion, only because I am letting you do that. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Archdeacon of Cloyne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wills.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
You need sources for "extremely"
Your revert was described as:
- Rolling back to the less technical version. Discussion ongoing in Talk.
but my changes had nothing to do with "technical version". Johnjbarton (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I take your point. You're quite right. This was a mistake of mine - I was intending to revert several changes per discussion on talk:Eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and just reverted your change only. I then went on to restore the desired version. Sorry about this. Chumpih t 21:13 and 21:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Oli Dugmore (July 30)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oli Dugmore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Chumpih!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 04:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
LastPass
Hi Chumpih. I wanted to check-in on if you had any input regarding Talk:LastPass#Poor_citations from a couple months ago regarding the heavy use of primary sources, and sources that are misrepresented, in the "Security incidents" section of the LastPass page. Since I have a conflict of interest, I'll rely on your impartiality, if you're willing to give my comments a close lookover. Thanks for all your participation so far. Best regards. AmyMarchiando (talk) 19:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Trade
Hello, Chumpih. Just wanted to let you know that I am looking into reviving formerly inactive WP:WikiProject Trade, where I found your name listed among a number of participants there. Glad to see you are still around! (All of the others have been inactive at Wikipedia for some time, so I've culled the list.) My interest stems from a series of discussions at Talk:Trade route, in particular maritime trade and ancient history of maritime trade, and I may try and create a task force for it. Anyway, I wanted to make sure you know about the revival effort, as you have some experience in this area which I don't, and I hope this reignites your interest in it. Please by all means do feel free to jump in at WP:TRADE as you see fit, or raise any issues at WT:TRADE. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Dear Mathglot, thanks for the notice. As you can probably see, I'm by no means a shining beacon of productivity here, but yes, I'm still around. Do put your name above mine on the WP:TRADE page - it would be more appropriate. Ancient history of maritime trade sounds absolutely fascinating, but it's an area in which I know practically nothing beyond the the first few lines of Cargoes. I'll do as you suggest, and look for opportunities to contribute there. Good luck! Chumpih t 06:15, 2 March 2025 (UTC)