User talk:DMacks/Archive 69

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 65Archive 67Archive 68Archive 69Archive 70Archive 71

Tech News: 2025-38

MediaWiki message delivery 17:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Oklopfer

Is Oklopfer a sockpuppet account of an LTA suspect? He still debate about IPA. He was not only belligerent towards me, but also towards other users in the previous days. Please investigate him immediately. Thank you. Señor verde (talk) 04:35, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

User:Señor verde: if so, it's not one I immediately recognize. What are other account(s) you suspect they match? DMacks (talk) 04:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
I was checked the page WP:LTA but seems no one criteria that matching Oklopfer on the list. But Oklopfer is disturbing if editing about International Phonetic Alphabet, always give the reason about where is/are the resource(s), but some edits were reverted by other users included Kwamikagami because of Oklopfer's disturbing edits. Señor verde (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-39

MediaWiki message delivery 22:51, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-40

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Question about a block

You blocked me for no reason.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:77A1:8240:69C0:7E96:2601:9015 (talk) 23:59, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

I have no idea what block you are talking about, or what specific edit and page you are talking about. Please give a link to the exact article and state the account or other similar information so I can look at its details. But based on your edit-summary, one possible situation is that you did not provide a cite to a reliable source (WP:BLP policy). DMacks (talk) 00:27, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

This Month in Education: September 2025

Unrecognized in Page protection

I was asking why does wikipedia puts page protection for false information. Does wikipedia follow International law or protocols Dalahow (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

WP:PROT is the page-protection policy. DMacks (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-41

MediaWiki message delivery 17:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Threose nucleic acid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prebiotic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your revert on "Lena"

The author is quite well known, has his own wiki page under his pen name qntm. Please restore the link I provided SnoTraveller (talk) 20:57, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

I added an additional note in my subsequent edit, once I figured out who it was. I stand by my position that it should not be included (that was just one of my concerns). If you have additional details, I'd be happy to look at them and see if I would support inclusion. DMacks (talk) 21:06, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi. All I can suggest is that "... in popular culture" sections are common on all sorts of pages. Here a single mention in a short story (one written in the style of WP) obviously doesn't merit a full section, but a mention somewhere is nevertheless apt. I leave it to your judgement, probably much better than mine, as I am not a heavy editor. SnoTraveller (talk) 21:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-42

MediaWiki message delivery 18:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Bitey?

Is there something going on with the user that I didn't see, that explains this warning? It's not clear to me that this user is being intentionally disruptive. His edits seem like an attempt to improve articles. We aren't supposed to dump on new users who are struggling to learn how to edit. -- Srleffler (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Warned at the 1 or 2 level, a mile of undone edits, a comment from the editor indicating that they recognized the concerns and would improve. Then they did not, and continued through several more sets of edits that were undone as well ("edit undo, edit undo" is a greater problem than "edit edit, undo undo"). In my experience, that typically means either a substantive language barrier or a failure to be serious about (or actually able to) make a course-correction. Either way, it's multiple failures to change after several different types of alerts about it, so while I'm not 100% sure it's bad-faith, I wanted a stronger hint of consequence than just another neutral request. DMacks (talk) 04:05, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
With a new editor who appears to be trying to contribute, it is often more effective to provide guidance rather than warnings.--Srleffler (talk) 15:11, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Indeed that's why I did that, and including specific explanation in response to their request for more info about my concern. And they responded that those additional comments were helpful and that they would adjust their edits based on them (specifically labeleing my comments as "guidance"). They then made several rounds of edits identical in form to their previous and not in keeping with that. Then you provided even more detailed explanation of some of their specific edits, why they were a problem, and a clear warning not to continue to do that. Then they continued to do that. Clearly you have higher tolerance for this either in general or in this specific instance. DMacks (talk) 15:20, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
I do have patience with new users who seem to be trying. I've noticed that some people are eager to help, but are slower to pick up Wikipedia's customs, style, and Wikitext formatting. We don't want to start out by pushing people away just because they take a little longer to get the hang of it. (And yes, I'm aware of and agree with WP:COMPETENCE.)--Srleffler (talk) 15:41, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Agreed. DMacks (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Re: tps

Thanks as always User:Acroterion! DMacks (talk) 21:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-43

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Are you block happy?

Dude you blocked me multiple times for over a year and I’ve never edited on wiki. What is your problem? 2600:387:15:2019:0:0:0:2 (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

I do not see any current block on your IP that was made by me. Given I have no idea which other account you're talking about, I won't be able to answer. But presumably the block log would have information. DMacks (talk) 00:38, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
But I do see that your IP is in a range that a now-banned user has been using to make abusive edits for a while. "To prevent abuse" is the explcitly stated purpose in our blocking policy. DMacks (talk) 00:47, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Fair enough. I appreciate the explanation. 2600:387:15:2019:0:0:0:2 (talk) 20:55, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-44

MediaWiki message delivery 19:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Guide to temporary accounts

Hello, DMacks. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences Appearance Advanced options Tick Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

This Month in Education: October 2025

Tech News: 2025-45

MediaWiki message delivery 19:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

added Toadspike
removed

CheckUser changes

added asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Cerium(III) hydroxide

I saw you removed the image from the article and you said '"Covalent monomeric" structure is contradicted by cited dewiki article', What does that mean? I don't mind that you did remove it, I just wonder what I did wrong so that i can improve in future.

≈≈≈≈ PeriodicEditor (talk) 19:52, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi PeriodicEditor. Although "cerium(III) hydroxide" has a ratio of one cerium atom to three hydroxyl groups, it does not appear to have actual discrete "Ce(OH)3" units, which is what that image illustrates. Instead, each cerium atom is linked to many others via shared hydroxyl groups as bridges: no cerium actually has "its own" set of three hydroxyl and many or most hydroxyl are not bonded to exactly one cerium atom. It's either similar to how graphite is not loose C atoms but instead a bonded network, or how sodium chloride is all individual and equally spaced ions. See de:Cer(III)-hydroxid for an illustration of its crystal structure. DMacks (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback, that makes sense but how do they share hydroxide groups, I thought that a hydroxide group can have 1 bond? PeriodicEditor (talk) 20:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
It's not a normal covalent bond. The oxygen atom of hydroxyl has three lone-pairs of electrons, and it can share more than one of them. One description I've seen is that it can have "two half-bonds", loosely sharing a separate electron-pair with each of two different neighbors, rather than one pair being shared more strongly with one neighbor. Happy to talk more about it; would be useful to know what your academic level is so I can find some useful analogies. DMacks (talk) 13:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
That makes sense, thanks, I'm currently GCSE but also doing some a-level stuff. Your explanation was great and actually quite helpful for some stuff I'm currently doing. PeriodicEditor (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
You're welcome. Glad to help! DMacks (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI